Categories:
By
Bertel Schmitt on June 1, 2012

GM CEO Dan Akerson might be in another one of his battles with the truth.
In a softballed interview with Fortune, GM’s CEO Dan Akerson said that he was suddenly and surprisingly drafted to lead GM as if it was time to go to war. “This was a call to service for me,” said Akerson, as he wrapped himself in a red, white, and blue flag and regaled interviewer Geoff Colvin with stories from the U.S. Naval Academy. Akerson makes the CEO job sound like a hardship post: (Read More…)
By
Edward Niedermeyer on May 11, 2010

Auto bailout mastermind Steve Rattner knows a thing or two about the truth. Just ask his former financial firm, Quadrangle. So, when asked by the Detroit News what he thought of allegations that GM mislead consumers with its “Payback” ad, he pulled a classic out of the thesaurus. The General, said Rattner,
may have slightly elasticized the reality of things.
And this is a real Corvette that went through a special “elasticizing machine” in the factory at Bowling Green, right?
By
Robert Farago on September 17, 2009

A brand is a promise to the consumer. It’s the umbrella under which all products must shelter. All the people responsible for a brand must ensure that it meets that promise. The Toyota Prius is a promise of reliable transportation that achieve high-mileage with low emissions. So it’s no wonder that Toyota has decided to stretch the brand to other vehicles. Oh, wait, the Prius isn’t a brand. It’s a model within a brand, which contains other examples of reliable transportation that achieves high-mileage with low emissions. Is that confusing? Well if it isn’t now, it soon will be. “The Highlander hybrid and Camry hybrid do OK, but calling it ‘Synergy Drive’ never resonated with consumers,” veteran Toyota dealer Earl Stewart told Automotive News [sub]. “But they can make hay on the Prius name. It’s a magic name. If somebody says ‘I drive a Prius,’ everybody knows what he means.” But for how long? The truth about a brand is that its products must fulfill the brand’s promise, or the brand dies. Confusing that brand diminishes it and alienates the people who gave birth to it in the first place. Maybe not straight away, but eventually. And forever.
Recent Comments
AFX - Now I can add Derek along with Doug to my list of “Millenial auto writers who think anything around 1980 or a little earlier was Ye Olden...
ajla - “Why the Falcon would flop if ‘brought here’.” It wouldn’t be a success, but I doubt it could do any worse than the Taurus...
chicagoland - “…because the car in the picture at the top of my page is the blandest of beigey McBlandmobiles…” Why the...
CelticPete - Drag racing is a good deal less expensive.. For the average hobbyist you can get a Fox Body Mustang or Camaro or something – soup...
Conslaw - The only way exporting Chinese-assembled cars to the United States would be politically viable would be to cap the imports at the # of US-built cars...
jberger - Looks like VW just built a Bricklin, I’m guessing it will be just as popular too. I love moonshot engineering, but this is just crap, just like the...
CelticPete - I had a Honda Civic Coupe but never souped it up. The thing is it takes alot of modding dollars to do what a generic fox body mustang can...
Ooshley - Current FG Falcon sits on an ever so slight evolution of the AU (c 1998), which will go down in history as the beginning of the end, EA169...
AFX - A girl I went to college with had an all wheel drive Ford Tempo. I was completely dumbfounded that they ever made a car like that.
doud1987 - Thanks for this great article Doug! I too can’t wait for the RS2 to be 25 years old to import it in the US. Some tried to import it under the...