By on June 24, 2013

Picture courtesy MyFolderz

When Jeep introduced the new-for-2014 Cherokee, the cute-ute’s polarizing styling, Eurotrash underpinnings, and front-wheel-drive base configuration immediately sent the autoblogosphere into a violent tizzy. Much of the criticism seemed to be engendered by the use of the name “Cherokee”, which is associated in the name of the average Jeep fan with the time-tested, AMC-era XJ Cherokee. (It should be noted, however, that Jalopnik has already decided the new Cherokee is superior to the old one.) Had Chrysler used the name “Liberty”, which is primarily associated with dorky-looking uranium-dense crapwagons leaking oil in traffic, or “Patriot”, which is primarily associated with the Dodge Caliber, much of the initial agitation might not have happened.

That’s all car-geek inside baseball, however. In the real world, meaning Manhattan, what really matters isn’t crawl ratio or wind noise or durability — it’s identity-based politics. It’s a surprise, then, that the New York Times has taken this long to uncover the critical feature of the new small Jeep: it’s all racist and whatnot.

(Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • ClutchCarGo: As an old white person I’m not feeling that important.
  • peeryog: The Jeep Grand Wagoneer in “The Great Outdoors” with John Candy
  • ajla: Car and Driver got 8.3 on the 2.0T and 7.6 on the 3.5L. caranddriver.com/reviews/20...
  • ClutchCarGo: “At the end of the day, Trump’s a businessman, and he’s got to be listening to business people who are...
  • brn: Automobile Catalog says 7.2 seconds. They tend to be on the optimistic side, but it’s not as slow as the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States