By Bertel Schmitt on April 19, 2009

Words of wisdom spoken on the eve of the Shanghai Auto Show: “The longer the crisis lasts, the bigger the chance of failure or a scale-down of some American and European automakers.” Words of wisdom from Xu Liuping, Chairman of Chongqing Changan Auto Co. on the sidelines of a news conference. “And that has provided a chance for entry by Chinese manufacturers.” The Chairman politely omitted to add “for pennies on the dollar,” but why stress the obvious. And guess who the Chairman’s company is coveting? “Changan, Ford Motor’s China partner, is among several Chinese auto makers that have expressed interest in the Volvo car brand, which the Detroit automaker is seeking to sell in an effort to raise cash,” writes Reuters. “Asked about progress on a possible Volvo deal, Xu declined to comment, citing disclosure rules mandated by the Chinese securities regulator.” Changan? Doesn’t that ring a (wedding) bell?

Yes, it’s the very same Changan that had been fingered by TTAC as a suitor for Volvo in December. Yes, it’s the same Changan that a day later denied that there’s anything to that story at all.  Yes, it’s the same Changan for which snapping up a distressed Volvo makes the most sense.

Quite possibly, Changan is the only auto company in the universe for which buying Volvo makes any sense at all: Changan is Volvo’s joint venture partner in China. Changan builds Volvos for the Chinese market. Changan could immediately turn around and sell Volvos all over the world. Their current joint venture contract prohibits exportation, but once they own Volvo all doors are wide open.

And, yes, it’s the same Changan that said in February it had signed a framework agreement with Autopark Mexico to start making cars in Mexico next year with an initial capacity of 50,000 units. Chairman Xu said Changan could sell cars to North America. From Mexico.

They would probably sell better with a Volvo nameplate and Volvo technology and existing Volvo homologation through an existing Volvo dealer network. What did we say when we announced the Chinese/Mexican tie-up last February? “Could come in handy for Changan’s bid for Volvo.”

7 Comments on “They’re Baaaaaaack: Changan Covets Volvo, Again...”


  • menno
    menno

    Makes perfect sense. Plus, the Chinese government has literally got something like 1.5 trillion US dollars to dispose of by buying up assets.

    Right now, China, as a nation, is busy buying up huge amounts of copper, palladium, etc. for storage.

    In exchange for soon worth-less dollars. Or hopefully not, but possibly worthless, dollars.

    In any case, they’ll have the materiels to proceed as the favored trade partner with any surviving economies with currencies worth trading for in the future.

    Put this way; you need copper for wiring in electric and hybrid electric cars. You need rhodium to make catalytic convertors work as 3-way catalysts (platinum alone won’t do it). China already is the major producer of rare earths, as in some 95% worldwide; these are needed for DC permanent magnet motors also used in some hybrid electric cars.

    China are no dummies.

  • George B
    George B

    The Chinese/Mexican tie-up link is broken. Found the story here:
    http://autonews.gasgoo.com/auto-news/1008286/Changan-Auto-to-build-cars-in-Mexico-eyeing-US-market.html

    Bertel, how does an initial annual capacity of 50,000 cars compare to Volvo’s current US sales? I could see how manufacturing Volvo’s in Mexico could solve exchange rate and manufacturing cost problems. The obvious question is why didn’t Ford already try this?

  • Juniper
    Juniper

    SSDD

  • menno
    menno

    I have a 2008-2009 Cars of the World book, and in it, Changan has no proper cars listed under their own manufacture. However, online is a different tale.

    The car even looks slightly Volvo-esque in a modern sense (and could easily have a Volvo grille added), and therefore it can easily be seen how this could become a Chinese manufactured and Mexican-assembled small Volvo for distribution in North America (NAFTA), alongside Chinese manufactured and possibly Mexican-assembled S80L (long wheelbase bigger Volvos) also sourced from Changan-Volvo.

    http://www.globalchana.com/portals/0/product/new_cv8/NewP.html

    BTW Changan is also known as Chana. (I don’t fathom Chinese nor do I know the culture so I have no idea why…)

    The cars not manufactured in China but manufactured in Sweden could and very probably would still be sold through the Volvo sales network if Changan bought it.

    I strongly suspect that within 3 or 4 years, the number of players in the glogal auto industry will shrink dramatically.

  • Bertel Schmitt

    @George B: Fixed. Thank you

  • Bertel Schmitt

    @menno: Made-in-China (by Changan) Volvos here: http://www.volvocars.com/zh-CN/Pages/default.aspx

  • MOT-Failure

    Bertel, thanks for the weblink to the Chinese made Volvos. Slightly strange to see a LWB S80, a slight throwback to the specially-made extended Volvo limos (740, 960, S90) of the 80s and 90s, as often seen in funeral processions…

    Still hoping that the Swedish government steps in and keeps the brand local, though I don’t hold out much hope considering the folks in Stockholm have turned a blind eye to Saab.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can also login using Facebook Connect. Connect with Facebook

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Hammer Time: Quality Work

    Gardiner Westbound - I typically buy a new “quality” car, maintain it well, and keep it for 10+ years. People always want my old cars so I get decent money for them...
  • Re: Hammer Time: Quality Work

    kevnsd - Steven well done, your assessment is spot on. I’m certain that this subject is on the minds of not only millions of people as they look at the car in the driveway but...
  • Re: Hammer Time: Quality Work

    John Horner - With shop labor rates in the $100/hour neighborhood I don’t think we are going to see a massive move to driving 10+ year old cars. Most such cars end up with...
  • Re: Japanese Government Worried About Toyota Backlash

    Contrarian - My company bid on an EPS controller for a large OEM a few years ago. I remember that I was not impressed with the amount of redundancy in the...
  • Re: Hammer Time: Quality Work

    HankScorpio - **you make it sound like car manufacturers merged because it was some evil plan to sell the same car to more people the reality is many of these manufacturers would...
  • Re: Hammer Time: Quality Work

    a-viking - I agree we should export more and have balanced trade with our trading partners. I am a huge proponent of balanced and fair trade. Where would Hyundai be today if the...
  • Re: Project Better Place Birthwatch: Visiting Hours

    mor2bz - I thought the Nissan Leaf was going to be their flagship. It appears that that car is going to be much more expensive than earlier promised....
  • Re: What’s Wrong With This Picture: Lost In Translation Edition

    Disaster - Me too! I thought for sure we were looking at the rear end of the Charger…or another similar Chrysler product. I think...
  • Re: Hammer Time: Quality Work

    john.fritz - And it’s gone. Good move Ford.
  • Re: Curbside Classic: 1965 Lincoln Continental

    Joe McKinney - I was refering to the current Town Car. Ford’s Panther platform was introduced in 1978 as a new, 1979 model. The Town Car, Crown Victoria...

 


Auto Insurance GPS Navigation
Car Loans Auto Parts
Car Warranty Wheels
Automotive Tires Car Care