By on December 5, 2013

16 - 1988 Dodge Colt Down on the Junkyard - Picture Courtesy of Murilee MartinWe see the occasional Colt hatchback in this series— say, this ’84 Plymouth Colt Turbo or this ’88 Dodge Colt hatchback— but the Colt sedan is stop-the-presses rare by Junkyard Find standards. Chrysler called this car the Premier, and it’s full of unusual-for-a-badge-engineered-econobox options. (Read More…)

By on April 24, 2013

Unless there’s a super-rare find that requires immediate action or it’s half-price day, I usually avoid hitting Denver junkyards when it’s snowing and/or below freezing out. Thanks to the magic of high altitude, it feels more like December than late April here… but checking the online inventory at my local self-service yard revealed a potential engine-donor for my ’41 Plymouth project. Disregard the snow, pack up the tools! (Read More…)

By on February 7, 2012

Turbocharging was big when the 80s began, and nobody liked turbocharging better by mid-decade than Chrysler, Mitsubishi, and Chrysler/Mitsubishi. Turbo Cordias, Turbo Omnis, Turbo K-cars, Turbo Starions and, of course, the various Chryslerized flavors of the Turbo Mitsubishi Mirage. I’d forgotten about the Plymouth-badged Turbo Colts, but then I found this low-mile example awaiting its date with The Crusher in a California self-service wrecking yard. (Read More…)

By on August 8, 2011


Chrysler spent a couple of decades selling Mitsubishis and Simcas with Dodge and Plymouth badges in North America, and the Mitsubishi Galant/Lancer-based Colt line went through the most twists and turns. At first, Plymouth-branded Colts were sold as Champs, but by the mid-1980s both the Dodge and Plymouth versions were called Colts. The difference? Damn if I can find one that goes deeper than emblems. (Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • Re: 2016 Ford Taurus Limited Review

    bball40dtw - Get the Flex Ecoboost instead. It’s better in every way except for ground clearance and “looking like a Land Rover”. People seem to love the...
  • Re: 2016 Ford Taurus Limited Review

    zip89105 - That’s disappointing. Makes me glad I bought a 2016 Fusion solely because they cost less. Ford is discontinuing this car, so many will be happy.
  • Re: 2016 Ford Taurus Limited Review

    bball40dtw - Might as well just step up to the MKS used.
  • Re: 2016 Ford Taurus Limited Review

    CoreyDL - The Explorer is not a good “value” any way you slice it, and not really a great car for the money either.
  • Re: 2016 Ford Taurus Limited Review

    bball40dtw - Mark isn’t a Ford loyalist. He bought the Fiesta because he likes small cars with manual transmissions and got a screaming deal. Also, despite what you...
  • Re: 2016 Ford Taurus Limited Review

    CoreyDL - Good for him, maybe this one is the right one.
  • Re: 2016 Ford Taurus Limited Review

    PrincipalDan - Now that the W-body has been replaced by the current Super Epsilon Impala, the Taurus is now the car for Americans who “purchase by the pound.”...
  • Re: 2016 Ford Taurus Limited Review

    CoreyDL - I really question the interior longevity of current VW products. I feel like they’re gonna be ratty pretty quickly.
  • Re: 2016 Ford Taurus Limited Review

    madman2k - We are thinking about getting an Explorer in about a year. I want one with the 4WD option and was considering this V6. The power numbers sound like it would be...
  • Re: 2016 Ford Taurus Limited Review

    ajla - I really wouldn’t expect a V8. Once FCA drops the 5.7L and Genesis drops the 5.0L, I’m thinking SRT will be the only four door under $60K to offer a V8....

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Bark M., United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic

Get No-holds-barred, take-no-prisoners Automotive News in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked