<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Truth About Cars &#187; F10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/tag/f10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:06:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.7" -->
	<itunes:summary>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>The Truth About Cars</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/cropped-mirror.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>The Truth About Cars</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>editors@ttac.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>editors@ttac.com (The Truth About Cars)</managingEditor>
	<copyright>2006-2009</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>The Truth About Cars</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics" />
	<itunes:category text="Games &amp; Hobbies">
		<itunes:category text="Automotive" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture" />
		<item>
		<title>Look At, But Don&#8217;t Talk To, The New BMW M5 (F10)</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/06/look-at-but-dont-talk-to-the-new-bmw-m5-f10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/06/look-at-but-dont-talk-to-the-new-bmw-m5-f10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3WTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enthusiasm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=399009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BMW F10 M5 has been shot at the Nürburgring, shown as a &#8220;concept,&#8221; and has generally been exposed to expectant fans the world over. But even as it was caught prepping for US market duty in Southern California, the name of the game was &#8220;look but don&#8217;t talk.&#8221; We&#8217;ve discussed the anti-social tendencies of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><object width="560" height="349"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OrbAgy0y3T4?version=3&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OrbAgy0y3T4?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="349" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>The BMW F10 M5 has been shot at the Nürburgring, <a href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/04/shanghai-auto-show-the-very-much-tinted-m5-concept/">shown as a &#8220;concept,&#8221;</a> and has generally been exposed to expectant fans the world over. But even as it was caught prepping for US market duty in Southern California, the name of the game was &#8220;look but don&#8217;t talk.&#8221; We&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/03/stump-the-best-and-brightest-whats-wrong-with-this-explorer/">discussed</a> the anti-social tendencies of test mule drivers before, but for some reason it always seems to surprise the folks who come across a mule on the road. On the other hand, if you saw a brand-new M5 on the road with private plates, would you expect the driver to give you the time of day? I thought not.</p>

<a href='' title='f10m55'><img width="75" height="50" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/06/f10m55-75x50.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="f10m55" /></a>
<a href='' title='f10m57'><img width="75" height="50" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/06/f10m57-75x50.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="f10m57" /></a>
<a href='' title='f10m52'><img width="75" height="50" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/06/f10m52-75x50.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="f10m52" /></a>
<a href='' title='f10m56'><img width="75" height="50" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/06/f10m56-75x50.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="f10m56" /></a>
<a href='' title='f10m5'><img width="75" height="50" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/06/f10m5-75x50.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="f10m5" /></a>
<a href='' title='f10m58'><img width="75" height="50" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/06/f10m58-75x50.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="f10m58" /></a>
<a href='' title='f10m51'><img width="75" height="50" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/06/f10m51-75x50.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="f10m51" /></a>
<a href='' title='f10m59'><img width="75" height="50" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/06/f10m59-75x50.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="f10m59" /></a>
<a href='' title='f10m53'><img width="75" height="50" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/06/f10m53-75x50.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="f10m53" /></a>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/06/look-at-but-dont-talk-to-the-new-bmw-m5-f10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: 2011 BMW 5 Series (535i and 550i)</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/review-2011-bmw-5-series-535i-and-550i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/review-2011-bmw-5-series-535i-and-550i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Karesh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5-Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[535i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[550i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road Test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=362499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the 1980s, BMW was all about the compact, performance-oriented 3-Series. They also offered the 5 and 7, but these were greatly outsold by competing Mercedes. Seeking to expand well beyond its driving enthusiast base, BMW made its cars ever more stylish, luxurious, and laden with technology. Despite mixed reactions to the Bangled exteriors [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8631.jpg" rel="lightbox[362499]" title="100_8631"><img class="size-large wp-image-362504 aligncenter" style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;" title="100_8631" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8631-1024x768.jpg" alt="" width="614" height="461" /></a></p>
<p>Back in the 1980s, BMW was  all about the compact, performance-oriented 3-Series. They also offered  the 5 and 7, but these were greatly outsold by competing Mercedes. Seeking  to expand well beyond its driving enthusiast base, BMW made its cars  ever more stylish, luxurious, and laden with technology. Despite mixed  reactions to the Bangled exteriors and iDrive, sales of the larger sedans  grew even faster than their curb weights, and in recent years they have  often outsold the E-Class and S-Class. A redesigned 2011 5-Series recently  arrived at dealers. With the new car, has BMW further lost the plot,  or rediscovered it?</p>
<p><span id="more-362499"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8607.jpg" rel="lightbox[362499]" title="100_8607"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-362518" style="margin: 10px;" title="100_8607" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8607-466x350.jpg" alt="" width="373" height="280" /></a>With the new 5 and 7 BMW has  returned to its old formula of “same timelessly styled sausage, different  lengths.” The new F10 BMW 5-Series looks much like the F01 7-Series,  only a size smaller. Which is still considerably larger than the previous  generation (E60) 5-Series: the wheelbase has grown by three inches (bringing  it within an inch of the E65 7-Series), the length by two, and the curb  weight by about 400 pounds.</p>
<p>The styling of the previous  generation (E60) 5-Series certainly had its critics, but I was not among  them. It was the best of the Bangle-era designs. When fitted with the  right wheels, it possessed a bold stance and aggressive edginess that  the new cleaned-up 5 lacks. Looking at the new 550i fitted with the  Sport Package, I kept wondering if it really had this package, for it  doesn’t modify the lower body styling and its frilly 15-spoke alloys  appear less sporty than the standard 18s. <a href="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8626.jpg" rel="lightbox[362499]" title="100_8626"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-362503" style="margin: 10px;" title="100_8626" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8626-466x350.jpg" alt="" width="373" height="280" /></a></p>
<p>The new 5’s interior styling  has been similarly refined. The nav screen, though enlarged, is much  more cleanly integrated into the instrument panel. A wider, shorter  center stack angled six degrees towards the driver visually connects  the instrument panel with the center console rather than visually separating  the two. The new interiors still aren’t as driver-focused as those  in classic BMWs, but they’re a definite step in the right direction.  The main aesthetic fault: even more than the exteriors, the interiors’  designs are very conservative, and provide little visual excitement.  Major gains have been made in ergonomics and usability. There are more  buttons, so the much-improved iDrive doesn’t have to be used for as  many things, but these buttons are logically grouped and located.</p>
<p>The standard driver’s seat in the 5 is serviceable for those who won’t be taking corners quickly. But the optional “comfort seats” included in the Sport Package are both much more comfortable and much more <a href="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8612.jpg" rel="lightbox[362499]" title="100_8612"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-362521" style="margin: 10px;" title="100_8612" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8612-466x350.jpg" alt="" width="373" height="280" /></a>supportive in aggressive driving. They’re a must. One puzzling deletion: the comfort seats have lost their power-adjustable side bolsters in the new 5-Series. Apparently these are more needed for aggressive cornering in the 750Li, where they&#8217;re still included?</p>
<p>The specs suggest that the  new 5-Series is about the same size inside as the old one. But, relative  to the driver, the instrument panel is farther away, and so provides  the impression of a larger car. A fan of compact cars, I prefer the  cozier driving position of the E60. The rear seat remains sufficiently  roomy and comfortable for adults, but the view forward is more constricted.  The largest dimensional change with the new 5: cargo volume has grown  by a substantial 4.4 cubic feet, to 18.4. This is a bit more than in  the 7, and up with the best in the segment.</p>
<p>The BMW 535i continues to be  powered by a 3.0-liter turbocharged inline six officially rated for  300 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque. But not by the same 300-horsepower  3.0-liter turbocharged inline six as last year’s car. In another strike  by the bean counters, one of the turbos has been deleted, though that  remaining is a twin-scroll design. I haven’t driven the old car recently,  but at low rpm the new engine seems to have more lag and more of a boosted  feel. Get on then off the throttle in casual driving, and the new engine  is a <a href="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8622.jpg" rel="lightbox[362499]" title="100_8622"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-362501" style="margin: 10px;" title="100_8622" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8622-466x350.jpg" alt="" width="373" height="280" /></a>noticeable split-second behind in both directions. From 3,000 rpm  on up, though, power delivery is seamless. Even aided by a new eight-speed  automatic, a gain of two ratios, acceleration doesn’t feel quite as  strong as before. Credit here likely goes to the gain of 400 pounds  rather than the loss of one turbo. A very quick car nevertheless.</p>
<p>With the E60, the 535’s twin-turbo  six felt nearly as strong as the 550’s naturally-aspirated eight.  What it couldn’t approach: the sound of the eight. For the F10, the  V8 has lost 400 cc of displacement but has gained a pair of turbos to  yield 400 horsepower and—even more noteworthy—450 pound-feet of  torque. Acceleration ranges from effortless to astounding, depending  on how deeply you plant the pedal. The 535i is plenty quick, but its  engine is clearly working harder, and its boost builds less transparently.  The traditional advantage of a V12 over a V8 has become the advantage  of a twin-turbocharged V8 over a turbocharged six. Lost from the old  550: the turbocharged eight sounds relatively ordinary.</p>
<p><a href="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8610.jpg" rel="lightbox[362499]" title="100_8610"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-362520" style="margin: 10px;" title="100_8610" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8610-466x350.jpg" alt="" width="373" height="280" /></a>BMW deserves credit for continuing  to offer a six-speed manual with both engines in the 5. Sadly, both  of the cars I drove had smooth-shifting eight-speed automatics. The  550i had handy paddle shifters, but the shift lever summoned up quick  shifts just as well in the 535i.</p>
<p>Even Hyundai can offer a quick  luxury sedan these days. BMW’s key advantage has always been handling.  At the event I attended, a Mercedes E350 was provided for comparison  purposes. Its steering was far too light and vague, and its standard  suspension permitted too much lean in turns and generally lacked composure.  The optional sport suspension would have helped the handling, but not  the steering. BMW didn’t have to stack the deck, but did anyway. In  BMW’s defense, the 535i on hand also lacked an optional sport suspension.  Even so un-optioned, the BMW handled with far superior precision and  control. The electric power steering, a first for this segment, is on  the light side, but is still much better <a href="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8606.jpg" rel="lightbox[362499]" title="100_8606"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-362517" style="margin: 10px;" title="100_8606" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8606-466x350.jpg" alt="" width="373" height="280" /></a>weighted and more communicative  than the system in the Benz. Between the chassis and the steering, you  can delicately place the BMW exactly where you want it. Driving the  car along a winding road involved little guesswork. As with other BMWs  past and present, the car readily seems a tightly integrated extension  of the driver.</p>
<p>This said, anyone who cares  about driving will want the Sport Package, and perhaps also the Dynamic  Handling Package. I say “perhaps,” because I drove no car with the  former’s sport suspension but without the latter’s adaptive shocks  (new to the 5) and active stabilizer bars. With these two packages,  the midsize BMW feels tighter, if still not tight, quicker to respond,  and even more precise. Conveniently located buttons can be used to vary  the suspension, steering, transmission, and throttle programming between  “Comfort,” “Normal,” “ Sport,” and “Sport+,” the last  of which disables the stability control. Want some throttle-induced oversteer? Done. Even with the torquetastic rear-wheel-drive 550i, oversteer  comes on gradually and proved very easy to modulate even with the stability  control off.</p>
<p><a href="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8608.jpg" rel="lightbox[362499]" title="100_8608"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-362519" style="margin: 10px;" title="100_8608" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/100_8608-466x350.jpg" alt="" width="373" height="280" /></a>Oddly, the ride felt the same  to me in every setting, and much smoother than in past sport suspended  5ers. Noise levels are all fairly low, if not the lowest. All is not  better, though. From the driver’s seat the new 5 feels larger and  heavier than the old one. Which shouldn’t come as a surprise, because  it is larger and heavier, and (as noted above) the driving position  is that of a larger car. The new 5 doesn’t as evenly split the difference  between the 3 and the 7. It’s more 7, less 3.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Even though the Bangle-era  cars were very successful, BMW clearly attended to critics when designing  the new 5-Series. The styling is cleaner, the ergonomics are much improved,  and the chassis is more refined. No great leap forward has been attempted  this time around, and the car is better in virtually every way as a  result. By nearly any objective measure, these are excellent cars. So  why didn’t I enjoy looking at them or driving them more? Somehow,  when BMW ticked off the boxes of items in need of improvement, enjoyment  wasn’t in the list. They’ve rediscovered the plot, but in letter  rather than spirit.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Vehicles for this review were provided by a dealer-hosted Ultimate Driving Experience</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Michael Karesh owns and operates <a href="http://www.truedelta.com">TrueDelta</a>, an online source of automotive pricing and reliability data</em></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/08/review-2011-bmw-5-series-535i-and-550i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Curbside Classic: The Ugliest Car Ever? 1977 Datsun F-10</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/01/curbside-classic-the-ugliest-car-ever-1977-datsun-f-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/01/curbside-classic-the-ugliest-car-ever-1977-datsun-f-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Niedermeyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curbside Classics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curbside Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Datsun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=341174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After two beautiful coupes this week, it&#8217;s time to get ugly. Seriously ugly, as in a serious contender for the ugliest car ever sold in the US. Yes, there&#8217;s competition for that title, one of which we&#8217;ve covered (Gremlin), and others we will soon. But let&#8217;s behold this Datsun F-10 Coupe, for which I am [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-341183" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/01/CC-50-070-800.jpg" alt="a load of ugly coming your way" width="560" height="407" /></p>
<p>After <a href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/curbside-classic-jaguar-xj-c-v12-coupe/">two</a> <a href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/curbside-classic-the-most-beautiful-pontiac-ever-1969-gran-prix/">beautiful</a> coupes this week, it&#8217;s time to get ugly. Seriously ugly, as in a serious contender for the ugliest car ever sold in the US. Yes, there&#8217;s competition for that title, one of which we&#8217;ve covered (<a href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/curbside-classic-1971-small-cars-comparison-number-6-amc-gremlin/">Gremlin</a>), and others we will soon. But let&#8217;s behold this Datsun F-10 Coupe, for which I am thankful that one is still around. It&#8217;s driver bought it new in 1977, and she&#8217;s still in love with her beautiful baby. Which raises the question: is ugliness in the eye of the beholder?<span id="more-341174"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-341184" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/01/CC-50-066-800.jpg" alt="which is worse, front or back?" width="560" height="384" /></p>
<p>There has to be some truth to that, because some folk&#8217;s idea of ugly cars is so totally off base.<a href="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/08/0824_uglycars/index_01.htm"> Business Week </a>recently carried a list of ten ugliest cars ever, and it included (get your meds ready): the <a href="http://www.kitfoster.com/images/2006-8-16_60CorvairWeb-Large.jpg" rel="lightbox[341174]">Corvair</a>(!), one of the most influential, revered and copied designs ever in the history of modern automobiles! They also listed the Vega, which was rather cute and well done, despite its other flaws. Just goes to show there&#8217;s no accounting for taste.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-341185" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/01/CC-50-074-800.jpg" alt="CC 50 074 800" width="560" height="420" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how quickly a car company can fall off the pedestal. The <a href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/curbside-classic-1970-datsun-510-bluebird1600/">Datsun 510</a> was hailed (still is) as a landmark in clean, timeless design, from a country that at the time was still finding its way stylistically. But only two years after the 510 arrived, Datsun was already going down a very different path stylistically. It started with the <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/da/Datsun_Cherry_First_iteration_Kent.jpg/250px-Datsun_Cherry_First_iteration_Kent.jpg" rel="lightbox[341174]">1970 Cherry</a>, the predecessor to this F-10. You can see two things going on in Nissan&#8217;s first FWD car, and one of the first from Japan. Its back half accurately predicts the very successful <a href="http://www.carsandtuning.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/datsun-240z_2.jpg" rel="lightbox[341174]">240 Z</a> but the front half is already going down the ugly road towards the F-10.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-341186" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/01/CC-50-077-800.jpg" alt="CC 50 077 800" width="560" height="420" /></p>
<p>The <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1e/Datsun_Cherry_Coupe_1975.jpg" rel="lightbox[341174]">Coupe version</a> of the first Cherry then adds a very high and bulbous rear end, and now the ingredients are largely in place. But what really makes the F-10 bad are the front and rear end details: the front looks like the designers went home one night, and the janitors cobbled something up out of junk and by beating on itwith an ugly stick. It&#8217;s about as bad as a front end gets on a car, no doubt.</p>
<p>(Update) I now realize our featured coupe has non-original or different black trim around its headlights. Here&#8217;s a wagon (not my pic) of the un-adulterated F-10 front end:</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-341200" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/01/Datsun_F10_002.jpg" alt="wearing its proper eye make-up (not my photo)" width="560" height="420" /></p>
<p>And lacking any other inspiration, the designers decided to mirror the front on the back end, with over-sized tail lights and a general lack of design acumen. I don&#8217;t know what Nissan was feeding its designers at the time, but the F-10 wasn&#8217;t the only recipient of its effects. The <a href="http://www.joyunexpected.com/archives/4997-78DatsunB210GX.jpg" rel="lightbox[341174]">B210</a> was the RWD counterpart to the F-10, and it&#8217;s details are only slightly less ugly, but its proportions aren&#8217;t quite as bad. We&#8217;ve got some nice ones coming in a CC soon.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-341187" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/01/CC-50-072-800.jpg" alt="CC 50 072 800" width="560" height="420" /></p>
<p>My only regret is that I haven&#8217;t found an <a href="http://members.fortunecity.com/mang01/Nissan/images/F10.jpg" rel="lightbox[341174]">F-10 wagon</a>, so that we could debate which one was worse. I couldn&#8217;t even find a decent color picture of one. But I knew someone who had one for years, and like the owner of this F-10, she loved it for the reliable and economical little hauler that it was.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get back to automotive aesthetics. It&#8217;s a funny thing about ugly cars, because even the ugliest can become endearing, because of their intrinsic qualities. The <a href="http://getcandy.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/citroen-ami-6.jpg" rel="lightbox[341174]">Citroen Ami 6</a> falls in that category. It was ugly as hell, but it was also so advanced, unique and eccentric, that I would love to have one. In the case of the Citroen, it was obviously designed by engineers who placed function over looks in every regard. That&#8217;s somehow honest and endearing.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-341188" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/01/CC-50-069-800.jpg" alt="CC 50 069 800" width="560" height="391" /></p>
<p>What&#8217;s really ugly is when designers try too hard to make something good looking, and cluelessly step on their own member in the process. I give you the <a href="http://www.elmejorsegurodecoche.es/images/fotos_coches/Ssang%20Yong%20Rodius%20270%20Xdi%20Limited%20AWD.jpg" rel="lightbox[341174]">Ssangyong Rodius</a>, which sports a rear appendage of a hatch that looks like the ultimate bad photo-shop addition. Or the <a href="http://www.automedia.com/NewCarBuyersGuide/photos/2006/Cadillac/Escalade%20EXT/Pickup_Truck/2006_Cadillac_EscaladeEXT_ext_1.jpg" rel="lightbox[341174]">Cadillac Escalade EXT</a>, which is just a bad dream come true. The <a href="http://www.chooseyouritem.com/autos/photos/105000/105209.2000.Isuzu.VehiCROSS.jpg" rel="lightbox[341174]">Isuzu Vehicross</a> falls into that category quite handsomely. I see more than a hint of the F-10 in the Vehicross, if we can blank out the large wheels.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/01/CC-50-062-800.jpg" rel="lightbox[341174]"><img class="size-medium wp-image-341191 aligncenter" src="http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/01/CC-50-062-800-550x275.jpg" alt="CC 50 062 800" width="495" height="248" /></a></p>
<p>Much of aesthetics is context, and this is where the F-10 story gets interesting. As much as I like greenhouses with visibility, and can hold up the <a href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/curbside-classic-1978-vw-dasherpassat-diesel-b1/">VW Passat/Dasher</a> as an example of clean timeless 1970&#8242;s design, I also recognize that gun-slit windows may be here to stay, and the benefits of aerodynamic kamm-back tails are indisputable.  So as I sat looking at these pictures last night, I realized that from a side profile, the F-10 really is somewhat contemporary, and a prophet of things to come. Just blank out those ugly front and rear end details, and you&#8217;re looking at what could be a Prius coupe, circa 1975. Or even a predictor of things yet to come, like the<a href="http://www.zcars.com.au/images/honda-crz-concept51.jpg" rel="lightbox[341174]"> Honda CR-Z</a>. Have we uncovered the <a href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/porsche-panameras-design-inspiration-discovered/">design inspiration</a> of another new car?</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.curbsideclassic.com/">More new Curbside Classics here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/01/curbside-classic-the-ugliest-car-ever-1977-datsun-f-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
