By on May 9, 2012

Class Counsel are correct in asserting that Peters’ demand for access to the fruits of discovery as actually a thinly disguised effort to use the discovered material to assist Peters in ‘begin[ning] a cottage industry of representing consumers or selling her $15 CD to them’.

Whoa, that’s a convoluted sentence, courtesy of the judge who mediated the settlement in the Honda Civic Hybrid class-action case. However, it more or less reflects the sentiments of the appeals court which just ruled Honda’s appeal of the $9,867 small-claims settlement granted to attorney and Civic owner Heather Peters. What does it mean? Click the jump for a helpful graphic.

(Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • jimble: The Holy Donut is truly the Holy Grail of donuts.
  • akear: It is strange that Cadillac get the best reviews and awards among American cars and finishes last here. The...
  • Philosophil: I hope Volvo’s low score is from their newer models as i’m about to pull the trigger on a 2016 XC70 (AWD...
  • akear: I guess the reason GM filled a lot of its North American design positions with Australians was out of sympathy.
  • gtemnykh: Your gen 1 was an automatic I assume? Our ’07 base manual regularly got summer tanks in the mid 30s,...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States