By on April 23, 2011

Last week we discussed a rumor that suggested the new 2013 Malibu’s rear legroom might be compromised as a result of its redesign, and in the original post I included the official manufacturer numbers for rear legroom in the “big six” midsize sedans. This led to an interesting discussion in our comments section, and the comparison apparently caught the attention of at least one boss of a global automaker’s US operations. This exec (who has admitted to being a daily TTAC reader), wrote in to point out that there are two different SAE standards for measuring rear legroom, the L33 “Effective legroom” test, in which the front seat is placed at the appropriate distance for a driver in the 95 percentile of height, and the L34 “Maximum driver legroom” test, in which the front seat is placed all the way before measuring. As a result of our conversation, I thought I’d share a comparison of the six best-selling D-segment sedans using a different (and hopefully less-confusing) metric: combined legroom. You can move the seat, but you can’t run away from this metric…

(Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • Ryoku75: No problemo, I was just putting that out there for the site maintenance folk to see. I suppose I deserve it...
  • brandloyalty: People are happy to pay more for cuv’s out of respect for the backs of the assembly line workers...
  • brandloyalty: I’ve found recently that if I have more than one ttac tab or window open, logging on will fail. I...
  • AVT: To me, this car died when they renamed it the q70 and dropped the fx50. I really liked the original generation...
  • I_like_stuff: Am I supposed to hate Tesla more now that it has 1500 options?

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff