Subaru 360 Vintage Ads: Cheap, Ugly Ads With Sexy Girl Extolling Cheap, Ugly Cars

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

Only in 1969: Cheap and crappy production values, mispronounced name of the car you’re selling, which was a cheap and ugly wart. All redeemed by the girl in bell bottoms. Sort of.

If you survived that, don’t miss this longer film extolling the remarkable virtues of Subaru’s 1969 lineup, including the legendary 360 Super Sport (!) with wild racing and crazy over steer footage. Also the pickup, van, and introducing the new FWD Star. Late sixties history is so…scary, especially when you lived through this yourself. (Note: the first minute is very dull, but hang in there, it gets better and better)

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 48 comments
  • BuzzDog BuzzDog on May 07, 2010

    Some have mentioned Consumer Reports' rating of "Not Acceptable" for the 360 in its April, 1969 issue; I found this pdf of the article at this site. Interestingly, vehicles weighing under 1,000 pounds (450 kg) were exempt from Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards of the time. The 360 weighed in at just seven pounds (three kg) below this limit. Thus, no dual braking system, minimum bumper height, headrests, collapsible steering column, effective wipers and defroster or even flat instrument panel knobs. I seem to recall reading that at least one state tried to outlaw the sale and registration of this vehicle. Despite its reputation as a deathtrap, I'd still love to own one to tool around the neighborhood, even after reading about the detailed 1,200-mile break-in ritual described in the Consumer Reports article.

  • Stevenmm Stevenmm on May 29, 2012

    Just to show that any car, regardless of it's virtues (or lack thereof) will find a following, I invite you to take a look at this page from my website... http://mysubaru360.com/photos/ I can assure you that there's nothing like parking a 360 next to a Ferrari at a car show. Guess who draws the bigger crowd? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KzI6RgIiT4 Best, Steve

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
Next