<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Last Call: Chrysler Pacifica</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:10:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WhatThe</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1518044</link>
		<dc:creator>WhatThe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 02:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1518044</guid>
		<description>The Pacifica was a great reliable wagon,despite its early years when Mercedes overpriced all of Chrysler&#039;s line especially the Pacifica.It would of done better if it was priced a bit lower and Chrysler had ythe hot 4.0 from the start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The Pacifica was a great reliable wagon,despite its early years when Mercedes overpriced all of Chrysler&#8217;s line especially the Pacifica.It would of done better if it was priced a bit lower and Chrysler had ythe hot 4.0 from the start.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paris-dakar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1504063</link>
		<dc:creator>paris-dakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1504063</guid>
		<description>The Roadmaster is on my list of &#039;Cars I Would Buy If I Was Looking and a Clean Example Was Available&#039;.

The Pacifica would be the automotive equivalent to a jail term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The Roadmaster is on my list of &#8216;Cars I Would Buy If I Was Looking and a Clean Example Was Available&#8217;.</p>
<p>The Pacifica would be the automotive equivalent to a jail term.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blautens</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1503618</link>
		<dc:creator>blautens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1503618</guid>
		<description>As a former B car owner (96 Impala SS), I have to stand up and say that taking a swipe at the Buick Roadmaster wagon is a bad idea - plenty of B car loyalists out there - and fervent ones at that. 

The LT1 was a great motor in stock form and it also had tons of aftermarket development and support.

Any wagon that weighed 4500 lbs and could turn consistent mid 14 second quarter miles (stock) is worth its weight in fake wood grain.

It&#039;s not hard at all to find videos of 12 second wagons that are just lightly modified...and even those owners that aren&#039;t up for drag racing seem to LOVE these cars.

Any fan base for the Pacifica yet? Any at car shows? Aftermarket parts?

*crickets chirping*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->As a former B car owner (96 Impala SS), I have to stand up and say that taking a swipe at the Buick Roadmaster wagon is a bad idea &#8211; plenty of B car loyalists out there &#8211; and fervent ones at that. </p>
<p>The LT1 was a great motor in stock form and it also had tons of aftermarket development and support.</p>
<p>Any wagon that weighed 4500 lbs and could turn consistent mid 14 second quarter miles (stock) is worth its weight in fake wood grain.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not hard at all to find videos of 12 second wagons that are just lightly modified&#8230;and even those owners that aren&#8217;t up for drag racing seem to LOVE these cars.</p>
<p>Any fan base for the Pacifica yet? Any at car shows? Aftermarket parts?</p>
<p>*crickets chirping*<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickR</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1502787</link>
		<dc:creator>NickR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502787</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The MPV and SWB Caravan were sized ‘just right’ but, unfortunately, the American auto consumer just didn’t see it that way when they were shopping for a new family mover. &lt;/em&gt;

Oddly enough the SWB version sold comparitively well in Canada.  One of the reasons I think the Journey is selling is because customer&#039;s accustomed to the older, smaller minivans are put-off by the super-sized Caravan and go for the smaller alternative.  (I still think that IF Chryco survives, they could have a winner on their hands, as humdrum as it may be, if they play their cards right.  Remember, cars-as-appliances is a huge market.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>The MPV and SWB Caravan were sized ‘just right’ but, unfortunately, the American auto consumer just didn’t see it that way when they were shopping for a new family mover. </em></p>
<p>Oddly enough the SWB version sold comparitively well in Canada.  One of the reasons I think the Journey is selling is because customer&#8217;s accustomed to the older, smaller minivans are put-off by the super-sized Caravan and go for the smaller alternative.  (I still think that IF Chryco survives, they could have a winner on their hands, as humdrum as it may be, if they play their cards right.  Remember, cars-as-appliances is a huge market.)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudiger</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1502738</link>
		<dc:creator>rudiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502738</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;BDB: &lt;em&gt;&quot;The thing that pisses me off about the Journey is that they killed the short wheelbase Caravan to make room for it. Dumb move, especially when gas prices when through the roof.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Didn&#039;t seem like too bright an idea to me, either. The SWB Caravan was a direct descendent of the tremendously successful 1983 Chrysler minivan and retained all the correct dimensions and corresponding benefits of the original. Killing it in favor of the less practical (but more stylish) Journey was a bonehead move.

Going to a traditional, four-door, station wagon configuration (even a tall station wagon that mimicked the look of an SUV) eliminated a couple of major features of the minivan, ie., the sliding doors and walk-thru from the front passenger seat to the rear.

Of course, the Mazda MPV minivan was packaged even better and it, apparently, didn&#039;t sell well enough to stop being eliminated and replaced by not one, but three vehicles: the smaller Mazda5 and larger (but substantially more expensive and less practical) Mazda CX-7 and CX-9.

The MPV and SWB Caravan were sized &#039;just right&#039; but, unfortunately, the American auto consumer just didn&#039;t see it that way when they were shopping for a new family mover. Those buyers were all gravitating to the much bulkier Sienna and Odyssey which, like the sole remaining Chrysler &#039;minivan&#039;, the Grand Caravan, had all really crossed over into large van territory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<blockquote>BDB: <em>&#8220;The thing that pisses me off about the Journey is that they killed the short wheelbase Caravan to make room for it. Dumb move, especially when gas prices when through the roof.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Didn&#8217;t seem like too bright an idea to me, either. The SWB Caravan was a direct descendent of the tremendously successful 1983 Chrysler minivan and retained all the correct dimensions and corresponding benefits of the original. Killing it in favor of the less practical (but more stylish) Journey was a bonehead move.</p>
<p>Going to a traditional, four-door, station wagon configuration (even a tall station wagon that mimicked the look of an SUV) eliminated a couple of major features of the minivan, ie., the sliding doors and walk-thru from the front passenger seat to the rear.</p>
<p>Of course, the Mazda MPV minivan was packaged even better and it, apparently, didn&#8217;t sell well enough to stop being eliminated and replaced by not one, but three vehicles: the smaller Mazda5 and larger (but substantially more expensive and less practical) Mazda CX-7 and CX-9.</p>
<p>The MPV and SWB Caravan were sized &#8216;just right&#8217; but, unfortunately, the American auto consumer just didn&#8217;t see it that way when they were shopping for a new family mover. Those buyers were all gravitating to the much bulkier Sienna and Odyssey which, like the sole remaining Chrysler &#8216;minivan&#8217;, the Grand Caravan, had all really crossed over into large van territory.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Green</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1502737</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502737</guid>
		<description>Rudiger --

I wonder that same thing.  Of course, it seems like the only people left who still &lt;i&gt;officially&lt;/i&gt; like station wagons are... car guys.  Go figure.  Everyone else wants something station-wagon like, they just want it called something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Rudiger &#8211;</p>
<p>I wonder that same thing.  Of course, it seems like the only people left who still <i>officially</i> like station wagons are&#8230; car guys.  Go figure.  Everyone else wants something station-wagon like, they just want it called something else.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudiger</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1502730</link>
		<dc:creator>rudiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502730</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Steve Green: &lt;em&gt;&quot;In short, she needed a station wagon.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;I wonder if this was the real issue with the Pacifica. Chrysler kept tap-dancing around calling it what it really was, avoiding at all costs what all auto companies have for years perceived as the kiss-of-death in vehicle class: the large station wagon.

It will be interesting to see how the Toyota Venza fares. That thing has Pacifica written all over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<blockquote>Steve Green: <em>&#8220;In short, she needed a station wagon.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I wonder if this was the real issue with the Pacifica. Chrysler kept tap-dancing around calling it what it really was, avoiding at all costs what all auto companies have for years perceived as the kiss-of-death in vehicle class: the large station wagon.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how the Toyota Venza fares. That thing has Pacifica written all over it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: probert</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1502717</link>
		<dc:creator>probert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502717</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Props for the greatest people mover ever made: The Toyota Previa.

Awesome and super sexy.

Dude, seriously! The four-wheeled egg with the mid-engine motor that NO ONE wants to work on? The one with barely enough beans to puff its way through traffic and rusts faster than Limbaugh swallows another Oxycottin? Please tell me you’re kidding.&lt;/em&gt;

It rusts way slower than Limbaugh&#039;s pill habit.  Only a 70s fiat or a dodge aspen can match that.

OK it&#039;s not super sexy OK.

Mid engine  - allwheel drive - 93 with 187000 - runs like  a very slightly wobbly top.  Fine around town - if you&#039;re coming to a really steep hill: gather all the speed you can and don&#039;t slow down.

I take it back - SUPER SEXY - to meet more girls you&#039;d have to buy a puppy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Props for the greatest people mover ever made: The Toyota Previa.</p>
<p>Awesome and super sexy.</p>
<p>Dude, seriously! The four-wheeled egg with the mid-engine motor that NO ONE wants to work on? The one with barely enough beans to puff its way through traffic and rusts faster than Limbaugh swallows another Oxycottin? Please tell me you’re kidding.</em></p>
<p>It rusts way slower than Limbaugh&#8217;s pill habit.  Only a 70s fiat or a dodge aspen can match that.</p>
<p>OK it&#8217;s not super sexy OK.</p>
<p>Mid engine  &#8211; allwheel drive &#8211; 93 with 187000 &#8211; runs like  a very slightly wobbly top.  Fine around town &#8211; if you&#8217;re coming to a really steep hill: gather all the speed you can and don&#8217;t slow down.</p>
<p>I take it back &#8211; SUPER SEXY &#8211; to meet more girls you&#8217;d have to buy a puppy.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dolorean23</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1502691</link>
		<dc:creator>dolorean23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502691</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Props for the greatest people mover ever made: The Toyota Previa.

Awesome and super sexy.&lt;/em&gt;

Dude, seriously! The four-wheeled egg with the mid-engine motor that NO ONE wants to work on? The one with barely enough beans to puff its way through traffic and rusts faster than Limbaugh swallows another Oxycottin? Please tell me you&#039;re kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Props for the greatest people mover ever made: The Toyota Previa.</p>
<p>Awesome and super sexy.</em></p>
<p>Dude, seriously! The four-wheeled egg with the mid-engine motor that NO ONE wants to work on? The one with barely enough beans to puff its way through traffic and rusts faster than Limbaugh swallows another Oxycottin? Please tell me you&#8217;re kidding.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirko Reinhardt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1502685</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirko Reinhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502685</guid>
		<description>@windswords : 
&lt;i&gt;Since the demise of the Pacifica SUV wannabe that’s really a mutated minivan the new Dodge Journey CUV has done very well despite a down market and very little marketing support. It’s not in the same size segment but it looks like a proper CUV, that is to say an SUV.&lt;/i&gt;

Oddly enough, here in Germany I heard a Dodge ad on the radio:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Ich bin ein Berliner&quot;
&quot;Mr. Gorbachev: Tear down this wall&quot;
&quot;Yes We Can&quot;

&quot;And again, three other Americans that changed the world. The Dodge Journey, the new &lt;b&gt;family van&lt;/b&gt; - now very affordable from your friendly Dodge dealer&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

So, here in Germany even an American company is OK with calling a minivan a minivan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@windswords :<br />
<i>Since the demise of the Pacifica SUV wannabe that’s really a mutated minivan the new Dodge Journey CUV has done very well despite a down market and very little marketing support. It’s not in the same size segment but it looks like a proper CUV, that is to say an SUV.</i></p>
<p>Oddly enough, here in Germany I heard a Dodge ad on the radio:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Ich bin ein Berliner&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Mr. Gorbachev: Tear down this wall&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Yes We Can&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;And again, three other Americans that changed the world. The Dodge Journey, the new <b>family van</b> &#8211; now very affordable from your friendly Dodge dealer&#8221;</i></p>
<p>So, here in Germany even an American company is OK with calling a minivan a minivan.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Green</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1502610</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502610</guid>
		<description>My wife&#039;s daily driver is a Pacifica.

She needed four seats and lots of cargo space, or sometimes to seat five or six.  In short, she needed a station wagon.

She didn&#039;t want to spend too much money, and at the time DaimlerChrysler had a very nice deal for Lockheed-Martin employees.

Other than a tire-pressure sensor problem, the wagon has been trouble-free.

Powerful?  Nope.  But it gets up to speed just fine on highway onramps -- even where we live at 7,500 feet above sea level.  The seats are comfortable, easy to adjust (that&#039;s one detail Mercedes has had right for years), the interior materials are nice to the touch and well-assembled.  And the height is especially great for expecting mothers to get in and out without too much hassle, even during labor.

It&#039;s not a faux-macho SUV.  It&#039;s not as stodgy as a minivan.  It&#039;s a station wagon.  And what she needed was... exactly that.  A mom car.

A great car?  Nope.  But for someone with a kid or two, and a large dog, and a love for buying hundreds of pounds of potting soil at a time at Home Depot, it&#039;s pretty close to great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My wife&#8217;s daily driver is a Pacifica.</p>
<p>She needed four seats and lots of cargo space, or sometimes to seat five or six.  In short, she needed a station wagon.</p>
<p>She didn&#8217;t want to spend too much money, and at the time DaimlerChrysler had a very nice deal for Lockheed-Martin employees.</p>
<p>Other than a tire-pressure sensor problem, the wagon has been trouble-free.</p>
<p>Powerful?  Nope.  But it gets up to speed just fine on highway onramps &#8212; even where we live at 7,500 feet above sea level.  The seats are comfortable, easy to adjust (that&#8217;s one detail Mercedes has had right for years), the interior materials are nice to the touch and well-assembled.  And the height is especially great for expecting mothers to get in and out without too much hassle, even during labor.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a faux-macho SUV.  It&#8217;s not as stodgy as a minivan.  It&#8217;s a station wagon.  And what she needed was&#8230; exactly that.  A mom car.</p>
<p>A great car?  Nope.  But for someone with a kid or two, and a large dog, and a love for buying hundreds of pounds of potting soil at a time at Home Depot, it&#8217;s pretty close to great.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Puthuff</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1502585</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Puthuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502585</guid>
		<description>windswords, the question wasn&#039;t which vehicle has the most quality/repair issues. What is &lt;em&gt;your &lt;/em&gt;point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->windswords, the question wasn&#8217;t which vehicle has the most quality/repair issues. What is <em>your </em>point?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legacygt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1502544</link>
		<dc:creator>legacygt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502544</guid>
		<description>I remember a NY Times article covering the NY Auto Show when the Pacifica arrived on the car show circuit. The article included universal praise for the Pacifica from designers from across the industry. They believed it was forward looking and a segment buster. I think they were right. The proliferation of similar cars in the years since and the fact that many of them are huge sellers is testament to that. 
So what went wrong with the Pacifica? I&#039;d say it&#039;s a story of 50% marketing and 50% pricing. The issues about the design and quality are real but not the story here. Other cars have similar issues. But the Pacifica was overpriced and undermarketed. I remember the first commercials featured Celine Dion. Celine Freakin&#039; Dion! And not even Titanic Celine Dion. She was already a punchline with a regular gig in Vegas at that point. How do you promote a groundbreaking vehicle with the most boring, vanilla, middle of the road songs playing in the background. OK, maybe you&#039;re targeting the middle of the market. But you priced the car way to high for that segment. Idiots!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I remember a NY Times article covering the NY Auto Show when the Pacifica arrived on the car show circuit. The article included universal praise for the Pacifica from designers from across the industry. They believed it was forward looking and a segment buster. I think they were right. The proliferation of similar cars in the years since and the fact that many of them are huge sellers is testament to that.<br />
So what went wrong with the Pacifica? I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s a story of 50% marketing and 50% pricing. The issues about the design and quality are real but not the story here. Other cars have similar issues. But the Pacifica was overpriced and undermarketed. I remember the first commercials featured Celine Dion. Celine Freakin&#8217; Dion! And not even Titanic Celine Dion. She was already a punchline with a regular gig in Vegas at that point. How do you promote a groundbreaking vehicle with the most boring, vanilla, middle of the road songs playing in the background. OK, maybe you&#8217;re targeting the middle of the market. But you priced the car way to high for that segment. Idiots!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RI Swamp Yankee</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1502464</link>
		<dc:creator>RI Swamp Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502464</guid>
		<description>OK. I&#039;m gonna say it.

The &#039;90s Chrysler cars were lightyears better looking than the Daimler-Benz models. The 300c, the Charger, the Magnum, the new T&amp;C - these now look cartoonish and crude.

The Concord, the 300D, the old T&amp;C - sculpted, elegant, graceful.

I know, I know, it surprised the hell out of me, too. I happened to look over at a 300c, and noticed it was parked next to a well-preserved Concorde that looked like it just drove off the lot. I was shocked - I remember hating on &quot;cab-forward&quot; so hard when it came out, yet here it was, all sleek and seductive. It wore off when I remembered what kind of powertrain it had, but man, what a good looking car. The old 300, too.

Old Dodges and Sebrings still look like ass, I checked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->OK. I&#8217;m gonna say it.</p>
<p>The &#8217;90s Chrysler cars were lightyears better looking than the Daimler-Benz models. The 300c, the Charger, the Magnum, the new T&amp;C &#8211; these now look cartoonish and crude.</p>
<p>The Concord, the 300D, the old T&amp;C &#8211; sculpted, elegant, graceful.</p>
<p>I know, I know, it surprised the hell out of me, too. I happened to look over at a 300c, and noticed it was parked next to a well-preserved Concorde that looked like it just drove off the lot. I was shocked &#8211; I remember hating on &#8220;cab-forward&#8221; so hard when it came out, yet here it was, all sleek and seductive. It wore off when I remembered what kind of powertrain it had, but man, what a good looking car. The old 300, too.</p>
<p>Old Dodges and Sebrings still look like ass, I checked.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTParts</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-2/#comment-1502440</link>
		<dc:creator>JTParts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502440</guid>
		<description>Along with the 5 seater cheapo came the 3.8 pushrod motor, which was less economical and less powerful than the 3.5. I always thought this was a good idea, big assed wagon. Is there a segment out there that would buy one that wasn&#039;t tarted up? rubber mats, no soft touch anything, a work wagon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Along with the 5 seater cheapo came the 3.8 pushrod motor, which was less economical and less powerful than the 3.5. I always thought this was a good idea, big assed wagon. Is there a segment out there that would buy one that wasn&#8217;t tarted up? rubber mats, no soft touch anything, a work wagon?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony-e30</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-1/#comment-1502418</link>
		<dc:creator>tony-e30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502418</guid>
		<description>I would argue that there are few family haulers that ride as brilliantly or are as nice to sit in as the Pacifica.

Good for you, not for Chrysler. Very good used car bargain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I would argue that there are few family haulers that ride as brilliantly or are as nice to sit in as the Pacifica.</p>
<p>Good for you, not for Chrysler. Very good used car bargain.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windswords</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-1/#comment-1502399</link>
		<dc:creator>windswords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502399</guid>
		<description>Jeff Puthuff: 

&quot;the vehicle was plagued with quality problems throughout its run?

You can start here. Enjoy the 212 pages.&quot;

Umm, Jeff if you go to the same website for problems with the 2007 Toyota Camry you get 482 pages: 

http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.f0c6927!make=Toyota&amp;model=Camry&amp;ed_makeindex=.f0c6927

So what was your point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Jeff Puthuff: </p>
<p>&#8220;the vehicle was plagued with quality problems throughout its run?</p>
<p>You can start here. Enjoy the 212 pages.&#8221;</p>
<p>Umm, Jeff if you go to the same website for problems with the 2007 Toyota Camry you get 482 pages: </p>
<p><a href="http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.f0c6927" rel="nofollow">http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.f0c6927</a>!make=Toyota&amp;model=Camry&amp;ed_makeindex=.f0c6927</p>
<p>So what was your point?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BEAT</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-1/#comment-1502377</link>
		<dc:creator>BEAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502377</guid>
		<description>I like the front end look of this car. It looks like the older design of the &lt;strong&gt;Chrysler Van Town and Country Touring Edition.&lt;/strong&gt;
This is a competitor with the Honda Odyssey and Toyota Sienna. Too bad Chrysler did not market them aggressively but concentrated with their Trucks and now they&#039;re broke. 

They should market this Pacifica. American families still likes bigger van made in America but saving gas is not on this car. The Van can haul 1/2 of your household furnitures but not this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I like the front end look of this car. It looks like the older design of the <strong>Chrysler Van Town and Country Touring Edition.</strong><br />
This is a competitor with the Honda Odyssey and Toyota Sienna. Too bad Chrysler did not market them aggressively but concentrated with their Trucks and now they&#8217;re broke. </p>
<p>They should market this Pacifica. American families still likes bigger van made in America but saving gas is not on this car. The Van can haul 1/2 of your household furnitures but not this one.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paris-dakar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-1/#comment-1502354</link>
		<dc:creator>paris-dakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502354</guid>
		<description>The Taurus X/Freestyle is a nice vehicle.  I borrowed my parents to move some stuff from MI to TX, very good performance even fully loaded.

Mileage wasn&#039;t anything to write home about though - 22-23 mpg 100% Highway @ 80mph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The Taurus X/Freestyle is a nice vehicle.  I borrowed my parents to move some stuff from MI to TX, very good performance even fully loaded.</p>
<p>Mileage wasn&#8217;t anything to write home about though &#8211; 22-23 mpg 100% Highway @ 80mph.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattPete</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-1/#comment-1502331</link>
		<dc:creator>MattPete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502331</guid>
		<description>Ford 500, or do you mean the Taurus X?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Ford 500, or do you mean the Taurus X?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-1/#comment-1502319</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502319</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised nobody mentioend Ford 500 in the comments. That looked like a Pacifica done right (on a former Volvo chassis). I saw two of them today while driving home from Trader Joe&#039;s, and no Pacifica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m surprised nobody mentioend Ford 500 in the comments. That looked like a Pacifica done right (on a former Volvo chassis). I saw two of them today while driving home from Trader Joe&#8217;s, and no Pacifica.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boosterseat</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-1/#comment-1502317</link>
		<dc:creator>boosterseat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502317</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&#039;Can we get some citations to back up the claims that Chrysler lost money on every Pacifica it sold ...&#039;&lt;/em&gt;
Well... they are bankrupt, completely, making it a pretty much moot point. Every one of these was obviously sold fleet and decontented - a dramatic change of plan from the launch concept of a premium $35k+ vehicle sold to entry lux buyers. The volume also sucked and the parts were all unique to Pacifica, which destroys the ability to amortize costs via volume. 
I drove one in 2007 when I had two small kids, planning on three. It was a near new rental return at about 50% off of new price. You couldn&#039;t fit a small umbrella stroller behind the third row seats, let alone buy groceries. If you folded down 1 seat and put anything on top of it, there would be someone sitting right next to the stuff, which would cascade into their lap around the first corner. Stupid car. 
We bought a new van that drives much better and has way more space. I&#039;m satisfied &amp; no wonder this mutt didn&#039;t sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>&#8216;Can we get some citations to back up the claims that Chrysler lost money on every Pacifica it sold &#8230;&#8217;</em><br />
Well&#8230; they are bankrupt, completely, making it a pretty much moot point. Every one of these was obviously sold fleet and decontented &#8211; a dramatic change of plan from the launch concept of a premium $35k+ vehicle sold to entry lux buyers. The volume also sucked and the parts were all unique to Pacifica, which destroys the ability to amortize costs via volume.<br />
I drove one in 2007 when I had two small kids, planning on three. It was a near new rental return at about 50% off of new price. You couldn&#8217;t fit a small umbrella stroller behind the third row seats, let alone buy groceries. If you folded down 1 seat and put anything on top of it, there would be someone sitting right next to the stuff, which would cascade into their lap around the first corner. Stupid car.<br />
We bought a new van that drives much better and has way more space. I&#8217;m satisfied &amp; no wonder this mutt didn&#8217;t sell.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Puthuff</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-1/#comment-1502300</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Puthuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502300</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;the vehicle was plagued with quality problems throughout its run?&lt;/em&gt;

You can start &lt;a href=&quot;http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.ef16286/0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Enjoy the 212 pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>the vehicle was plagued with quality problems throughout its run?</em></p>
<p>You can start <a href="http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.ef16286/0" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Enjoy the 212 pages.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLS</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-1/#comment-1502295</link>
		<dc:creator>MLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502295</guid>
		<description>Can we get some citations to back up the claims that Chrysler lost money on every Pacifica it sold and that the vehicle was plagued with quality problems throughout its run?  I&#039;ve not read either of these things anywhere else before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Can we get some citations to back up the claims that Chrysler lost money on every Pacifica it sold and that the vehicle was plagued with quality problems throughout its run?  I&#8217;ve not read either of these things anywhere else before.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shogun</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/the-parting-shot-the-chrysler-pacifica/comment-page-1/#comment-1502270</link>
		<dc:creator>Shogun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=320174#comment-1502270</guid>
		<description>Er. Wasn&#039;t it the Lexus RX that created this CUV segment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Er. Wasn&#8217;t it the Lexus RX that created this CUV segment?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 48/155 queries in 0.138 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-23 00:11:57 -->