The Truth About Cars » AC Cobra http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news. Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:58:35 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1 The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news. The Truth About Cars no The Truth About Cars editors@ttac.com editors@ttac.com (The Truth About Cars) 2006-2009 The Truth About Cars The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news. The Truth About Cars » AC Cobra http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/wp-content/themes/ttac-theme/images/logo.gif http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com Happy 50th Birthday, Shelby Cobra http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2012/04/happy-50th-birthday-shelby-cobra/ http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2012/04/happy-50th-birthday-shelby-cobra/#comments Sun, 01 Apr 2012 16:21:29 +0000 http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=437421

50 years ago, the Shelby Cobra made its debut at the New York Auto Show, spawning a rich legacy of American motorsport success, and rampant kit car clones. 

Jamie Kitman’s piece in the New York Times examines the Cobra’s genesis as one of the best examples of Anglo-American collaboration. The 1962 New York Auto Show saw the debut of the MKI Shelby Cobra, using the British AC Ace as a starting point. Out went the wimpy inline six, and in went a 260 c.i.d Ford V8, with a 289 c.i.d V8 following shortly after. Upgrades, both cosmetic and mechanical followed in the later years, – the 427-powered MKIII cars, with their big-block engines and flared bodywork, are the most well-loved, and often the basis for the ubiquitous kit cars that still survive to this day.

While motorsports greats like Dan Gurney, Phil Hill and Bob Bondurant helped propel the Cobra to motorsports success, Carroll Shelby’s marketing acumen was an even greater force for popularizing the car. The Cobra had a number of “product placement” gigs in Elvis films (such as Viva Las Vegas) and pop songs. It didn’t hurt that some of NASA astronauts also drove Shelby Cobras, helping put them front and center in the public’s eye.

Cobra production ended in 1967, with Carroll Shelby turning his attention to Shelby Mustangs and the Ford GT40 program. But the Cobra managed to survive in the hearts and minds of the public, and over the years, replicas, from third parties as well as Shelby American, have popped up in various forms. Some have been authorized by Carroll Shelby, while others have been the subject of frequent, well-publicized litigation.

The Shelby Cobra has managed to endure the test of time in a way that few cars have. Its shape, like that of the Citroen DS or the Datsun 240Z is at once a product of its time, but also avoids looking dated. A thriving kit-car industry (and a nearly endless supply of donor Mustangs) has ensured that new Cobras (regardless of provenance) hit the streets every year. Here’s to another 50 years of this audacious, belligerent trans-continental hybrid.

]]>
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2012/04/happy-50th-birthday-shelby-cobra/feed/ 23
The Cobra And The Cheetah: A Muscle Car Tale (Part Two) http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/09/the-cobra-and-the-cheetah-a-muscle-car-tale-part-two/ http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/09/the-cobra-and-the-cheetah-a-muscle-car-tale-part-two/#comments Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:43:56 +0000 http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=365071

Part One of this piece can be found here.

Were it not for an act of God, the fecklessness of General Motors’ executives and the difference between a self-promoting Texan and a Californian willing to walk away from it all, the many Cobras you see, real and ersatz, would be joined by another predator, Bill Thomas’ Cheetah.

Developed with backdoor assistance from Chevrolet, the Cheetah was the Chevy powered answer to the “Powered by Ford” Cobra. A racing Cheetah was given one of the first Gen IV big block 396 Chevy “rat” motors made. Based around Corvette drivetrain and suspension components, and a not very robust tube frame, the Cheetah was covered in a body that is unforgettable.

Though the Cheetah only competed in a small number of SCCA races, winning 11 events while simultaneously developing a reputation for extreme speed but treacherous handling (caused by the flimsy chassis), its drop dead gorgeous body styling made it instantly memorable. The fact that the Cheetah came out in the mid 1960s, when scale models and slot car racing were hugely popular with teen baby boomers, didn’t hurt the car’s popularity.

Don Edmunds, who later went on to build over 600 race cars, laid out the basic components and then sketched a coupe body around them. For good weight distribution, they used the front mid engine layout, with the entire engine behind the front axle line. Mid-engine cars were starting to become state of the art in racing, however the needed transaxles were expensive and fragile. Mounting the engine up front but as far back as possible kept the main mass inside the wheelbase, but allowed the use of conventional transmissions and rear ends. The Cheetah took this concept to the extreme. The front of the engine was a full two feet behind the front axle line, allowing Thomas and Edmunds to completely eliminate the driveshaft. The Muncie 4 speed’s output shaft was hooked directly to the U-Joint at the front of the differential. It made for outstanding weight distribution but also cramped seating and sometimes unbearable heat from the engine and transmission sitting right next to the driver. The foot box sat between the engine block and the headers, which exited out the side of the car.

With those proportions set, Edmunds drew a tight coupe body, with minimal overhangs and an extreme turn under. At first it looks like it could be a caricature of a sports car, a cartoon, but no, the car exists and runs. If it was a cartoon, it would, by the way, run on Adult Swim, not Nickelodeon. The Cheetah is sex on wheels.

[Author's note: The following should be viewed in the context of how TTAC got started. Robert Farago founded The Truth About Cars after he got fired from his newspaper gig for describing the front end of the Subaru Tribeca as looking like a vagina.]

The Jaguar E-Type’s long hood has often been described as phallic. The E-Type coupe’s teardrop passenger compartment adds a scrotal sack to the long hood’s phallus. Well if the E-Type is a phallic symbol, the Cheetah is a well endowed phallic symbol on Viagra. As with most sexy cars, there is also some femininity in the Cheetah’s shape as well. Some of those ’60s Ferraris are very sensually styled, but the Cheetah is the BSD of hot ’60s cars.

I don’t think the relationship between the Jaguar and the Cheetah looks are coincidental. Thomas did choose to name his car after a faster big cat than the jaguar, and the cars do share the same general profile.

The E-Type has a 96 inch wheelbase and is about 14.5 feet long. The Cheetah is a much shorter car. The wheelbase is 90 inches and the overall length just under 12 feet. Still the hood of the Cheetah looks even longer than that of the XKE.

One of the important dimensions car designers set when first drawing a car is the relationship between the front wheel and the base of the windshield. Because the Cheetah’s engine is so far back in the chassis relative to the front axle, the axle to cowl distance in the Cheetah is just about as long as that of the E Type, a much longer car (the E has a long hood because of the inline 6 cylinder engine). Though the Jaguar has a much longer front overhang and a front end that is measurably longer than the Cheetah’s, the visual effect of the Cheetah’s styling is that it looks stretched compared to the Jaguar. The cowl and passenger compartment look pushed back. The Cheetah is also girthier than the E Type. Track is about 8″ wider and overall width about 4.5″ wider. Keeping with the sexual imagery, the Cheetah’s front fender swells as it arcs over the wheels. Those fender swells, combined with the rear fender haunches, add a female flavor to the car’s shape, suggesting a bust and hips.

By the way, I’m sure that Edmunds and Thomas would have laughed at all this sex talk. They just built a cool looking car.

The Cheetah’s passenger compartment is more compact and than the E-Type’s. Unlike the E-Type, whose tires & wheels are somewhat obscured by bodywork, the Cheetah’s wheel openings are fully exposed, giving the car a more aggressive look.

Like the Shelby Daytona Coupe, there’s not a bad angle on the car. The shapes of the panels flow seamlessly into each other. Just about every shape of the car is sensuous. The panel that continues the cowl down the side of the car in front of the gull wing door is a work of art all by itself. Viewed from the front, the car is low, almost sinister looking, a predator crouching. From the side, the rear end looks coiled for action and the long hood evokes speed. In nature, cheetahs (and greyhounds) are fast because they have powerful thighs and long spines that allow them to extend long leaping strides.

While it wasn’t perfect, the Cheetah was visually arresting and stunningly fast.

The Cheetah’s shortcomings were mostly due to the fact that it was not really designed to go hunt Cobras. Though many accounts say that the Cheetah was specifically conceived by GM as a Cobra beater, it’s not clear that was really the case. Certainly, once its speed was obvious it was a logical choice to use to go racing with the Cobras. On Daytona’s high banks the Cheetah did 215 mph, so it was undeniably fast. On the other hand, the idea that GM management would pay a privateer to go racing against Fords at a time when Zora Duntov’s racing Corvettes weren’t exactly getting wholehearted support from the suits is dubious.

According to people close to him (later in life Thomas himself avoided speaking about Cheetah) Thomas’ original plan was to make money selling cars that were more fast boulevard cruisers than purpose built race cars. Though the factory did some developmental track testing and racing with Jerry Titus at the wheel, as well as a little bit of factory drag racing, almost all Cheetah racing was done by privateers.

The Cheetah came to be because Thomas wanted to do more business with Chevy. He already had a working relationship with some people at Chevrolet. He had raced a team of Corvettes and built special events vehicles with Bill Stroppe for Chevrolet marketing. Stroppe decided to concentrate on projects for Ford, so Thomas hooked up with Bill Edmunds and Don Borth to do the work for Chevy. To demonstrate what they could do, they built a 1962 Chevrolet sedan for Dan Gurney to drive in the inaugural USAC stock car race at Riverside (way back when, USAC had a series to compete with NASCAR). The car came in 1st and 2nd in the two heats, winning the overall, but USAC disqualified them for some chassis mods and Thomas decided to switch to sports car “specials” that could compete in the SCCA. The idea wasn’t to go racing, though, it was to make money selling the cars.

Thomas’ connections with Chevrolet meant a supply of the latest Corvette performance components. The Cheetah used ‘Vette steering knuckles up front, attached to some rather spindly looking tubular A arms that were fabricated in-house and were controlled by coilover shock absorbers. In the back, the stock Corvette suspension and rear end was used, with the Corvette’s transverse leaf spring was swapped in favor of coilover units. Disc brakes were in short supply, so the early Cheetah used heavy duty finned Chevy drums with sintered linings. Later, discs were fitted. The first three cars had fabricated aluminum body panels. After that, molds were pulled and the remaining cars were made of fiberglass.

This was around the time that Zora Duntov was working on the lightweight Grand Sport Corvettes, and part of Thomas’ back door cooperation with GM meant that Cheetah #1 was purchased by the automaker (some accounts say it was Cheetah #2) and shipped back to the Warren Tech Center. Duntov and his colleagues found that the car had outstanding grip on the skid pad, but that the frame was not torsionally rigid. Later, after the Cheetah was raced, teams would discover frame members displaced as much as 75mm after races and most would add stiffening triangulation and gussets to try to make their cars stiffer. The original frames used 1 1/8″ 4130 chromoly steel tubing with a 0.063″ wall thickness. That’s in a car that weighed 1700 lbs and had at least 400 HP. That tubing today would be considered unsafe for building a 1200 lb Lotus Seven replica. Most “Locosts” are built with 0.095″ tubing. The folks who build Se7ens with V8 power (yes, Virginia, there are LSx powered Se7ens) use inch and a half diameter tubing as well.

Customer cars sold for $7,500 to $12,000 in 1965 era dollars. A homologation run of 100 copies, to satisfy the SCCA, was planned.

Thomas, though, didn’t have good fortune like Carroll Shelby whose patron in Dearborn openly worked with racers. GM officially did not support racing, so Thomas’ continued supply of components was based on handshakes, personal relationships and stuff getting shipped out the back door. It was similar to the relationship Jim Hall and Hall Sharpe of Chaparral had with Chevrolet. Technology transfers went in both directions, but everyone had to keep quiet about it to keep the suits out of the loop so they wouldn’t shut it all down. Apparently Hall was better at the game. Perhaps because of the Chaparral team’s many innovations (including using a Powerglide based automatic transaxle) were proprietary, Hall’s secrecy was legendary. Hall wanted to win races. Thomas, though, wanted to sell cars. To sell cars you need publicity. Publicity can be a two edged sword. After an 8 page spread appeared on the Cheetah in Hot Rod magazine, GM executives, already skittish about backdoor sponsorship of racing, put the kibosh on supplying engines to Bill Thomas Race Cars. Not long afterwards, a fire at the Cheetah shop destroyed most of the tooling and molds. Only 23 Cheetahs were built, of which at least 8 survive. Thomas got out of the car business in 1969, started investing in real estate, and died in October of 2009.

As I said, though they didn’t build many Cheetahs, the car was popular and stuck in people’s minds. Some folks don’t want to drive just another Cobra replica, even if the replica can do sub 4 second 0-60 runs. It should come as no surprise that there are people who build Cheetah replicas too. After Bill Thomas got out of the business Dean Morrison bought the rights and some tooling for the Cheetah, and later sold them to Buford Everett in 1983. Everett’s family business continues to make Cobra replicas but it’s not clear how many Cheetahs they and Morrison produced.

Ruth Engineering & Racing, makes what they say is the first “streetable Cheetah” kit, with a properly engineered chassis and attention paid to isolating heat from the passenger compartment. You can buy a body kit for about $18K and an assembled rolling chassis that uses C4 Corvette components plus the body kit for $39,500. It may be streetable but first you’ll have to come up with your own interior and wiring harness. RER says that they can fit brackets for any Chevrolet V8 so if you want to use a SBC with Edelbrock heads and a big carb, a LT1, a LSx, or even an old school 396/454 big block rat motor, you can run your choice of bow tie engines.

Shell Valley Classic Wheels, which has been making Cobra and Jaguar replicas for 35 years, also offers a Cheetah replica kit for $19,995.

Kit Car magazine editor Ed Zinke used a Shell Valley Cheetah body in his continuing Ecocat project, a Cheetah powered by a GM Performance/Hahn Racecraft Turbo 2.2 Ecotec motor.

Carroll Shelby’s own continuation Cobras and his licensing deal with Superformance shows that while style is important some folks will pay extra for authenticity. It’s not just the value of the provenance of an authorized replica. Vintage racing has become serious business and if a manufacturer wants to be able to get competition approval, it’s best if they have the cooperation (and the original blueprints) of the vehicle’s originator.

Before Bill Thomas’ death he was fortunate to see the Cheetah reborn. In 2001 Robert Auxier was licensed by Thomas to recreate and sell the authorized “Bill Thomas Cheetah Continuation Turnkey Collectible” and the car is built and sold by Auxier’s company, BTM LLC of Arizona. For safety reasons, the continuation Cheetah is not an exact duplicate. Shortcomings with the frame and front suspension have been rectified, with thicker tubing and more stiffening members welded into the frame.

We’ve got better brakes and better tires on the continuation cars. We built the chassis 33 percent stronger and fixed the few weak points that we knew about, and it’s a bulletproof car now.”

Other than that, the car is identical to those built in 1964. Fixtures were built from measurements taken from an original frame, and molds were pulled from an original Bill Thomas built car. Even the interior is original design. Though Thomas had the original blueprints to help with the architecture of the Cheetah, the interior was not well documented. Fortunately one of the eight surviving original Cheetahs has an original interior, so that was copied.

The continuation Cheetah has already surpassed the success of the original, with Auxier reporting having sold 32 and delivered 30 cars by the end of 2009, at a price between $80,000 and $100,000 depending on engine and whether it’s for the street or track. The buyers are a mix of collectors and vintage racing enthusiasts.

Cars intended for racing get additional upgrades: more gusseting, more tubing, different suspension components, different shocks, an oil cooler, a better engine, better clutch, and a fuel cell/fire system. The continuation Cheetahs are already being raced in North American vintage racing and BTM LLC is working with the FIA to allow the new Cheetahs to be used in international competition. Auxier says that having Thomas as part of the project made the process much easier.

At the time of his death, Thomas had signed 100 certificates of authenticity for the continuation cars. It’s not clear what BTM will do should production reach 100. Considering how many Cobra replicas there are, it wouldn’t be terrible if BTM made a continuation of the continuation. Though GM stopped supplying engines the first time around, if you think about how the automakers have been working hard to market both current and vintage crate motors, this time I think that GM Performance will sell them all the engines they can use. I’ll take my Cheetah with a LS9 and a Tremec 6 speed.

]]>
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/09/the-cobra-and-the-cheetah-a-muscle-car-tale-part-two/feed/ 15
TVR Reborn As AC Cobra Scam Partner http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/04/tvr-reborn-as-ls-powered-ac-cobra-scam-synergy/ http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/04/tvr-reborn-as-ls-powered-ac-cobra-scam-synergy/#comments Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:39:39 +0000 http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=354582

TVR has never been a well-known brand in the United States, where its closest brush with fame was a cameo by a TVR Tuscan in the excrescent JohnTravolta vehicle Swordfish. In the UK, however, the TVR name is as rich in legend as Lotus or Morgan, speaking to a proud history of wild, hairy, fiberglass muscle cars with bizarre styling and even more bizarre handling characteristics. And like most blue-collar, British, backyard shed-based sportscar makers, TVR has not had an easy time of it lately. Having spent ruinous amounts developing an in-house V8 and a derivative straight-six engine under Peter Wheeler’s leadership in the 90s, the company fell on hard times and was bought in 2004 by 24 year-old Russian oligarchlet Alexander Smolensky. Despite promising to keep TVR British, Smolensky broke up the firm, kept the IP and brand rights, and reportedly moved production to Turin. Now, suddenly, Smolensky says he’s bringing TVR back, promising an appearance by an all-new Chevy LS-powered TVR at this summer’s Goodwood Festival of Speed. And yet TVR fans aren’t exactly falling all over themselves with glee… now why would that be?

For one thing, TVR was always a truly British company… so much so, in fact, that it was always a Blackpool company first and foremost. As one multiple TVR owner put it poignantly at Pistonheads:

TVR wasnt about making hairy arsed cars for me, it was my *home* making something that was famous worldwide and demanded respect from every other motor out there. It wasnt just knocked up by blokes in a shed, it was knocked up by blokes I knew, in a shed that was round the corner from my football club. There is a whole load of sentimental value locked up in that that probably is irrelevent to most other folks or doesnt make sense to everybody else, but to me…it means damn near the world.

And it’s not as if Smolensky is bringing production back to the sheds of Blackpool, either. According to an Autocar interview with TVR’s owner, production of the new convertible model will take place at Gullwing, a German kit-car maker. And then there’s the fact that the reborn TVR is ditching the old in-house, flat-crank AJP V8 and “Speed Six” engines in favor of an American crate engine, since confirmed by Smolensky to be Corvette-sourced. Everyone, from hard-core TVR-heads to car bloggers who once had the exquisite pleasure of being scared shitless by a passing Cerbera knows that, as good as the LSx engines are, they are no substitute for the sound made by a “proper” 90s TVRs. But, says Smolensky,

We looked at every engine available — including making our own — and decided that the Corvette was the most powerful off-the-shelf design going. Fitting it to our chassis allows us to meet all current regulations and is not too big a step.

And then there’s the price. Smolensky tells Pistonheads that the new TVR will cost upwards of $100k, while telling Autocar that

the new car “shouldn’t cost any more” than the European price of an equivalent Corvette.

The Corvette ZR1 costs just over $100k in the US, but retail for over $200k in Europe, so there’s no way of knowing whether its supercharged LS9 will be used in the forthcoming TVR. Besides, the Corvette engine is only a stepping-stone for TVR, as according to Smolensky, a hybrid TVR is being “considered.” And for all the wrong reasons. He explains:

I always wanted an automatic model, but the chassis wouldn’t allow either a regular auto or an automated manual. The hybrid concept would allow us to kick out the conventional gearbox completely.

But the real reason to pretend that TVR never stopped being dead has nothing to do with TVR heritage, or whether it can compete with its engine donor. The real news in the TVR revival story is the fact that it will be made by Gullwing. That firm also builds the AC Cobra MkVI for Alan Lubinsky’s AC Sports Cars, and the infamous Cobra-peddling-scamster is reported to be involved in the TVR revival. Having screwed over investors in Texas, Connecticut, and Malta, Lubinsky is reviving his scam with Gullwing in Germany… and it appears that the TVR brand is getting pulled in as well. For all we know, the TVR angle in all this is just so much bodywork, with the old TVR steel backbone frame residing under each car.

In any case, we don’t particularly want to find out. Sometimes it’s best for the dead to simply stay dead and live in memory. After all, there will always be someone else offering to sell you a $100k kit car.

]]>
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/04/tvr-reborn-as-ls-powered-ac-cobra-scam-synergy/feed/ 7
What’s Wrong With This Picture: AC Cobra Redux Edition http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/02/whats-wrong-with-this-picture-ac-cobra-redux-edition/ http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/02/whats-wrong-with-this-picture-ac-cobra-redux-edition/#comments Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:17:57 +0000 http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=346054

Other, more enthusiast-oriented blogs have already cooed approvingly at the Hennessey Venom, which is set to debut in the next several months. We take note of it only because of how familiar its formula is. Take a lightweight British roadster, slap in a fire-breathing American V8 (in this case, a 1,000 hp twin-turbo version of the Corvette ZR1′s mill), destroying the donor car’s immaculate balance and creating something that rates higher on the gee-whiz-ain’t-it-cool meter than on any remotely utilitarian measure. Sound familiar? If it doesn’t now, it might in a few decades, when Hennessey unsuccessfully attempts to sue enthusiasts who build replicas of its entirely unoriginal supercar.

]]>
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/02/whats-wrong-with-this-picture-ac-cobra-redux-edition/feed/ 20