<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tesla Death Watch 41: Tesla Death Watch Ended</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:14:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rolosrevenge</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-2/#comment-1041861</link>
		<dc:creator>rolosrevenge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1041861</guid>
		<description>Are you guys going to ever do a performance verification on Jason Calacanis&#039; roadster? I&#039;ve been waiting for that ever since that post a few weeks ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Are you guys going to ever do a performance verification on Jason Calacanis&#8217; roadster? I&#8217;ve been waiting for that ever since that post a few weeks ago.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neonjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-2/#comment-1041101</link>
		<dc:creator>neonjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1041101</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see.  One one hand we have several companies that make millions of cars each year and we have a death watch.  On the other hand, we have a company that hasn&#039;t delivered on anything except the basic claim to hand-build a few cars.  No production, non-conformance to claimed specs, hype and lying as the main product and a company that has no possible chance of surviving even if they could possibly do what they claimed.  

Now you&#039;re proposing to drop the death watch?

WTF are you guys smoking?

This is the only place we can get &quot;car guys&quot;-oriented info on the company instead of the screaming green spew that other news outlets deliver.  If you discontinue the Death Watch, How the hell are we going to get any information that is believable?

You REALLY need to re-think this one.

JGD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Let&#8217;s see.  One one hand we have several companies that make millions of cars each year and we have a death watch.  On the other hand, we have a company that hasn&#8217;t delivered on anything except the basic claim to hand-build a few cars.  No production, non-conformance to claimed specs, hype and lying as the main product and a company that has no possible chance of surviving even if they could possibly do what they claimed.  </p>
<p>Now you&#8217;re proposing to drop the death watch?</p>
<p>WTF are you guys smoking?</p>
<p>This is the only place we can get &#8220;car guys&#8221;-oriented info on the company instead of the screaming green spew that other news outlets deliver.  If you discontinue the Death Watch, How the hell are we going to get any information that is believable?</p>
<p>You REALLY need to re-think this one.</p>
<p>JGD<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZoomZoom</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-2/#comment-1038782</link>
		<dc:creator>ZoomZoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1038782</guid>
		<description>Boy, if this site were getting too negative, I would have started using smiley-face emoticons months ago!  (:wink:)

When did TTAC start wetting a finger and sticking it up in the air to see which way the wind was blowing?  (:surprised look/mouth open:)

I started coming here for the GM Deathwatch articles...around #60 or so.  Robert was the only one telling the truth, for Christ&#039;s sake!  (:true-dat, hands on hips:)

Seeing some of the auto boneyard/junkyard photos was a little bit of a downer, but negativity?  No way.  Reality, yes; negativity, no.  (:finger_wag/shame on buff rags:)

You certainly didn&#039;t stop writing the GM/DW or F/DW or C/SW articles to satisfy anybody&#039;s delicate sensitivities; why get squeamish now? (:Confused smiley/WTF?:)

Sometimes these things take time to come about; saying the truth is never the wrong thing to do, even if it takes a long time for the end-result to become apparent to the common man or woman.  

I didn&#039;t read most of the Tesla Death Watch articles, but only because of time constraints and because Tesla wasn&#039;t yet a major market player.  But that does NOT mean that the TDW&#039;s shouldn&#039;t have been written, nor that they were negative.

I say killing off the TDW was a mistake, but I must have missed that poll question.  It&#039;s your site, though.  I just hope it&#039;s the first &lt;strong&gt;AND LAST&lt;/strong&gt; content decision you leave up to the readership.  At least until 2011. (:arms crossed in front; So there!:)

Oooh, but taking my advice would be like turning a content decision over to me, part of the readership...wouldn&#039;t it?  Okay, maybe I don&#039;t want that responsibility.  (:throwing_hands_up!:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Boy, if this site were getting too negative, I would have started using smiley-face emoticons months ago!  (:wink:)</p>
<p>When did TTAC start wetting a finger and sticking it up in the air to see which way the wind was blowing?  (:surprised look/mouth open:)</p>
<p>I started coming here for the GM Deathwatch articles&#8230;around #60 or so.  Robert was the only one telling the truth, for Christ&#8217;s sake!  (:true-dat, hands on hips:)</p>
<p>Seeing some of the auto boneyard/junkyard photos was a little bit of a downer, but negativity?  No way.  Reality, yes; negativity, no.  (:finger_wag/shame on buff rags:)</p>
<p>You certainly didn&#8217;t stop writing the GM/DW or F/DW or C/SW articles to satisfy anybody&#8217;s delicate sensitivities; why get squeamish now? (:Confused smiley/WTF?:)</p>
<p>Sometimes these things take time to come about; saying the truth is never the wrong thing to do, even if it takes a long time for the end-result to become apparent to the common man or woman.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t read most of the Tesla Death Watch articles, but only because of time constraints and because Tesla wasn&#8217;t yet a major market player.  But that does NOT mean that the TDW&#8217;s shouldn&#8217;t have been written, nor that they were negative.</p>
<p>I say killing off the TDW was a mistake, but I must have missed that poll question.  It&#8217;s your site, though.  I just hope it&#8217;s the first <strong>AND LAST</strong> content decision you leave up to the readership.  At least until 2011. (:arms crossed in front; So there!:)</p>
<p>Oooh, but taking my advice would be like turning a content decision over to me, part of the readership&#8230;wouldn&#8217;t it?  Okay, maybe I don&#8217;t want that responsibility.  (:throwing_hands_up!:)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fallout11</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1038441</link>
		<dc:creator>fallout11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1038441</guid>
		<description>As a longtime reader of TTAC (four years now), let me be clear: It is the Death Watches that made TTAC.
Ignore the handful of recent naysayers, stick with what made TTAC what it is today. They are the only reason I visit, I can read vapid keyboard drooling regarding driving an Accord for a year or similar pretty much anywhere.
As with the others, I will miss this Death Watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->As a longtime reader of TTAC (four years now), let me be clear: It is the Death Watches that made TTAC.<br />
Ignore the handful of recent naysayers, stick with what made TTAC what it is today. They are the only reason I visit, I can read vapid keyboard drooling regarding driving an Accord for a year or similar pretty much anywhere.<br />
As with the others, I will miss this Death Watch.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: breimann</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1037781</link>
		<dc:creator>breimann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1037781</guid>
		<description>long time reader, first time posting - 

I enjoy the death watch. You call it negativity, I call it news. I will miss the Death Watch, I hope the others stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->long time reader, first time posting &#8211; </p>
<p>I enjoy the death watch. You call it negativity, I call it news. I will miss the Death Watch, I hope the others stay.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rolosrevenge</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1037561</link>
		<dc:creator>rolosrevenge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1037561</guid>
		<description>I joined this site when I found the death watch, I will miss it. I do appreciate what Tesla has been able to accomplish which is to get everyone thinking about electric cars after they had been pronounced dead. That is a positive contribution even if they only ever do deliver a couple hundred roadsters. Now BMW, Daimler, Mitsubishi, and Renault Nissan, are making fully electric models. Would this have happened without Tesla? Maybe not as soon. Tesla fueled hype made the major auto manufacturers look at producing EVs and helped change the image of electrics being golf carts. I can respect them for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I joined this site when I found the death watch, I will miss it. I do appreciate what Tesla has been able to accomplish which is to get everyone thinking about electric cars after they had been pronounced dead. That is a positive contribution even if they only ever do deliver a couple hundred roadsters. Now BMW, Daimler, Mitsubishi, and Renault Nissan, are making fully electric models. Would this have happened without Tesla? Maybe not as soon. Tesla fueled hype made the major auto manufacturers look at producing EVs and helped change the image of electrics being golf carts. I can respect them for that.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porschespeed</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1037031</link>
		<dc:creator>porschespeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1037031</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;All of the comments on Tesla miss the point. The roadster is just to bring in revenue and get the company going. The WhiteStar sedan, built at a new factory in San Jose on a newly designed proprietary chassis in 2012 was to be the big car, at $60k and competing with BMW, followed by the Blue Star, a Prius competitor.

It also misses the point on Tesla technology. Tesla’s technology is primarily software. THis will be more valuable as battery technology improves along the projected cost curve. Probably by 20-30% a year.&lt;/em&gt;

No, I think some of us get the point. 

The roadster brings in no revenue - 100 cars at $100K. Most of which goes right back out of the checkbook for the body, motor, and batteries. 

Whitestar. Not gonna happen. They can&#039;t even get roadster production going. 

Software? Really? Show me one Tesla patent that&#039;s worth licensing. Don&#039;t see Toyota or Honda lining up. They are already light-years ahead of Tesla. Who are the potential licensees? Beyond that, if you know anything about the auto industry, manufacturers are loathe to license anything from anyone. Ever. Even if it is the most cost-effective solution set. 

More importantly, once again, just add up the numbers and the burn rate. Then figure out how much they have to sell just to get back to zero.

I was in Silicon Valley during the &#039;just throw money&#039; days. Tesla has no more viable business plan than dozens of kids who blew through tens/hundreds of millions back then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>All of the comments on Tesla miss the point. The roadster is just to bring in revenue and get the company going. The WhiteStar sedan, built at a new factory in San Jose on a newly designed proprietary chassis in 2012 was to be the big car, at $60k and competing with BMW, followed by the Blue Star, a Prius competitor.</p>
<p>It also misses the point on Tesla technology. Tesla’s technology is primarily software. THis will be more valuable as battery technology improves along the projected cost curve. Probably by 20-30% a year.</em></p>
<p>No, I think some of us get the point. </p>
<p>The roadster brings in no revenue &#8211; 100 cars at $100K. Most of which goes right back out of the checkbook for the body, motor, and batteries. </p>
<p>Whitestar. Not gonna happen. They can&#8217;t even get roadster production going. </p>
<p>Software? Really? Show me one Tesla patent that&#8217;s worth licensing. Don&#8217;t see Toyota or Honda lining up. They are already light-years ahead of Tesla. Who are the potential licensees? Beyond that, if you know anything about the auto industry, manufacturers are loathe to license anything from anyone. Ever. Even if it is the most cost-effective solution set. </p>
<p>More importantly, once again, just add up the numbers and the burn rate. Then figure out how much they have to sell just to get back to zero.</p>
<p>I was in Silicon Valley during the &#8216;just throw money&#8217; days. Tesla has no more viable business plan than dozens of kids who blew through tens/hundreds of millions back then.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akear</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1036852</link>
		<dc:creator>akear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1036852</guid>
		<description>Any company that sells only a 100 products does not deserve any kind of &quot;watch&quot;. Tesla is not a viable company, but resembles more of an advanced university research project.
I don&#039;t know what Franz von Holzhausen (mazda&#039;s talented US design chief) was thinking when he left Mazda to work for Tesla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Any company that sells only a 100 products does not deserve any kind of &#8220;watch&#8221;. Tesla is not a viable company, but resembles more of an advanced university research project.<br />
I don&#8217;t know what Franz von Holzhausen (mazda&#8217;s talented US design chief) was thinking when he left Mazda to work for Tesla.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1036782</link>
		<dc:creator>David Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1036782</guid>
		<description>As many of you probably remember, I have defended Tesla as a company with great ideas, even if their management has seemed problematic.

I would like to see the Tesla Death Watch live, so I could still easily find all the Tesla stories.  If you want to cut down the snark a bit, why not merge the Birth and Death watch into a single Tesla Watch category?

I don&#039;t think there&#039;s any question that Tesla has performed its mission in making the electric car more interesting to all of us, and reassuring us that driving fun will not die with the internal combustion engine.

I for one would like to see what Tesla does with whatever share of the bailout money it receives.  At least it has been making a good faith effort at doing what the Big Three have not.

So I hope you continue covering Tesla at the same level of intensity - even though I still support the company and think it&#039;s capable of doing great things.

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->As many of you probably remember, I have defended Tesla as a company with great ideas, even if their management has seemed problematic.</p>
<p>I would like to see the Tesla Death Watch live, so I could still easily find all the Tesla stories.  If you want to cut down the snark a bit, why not merge the Birth and Death watch into a single Tesla Watch category?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any question that Tesla has performed its mission in making the electric car more interesting to all of us, and reassuring us that driving fun will not die with the internal combustion engine.</p>
<p>I for one would like to see what Tesla does with whatever share of the bailout money it receives.  At least it has been making a good faith effort at doing what the Big Three have not.</p>
<p>So I hope you continue covering Tesla at the same level of intensity &#8211; even though I still support the company and think it&#8217;s capable of doing great things.</p>
<p>D<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thalter</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1036182</link>
		<dc:creator>thalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1036182</guid>
		<description>Is it time to start a Death Watch Death Watch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Is it time to start a Death Watch Death Watch?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: campocaceres</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035931</link>
		<dc:creator>campocaceres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035931</guid>
		<description>Good for you, Mr. Farago.  I got a laugh out of the first Tesla deathwatch, thinking it was a bit tongue-in-cheek since I expected the deathwatch to be reserved for the auto industry&#039;s major players.  By number 40 though, the joke has gotten a bit stale. Though I am confident your site will continue its &quot;watch&quot; on Tesla, without the immediate &quot;axe to grind,&quot; so to speak.

Thanks for listening to your readers and keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Good for you, Mr. Farago.  I got a laugh out of the first Tesla deathwatch, thinking it was a bit tongue-in-cheek since I expected the deathwatch to be reserved for the auto industry&#8217;s major players.  By number 40 though, the joke has gotten a bit stale. Though I am confident your site will continue its &#8220;watch&#8221; on Tesla, without the immediate &#8220;axe to grind,&#8221; so to speak.</p>
<p>Thanks for listening to your readers and keep up the good work!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rix</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035902</link>
		<dc:creator>Rix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035902</guid>
		<description>Tesla is getting a quarter billion in aid from the State of California to build a new factory.

All of the comments on Tesla miss the point. The roadster is just to bring in revenue and get the company going. The WhiteStar sedan, built at a new factory in San Jose on a newly designed proprietary chassis in 2012 was to be the big car, at $60k and competing with BMW, followed by the Blue Star, a Prius competitor.

It also misses the point on Tesla technology. Tesla&#039;s technology is primarily software. THis will be more valuable as battery technology improves along the projected cost curve. Probably by 20-30% a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Tesla is getting a quarter billion in aid from the State of California to build a new factory.</p>
<p>All of the comments on Tesla miss the point. The roadster is just to bring in revenue and get the company going. The WhiteStar sedan, built at a new factory in San Jose on a newly designed proprietary chassis in 2012 was to be the big car, at $60k and competing with BMW, followed by the Blue Star, a Prius competitor.</p>
<p>It also misses the point on Tesla technology. Tesla&#8217;s technology is primarily software. THis will be more valuable as battery technology improves along the projected cost curve. Probably by 20-30% a year.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porschespeed</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035741</link>
		<dc:creator>porschespeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035741</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Meh, the whole ‘Death Watch’ title is a little dramatic, especially for a company like Tesla which may or may not die.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Maybe calling it a Death Watch is jumping the gun,...&lt;/em&gt;

At the risk of debating the likelyhood the sun will like rise tomorrow, please, please tell me the scenario in which Tesla Motors survives.

Just survives, mind you. Not &#039;is profitable&#039; or &#039;thrives&#039; producing massive ROI for the chumps, err, investors.

Just do the simple math of amount invested, profit per car and then let me know how many $100K low margin rebadged Lotii need to be sold. Just to get back to zero. 

They have no cutting edge licensable tech so that avenue is closed too. 

Tesla is in the gas chamber chair right next to GM. John Wayne Gacy had a better chance of hearing good news on the phone. 

Send in the clowns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Meh, the whole ‘Death Watch’ title is a little dramatic, especially for a company like Tesla which may or may not die.</em></p>
<p><em>Maybe calling it a Death Watch is jumping the gun,&#8230;</em></p>
<p>At the risk of debating the likelyhood the sun will like rise tomorrow, please, please tell me the scenario in which Tesla Motors survives.</p>
<p>Just survives, mind you. Not &#8216;is profitable&#8217; or &#8216;thrives&#8217; producing massive ROI for the chumps, err, investors.</p>
<p>Just do the simple math of amount invested, profit per car and then let me know how many $100K low margin rebadged Lotii need to be sold. Just to get back to zero. </p>
<p>They have no cutting edge licensable tech so that avenue is closed too. </p>
<p>Tesla is in the gas chamber chair right next to GM. John Wayne Gacy had a better chance of hearing good news on the phone. </p>
<p>Send in the clowns.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maniceightball</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035692</link>
		<dc:creator>maniceightball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035692</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I made my point: they’re a company fuelled by tree-hugging hype rather than solid engineering or accountability.&lt;/i&gt;

The engineering&#039;s fine. You&#039;re spot on about the accountability and management, though.

RF -- Maybe calling it a Death Watch is jumping the gun, but the negativity is definitely called for when people throw around massive sums of money so recklessly. But good call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>I made my point: they’re a company fuelled by tree-hugging hype rather than solid engineering or accountability.</i></p>
<p>The engineering&#8217;s fine. You&#8217;re spot on about the accountability and management, though.</p>
<p>RF &#8212; Maybe calling it a Death Watch is jumping the gun, but the negativity is definitely called for when people throw around massive sums of money so recklessly. But good call.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeeDashOff</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035641</link>
		<dc:creator>GeeDashOff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035641</guid>
		<description>Meh, the whole &#039;Death Watch&#039; title is a little dramatic, especially for a company like Tesla which may or may not die.

Keep reporting on Tesla good or bad news with different and pithier headlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Meh, the whole &#8216;Death Watch&#8217; title is a little dramatic, especially for a company like Tesla which may or may not die.</p>
<p>Keep reporting on Tesla good or bad news with different and pithier headlines.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dean</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035541</link>
		<dc:creator>dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035541</guid>
		<description>Holy shit.  Excuse my bluntness, but with the general dearth of reading comprehension skills on display in this thread, it is no bloody wonder that the bash TTAC thread grew so quickly.

People, read the fucking article.  RF plainly states that he will continue to highlight news from Tesla &quot;if and when the situation merits&quot; so rest assured that should evidence of Tesla&#039;s continued dance with the inevitability of its doom come to light, you will read about it here.

All he is doing is dropping the title and the category from new posts.  Which is a good thing.

Please excuse my language, but few things piss me off like people who will jump all over someone for writing something that they couldn&#039;t be bothered to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Holy shit.  Excuse my bluntness, but with the general dearth of reading comprehension skills on display in this thread, it is no bloody wonder that the bash TTAC thread grew so quickly.</p>
<p>People, read the fucking article.  RF plainly states that he will continue to highlight news from Tesla &#8220;if and when the situation merits&#8221; so rest assured that should evidence of Tesla&#8217;s continued dance with the inevitability of its doom come to light, you will read about it here.</p>
<p>All he is doing is dropping the title and the category from new posts.  Which is a good thing.</p>
<p>Please excuse my language, but few things piss me off like people who will jump all over someone for writing something that they couldn&#8217;t be bothered to understand.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueBrat</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035532</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueBrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035532</guid>
		<description>Considering there&#039;s other players in this market now, Tesla Motors is not a star player it started out as. 

Let&#039;s all yawn and move on. What&#039;s new with Morgan these days?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Considering there&#8217;s other players in this market now, Tesla Motors is not a star player it started out as. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s all yawn and move on. What&#8217;s new with Morgan these days?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forraymond</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035381</link>
		<dc:creator>forraymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035381</guid>
		<description>I saw a Tesla placed in a television program earlier this week.  There was a close-up of the rear of the car focusing on the name, then it quietly sped off screen.  Hot looking car and eventually (electric propulsion) will be the norm.  Tesla may be ahead of it&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I saw a Tesla placed in a television program earlier this week.  There was a close-up of the rear of the car focusing on the name, then it quietly sped off screen.  Hot looking car and eventually (electric propulsion) will be the norm.  Tesla may be ahead of it&#8217;s time.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: golf4me</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035301</link>
		<dc:creator>golf4me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035301</guid>
		<description>Why? Oh well, good thing there are 20 other blogs to choose from. Frankly, this was your best feature. This is a car-lovers site, and anything with a battery that is used for anything other than starting a (real) vehicle is a travesty and a fraud. It&#039;s a golfcart, and I can drive those for free all day at my club. Will you at least report when they finally do die a horrible death? Please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Why? Oh well, good thing there are 20 other blogs to choose from. Frankly, this was your best feature. This is a car-lovers site, and anything with a battery that is used for anything other than starting a (real) vehicle is a travesty and a fraud. It&#8217;s a golfcart, and I can drive those for free all day at my club. Will you at least report when they finally do die a horrible death? Please?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guyincognito</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035231</link>
		<dc:creator>guyincognito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035231</guid>
		<description>Boo! Come on, they&#039;ve got but a few mil in the bank, a slew of orders they ain&#039;t got the money to fill, and a new product dead before it even started (but after a large investment and a lawsuit), they&#039;re near as death as any of the not so big 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Boo! Come on, they&#8217;ve got but a few mil in the bank, a slew of orders they ain&#8217;t got the money to fill, and a new product dead before it even started (but after a large investment and a lawsuit), they&#8217;re near as death as any of the not so big 3.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Berkowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035222</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Berkowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035222</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;oldyak :

And,now with gas a $1.50 a gallon….
Who cares&lt;/em&gt;

Don&#039;t worry. It&#039;ll be $3.00/gallon by next summer and will keep going up after that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>oldyak :</p>
<p>And,now with gas a $1.50 a gallon….<br />
Who cares</em></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry. It&#8217;ll be $3.00/gallon by next summer and will keep going up after that.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stepon</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035221</link>
		<dc:creator>stepon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035221</guid>
		<description>They got to him.  Its too late now, just let it go all of you.  This asset is finished but the battle isn&#039;t over.  A moment of silence for the Frogger it will not be pretty watching TTAC succumb to the sycophants and apologists but it always happens eventually.

&quot;Blessed are the meak for they will inherit the earth.&quot;  I for one certainly hope not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->They got to him.  Its too late now, just let it go all of you.  This asset is finished but the battle isn&#8217;t over.  A moment of silence for the Frogger it will not be pretty watching TTAC succumb to the sycophants and apologists but it always happens eventually.</p>
<p>&#8220;Blessed are the meak for they will inherit the earth.&#8221;  I for one certainly hope not.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philbailey</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035171</link>
		<dc:creator>philbailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035171</guid>
		<description>Maybe you could now start a Diesel death watch? Go on, I KNOW you&#039;d like to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Maybe you could now start a Diesel death watch? Go on, I KNOW you&#8217;d like to.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035131</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035131</guid>
		<description>&quot;Death Watch&quot; attitude is what makes this place!

I hope y&#039;all keep the attitude even if you lose the headline.

You&#039;re welcome to start a &quot;Matthew Sullivan Death Watch&quot; in its place.  I think (hope) you should be able to milk that for another 30-40 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;Death Watch&#8221; attitude is what makes this place!</p>
<p>I hope y&#8217;all keep the attitude even if you lose the headline.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re welcome to start a &#8220;Matthew Sullivan Death Watch&#8221; in its place.  I think (hope) you should be able to milk that for another 30-40 years.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Holzman</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tesla-death-watch-41-tesla-death-watch-ended/comment-page-1/#comment-1035032</link>
		<dc:creator>David Holzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=183812#comment-1035032</guid>
		<description>I think reporting on Tesla is valuable. Maybe not as an official deathwatch, maybe not quite as snarky, and maybe not as much. But certainly any major developments are well worth hearing about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think reporting on Tesla is valuable. Maybe not as an official deathwatch, maybe not quite as snarky, and maybe not as much. But certainly any major developments are well worth hearing about.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 58/162 queries in 0.144 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 09:15:41 -->