By on April 25, 2012

A funny thing happened while reading the comments on Monday’s CTS-V coupe design study: I recalled that car design students are brands unto themselves, complete with perception gaps.  I was certainly a Yugo, no “gap” needed.  Others were solid BMWs, most of the time.  We had a few Ferraris, even if they performed like every other Corvette in class. And there’s the rub: just because a “Ferrari” makes something great looking, did they make the best concept in the class?  Is a flashy rendering really that great, if it will never make production without a truckload of compromise?

With that in mind, walk about 100 yards with me from our last case study. Behold: another radical GM coupe on the same lot.

As much as we all like the CTS-V coupe for merely existing, it is sorely lacking in ATD. (Attention To Detail)  If you want to rally around the General for making a coupe with brass balls and brilliant ATD, well, you could do much worse than the 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme. (Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • JerseyRon: Yes, I realized Doug posted this over 2 years ago so why comment now? I couldn’t help but be struck...
  • JohnTaurus: That’s a great point. People who don’t like or care whatsoever about cars still know the...
  • HotPotato: “The interesting thing is that the number 1 trade-in for almost all electric cars is a Prius – which...
  • JohnTaurus: Use google to search all of craigslist. Just type “site:craigslist.org cto” and then add...
  • JohnTaurus: Someone needs to put a quarter in the “just get snow tires/YOU DONT NEED AWD” jar....

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff