Dave writes:
Hello Sajeev,
I just bought a 2000 Saturn LW1 6 weeks ago. It has a L4 2.2 Liter engine with 200,000 miles on it. After 3 weeks out of the country I came back and started it up. Was a little rough then smoothed out. I just changed parking spots. Did this one more time. The third time starting it up it would not fire. No strange noises, just no running engine. I suspected bad ignition coil. I had just changed the spark plugs before my trip and they had about 50 miles on them. Ignition coil was fine at all four points using a ignition tester. I even put new plugs in again. Fuel rail has the specified 60 PSI. Theorizing that may the fuel injectors were shut down i tried starter spray in the air intake. The motor will not fire. A compression test with a gauge picked up at advance gave me less than 10 PSI on the two outer cylinders and about 24 on the two inner. The Haynes manual is very unhelpful and only states for compression specs. that the lowest compression cylinder value should be no less that 70% of the highest compression cylinder value.
I read on-line (http://www.saturnfans.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1781795) the same but that no cylinder should be less than 100 PSI. While cranking the engine there was some light smoke visible behind the engine above the exhaust manifold, but unable to determine the source.
My question is: are you aware of catastrophic head gasket failures on these engines? I am surprised that the engine will not fire at all even if the head gasket does have a problem. I have removed the valve cover and see that the timing chain is still there and working.
When I changed the plugs last month I applied anti-seize thread sealant to the plugs as instructed in the manual. I am now having wild imaginings that the anti-seize thread sealant got into the cylinders and impregnated the gasket and is somehow responsible for this catastrophic failure. I am going to tear into the engine tomorrow and try to replace the head gasket, because i need to get this car running again ASAP. I am being hopeful and unrealistically optimistic that I cold get some input/ thoughts from you before morning when I start this laborious task…
Ideas? (Read More…)



Recent Comments
RobertRyan - @ScoutDude “They are definitely relying heavily on trucks but they aren’t doing that bad in other segments. The Econoline, Escape, Explorer, and...
Lie2me - With your imagery as contrasting as the red leather piping, I could all but hear “God Save The Queen” emanating from the Lexicon...
WaftableTorque - Good to know. My 2002 LS430 has been quite reliable, but its not a cheap car to maintain. My biggest maintenance expenses were a laser cruise control...
Scoutdude - Yet they spent a bunch of money to develop an all new Ranger, though they chose to not offer it in the US, to protect the F150′s #1 spot. Of course...
Kyree S. Williams - My main issue with these Rolls-Royces is that they are only preservable because of the fact that they are infrequently driven. Most...
Derek Kreindler - Geozinger, I did a review of one late in 2012…
Derek Kreindler - I couldn’t remember if it was you who wrote the great comment on start-stop or not, but I had you in mind when I wrote it. Now that I’ve...
Scoutdude - They are definitely relying heavily on trucks but they aren’t doing that bad in other segments. The Econoline, Escape, Explorer, and Fiesta are...
Power6 - Don’t really know what to say. This site is great but there it is always headed up by some unstable individual, might be that low...
Derek Kreindler - 4th grade? Good god, I thought I was young…