<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TTAC Photochop: New Lexus SC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:36:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrei Avarvarii</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/comment-page-1/#comment-211452</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei Avarvarii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/#comment-211452</guid>
		<description>@ Johnson
What are we doing here are &quot;photochops&quot;, which, believe it or not, are based on photos of existing cars. Sometimes the changes are so dramatic that no one can tell what was the original car. Some other times such drastic changes are not justified. This representation of the SC is indeed blending the production IS with the LF-A Concept. And if we reflect on that a little bit, mixing a beautiful sedan with a futuristic roadster in order to obtain a four seater convertible might actually make sense.
You are right that the LF-A is not replacing the SC. The LF will be a two seater supercar. After discontinuing the current SC I am sure that Lexus will issue a new 4-seats cabriolet, they have all the reasons they need to do that. Whether they will call it SC or IS convertible is just marketing, but I&#039;ll go for SC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@ Johnson<br />
What are we doing here are &#8220;photochops&#8221;, which, believe it or not, are based on photos of existing cars. Sometimes the changes are so dramatic that no one can tell what was the original car. Some other times such drastic changes are not justified. This representation of the SC is indeed blending the production IS with the LF-A Concept. And if we reflect on that a little bit, mixing a beautiful sedan with a futuristic roadster in order to obtain a four seater convertible might actually make sense.<br />
You are right that the LF-A is not replacing the SC. The LF will be a two seater supercar. After discontinuing the current SC I am sure that Lexus will issue a new 4-seats cabriolet, they have all the reasons they need to do that. Whether they will call it SC or IS convertible is just marketing, but I&#8217;ll go for SC.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/comment-page-1/#comment-210622</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/#comment-210622</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Jason:
This may look better than the current SC, but I never quite understood the SC anyway. It’s ugly and bulbous and squat. Less than 300 HP. With a starting price of over $65K?? I just don’t get it. Why is it so expensive?
&lt;/em&gt;

Why is the Benz SL so expensive, or why is the 6 Series so expensive? The SC430 is a bargain compared to either of them. Or what about the Cadillac XLR? Why is that so expensive? It offers a horrible interior not to mention mediocre quality, an exterior fit for the 80s, and an uncomfortable ride. You can say the BMW or Benz have a panache to them, but the XLR has very little going for it. 

Fact is, ALL cars in this class are expensive, but the SC remains the bargain of the class.

Also, question to Andrei Avarvarii: why photoshop the LF-A as the next SC? Lately I&#039;ve noticed A LOT of websites saying that the LF-A is going to be the next SC. Fact is, this is simply NOT true. The LF-A is going to be a supercar, a halo car for all of Toyota and for the Lexus brand. The next SC will not be related to the LF-A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Jason:<br />
This may look better than the current SC, but I never quite understood the SC anyway. It’s ugly and bulbous and squat. Less than 300 HP. With a starting price of over $65K?? I just don’t get it. Why is it so expensive?<br />
</em></p>
<p>Why is the Benz SL so expensive, or why is the 6 Series so expensive? The SC430 is a bargain compared to either of them. Or what about the Cadillac XLR? Why is that so expensive? It offers a horrible interior not to mention mediocre quality, an exterior fit for the 80s, and an uncomfortable ride. You can say the BMW or Benz have a panache to them, but the XLR has very little going for it. </p>
<p>Fact is, ALL cars in this class are expensive, but the SC remains the bargain of the class.</p>
<p>Also, question to Andrei Avarvarii: why photoshop the LF-A as the next SC? Lately I&#8217;ve noticed A LOT of websites saying that the LF-A is going to be the next SC. Fact is, this is simply NOT true. The LF-A is going to be a supercar, a halo car for all of Toyota and for the Lexus brand. The next SC will not be related to the LF-A.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/comment-page-1/#comment-210492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/#comment-210492</guid>
		<description>This may look better than the current SC, but I never quite understood the SC anyway. It&#039;s ugly and bulbous and squat. Less than 300 HP. With a starting price of over $65K?? I just don&#039;t get it. Why is it so expensive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This may look better than the current SC, but I never quite understood the SC anyway. It&#8217;s ugly and bulbous and squat. Less than 300 HP. With a starting price of over $65K?? I just don&#8217;t get it. Why is it so expensive?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dean</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/comment-page-1/#comment-210322</link>
		<dc:creator>dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/#comment-210322</guid>
		<description>Looks very sharp, although I agree with akatsuki that it looks like a potential IS convertible more than a 2+2 SC replacement.

If Lexus insists on carrying the SC I&#039;d like to see it move to a strict 2-seater, with an SC-F version with, oh, 450 HP or so.

Then hire Andreii to design the IS convertible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Looks very sharp, although I agree with akatsuki that it looks like a potential IS convertible more than a 2+2 SC replacement.</p>
<p>If Lexus insists on carrying the SC I&#8217;d like to see it move to a strict 2-seater, with an SC-F version with, oh, 450 HP or so.</p>
<p>Then hire Andreii to design the IS convertible!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: incitatus</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/comment-page-1/#comment-209952</link>
		<dc:creator>incitatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/#comment-209952</guid>
		<description>With all those straigth lines in the fron it starts looking like a 350Z to me. I love 350Z looks and I&#039;d hate to see Lexus copying. But again, there is a limited number of ways one can combine a few lines and shapes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->With all those straigth lines in the fron it starts looking like a 350Z to me. I love 350Z looks and I&#8217;d hate to see Lexus copying. But again, there is a limited number of ways one can combine a few lines and shapes.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Haak</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/comment-page-1/#comment-209862</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Haak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/#comment-209862</guid>
		<description>Nice work!  Dramatic improvement over the current SC (not that it&#039;s too hard to look better than that blob).

I also agree with you on the LS&#039;s looks.  It&#039;s a great looking car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Nice work!  Dramatic improvement over the current SC (not that it&#8217;s too hard to look better than that blob).</p>
<p>I also agree with you on the LS&#8217;s looks.  It&#8217;s a great looking car.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akatsuki</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/comment-page-1/#comment-209812</link>
		<dc:creator>akatsuki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/#comment-209812</guid>
		<description>I think the IS is just about a masterpiece except for the poor taillights which just look a bit too plasticky and boy-racerish. Still the best looking in the class (although I do sorta like the new C)

I think the LS is a bit less successful, while handsome it is just that bit too understated, a little more character would do wonders (I think the A8 and QP both are better looking).

As for the chop, it looks more like an eventual hardtop IS convertible. The SC is always the stepchild of the Lexus family, redesigned too infrequently and, for some reason, always a bit too jellybean-esque. I would like to see a bit more aggressive stance and maybe a couple of Aston influences seep in on the SC personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think the IS is just about a masterpiece except for the poor taillights which just look a bit too plasticky and boy-racerish. Still the best looking in the class (although I do sorta like the new C)</p>
<p>I think the LS is a bit less successful, while handsome it is just that bit too understated, a little more character would do wonders (I think the A8 and QP both are better looking).</p>
<p>As for the chop, it looks more like an eventual hardtop IS convertible. The SC is always the stepchild of the Lexus family, redesigned too infrequently and, for some reason, always a bit too jellybean-esque. I would like to see a bit more aggressive stance and maybe a couple of Aston influences seep in on the SC personally.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thalter</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/comment-page-1/#comment-209692</link>
		<dc:creator>thalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/#comment-209692</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t mess with success. I&#039;ll take L-finesse over Bangle Butt any day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Don&#8217;t mess with success. I&#8217;ll take L-finesse over Bangle Butt any day.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan Benoit</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/comment-page-1/#comment-209642</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Benoit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/news-blog/ttac-photochop-new-lexus-sc/#comment-209642</guid>
		<description>I thought Lexus was getting rid of the L-finesses language and moving on to something else.  It&#039;s too bad, because I totally agree -- the L-finesse series are some of the best-looking cars on the road.  Better than anything with a toyota badge on it, certainly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I thought Lexus was getting rid of the L-finesses language and moving on to something else.  It&#8217;s too bad, because I totally agree &#8212; the L-finesse series are some of the best-looking cars on the road.  Better than anything with a toyota badge on it, certainly.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 29/70 queries in 0.104 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 00:48:08 -->