Tag: Caliber

By on April 30, 2014

John writes:

Hi Sajeev,

I’ve had a 2009 Dodge Caliber SRT4 for a few years and it’s coming up to its first all-around brake job at 50,000 miles / 80,000 km (I drive like a granny). I work at a dealership (different brand) but can get parts at a bit of a discount. Still, OEM brakes + pads on this thing are $980+tax Canadian. From what I’ve seen I can get aftermarket ones for a quarter of that. One of the mechanics here suggests I put on OEM pads and aftermarket discs. (Read More…)

By on June 21, 2011

You’d think with an owner by the name of Fiat, Chrysler would  be knee-deep in small cars. Just the opposite is true. The Freep complains:

“Chrysler, for all of its recent improvements, is missing out on one of the biggest opportunities of the year: a chance to grab a larger slice of the small-car segment while Japanese automakers try to rebuild their car supplies after the March earthquake and tsunami that disrupted operations.”

(Read More…)

By on January 18, 2011

My friend Ash Sutcliffe of China Car Times reports that Chrysler will be bringing the Dodge Caliber to China, for production at the Guangzhou Auto / Fiat joint venture. (Read More…)

By on May 3, 2010

The AP [via Google] reports that NHTSA’s investigation of the pedals manufactured by CTS that were behind Toyota’s recent unintended acceleration recall has widened to include 2007 model-year Dodge Calibers. Dodge built 161,000 Calibers in the 2007 model-year, but according to Chrysler Group complaints of sticking accelerators only cover about 10,000 vehicles built between March and April of 2006… even though all 2007 model-year vehicles were built with CTS pedals. So what’s the difference between vehicles made in that five-week period and the rest of the 2007 model-year? According to Chrysler spokesfolks:

We have data that is telling us that there were a certain amount of complaints during that time period

(Read More…)

By on March 24, 2010

For a moment, turn away from the uncertain prospects of Chrysler’s Fiat-directed future and consider the subject of this review as nothing other than one entry in the popular five-door hatchback segment of the North American compact car market.

That’s what I had to do, anyway, in order to rationalize driving and writing about a vehicle that a lot of folks would justifiably consider to be a loser car from a loser car company. The question is, is it really?

(Read More…)

By on February 3, 2010

Today’s review of the Fiat Bravo is more than just a unique look at a European-market vehicle that will never be sold in the United States: it’s an(other) early look at the future of Chrysler. Sergio Marchionne has called the C and D segments “critical” for US-market success, and the C-Evo platform that lies beneath the Fiat Bravo tested today, will form the basis for planned 2012 replacements to the Caliber and PT Cruiser and possibly the re-launched Sebring and Avenger (reportedly in stretched form). Indeed, the Lancia-trimmed version, known as the Delta, was shown at the Detroit Auto Show in Chrysler-brand drag, apparently to prove how easy these rebadges will be. As cynical as this might seem, Mr Bronfer’s relatively positive review leaves little doubt that Fiat’s got more to offer the C and D segments than the aging, neglected Mitsubishi platform that currently underpins Chrysler’s offerings in these classes. In that sense, this is some of the most positive news we’ve heard about Chrysler’s future in a while.

Recent Comments

  • Re: Reader Review: 2002 Lexus SC430

    28-Cars-Later - Me too.
  • Re: Reader Review: 2002 Lexus SC430

    b787 - Does anybody make car buying decisions based on Jeremy Clarkson’s opinion? I love Top Gear, but its primary purpose is to entertain. They rank cars based on...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 1987 Hyundai Excel with Not-Rare-Enough Zero-Options Package

    outback_ute - I think you are right. “I can’t think of any vehicle manufacturer whose products improved as much and as...
  • Re: 2016 BMW X1 Review – The Un-BMW

    PeriSoft - “As I say whenever the whining starts about BMW losing the plot, people have been saying the EXACT same things ever since the e21 320i replaced the 2002...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2002 Lexus SC430

    PRNDLOL - The standard alloy wheels were and will always be horror show-ugly, this example thankfully isn’t sporting them. To me this will always be remembered as the...
  • Re: Full-size SUVs Aren’t Taking Part in the SUV Boom

    gtemnykh - I like having everything covered, and in particular the case of 2 parents+ 2 kids+ 2 dogs, having everyone inside is a plus. The...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2002 Lexus SC430

    JMII - Yeah it was typical TG silliness. There main take was they though the SC was some kind of sports car… and it wasn’t. My wife wants one of these very...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2002 Lexus SC430

    28-Cars-Later - I’d much rather have the Soarer SC but I would have the SC430 for the right price because I think it is a fine piece of engineering. However the SC430...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2002 Lexus SC430

    seth1065 - My neighbor bought one new in 03 I think, never had an issue with it, you could do much worse in a two seater vert, they are for people who live with their cars...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2002 Lexus SC430

    shaker - “Looking at the new LC500 shows how far they have fallen from their “relentless pursuit of perfection” — all the way down to just the relentless pursuit of...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Bark M., United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic

Get No-holds-barred, take-no-prisoners Automotive News in your Facebook Feed!

Already Liked