Dear Sajeev,
A recent post on the CX-9 users forum (at www.mazdas247.com) caught my eye. An stalwart owner tore down his 3.5 (Ford) engine to clean up a sludging problem and broke a rod bolt in the process. He then discovered much to his dismay that replacement rod bolts are not considered “serviceable parts” by Mazda. In fact, it turns out that most of the internal engine components you would want to replace in a rebuild are not available from Mazda. (This is true for both the 3.5 and the more recent 3.7 litre versions.) Unavailable items include pistons, rings, bearings, etc. Searching on-line one can find the typical factory exploded parts diagrams with all these internal components listed, but in lieu of part numbers there is the notation, “This part is not serviced.” (Here’s an example) (Read More…)
Categories:


Recent Comments
Summicron - I admire this article more with each re-read. Such a clever use of past vehicles as a vehicle to deliver the subtext: “As it was in the...
noreaster - If you really think criticism of government “investment” is based on the...
CJinSD - In your view, which countries other than Japan are first world countries? The UK? Ford...
Inside Looking Out - Right – it is called third world country – the country which is...
CJinSD - Why do Americans like cars with trunks? Why do the most prosperous people the world over like cars with trunks? Pretty much the same reasons...
RobertRyan - “Brazil’s iron ore is a sought after commodity on the world market as well (especially in places like Australia and...
Kyree S. Williams - Did you ever do any advertising for any of VW Group’s other brands, or was it solely Volkswagen?
Skink - Or at least a half dozen emaciated prisoners. Or a few hundred cremated ones, ja? Type fewer, not less, Bertel, when some things can be counted.
Kyree S. Williams - Right…because neither Nissan nor any other foreign automakers...
OneAlpha - I don’t even think about the “safety” of modern cars because, to paraphrase Morpheus, “What is Safe? How do you...