A 2000 Ford Mustang GT is not exactly a car that I would like to call a second home.
It’s a tad claustrophobic. The plastics are borderline industrial grade. And the Ford 4.6 Liter Modular V8 is not especially known for offering the level of fuel efficency needed to make this car a long-term money saver.
Thankfully, this vehicle was quickly disqualified thanks to a Carfax that showed it only had 123k miles back in 2010.
300k a year? Two years in a row? I think not!


Recent Comments
Lie2me - With your imagery as contrasting as the red leather piping, I could all but hear “God Save The Queen” emanating from the Lexicon...
WaftableTorque - Good to know. My 2002 LS430 has been quite reliable, but its not a cheap car to maintain. My biggest maintenance expenses were a laser cruise control...
Scoutdude - Yet they spent a bunch of money to develop an all new Ranger, though they chose to not offer it in the US, to protect the F150′s #1 spot. Of course...
Kyree S. Williams - My main issue with these Rolls-Royces is that they are only preservable because of the fact that they are infrequently driven. Most...
Derek Kreindler - Geozinger, I did a review of one late in 2012…
Derek Kreindler - I couldn’t remember if it was you who wrote the great comment on start-stop or not, but I had you in mind when I wrote it. Now that I’ve...
Scoutdude - They are definitely relying heavily on trucks but they aren’t doing that bad in other segments. The Econoline, Escape, Explorer, and Fiesta are...
Power6 - Don’t really know what to say. This site is great but there it is always headed up by some unstable individual, might be that low...
Derek Kreindler - 4th grade? Good god, I thought I was young…
Kyree S. Williams - In my opinion, this car is still wrought with some of the convoluted elements that were present in 2003-era BMW design, but it’s...