By on April 25, 2012

A funny thing happened while reading the comments on Monday’s CTS-V coupe design study: I recalled that car design students are brands unto themselves, complete with perception gaps.  I was certainly a Yugo, no “gap” needed.  Others were solid BMWs, most of the time.  We had a few Ferraris, even if they performed like every other Corvette in class. And there’s the rub: just because a “Ferrari” makes something great looking, did they make the best concept in the class?  Is a flashy rendering really that great, if it will never make production without a truckload of compromise?

With that in mind, walk about 100 yards with me from our last case study. Behold: another radical GM coupe on the same lot.

As much as we all like the CTS-V coupe for merely existing, it is sorely lacking in ATD. (Attention To Detail)  If you want to rally around the General for making a coupe with brass balls and brilliant ATD, well, you could do much worse than the 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme. (Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • speedlaw: Really. OK, I’m impressed with the output of a 2.0 liter turbo BMW, likewise the same in a Ford. Yes,...
  • Pig_Iron: Gonna miss your writing. You definitely had a different slant. It made my brain tilt. It is good mental...
  • Pig_Iron: Wishing Tim the very best. I really enjoyed his articles. Bon voyage. :-)
  • mdensch: Three of the photos accompanying the article were lifted from an article I posted on carsindepth.com two...
  • focus-ed: “best implementation of a moon roof” my a.. This is the only vehicle that offers the driver and...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States