By on April 18, 2012

It’s strange how the passage of a few decades makes the mid-70s Corolla seem like a much better car than it actually was. Granted, it was quite a car for the time, with a combination of price, reliability, and fuel economy that Detroit and Europe couldn’t touch… but if we take ourselves out of the mindset of the Malaise Era and fast-forward our vehicular expectations maybe ten years, this generation of Corolla turns out to be a cramped, underpowered, noisy econobox that lasted maybe 150,000 miles (if you lived in the rust-free Southwest). (Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • Magnusmaster: The sixth-generation Fiesta didn’t do very well in Latin America, so Ford will do what everyone...
  • Russycle: “…1,500 possible configurations. Do you need that much choice? Probably not. But you have to...
  • Carrera: I like the 2014-2017 Accord very much but I think this new generation has nailed the looks.
  • bikegoesbaa: So your definition of “getting shafted” is “getting the car you want for a price you a...
  • CaddyDaddy: If The Accord had a push button selector for the transmission on the dash and paddle shifters (not that...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff