I love old rear wheel drive Volvos.
|2015 Honda Odyssey EX Long-Term Test: 19,000 Miles And Counting||2017 Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid Limited Review – Cheaper, More Attractive, And Better Than The Obvious Choice||No Fixed Abode: Release the Mad Men!||Somehow, Jalopnik’s 2017 Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio Didn’t Break Down, But It Sure Wasn’t Exactly Perfect||Volkswagen’s Car Sex Commercial is Unsettling in an Unusual Way||Consumer Reports’ 2017 Alfa Romeo Giulia Ti Basically Lives In The Dealer Service Bay||2017 Mazda CX-5 First Drive Review – Less is More|
A 1995 Volvo 960. Supple leather that made long trips easy. Great safety and visibility. It represented what I thought would be the perfect family car.
I financed it quick enough. But then the troubles began.
Today, the Volvo 760 celebrates 30 years on this planet. Concieved in an uncertain time in the auto industry and launched in 1982, the 760’s various incarnations lasted until the S90 and V90 were laid to rest in 1998.
Like so many great cars, the 760 was built with whatever happened to be laying around at the time. Cost-effective was the operative word, and the 240’s basic architecture was lengthened slightly, while losing 220 lbs in the process. A 2.8L V6 (the famous PRV motor) was available, as well as a diesel, but the 760 Turbo would live on in the hearts and minds of enthusiasts.
My friend Chris, who took the above photograph, grudgingly gave up his own pristine 700-Series Turbo this summer, for a Lexus IS250. I only got the chance to drive it once, but reveled in the massive turbo lag and equally entertaining turbo boost and the utilitarian nature of the cabin. The 760 Turbo was arguably the last idiosyncratic Volvo (though the 740 and 900 Series carried on its lineage despite re-skins and name changes), with a host off oddities like the self-leveling Nivomat suspension, a turbo boost gauge without any calibration, and the “4-Speed plus Overdrive” manual gearbox.
The introduction of the 850 range in the early 1990s marked the end of an era, as front-wheel drive and transverse engines asserted their dominance in the Volvo lineup. While I’m a fan of the current cars (the S60, XC90 and XC90 are solid vehicles), the old, boxy rear-drivers are iconic vehicles and arguably the heart and soul of the marque.
|2015 Honda Odyssey EX Long-Term Test: 19,000 Miles And Counting|
|Retro Comparo: 1992 Honda Prelude Si vs. 1992 Acura Integra GS-R|
|2004 Toyota Camry LE V6 Update: Make It 13 Winters and 347,000 Miles|
|2017 Ford F-150 Raptor Review – Apex Predator|
|2017 Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid Limited Review – Cheaper, More Attractive, And Better Than The Obvious Choice|
|The 18-Year-Old Auto Upgrade: Jim’s 1999 Acura TL|
|2017 Kia Niro EX Review – Don’t Call It a Hatchback|
|1987 Plymouth Caravelle Turbo SE Sedan|
|1990 Mitsubishi Sigma|
|2004 Saturn Ion Sedan with Manual Transmission|
|1990 Range Rover Classic|
|1967 Chevrolet P20 Adventure Line Motorhome|
|1987 Dodge 600 SE|
|2000 Toyota Echo|