By on February 13, 2013

Dan writes:

Dear Sajeev,

A recent post on the CX-9 users forum (at www.mazdas247.com) caught my eye. An stalwart owner tore down his 3.5 (Ford) engine to clean up a sludging problem and broke a rod bolt in the process. He then discovered much to his dismay that replacement rod bolts are not considered “serviceable parts” by Mazda. In fact, it turns out that most of the internal engine components you would want to replace in a rebuild are not available from Mazda. (This is true for both the 3.5 and the more recent 3.7 litre versions.) Unavailable items include pistons, rings, bearings, etc. Searching on-line one can find the typical factory exploded parts diagrams with all these internal components listed, but in lieu of part numbers there is the notation, “This part is not serviced.” (Here’s an example) (Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • Re: Generation Why: I Want My S16

    PonchoIndian - I would hope the 2.3 didn’t overwhelm a chassis that also see’s 435hp on a regular production model, not to even mention the 500+ hp versions that...
  • Re: Bark’s Bites: Viva La Fiesta!

    baconator - I drove the Fiesta ST a couple of weeks back and fell in love with it. The suspension tuning is sublime. The car nails that sense of fun and engagement even...
  • Re: Honda Jade Crossing Over To JDM From China

    TMA1 - I’ve seen these in China, I always assumed they came from Japan and were designed for that market. A Mazda5 competitor that would have no place in...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Saturn L200

    bball40dtw - That first picture looks like a depressing version of my late-90s to early-00s Southeast Michigan high school parking lot. Grand Am. Check. Grand Prix. Check....
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Saturn L200

    danio3834 - I’m not sure if it was contempt that killed Saturn, but simple indifference. They did put the effort into making different cars than the rest of GM, but...
  • Re: Generation Why: I Want My S16

    PonchoIndian - no ragrets! Nice car btw
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Saturn L200

    danio3834 - A completely anonymous car. Saturn is quickly becoming nothing more than a legend. Before you know it, no one will believe they even existed.
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Saturn L200

    psarhjinian - I suspect GM (the parent company) wanted Saturn to fail: it really was a rebuke to GM as a whole did business. The interesting thing is that GM is also really...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Saturn L200

    rpol35 - “Yes, we’re having 21st Century Junkyard Find Week!” Yes we are, we could continue with more and make a movie about it and call it, “Craptasia...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Saturn L200

    psarhjinian - I liked these in concept (and, living in a big city at the time, loved the plastic panels!) but man, did the execution ever suck. The L drove poorly,...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States