By on April 18, 2012

It’s strange how the passage of a few decades makes the mid-70s Corolla seem like a much better car than it actually was. Granted, it was quite a car for the time, with a combination of price, reliability, and fuel economy that Detroit and Europe couldn’t touch… but if we take ourselves out of the mindset of the Malaise Era and fast-forward our vehicular expectations maybe ten years, this generation of Corolla turns out to be a cramped, underpowered, noisy econobox that lasted maybe 150,000 miles (if you lived in the rust-free Southwest). (Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • EAF: Slavuta, how does the Skyactiv G 2.5 stack up against Hyundai’s 1.6 turbo? I agree with you btw! The...
  • Big Al From 'Murica: Sure I would…so long as it has Bronco badges!
  • nels0300: I don’t think it even needs to be plain looking. Cleaning up the bumpers and adding a volume button...
  • Big Al From 'Murica: I’d daily it.
  • JohnTaurus: So any time one of us has a point, we should just keep posting new comment threads until (or even after)...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States