By on April 29, 2013

There’s a “problem” with the modern performance variant: they are too easy to review. You see, dropping a high-horsepower V8 into anything makes it good. Take the last generation Chrysler 300 SRT8. It’s interior was made from plastics rejected by Lego and Rubbermaid and you’d be hard pressed to tell it apart from the $9.99 rent-a-car special. The big difference with the SRT versions was that Chrysler stuffed a 425HP 6.1L V8 under the hood and a set of pipes that made the 300 sound like sex. The uncomfortable seats, crappy dash plastics and 1990s stereo were distant memories. If Chrysler had managed to fit the same V8 into the Sebring, it would have been the best convertible ever. This time is different. Before the 2013 300 SRT8 arrived, I decided I would not be seduced by Chrysler’s larger, meaner, sexier, more powerful 6.4L engine and review it like any other car. Can that be done?

(Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • stingray65: Ever heard of Skype? Gore’s boring and inaccurate Powerpoint presentations would be much more...
  • 2drsedanman: At least the grille openings are getting smaller.
  • deanst: This is the study I referenced a week or so ago when the topic was the uselessness of CAFE standards. And the...
  • DevilsRotary86: “that requires sacrifice or pain (like living with an uncomfortable fuel efficient car)”...
  • Johnster: I wonder if they are considering “Coupe” versions of the XJ, XF and XE? I liked the old...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States