I’ve recently decided I need a second car, even though I am, in fact, only one person. Car guys get it: different cars serve different purposes, and the second car will be a weekend toy. My girlfriend isn’t as sympathetic despite possessing 26 pairs of shoes, each of which look exactly the same to the naked eye.
Tag: SVT
TTAC Commentator tresmonos writes:
OK. So I used to work for Ford and am now gainfully employed by them (again). My dilemma is as follows:
I am rolling on a Z24 cavalier that I bought brand new in 2001. It has 160K on the clock and the only thing I can see that’s wrong with it is a AC compressor that’s been on limp mode since 2007 (bearing), bad drum brakes due to my laziness (LMAO – SM), and interior fan’s lowest two resistors being shot. The twin cam has a bad coil as it misses at idle, but I could care less. The car’s exterior filth has literally out lasted my marriage. It’s been a hell of a financial savings for me. But we all know the twin cam dream won’t last much longer.
I temporarily moved to SC and blew my car savings load on a 100% rust free 1984 lincoln continental turbo diesel. I repainted it and have slaved over some wiring nightmares on it. I’ve got 6K invested in the thing. And I need a new mode of transportation. Foolish purchase, I know… but if you would look at the clean, rust free body, and sit in that Corinthian plush leather seats whilst romping on the gas to behold two dual plumes of diesel particulate whooshing in the rear view, you’d understand.
Doug writes:
I currently lease a 2008 Ford Fusion SEL 5 speed, loaded with heated leather, sunroof, SYNC. It has under 20,000 miles with 2 payments left. The lease end buyout is $14,100. I am debating whether to buy out my lease for cash, or just by a beater – I was thinking of a 1998 Ford Contour SVT in the $2500 range. I am about to start a 5 year sprint to pay off my mortgage, so I don’t want endless repair bills during this time. Buy the lease, or buy the beater?
It would be difficult to conceive of a vehicle better-suited to demonstrating TTAC’s diversity of automotive reviewers than the massive and massively outrageous Ford Raptor. Robert Farago would have eviscerated it with a zero-star diatribe on the inadvisability of building three-ton boutique trucks with borrowed funds. Sajeev Mehta would rhapsodize about the graphics but demonize the chunky controls. Daniel Stern might be have complained about the lighting system. As fate would have it, however, I’m the fellow who got the Raptor to review. So I took it mudding.





Recent Comments
RobertRyan - That and “the amazing Tauras’ as one lunatic fan boy called it. We had the original “catfish” Tauras, that was...
thornmark - You might remember that the original 1960 Falcon was imported to Australia – it was a big seller but a poor fit...
jimmyy - Perhaps the people of Australia will be the fortunate consumers of union built Fusion … provided to you by Ford who scored a near...
RobertRyan - Asians are making inroads in the US and Australia.
Gentle Ted - Ford has been outshone by Asian Manufactures, it was only time for this to happen, if you make crappy vehicles, this was bound to...
RobertRyan - Which is the terrible Mondeo here.
RobertRyan - This thread is a spillover from the “Currency Manipulation” one. Either way it is not good for Ford and the people of...
jimmyy - That Australian Ford in the above picture looks far better than anything Ford sells in the US. We get the cheap suit looking Fusion with...
sirwired - I’m not sure what the big fuss is about the loan program. 2% Seems to be a pretty good loss rate for a private investment fund. Heck, for one...
John Rosevear - Chrysler disagrees. Of course, that raises the question of whether Chrysler is an “American car company” at this point.