Categories:
By
Ronnie Schreiber on April 10, 2013

You will find distinct improvements in the 1939 cars. The new cars are generally more functionally streamlined than ever before. Many wind-resisting gadgets have either been completely eliminated or made integral parts of the bodies. Headlights, in most models, have been set in the front fenders both to give wider light range and to reduce wind resistance. Trunk bulges have tended to disappear, but without loss of luggage space. Windshields are generally wider and higher, and corner posts are smaller to improve vision. Interiors are wider and seats designed for greater comfort. Upholstery is more luxurious. Door and window handles are improved to avoid catching clothes. Motors are generally more powerful without any sacrifice in economy. Hydraulic brakes have been improved, and frames and bodies strengthened for safety.
- Collier’s Magazine November 19, 1938
Discuss amongst yourselves.
Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, a realistic perspective on cars & car culture and the original 3D car site. If you found this post worthwhile, you can get a parallax view at Cars In Depth. If the 3D thing freaks you out, don’t worry, all the photo and video players in use at the site have mono options. Thanks for reading – RJS
By
Paul Niedermeyer on February 17, 2010

[Note: A significantly expanded and updated version of this article is here]
For most of the fifties, sixties and into the early seventies, automotive aerodynamicists were mostly non-existent, or hiding in their wind tunnels. The original promise and enthusiasm of aerodynamics was discarded as just another style fad, and gave way to less functional styling gimmicks tacked unto ever larger bricks. But the energy crisis of 1974 suddenly put the lost science in the spotlight again. And although historic low oil prices temporarily put them on the back burner, as boxy SUVs crashed through the air, it appears safe to say that the slippery science has finally found its place in the forefront of automotive design. (Read More…)
By
Paul Niedermeyer on February 14, 2010

[Note: A significantly expanded and updated version of this article can be found here]
That air presented the greatest obstacle to automotive speed and economy was understood intuitively, if not scientifically since the dawn of the automobile. Putting it into practice was quite another story. Engineers, racers and entrepreneurs were lured by the potential for the profound gains aerodynamics offered. The efforts to do so yielded some of the more remarkable cars ever made, even if they challenged the aesthetic assumptions of their times. We’ve finally arrived at the place where a highly aerodynamic car like the Prius is mainstream. But getting there was not without turbulence. (Read More…)
By
Paul Niedermeyer on February 8, 2010

In honor of our greatest president’s birthday this Friday, it’s going to be Lincoln Week at Curbside Classic. We’ll start with a brief history of the brand to set us up for the sixties, when our featured cars begin. (Read More…)
Recent Comments
gearhead77 - Sorry, poor choice of words or maybe I’m thinking of the wrong debacle. There’s been so many recently, real or imagined. Just saying that there are some...
TR4 - I suspect it was required as part of a dry sump oiling system. Presumably when they started laying the Offy down on its...
E46M3_333 - Making batteries requires a huge investment in capital equipment and hard automation for production. If you don’t have the demand, the machines...
suspekt - Surely Honda must be the envy of the automotive world with respect to this bold venture. I would venture to say that Toyota is the only other automotive brand that could...
tjh8402 - @ gearhead 77: how many of those Phenoms are operated by charter or fractionals? Both Phenom 100 and 300 have become the darlings of many of the larger fleet buyers. That...
alluster - “But my mind says the numbers and cost don’t add up to a long term viable business.” You are correct. The number of people who can...
jpolicke - I’ll wait for the C789 batteries. Then for sure they’ll be good.
bumpy ii - The drivetrain loss comes from having an extra set of axles, driveshafts, and differentials to spin around, since you don’t get locking hubs or a...
DC Bruce - If you can believe the Consumer Reports reports, so far, Ford’s 4s are underwhelming in terms of both fuel economy and performance. And there’s...
mr_muttonchops - They’ve saving that for the 2.5 Series Gran Coupe!