TTAC commentator educatordan writes:
I know this is an exercise in mental masturbation but I find myself thinking about it and perhaps the B&B with their extensive experience could shed some light on the subject. (Read More…)
TTAC commentator educatordan writes:
I know this is an exercise in mental masturbation but I find myself thinking about it and perhaps the B&B with their extensive experience could shed some light on the subject. (Read More…)

Do you think that cars have lost their soul? Nina Tortosa, General Motors aerodynamicist for the Voltec/E-Flex programs, says that cars look more and more alike because “we all have to abide by the same laws of physics. It doesn’t matter if we don’t like them,” Nina Tortosa told WardsAuto.
Mere mortals have to contend with two certainties – death and taxes. Car designers are faced with a third one: Cd, or the drag coefficient.
(Read More…)
[Note: A significantly expanded and updated version of this article is here]
For most of the fifties, sixties and into the early seventies, automotive aerodynamicists were mostly non-existent, or hiding in their wind tunnels. The original promise and enthusiasm of aerodynamics was discarded as just another style fad, and gave way to less functional styling gimmicks tacked unto ever larger bricks. But the energy crisis of 1974 suddenly put the lost science in the spotlight again. And although historic low oil prices temporarily put them on the back burner, as boxy SUVs crashed through the air, it appears safe to say that the slippery science has finally found its place in the forefront of automotive design. (Read More…)
This 1965 Falcon Futura first caught my eye, not the Prius. But seeing them jowl-to-cheek gave me a dramatic lesson in how far car aerodynamics have come. Well, at least in common everyday cars. The Tatra T77 of 1934 still has this Prius’ Cd of .25 handily beat. The Falcon? Who knows; probably around .50 or so. But this semi-fastback roof on the Falcon was the hot new thing when it came out on the 1963.5 Fords, specifically to help the big Galaxie on the high speed NASCAR tracks. (Read More…)
[Note: A significantly expanded and updated version of this article can be found here]
That air presented the greatest obstacle to automotive speed and economy was understood intuitively, if not scientifically since the dawn of the automobile. Putting it into practice was quite another story. Engineers, racers and entrepreneurs were lured by the potential for the profound gains aerodynamics offered. The efforts to do so yielded some of the more remarkable cars ever made, even if they challenged the aesthetic assumptions of their times. We’ve finally arrived at the place where a highly aerodynamic car like the Prius is mainstream. But getting there was not without turbulence. (Read More…)
Recent Comments
Lorenzo - That was Noah. He kicked the dinos off the ark when a T-Rex ate the unicorns.
onyxtape - I remember reading somewhere that the Roslyn BMW plant had the highest quality output in the entire company – even higher than its plants in Germany. When I...
-Nate - =8-) Thanx ~ I hadn’t thought of that . -Nate
ect - In 1913 (100 years ago) Canada and Argentina were at similar levels of development and GDP per capita. It was commonly understood that Argentina had better...
bigtruckseriesreview @ Youtube - :-(
NMGOM - sirwired…. Your comments are in quotes: “1) Because the energy density is so low, higher pressures (or volumes) are required...
ect - +1. The company I worked for thorugh most of the 90′s was a supplier to all of the D3. Chrysler’s renaissance after the departure of Iacocca was...
Onus - My friends mom had one of these in 4 cylinder form until 2 years ago. Freaking destroyed the thing. To her and my friend it was just a...
TW4 - Gasoline tax isn’t smart, either. The US is a widely dispersed population that relies heavily on labor mobility to...
Onus - Yup same transmission. The MTX-75. Its the 5 speed that still comes in the focus. It was designed for the mondeo if you believe...