By Edward Niedermeyer on March 21, 2008

piaxp_stacked.jpgAs we reported earlier, the X-Prize (of "paying people to shoot themselves into space in home-built rockets" fame) is bringing its "Revolution Through Competition" approach to the lofty goal of the 100mpg car. Well, they finally got the money together, thanks to title sponsor Progressive Insurance. And they even have a Senate resolution praising them for their bold, visionary whatever. So let the games begin! Oh, but first your garage-built go-kart must pass safety, cost, features and business plan inspections to ensure that only production-capable, consumer-friendly cars compete. Yup, they said business plans. Sorry Tesla!

12 Comments on “The Uncanny X-Prize...”


  • Landcrusher

    “Sorry Tesla!”

    SMACK!

    In Tesla’s defense, better to have no plan at all, than to have one that is just gibberish without any meat. Yes, GM, I am talking about YOU.

  • Robert Schwartz

    I think their money is safe. CNN reports:

    The purse will be split between two categories: mainstream and alternative cars.

    Mainstream cars must carry four or more passengers and have climate control, an audio system and 10 cubic feet of cargo space. They also must have four or more wheels, hit 60 miles per hour in less than 12 seconds and have a minimum top speed of 100 miles per hour and a range of 200 miles.

    Alternative vehicles will be required to carry two or more passengers and five cubic feet of cargo, have a top speed of at least 80 miles per hour and have a range of at least 100 miles.

  • Daniel Cote
    dancote

    Why do you think their money is safe? There are already several alternative cars that meet or exceed the stated criteria. Aptera and Allé to name 2. As for business plans, I think Aptera may have the edge so far.

  • Greg Bennett
    steronz

    Dancote –

    Keep in mind that the “range” is “range between fillups.” They still have to go 3000 miles in order to win. I know the Aptera still claims to do 130mpg with the batteries completely drained, so if they can really pull that off in real life driving, they should be legit to win. But the batteries and electric motor won’t really help them any.

  • john tacchetti
    frontline

    It is hard for me to hide my excitement for this “X” prize. The outcome of this could be life changing for a lot of folks.

  • Stephan Wilkinson
    Stephan Wilkinson

    They laughed when Burt Rutan set out to build “home-made rockets,” too. It’s so easy for non-achievers to snort-snort-chortle-chortle from a safe distance.

  • Facebook User

    We’ll see what comes of this, but it certainly is a better idea than government funded research and a heck of a lot cheaper.

  • guyincognito

    I don’t see how the prize itself will generate “revolution through competition”. It costs one hell of a lot more than $10M ($5?) to make such a vehicle and plenty of profit could be made if you could actually make a profitable mass production version of it.

  • Robert Schwartz

    They ll laughed at Christopher Columbus … ,but they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.

  • Robert McKenney
    shaker

    That “top speed of 100MPH” requirement is just about enough to guarantee that it’s not gonna happen… unless the “four passengers” are lying flat.

  • John

    A cynic would note the irony of an insurance company sponsoring this event. Experts in risk accessment, they could weigh the probability of payout vs the mountain of positive public exposure such an event would create. Any cynics here?

    John

  • Josh Davis

    I love this type of competition. I just wish I could watch development (drama-free) on TV as a reality series, along with intelligent, insightful commentary from the folks who work through the barriers they encounter. Maybe one of the less shitty networks could pick that up and boost the prize.

    Oh wait, sorry, I was dreaming. That would require brainpower to absorb! The private rocket XPrize was pretty fascinating to read about; most of the teams had good blogs, and chronicled what happens when people from all sorts of backgrounds approach a subject very, very few people have been involved with.

    Also, for $500k, sure, it’s pretty small compared to the cost of entry, but I *THINK* the funding you can obtain isn’t very regulated, so typically this will be for exposure and advertising, and the prize is just icing. Avoiding entry because “the prize is simply too small” sounds like a GM PR defecation.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can also login using Facebook Connect. Connect with Facebook

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Tata Defends JLR Acquisition

    Nutsaboutcars - I have a ton of respect for Mr. Ratan Tata,  but his Jaguar remarks are wishful thinking and whistling in the dark. Jag and L-R could not make a dime well...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    Nutsaboutcars - After Driving the previous Prius for 3 days in the LAX area in April and June, my opinion of the car went up by a huge amount. Well behaved,...
  • Re: Take Two: 2009 Honda Accord LX Review

    bollocks - Sherman lin “I had a 91 EX with automatic and I miss it dearly. That car was head and shoulders above every other midsize offering then. I wish I had...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Mercedes Benz 190E 2.3-16

    Bulldog Drummond - Hi there, driving in the uk is hardly the same as hammering the back roads but interested to read your comments on the Merc steering....
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    oldowl - Was: mid-1980s Saab 99L (lime green) Am: 2010 Prius IV (winter gray)
  • Re: Review: Porsche GT3

    bollocks - I think some of you are being too hard on Sajeev.  Until a few years ago, I never understood why people went gaga over the 911.  It’s archaic.  It’s not...
  • Re: Karmann Lives, Kindof

    mpresley - That may be true, but no one could match the number of snaps (half of them not working) on the top of my old MG Midge.  Besides, what’s a little water between...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    ragtopman - I’m practical but want a little fun out of life. Getting there is sometimes more important than being there. Has to be a convertible. My wife found...
  • Re: EPA: New Car Fuel Economy Continues to Improve; Back to Early 1980’s Level

    mpresley - …any increase in fleet MPG results in lower than otherwise gas prices for all of us…   What you say...
  • Re: Saturday Concours: LeMons in Texas

    Sajeev Mehta - Actually it kinda does: http://www.concoursdlemons.com /

 


Auto Insurance GPS Navigation
Car Loans Auto Parts
Car Warranty Wheels
Automotive Tires Car Care