I love old rear wheel drive Volvos.
|This Man Was the Biggest Nonconformist In Texas||We’re Driving A 2016 Mazda CX-9 Signature, Which Is Very Expensive, And Very Good||Bark’s Bites: Who Is Bark, And Why Should We Listen To Him?||Ford Mustang vs. Chevrolet Camaro: 2016 Is Clearly Not The New Camaro’s Year||TTAC’s Long-Term Test 2015 Honda Fit: The Bell Tolls at 7,987 Miles||How Decision 2016 Will Affect the Auto Industry||Ford C-Max vs. Toyota Prius: Ford Wins, But Nobody Heeds My C-Max Recommendation|
A 1995 Volvo 960. Supple leather that made long trips easy. Great safety and visibility. It represented what I thought would be the perfect family car.
I financed it quick enough. But then the troubles began.
Today, the Volvo 760 celebrates 30 years on this planet. Concieved in an uncertain time in the auto industry and launched in 1982, the 760’s various incarnations lasted until the S90 and V90 were laid to rest in 1998.
Like so many great cars, the 760 was built with whatever happened to be laying around at the time. Cost-effective was the operative word, and the 240’s basic architecture was lengthened slightly, while losing 220 lbs in the process. A 2.8L V6 (the famous PRV motor) was available, as well as a diesel, but the 760 Turbo would live on in the hearts and minds of enthusiasts.
My friend Chris, who took the above photograph, grudgingly gave up his own pristine 700-Series Turbo this summer, for a Lexus IS250. I only got the chance to drive it once, but reveled in the massive turbo lag and equally entertaining turbo boost and the utilitarian nature of the cabin. The 760 Turbo was arguably the last idiosyncratic Volvo (though the 740 and 900 Series carried on its lineage despite re-skins and name changes), with a host off oddities like the self-leveling Nivomat suspension, a turbo boost gauge without any calibration, and the “4-Speed plus Overdrive” manual gearbox.
The introduction of the 850 range in the early 1990s marked the end of an era, as front-wheel drive and transverse engines asserted their dominance in the Volvo lineup. While I’m a fan of the current cars (the S60, XC90 and XC90 are solid vehicles), the old, boxy rear-drivers are iconic vehicles and arguably the heart and soul of the marque.
|TTAC’s Long-Term Test 2015 Honda Fit: The Bell Tolls at 7,987 Miles|
|Ford C-Max vs. Toyota Prius: Ford Wins, But Nobody Heeds My C-Max Recommendation|
|2016 Toyota RAV4 AWD Review – Competent Guy Gets the Reward|
|2017 Honda Ridgeline First Drive Review – Tacking into the Wind|
|2016 Ford Focus EV Review – Choice in a Familiar Wrapper|
|I’m Driving a 2016 Chevrolet Malibu 1.5T and Feel Guilty for Liking It This Much|
|2016 Shelby Mustang GT-H Review – What Were Once Vices Have Become Brand Virtues|
|1999 Cadillac Eldorado ETC|
|1990 Geo Storm GSi|
|1985 Buick Riviera|
|1986 Pontiac Fiero SE|
|1988 Mitsubishi Precis|
|1981 Toyota Corolla SR-5 Liftback|
|1969 Chevrolet ChevyVan 108|