Toyota Casts Aspersions On Unintended Acceleration Aspersions
Toyota and its contracted engineering auditing firm Exponent held a webcast today to refute the claims that Professor David Gilbert has leveled in an ABC report and recent congressional testimony. Gilbert claimed that he was able to induce sudden acceleration without triggering failsafe mode or an error code in Toyotas by hacking into a Toyota pedal. Toyota and Exponent’s central claims are that the conditions created in Gilbert’s test could not be replicated in real life and that similar tests produced identical results in competitor vehicles.
These claims have been raised before, and discussed at some length here at TTAC, and the demonstration was provided Toyota much-needed ammunition to counter the wildest claims that have been leveled against it in recent weeks. Though it didn’t conclusively prove that a pedal could never be affected by mechanical or electronic interference, it did confirm doubts about Gilbert’s test methodology.
But this was a singularly dissatisfying conclusion. After all, Gilbert’s test never claimed to have identified the exact problem, merely that the possibility of an undetectable problem existed. Having achieved similar results to Gilbert’s with competitor automobiles (something Gilbert was strangely unable to replicate), Toyota showed merely that its cars are no more vulnerable to such untraceable errors than any others. What it failed singularly to do is explain convincingly why unintended acceleration complaints are higher in its vehicles. As one questioner noted with frustration towards the end of the webcast, the statistics aren’t changed by this demonstration.
And so, just like the congressional hearings and trial-by media, this latest chapter in the Toyota saga must be placed the “frustratingly inconclusive” pile. In that sense, it’s something of a marginal win for Toyota, even though it does nothing to repair its reputation as a quality-obsessed automaker. And though Toyota and Exponent had little choice but to respond to the many aspersions cast upon them at the congressional hearings, by going on the offense, they managed to look more defensive and less like the victims of a witch hunt.
There is no shortage of losers in the Toyota unintended acceleration drama. Perhaps it’s time to stop holding out hope for the emergence of anything resembling a conclusive truth in the matter. As we’ve noted before, unintended acceleration is rarely a problem with a single identifiable cause.
More by Edward Niedermeyer
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- SCE to AUX It's fun when liberal interests fight each other.
- Varezhka Suzuki Jimny, Toyota Century, and I know it technically just ended production but Honda e.
- CoastieLenn For those that care to read the details of the crash NOT included in this article but published elsewhere- this happened at nearly 10pm when the CRV was stopped in the center lane of travel, lights off, with the driver remaining in the car. Not only is it not known if Blue Cruise was being used, it would have been a nightmare for most alert human drivers to mitigate that driving the 70+mph speed limit on many sections of I-10 in Texas, much less an AV system.
- Jeff This is what I would want: Toyota has now released an affordable truck called the Toyota IMV 0. The newly developed vehicle made in Thailand comes with a rear-wheel drive and a gasoline 2.0-liter inline-four matched to a 5-speed manual transmission. NEW $10,000 Toyota Pickup Has Ford & GM Crapping ... YouTube · Tech Machine 8 minutes, 46 seconds Dec 26, 2023
- Jalop1991 At the same time, let's take these drivers off the road--at least the ones that haven't yet taken themselves off the road.I can guarantee, at no point was this guy or any of the dead Tesla-stans actually driving the car. They were staring at their phones, because, HEY, SELF DRIVING!!
Comments
Join the conversation
Repeat after me: Just trust the big corporation. They have your best interests at heart and would never, ever hide their dirty laundry.
Toyota may have stumbled yet again in this piece by naming other brands that they have tested that supposedly 'failed' under the same conditions. Each of those named companies may now think that they have a vested interest in distinguishing their ETC System from that of Toyota and refuting the implications in the video. I certainly would. If I were Ford or Subaru or one of the other named brands, I would be putting a lot of engineering effort into reviewing the possibilities for failure in their system and that of Toyota. I'm sure if they do that and turn up something, Toyota will get yet another kick in the pants. Dumb move Toyota.