By Megan Benoit
April 28, 2008 - 11,998 Views
Most people drive the Acura Integra like they stole it. Mostly, it's because they have. Or, more accurately, someone else did. Model years ‘94 to ‘01 regularly grace the zenith of the annual top ten most stolen automobiles. Moral outrage aside, the Integra's tendency to disappear is entirely understandable. It's a cheap, fast, infinitely modifiable and reliable automobile that appeals to teenage boys, college students, financially-strapped pistonheads, rice rocketeers and thrifty professionals looking for a set of hot wheels (so to speak).
The Integra may be a bit wedge-shaped for fans of today's suppositorial supercars, but it's both distinctive and attractive- a combination that eludes most of today's automakers. If only Subaru could learn from the Acura's quirky yet tasteful circular headlights. The [optional] rear spoiler is, of course, entirely useless. But it balances the car's appearance, adding just the right touch of Zen-tinged Japanese aggression. If you want practicality, the hatch is it. Make that IT.
Inside, the Integra is your garden variety Honda. With proper love and care, the Integra's interior stands the test of time– assuming you can stand the squeaks and rattles that develop. (Alternatively, you can replace the stock radio with Sony ICE with Bowel Mover Bass Booster.) The Integra hatch's rear seats are nominal, but the front chairs are high and mighty, providing excellent visibility (if none of that Italian astronaut thing) inside a widescreen greenhouse.
Generally, the Integra's ergonomics are ideal; there's a reason the NSX supercar's cabin offered a cantilevered riff on the same theme. Of course, no one buys the ‘teg for its looks or the cabin's fit and finish. They buy it for the engine. Twisting the key reminds you of the car's core appeal: a perfectly tuned four-banger.
O.K. we need to be clear about the meaning of "perfectly." There's not a lot of horsepower about. The second USDM Integra ('90) stabled just 130 horses. By '93, it rose to… 140, and stayed there. It must also be said that even the '97 Integra's 1.8-liter, DOHC powerplant has less torque than a Kobalt 38" reversible drill. We're torquing 124 ft.-lbs. @ 5000rpm.
But those early Acuras ain't got much mass neither. (Look ma! No airbags! No traction control!) The second gen Integra weighs-in at a featherlight 2560 lbs. (three-door manual) or 2703 lbs. (four-door manual), climbing to only 2672 lbs. in 1997. And the revs top-out at either 6500 rpms or a startling 8000 rpms (GS-R).
A non-VTEC second gen ‘teg will sprint from rest to sixty miles per hour in 7.9 seconds. The GSR trims a half second from that time. On paper, meh. In real life, an unmodded Integra is the dictionary definition of zippy ("nippy" being PC poison these days). In fact, the engine's Oliver Twist's dream caregiver. "Please sir, may I have some more?" MORE? ABSO-DAMN-LUTELY!
The Integra's five-speed manual gearbox is equally laudable, dishing out deliciously short, satisfying, flick-your-fingers shifts. And you can keep at it forever. I met an Integra owned by a clueless gear-grinding n00b with 100k miles on the clock (the car, not the owner) still equipped with the original clutch (ditto). Replace the Integra's timing belt every 90k miles and Bob-san's your uncle.
Despite the Integra's mechanical integrity and longevity, there's a reason you rarely see someone over the age of 30 driving one. I'm not saying the Integra's a hard-riding car, but there are more pliable diamonds. The aforementioned squeaks and rattles are an entirely logical reflection of the punishment delivered by the Integra's independent double-wishbone suspension, with coil springs and stabilizer bar (front and rear).
There are plenty of suspension "upgrades" available, but they tend to make the ride quality worse, not better. And that's because sharpening the Integra's suspension transforms the Integra from a handgun into a laser-guided missile. Not to put too fine a point on it, aside from the post-Integra Mazda Miata/MX-5, Ye Olde Acura is truly one of the best-handling cars money can buy. If you don't know how much fun a front wheel-drive vehicle can be, and can't afford a Golf GTI, the line forms here.
Speaking of tight budgets, thanks [again] to its light weight, a manual non-flogged, non-modded Integra (RS/LS/GS) gets 25/31 mpg. The GS-R racks-up a [theoretical] 24/29 EPA mpg.
For pistonheads on a budget who like track days and don't mind saying "there goes another filling" on a semi-regular basis, the Acura Integra is a perfect used car. It's a steal (literally), it'll run forever, and when you do get some cash, there are hundreds of performance mods for sale, from turbos (good luck with that) to fake Type-R badges. Or is that the other way around?
And when you're ready to take your chiropractor off of speed dial, well, you COULD become just another insurance statistic. That said, Integra owners would never dream of such perfidy. Seriously. Never.
64 Responses to “ Third Generation Acura Integra Review ”
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Show All Reverse Order
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Show All Reverse Order
Leave a Reply
Back to Top
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe to Newsletter
More Reviews

Digg
del.icio.us
Blinklist
Furl
Netscape
Google
NewsVine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
Windows Live
POWERED
April 28th, 2008 at 7:53 am
I owned a 94 GS-R, and you pretty much nailed it. It was a thoroughly satisfying machine to drive - sharp handling, and engine that loved to play, and a truly wonderful 5-speed transmissions.
The only thing it was lacking was refinement. It was almost painfully noisy on the highway, turning almost 4K RPM at 80 MPH, as I recall.
April 28th, 2008 at 8:09 am
Only problem is, finding one that hasn’t a) been heavily and tastelessly modified by someone whose mechanical experience doesn’t extend beyond playing a game console or b) thrashed absolutely to death. Durable it may be, but being redlined mercilessly takes it’s toll.
April 28th, 2008 at 8:15 am
You didn’t mention the best part about Integras — all the good parts bolt right up to the much cheaper and lighter Civic.
Honda said, “Let us build a light weight econobox with a double wishbone suspension. And we shall call it the Civic.” And it was good. And then Honda said, “Let us build a parts car for the Civic, so that people don’t have to put up with wheezy single cams, rear drum brakes, and low-buck interiors. And we shall call it the Integra. And we shall build hundreds of thousands of them, and they shall overflow the junkyards of America, bursting forth with DOHC engines, 10.3″ brake rotors, and proper side bolsters.” And it was good.
April 28th, 2008 at 8:20 am
It certainly was good. I never owned an Integra, however, but the driving similarities between it and the Civic are pretty much the same, save for the more sporting Integra’s suspension tuning. The Acura is a very entertaining car to drive, fuel efficient and due to its hatchback design (2 doors not withstanding) a very practical car as well. And believe me, it was hard not redlining the engine on every shift just to hear revs climb and the VTEC switch over.
In terms of modifying, I’d just throw on some better rubber and leave it at that.
April 28th, 2008 at 8:47 am
Great review. And I like that Megan identifies who the car is best for. Typically, reviewers get too focused on determining which car is best, rather than realizing its a matter of context.
April 28th, 2008 at 8:52 am
Great review by the way and I loved reading it.
April 28th, 2008 at 9:19 am
RGS920 :
However, I was a little confused by the pictures. This is a review as far as I can tell about the Integra base model and GSR trim but the pictures are of a Type R.
I’m not sure what the confusion is. The review covered the Gen 3 Integra, not a specific model or trim level. The pictures are intended to represent the various trims and body styles they offered and came from the Acura media site. They are labeled as Acura labeled them.
April 28th, 2008 at 9:25 am
Great review.
These cars (any generation) are great fun, economical and will run forever. In 2003 and after 150k miles I gave up my ‘89 because I was getting too old for it (and not the other way around).
By the way:
The first USDM Integra (’90) stabled just 130 horses.
Wasn’t the first USDM Integra a 1987 model?
April 28th, 2008 at 9:25 am
That’s fine. I’ll remove the last two paragraphs of my comment because they will detract from constructive discussion.
April 28th, 2008 at 9:28 am
@ italianstallion,
Yes, you caught a typo! It should say 2nd gen… see corrected text.