<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: 2007 Suzuki SX4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:50:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: btdevo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-1268821</link>
		<dc:creator>btdevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-1268821</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had my SX4 Touring Package 2 (top of the line with manual) for 10 months, and like it more than when I first purchased it.  It really does respond to the drivers commands, and averaging 26.6 MPG....no complaints at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;ve had my SX4 Touring Package 2 (top of the line with manual) for 10 months, and like it more than when I first purchased it.  It really does respond to the drivers commands, and averaging 26.6 MPG&#8230;.no complaints at all.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAdidas21</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-1124201</link>
		<dc:creator>JAdidas21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-1124201</guid>
		<description>Just a quick correction, it appears that Suzuki will still persue a North American release of the Kizashi for the 2010 model year. As it turns out, they felt it would end up costing more to postpone final development and launch of the Kizashi versus moving forward with it.  Good news for Suzuki Dealerships thru out North America!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Just a quick correction, it appears that Suzuki will still persue a North American release of the Kizashi for the 2010 model year. As it turns out, they felt it would end up costing more to postpone final development and launch of the Kizashi versus moving forward with it.  Good news for Suzuki Dealerships thru out North America!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAdidas21</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-1115871</link>
		<dc:creator>JAdidas21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-1115871</guid>
		<description>Good review, fair and balanced. Some interesting user comments too. Just to clarify a few things though. 
The Suzuki SX4 is a 100% Suzuki engineered design, NOT fiat.  The only thing about the SX4 that is Fiat would be the Diesel version sold in Europe under the Fiat badge. And even in that case, the car is still Suzuki engineered but the engine they drop in it is from Fiat. If you choose the manual transmition offering then you would also be getting a Fiat 6-speed tranny.
The Suzuki SX4 itsel though is a variant of the Suzuki Swift, in what can be called a &quot;Streched Swift Platform&quot;. And Fiat absolutely NOTHING to do with the engineering, design, or implementation of that platform.

The reason Suzuki is allowing Fiat to rebadge and sell this Suzuki engineered vehicle was in exchange for Suzuki being able to use and build the Fiat Diesel engine to use in Suzuki cars in other parts of the world such as India.
  
The STYLING of the SX4 was done by an Italian firm ItalDesign with obvious good results. But once again, to clarify, THE SX4 IS 100% SUZUKI ENGINEERED AND DESIGNED, &gt;NOT&lt; Fiat. It is based on the Swift platform.
 The Fiat Sedici is a rebadged Suzuki SX4 which in some cases can come equiped with a fiat diesel engine.
Europe gets most of its SX4&#039;s from the Suzuki plant in Hungary. 
North America however gets their SX4&#039;s direct from the Suzuki Plant in Japan. Japanese engineered, Japanese built.

As far as Suzuki selling Korean Re-badges you have GM to thank for that. After GM took over Daewoo they decided that the only car of the Daewoo line-up that they made sense to add to their own and sell in the US was what would become the Aveo.  The other Daewoo offerings they felt might tend to compete for sales with GM&#039;s existing American built cars. Thus, they passed on several daewoo models to Suzuki to be sold under the Suzuki badge in it&#039;s US Suzuki dealerships.  Suzuki initially agreed to this with the assurances from GM that they were going to dramatically improve the quality assurance programme at the Daewoo plants in Korea.  
This worked well for Suzuki at the time since the North American division of Suzuki was in full gear in it&#039;s attempt to expand its dealership network in North America.  The main thing holding them back was a lack of actual car models to sell.  At the time Suzuki only had the XL7, Vitara, and its lone and only car, the Aerio.
 
 Not sufficient offerings to achieve the type of sales goals they were looking for or to attract car dealers to pick up the Suzuki line.

By adding the Reno and Forenza, this allowed them to do precisely what they what they had planned, with new Suzuki dealerships popping up all over the country.
  But alas, GM&#039;s promises to dramatically improve Daewoo&#039;s quality assurance programme never came thru... and the reliability of the Korean re-badges didn&#039;t hold up to Suzuki&#039;s desired level for any car with its name on it.

Thus Suzuki cancelled its agreement with GM to sell the Daewoo models in the US, opting instead to focus on its own Suzuki platforms, and gradually increase its own offerings. 
 
The Suzuki Swift (not the canadian swift+) and the SX4 are first fruits of Suzuki&#039;s new approach and design. Soon North America will get the newest generation of the Swift.

Unfortunately because of worsening world wide economic condition and the severe impact this is having on auto-sales, Suzuki had decided to postpone it&#039;s launch of the mid-sized sedan in North America named Kizashi.  Instead Suzuki will focus on its smaller iterations such as the new A-Star which will be arriving shortly on European shores and will offer entry level buys a well engineered car at a low price and fantastic fuel economy as well as the lowest carbon emissions in the industry.

SX4 too is being improved with new gearing and soon will see a 6-speed manual as well as VVT as standard to improve fuel standards and offer lower revs and hwy speeds.

As far as the turbo edition, as someone already stated, you can order a turbo edition SX4 thru your dealership which will come from Road Race Motorsports. 
Suzuki IS currently testing both a Diesel SX4 in Canada as well as its own in-house turbo set up for possible sales in North America. Suzuk is still not convinced there is a market here for a Turbo SX4.
The Diesel SX4 being tested in Canada is getting very good response so hopefully if Suzuki can ride out the current worldwide economic chaos, we may soon see an Diesel SX4 in North America too.

As for the SX4 WRX, that racing programme unfortunalely has been cancelled, again due to the worldwide economic shakedown. 
Even Subaru has pulled out of the WRC for the same reason. 
We have yet to see what the worldwide economic meltdown will mean to the big auto manufacturors, but there is already talk in Japan of possible mergers on the table... with the end result of creating a &quot;Japanese Big-3&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Good review, fair and balanced. Some interesting user comments too. Just to clarify a few things though.<br />
The Suzuki SX4 is a 100% Suzuki engineered design, NOT fiat.  The only thing about the SX4 that is Fiat would be the Diesel version sold in Europe under the Fiat badge. And even in that case, the car is still Suzuki engineered but the engine they drop in it is from Fiat. If you choose the manual transmition offering then you would also be getting a Fiat 6-speed tranny.<br />
The Suzuki SX4 itsel though is a variant of the Suzuki Swift, in what can be called a &#8220;Streched Swift Platform&#8221;. And Fiat absolutely NOTHING to do with the engineering, design, or implementation of that platform.</p>
<p>The reason Suzuki is allowing Fiat to rebadge and sell this Suzuki engineered vehicle was in exchange for Suzuki being able to use and build the Fiat Diesel engine to use in Suzuki cars in other parts of the world such as India.</p>
<p>The STYLING of the SX4 was done by an Italian firm ItalDesign with obvious good results. But once again, to clarify, THE SX4 IS 100% SUZUKI ENGINEERED AND DESIGNED, &gt;NOT&lt; Fiat. It is based on the Swift platform.<br />
 The Fiat Sedici is a rebadged Suzuki SX4 which in some cases can come equiped with a fiat diesel engine.<br />
Europe gets most of its SX4&#8217;s from the Suzuki plant in Hungary.<br />
North America however gets their SX4&#8217;s direct from the Suzuki Plant in Japan. Japanese engineered, Japanese built.</p>
<p>As far as Suzuki selling Korean Re-badges you have GM to thank for that. After GM took over Daewoo they decided that the only car of the Daewoo line-up that they made sense to add to their own and sell in the US was what would become the Aveo.  The other Daewoo offerings they felt might tend to compete for sales with GM&#8217;s existing American built cars. Thus, they passed on several daewoo models to Suzuki to be sold under the Suzuki badge in it&#8217;s US Suzuki dealerships.  Suzuki initially agreed to this with the assurances from GM that they were going to dramatically improve the quality assurance programme at the Daewoo plants in Korea.<br />
This worked well for Suzuki at the time since the North American division of Suzuki was in full gear in it&#8217;s attempt to expand its dealership network in North America.  The main thing holding them back was a lack of actual car models to sell.  At the time Suzuki only had the XL7, Vitara, and its lone and only car, the Aerio.</p>
<p> Not sufficient offerings to achieve the type of sales goals they were looking for or to attract car dealers to pick up the Suzuki line.</p>
<p>By adding the Reno and Forenza, this allowed them to do precisely what they what they had planned, with new Suzuki dealerships popping up all over the country.<br />
  But alas, GM&#8217;s promises to dramatically improve Daewoo&#8217;s quality assurance programme never came thru&#8230; and the reliability of the Korean re-badges didn&#8217;t hold up to Suzuki&#8217;s desired level for any car with its name on it.</p>
<p>Thus Suzuki cancelled its agreement with GM to sell the Daewoo models in the US, opting instead to focus on its own Suzuki platforms, and gradually increase its own offerings. </p>
<p>The Suzuki Swift (not the canadian swift+) and the SX4 are first fruits of Suzuki&#8217;s new approach and design. Soon North America will get the newest generation of the Swift.</p>
<p>Unfortunately because of worsening world wide economic condition and the severe impact this is having on auto-sales, Suzuki had decided to postpone it&#8217;s launch of the mid-sized sedan in North America named Kizashi.  Instead Suzuki will focus on its smaller iterations such as the new A-Star which will be arriving shortly on European shores and will offer entry level buys a well engineered car at a low price and fantastic fuel economy as well as the lowest carbon emissions in the industry.</p>
<p>SX4 too is being improved with new gearing and soon will see a 6-speed manual as well as VVT as standard to improve fuel standards and offer lower revs and hwy speeds.</p>
<p>As far as the turbo edition, as someone already stated, you can order a turbo edition SX4 thru your dealership which will come from Road Race Motorsports.<br />
Suzuki IS currently testing both a Diesel SX4 in Canada as well as its own in-house turbo set up for possible sales in North America. Suzuk is still not convinced there is a market here for a Turbo SX4.<br />
The Diesel SX4 being tested in Canada is getting very good response so hopefully if Suzuki can ride out the current worldwide economic chaos, we may soon see an Diesel SX4 in North America too.</p>
<p>As for the SX4 WRX, that racing programme unfortunalely has been cancelled, again due to the worldwide economic shakedown.<br />
Even Subaru has pulled out of the WRC for the same reason.<br />
We have yet to see what the worldwide economic meltdown will mean to the big auto manufacturors, but there is already talk in Japan of possible mergers on the table&#8230; with the end result of creating a &#8220;Japanese Big-3&#8243;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AuricTech</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-993171</link>
		<dc:creator>AuricTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-993171</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;stvdino :
October 8th, 2008 at 9:15 pm

Does anyone have any more exact or accurate info or read anything new on when the SX4 turbo, WRC version will be available?&lt;/i&gt;

Well, while it&#039;s not yet a factory option, for around $4500 you can buy the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.roadracemotorsports.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&amp;cPath=2&amp;products_id=345&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Road Race Motorsports SX4 Turbo Kit&lt;/a&gt;.  Road Race Motorsports does have a working relationship with Suzuki, so official sanction of this kit is at least a possibility.

You can find a discussion of the current version of the RRM turbo kit at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sx4club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4863&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this SX4Club.com thread&lt;/a&gt;.  Note that it&#039;s reported to deliver 220 whp....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>stvdino :<br />
October 8th, 2008 at 9:15 pm</p>
<p>Does anyone have any more exact or accurate info or read anything new on when the SX4 turbo, WRC version will be available?</i></p>
<p>Well, while it&#8217;s not yet a factory option, for around $4500 you can buy the <a href="http://www.roadracemotorsports.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&amp;cPath=2&amp;products_id=345" rel="nofollow">Road Race Motorsports SX4 Turbo Kit</a>.  Road Race Motorsports does have a working relationship with Suzuki, so official sanction of this kit is at least a possibility.</p>
<p>You can find a discussion of the current version of the RRM turbo kit at <a href="http://www.sx4club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4863" rel="nofollow">this SX4Club.com thread</a>.  Note that it&#8217;s reported to deliver 220 whp&#8230;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stvdino</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-833692</link>
		<dc:creator>stvdino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-833692</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have any more exact or accurate info or read anything new on when the SX4 turbo, WRC version will be available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Does anyone have any more exact or accurate info or read anything new on when the SX4 turbo, WRC version will be available?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stvdino</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-833681</link>
		<dc:creator>stvdino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-833681</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s all the true car enthusiasts be reminded  that there was another AWD, four door with hatchback, 5 speed, turbocharged 2 liter designed by Giugaro which sold in Europe in the 80&#039;s and 90&#039;s  It&#039;s called the Lancia Delta Integrale. It won the World Rally championship six years in a row and scored 46 WRC victories.   The Suzuki is in spirit and package very similar in being very fun to drive, responsive and designed by the same person.  Now I can buy a Suzuki SX4  here in the US, put Lancia badges on it and imagine it&#039;s the new Delta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Let&#8217;s all the true car enthusiasts be reminded  that there was another AWD, four door with hatchback, 5 speed, turbocharged 2 liter designed by Giugaro which sold in Europe in the 80&#8217;s and 90&#8217;s  It&#8217;s called the Lancia Delta Integrale. It won the World Rally championship six years in a row and scored 46 WRC victories.   The Suzuki is in spirit and package very similar in being very fun to drive, responsive and designed by the same person.  Now I can buy a Suzuki SX4  here in the US, put Lancia badges on it and imagine it&#8217;s the new Delta.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AuricTech</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-322132</link>
		<dc:creator>AuricTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-322132</guid>
		<description>Jamo, the 2007 SX4 Sport was a trim level, as only the hatchback was available.  The 2008 SX4 Sport is the sedan version (currently available only in front wheel drive); the hatchback is now officially the SX4 Crossover.

Confused?  You won&#039;t be, after this episode of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soap_%28TV_series%29&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Soap&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Jamo, the 2007 SX4 Sport was a trim level, as only the hatchback was available.  The 2008 SX4 Sport is the sedan version (currently available only in front wheel drive); the hatchback is now officially the SX4 Crossover.</p>
<p>Confused?  You won&#8217;t be, after this episode of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soap_%28TV_series%29" rel="nofollow"><i>Soap</i></a>.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohnonothimagain</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-300122</link>
		<dc:creator>ohnonothimagain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 23:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-300122</guid>
		<description>I had a 1989 Suzuki Swift GT-one of the most fun cars I&#039;ve ever had. 100hp in a 1700 pound car lead to exciting rides. But the quality was less than stellar. The drivers seatback broke in two while I was driving on the highway-I had to hang on for dear life with no drivers seatback. When I took it in for repair-I was told it would take 1-2 months to get a new seat from Japan as they weren&#039;t stocked in the US. ok ok I got that out of my system. The SX4 looks ok, and sounds like it has decent specs; but you can&#039;t delete the roof rails; and I&#039;m still scared of those seats. Perhaps build quality has improved since 1989-I hope so. Otherwise you&#039;d better hang on when you&#039;re driving just in case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I had a 1989 Suzuki Swift GT-one of the most fun cars I&#8217;ve ever had. 100hp in a 1700 pound car lead to exciting rides. But the quality was less than stellar. The drivers seatback broke in two while I was driving on the highway-I had to hang on for dear life with no drivers seatback. When I took it in for repair-I was told it would take 1-2 months to get a new seat from Japan as they weren&#8217;t stocked in the US. ok ok I got that out of my system. The SX4 looks ok, and sounds like it has decent specs; but you can&#8217;t delete the roof rails; and I&#8217;m still scared of those seats. Perhaps build quality has improved since 1989-I hope so. Otherwise you&#8217;d better hang on when you&#8217;re driving just in case.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-175292</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-175292</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t figure out the difference between the Sport and the wagon from this review. Are they the same thing?  I wouldn&#039;t have thought the Sport would have 4wd.  It doesn&#039;t say so on the Suzuki website when you compare it to other cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I can&#8217;t figure out the difference between the Sport and the wagon from this review. Are they the same thing?  I wouldn&#8217;t have thought the Sport would have 4wd.  It doesn&#8217;t say so on the Suzuki website when you compare it to other cars.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fotografree</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-102293</link>
		<dc:creator>fotografree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-102293</guid>
		<description>you can hear from actual sx4 owners at www.sx4club.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->you can hear from actual sx4 owners at <a href="http://www.sx4club.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sx4club.com</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: runningonfumes</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-93401</link>
		<dc:creator>runningonfumes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-93401</guid>
		<description>I have a Forenza, 5sp.  Don&#039;t laugh, I was &quot;between jobs&quot; and needed a cheap island car.  Yes the interior is not great, but it&#039;s held up well in the year and a half I&#039;ve owned it.  It&#039;s had no maintenance or repairs except for a 7500 mile oil change.  I can have fun in it cuz it&#039;s a manual, if I concentrate.  The Forenzas were designed by Ital Design too. The engines are pure Daewoo sewing machines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I have a Forenza, 5sp.  Don&#8217;t laugh, I was &#8220;between jobs&#8221; and needed a cheap island car.  Yes the interior is not great, but it&#8217;s held up well in the year and a half I&#8217;ve owned it.  It&#8217;s had no maintenance or repairs except for a 7500 mile oil change.  I can have fun in it cuz it&#8217;s a manual, if I concentrate.  The Forenzas were designed by Ital Design too. The engines are pure Daewoo sewing machines.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drp5</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-88813</link>
		<dc:creator>drp5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-88813</guid>
		<description>I bought my SX4 in Aug 07 and love it so much I couldn&#039;t help myself from taking a few road trips right away. I put 3500 miles on it the first month; it&#039;s a fun car to drive both on the twisty mountain back roads here in AZ or in town. Highway driving is OK but I find myself looking at the map more often now seeing if there is another more indirect way to get to where I&#039;m going. The last detour was only 100 miles but it was one fun canyon road. Oh, BTW, the main reason I bought the car was because I fitted my 350+ pound body into it effortlessly. This was unlike trying to squeeze into the Accent or Corolla I looked at earlier in the week. Add in all of the other features (AWD, 4 wheel disks, 16 in alloy wheels, ect.)it was a no brainier for me. Driving is fun again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I bought my SX4 in Aug 07 and love it so much I couldn&#8217;t help myself from taking a few road trips right away. I put 3500 miles on it the first month; it&#8217;s a fun car to drive both on the twisty mountain back roads here in AZ or in town. Highway driving is OK but I find myself looking at the map more often now seeing if there is another more indirect way to get to where I&#8217;m going. The last detour was only 100 miles but it was one fun canyon road. Oh, BTW, the main reason I bought the car was because I fitted my 350+ pound body into it effortlessly. This was unlike trying to squeeze into the Accent or Corolla I looked at earlier in the week. Add in all of the other features (AWD, 4 wheel disks, 16 in alloy wheels, ect.)it was a no brainier for me. Driving is fun again!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pencils</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-88607</link>
		<dc:creator>Pencils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-88607</guid>
		<description>My husband and I bought an SX4 in December last year, not long after they hit the market.  We wanted a small car with fairly good gas mileage, and we needed four wheel drive, as my husband has to drive to work no matter the weather conditions. We did a little research, and this was the only option in its class.  Both of us were leery of buying a car in its first model year--my last car was a Civic, bought specifically because I wanted a car with a long history.  Still, after a zippy test drive, we were sold.  Or sold on the car, anyway, we had some problems with a rude dealer--why do car salesmen think they&#039;re doing you a favor, when we&#039;re buying something very expensive from them?  We walked out and found a more polite dealership. Anyway, we&#039;ve had the car for nearly a year, and it&#039;s been great. Only problems have been warning lights popping up when there&#039;s nothing wrong--we had them checked.  We&#039;re disappointed in the gas mileage, but it&#039;s not the end of the world.  It&#039;s a little loud at high speeds, but, again, it&#039;s a small and inexpensive car, you get what you pay for.  Other than those things, we&#039;ve enjoyed the car.  My husband is 6&#039;1&quot;, I&#039;m 5&#039;11&quot;, and we have a son who is over 6&#039; and growing, and we fit in there comfortably. And the seats aren&#039;t that bad, really. With or without the seats folded down, there&#039;s an amazing amount of space to transport large, bulky, or just numerous items.  And I can&#039;t tell you how many times I&#039;ve returned to my car in a parking lot and found guys looking it over, peering in the windows, wanting to hear all about it.  We haven&#039;t seen that many SX4s around, but I think there will be more as word gets out about this car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My husband and I bought an SX4 in December last year, not long after they hit the market.  We wanted a small car with fairly good gas mileage, and we needed four wheel drive, as my husband has to drive to work no matter the weather conditions. We did a little research, and this was the only option in its class.  Both of us were leery of buying a car in its first model year&#8211;my last car was a Civic, bought specifically because I wanted a car with a long history.  Still, after a zippy test drive, we were sold.  Or sold on the car, anyway, we had some problems with a rude dealer&#8211;why do car salesmen think they&#8217;re doing you a favor, when we&#8217;re buying something very expensive from them?  We walked out and found a more polite dealership. Anyway, we&#8217;ve had the car for nearly a year, and it&#8217;s been great. Only problems have been warning lights popping up when there&#8217;s nothing wrong&#8211;we had them checked.  We&#8217;re disappointed in the gas mileage, but it&#8217;s not the end of the world.  It&#8217;s a little loud at high speeds, but, again, it&#8217;s a small and inexpensive car, you get what you pay for.  Other than those things, we&#8217;ve enjoyed the car.  My husband is 6&#8242;1&#8243;, I&#8217;m 5&#8242;11&#8243;, and we have a son who is over 6&#8242; and growing, and we fit in there comfortably. And the seats aren&#8217;t that bad, really. With or without the seats folded down, there&#8217;s an amazing amount of space to transport large, bulky, or just numerous items.  And I can&#8217;t tell you how many times I&#8217;ve returned to my car in a parking lot and found guys looking it over, peering in the windows, wanting to hear all about it.  We haven&#8217;t seen that many SX4s around, but I think there will be more as word gets out about this car.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conspire</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-82361</link>
		<dc:creator>conspire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-82361</guid>
		<description>Suzuki calls its SX4 a Crossover. What&#039;s the problem with you people accepting this? Why do some of you call it a hatchback, or a wagon? No, it is a Crossover SUV. Why do Sport Utility Vehicles have to be monster vehicles? Why can&#039;t we have a small car be a Crossover SUV? Is there someone out there that owns the definition of SUV that I have dared to disagree with? 

According to Suzuki, SX4 stands for:
S - Sport
X - Crossover (x-over)
4 - 4-wheel drive

So the Suzuki SX4 is a Crossover SUV, period. It is not a wagon! I am sick and tired of looking at monster SUV&#039;s and being told that being huge is the way they all are. I have been looking for a real small SUV for a while now, and am pleased to have found one in the SX4. I no longer have to drag tons of excess sheet metal around town.

No, I do not work for Suzuki - I am just a regular car buyer. Actually, I live in Chongqing, China. Here the SX4 has a smaller engine (1600 liter) but is very well equipped. Mine has a wonderful premium sound system (364 watts of sound in the little SX4 box!) and leather throughout. Car driving is tight here, where everyone pushes themselves into small spaces. So a smaller car is easier to manage. 

As for being a good off-road vehicle,...
1. SUV cars needs to have good ground clearance. SX4 is 6.9 inches compared with 4 inches on the Honda Fit.
2. Should have a strong chassis-axle-wheel system. This is the most distinctive aspect of the SX4, with its 16&quot; wheels (in China) and a heavier chassis, which makes the car heavier than the Honda Fit.
3. Should be a 5-door hatchback, enabling large and flexible storage space behind the back seat.
4. Should have a full-size rear seat for passengers, which can be converted into storage space.
5. Should have an adequately strong engine that does well when traversing off-road terrain.
6. Should be sporty/fun to drive. The SX4 certainly is.

Clearly, Suzuki went straight at making a small SUV. I think they did quite well.

The SX4 IS A CROSSOVER SUV, not a station wagon or a tiny city car such as the Honda Fit or Toyota Yaris. The SX4 is the first of a new class of cars - a small, true Crossover SUV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Suzuki calls its SX4 a Crossover. What&#8217;s the problem with you people accepting this? Why do some of you call it a hatchback, or a wagon? No, it is a Crossover SUV. Why do Sport Utility Vehicles have to be monster vehicles? Why can&#8217;t we have a small car be a Crossover SUV? Is there someone out there that owns the definition of SUV that I have dared to disagree with? </p>
<p>According to Suzuki, SX4 stands for:<br />
S &#8211; Sport<br />
X &#8211; Crossover (x-over)<br />
4 &#8211; 4-wheel drive</p>
<p>So the Suzuki SX4 is a Crossover SUV, period. It is not a wagon! I am sick and tired of looking at monster SUV&#8217;s and being told that being huge is the way they all are. I have been looking for a real small SUV for a while now, and am pleased to have found one in the SX4. I no longer have to drag tons of excess sheet metal around town.</p>
<p>No, I do not work for Suzuki &#8211; I am just a regular car buyer. Actually, I live in Chongqing, China. Here the SX4 has a smaller engine (1600 liter) but is very well equipped. Mine has a wonderful premium sound system (364 watts of sound in the little SX4 box!) and leather throughout. Car driving is tight here, where everyone pushes themselves into small spaces. So a smaller car is easier to manage. </p>
<p>As for being a good off-road vehicle,&#8230;<br />
1. SUV cars needs to have good ground clearance. SX4 is 6.9 inches compared with 4 inches on the Honda Fit.<br />
2. Should have a strong chassis-axle-wheel system. This is the most distinctive aspect of the SX4, with its 16&#8243; wheels (in China) and a heavier chassis, which makes the car heavier than the Honda Fit.<br />
3. Should be a 5-door hatchback, enabling large and flexible storage space behind the back seat.<br />
4. Should have a full-size rear seat for passengers, which can be converted into storage space.<br />
5. Should have an adequately strong engine that does well when traversing off-road terrain.<br />
6. Should be sporty/fun to drive. The SX4 certainly is.</p>
<p>Clearly, Suzuki went straight at making a small SUV. I think they did quite well.</p>
<p>The SX4 IS A CROSSOVER SUV, not a station wagon or a tiny city car such as the Honda Fit or Toyota Yaris. The SX4 is the first of a new class of cars &#8211; a small, true Crossover SUV.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinb120</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-81540</link>
		<dc:creator>kevinb120</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-81540</guid>
		<description>Funny enough, I have worked in the auto sales business for years and have never liked compact cars as a whole.  The only one I have even owned outside of my high school years was an SVT Focus with the European package(wonderful car I should of never sold).  I typically shun &#039;Korean&#039; cars(as suzuki is generally though of as daewoo rebadges) in general-simply because its so below my radar to consider purchasing one it really has no bearing on my life.  

We recently aquired a Suzuki franchise in our dealer group.  The vehicle line to me looked like Hyundai cira 1995.  I took each one around the block once so I can say I drove it in case I may have a client I may have &#039;switch&#039; to one(with the aforementioned credit scoring in the previous post..).  All were the same thing: &#039;eh, looks ok, hey-started on the first try-not bad, engine a little rough, steering clunks at full lock, brakes a little weak...oh well I drove it&#039;.  

HOWEVER I noticed in the corner of the lot we had a couple of the little SX4&#039;s.  Styling looked like a little european city car.  A little closer and it had 17&quot; wheels with a decent set of shoes-hmm.  4 wheel disc brakes, all the trim looks nice and tidy-hmm.  146hp on the window sticker...Well I grabbed the keys and the interior has a basic but taut look to the components, a little jeweling here, some surface texture there-really nothing bad at all.  The view out is definitey strange at first, but very &#039;smart&#039; looking overall.  

Started it up and moved it around the lot-engine smooth and responsive, no thunking or rubbery feeling in the suspension or steering, shifter nice and crisp-hmm.  Well I went off for an hour and took it to lunch and was thoroughly impressed in every way. Even the sedan which at first looks like an echo starts to win you over.  But overall a very sound and refined car with very tossable handling, and for the price-outstanding!  It definitely gives you the feeling of having taken something right off a tightly packed city street in Europe and dropping it right in the middle of an American dealership chain parking lot.  What a delightful little car completely off the radar here...

Being that we have an open floor(we can sell everything in our chain of dealers),  I snuck a few over to the Ford dealer I work to put on static display. Of course me-&#039;Mr Hotrod&#039; got quite a few jokes from my fellow workers as to how much I like the little buggers-after a little salesman on saleman chatting, they quite frequently leave the display pad :)  (Reminds me of when I owned an RX7TT in 93 when I picked up a used Miata as a second car that I ended up driving more.  All my friends gave me crap about the Miata. I would ask them &#039;have you driven one?&#039; - &#039;then shut up, if you want your butt kicked yet again I will gladly pull the TT out of the garage&#039; and would continue to putt around in the M...)

I now make it a point to show them to anyone looking in the 13-18k range for a new car, and we will probably end up selling more from the Ford store then the Suzuki outlet.  When it stands alone by itself, the Suzuki &#039;aura&#039; of the brand as a whole fades away faster and how much of a quirky-cute, fun, and personable little package the SX4 really is shines much more brightly.  Great little car for the money, some buyers need to turn the brain back on from simply wandering into a Hodoyta dealer for a Yaris/Fit and give this little bugger a try.

Heh, That&#039;s the most I&#039;ve said about a sub-150hp car in a long, long time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Funny enough, I have worked in the auto sales business for years and have never liked compact cars as a whole.  The only one I have even owned outside of my high school years was an SVT Focus with the European package(wonderful car I should of never sold).  I typically shun &#8216;Korean&#8217; cars(as suzuki is generally though of as daewoo rebadges) in general-simply because its so below my radar to consider purchasing one it really has no bearing on my life.  </p>
<p>We recently aquired a Suzuki franchise in our dealer group.  The vehicle line to me looked like Hyundai cira 1995.  I took each one around the block once so I can say I drove it in case I may have a client I may have &#8217;switch&#8217; to one(with the aforementioned credit scoring in the previous post..).  All were the same thing: &#8216;eh, looks ok, hey-started on the first try-not bad, engine a little rough, steering clunks at full lock, brakes a little weak&#8230;oh well I drove it&#8217;.  </p>
<p>HOWEVER I noticed in the corner of the lot we had a couple of the little SX4&#8217;s.  Styling looked like a little european city car.  A little closer and it had 17&#8243; wheels with a decent set of shoes-hmm.  4 wheel disc brakes, all the trim looks nice and tidy-hmm.  146hp on the window sticker&#8230;Well I grabbed the keys and the interior has a basic but taut look to the components, a little jeweling here, some surface texture there-really nothing bad at all.  The view out is definitey strange at first, but very &#8217;smart&#8217; looking overall.  </p>
<p>Started it up and moved it around the lot-engine smooth and responsive, no thunking or rubbery feeling in the suspension or steering, shifter nice and crisp-hmm.  Well I went off for an hour and took it to lunch and was thoroughly impressed in every way. Even the sedan which at first looks like an echo starts to win you over.  But overall a very sound and refined car with very tossable handling, and for the price-outstanding!  It definitely gives you the feeling of having taken something right off a tightly packed city street in Europe and dropping it right in the middle of an American dealership chain parking lot.  What a delightful little car completely off the radar here&#8230;</p>
<p>Being that we have an open floor(we can sell everything in our chain of dealers),  I snuck a few over to the Ford dealer I work to put on static display. Of course me-&#8217;Mr Hotrod&#8217; got quite a few jokes from my fellow workers as to how much I like the little buggers-after a little salesman on saleman chatting, they quite frequently leave the display pad :)  (Reminds me of when I owned an RX7TT in 93 when I picked up a used Miata as a second car that I ended up driving more.  All my friends gave me crap about the Miata. I would ask them &#8216;have you driven one?&#8217; &#8211; &#8216;then shut up, if you want your butt kicked yet again I will gladly pull the TT out of the garage&#8217; and would continue to putt around in the M&#8230;)</p>
<p>I now make it a point to show them to anyone looking in the 13-18k range for a new car, and we will probably end up selling more from the Ford store then the Suzuki outlet.  When it stands alone by itself, the Suzuki &#8216;aura&#8217; of the brand as a whole fades away faster and how much of a quirky-cute, fun, and personable little package the SX4 really is shines much more brightly.  Great little car for the money, some buyers need to turn the brain back on from simply wandering into a Hodoyta dealer for a Yaris/Fit and give this little bugger a try.</p>
<p>Heh, That&#8217;s the most I&#8217;ve said about a sub-150hp car in a long, long time&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heswa</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-78796</link>
		<dc:creator>heswa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-78796</guid>
		<description>The end of my post should have said &quot;See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzuki_SX4&quot; [for some reason it wouldn&#039;t let me edit my own post...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The end of my post should have said &#8220;See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzuki_SX4" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzuki_SX4</a>&#8221; [for some reason it wouldn't let me edit my own post...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heswa</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-3/#comment-78605</link>
		<dc:creator>heswa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-78605</guid>
		<description>Nicke,

The SX4 was a joint project between Suzuki and Fiat.  My understanding is that most of the mechanical design was Suzuki&#039;s, while the visual design was done in Italy.  The Fiat version is called the Sedici.  European destination cars (both the Suzuki and Fiat versions) are built in Hungary, while cars sold in Canada and the U.S. are built in Japan.  I believe there&#039;s also a factory in India for cars sold in India. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzuki_SX4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Nicke,</p>
<p>The SX4 was a joint project between Suzuki and Fiat.  My understanding is that most of the mechanical design was Suzuki&#8217;s, while the visual design was done in Italy.  The Fiat version is called the Sedici.  European destination cars (both the Suzuki and Fiat versions) are built in Hungary, while cars sold in Canada and the U.S. are built in Japan.  I believe there&#8217;s also a factory in India for cars sold in India. See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzuki_SX4" rel="nofollow"></a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicke</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-2/#comment-75750</link>
		<dc:creator>nicke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-75750</guid>
		<description>PS, as far as I know the SX4 is a Fiat built in Hungary and desigend by Guargio...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->PS, as far as I know the SX4 is a Fiat built in Hungary and desigend by Guargio&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicke</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-2/#comment-75748</link>
		<dc:creator>nicke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-75748</guid>
		<description>Are they ever going to make a Rally Homolagation version? Now when the WRX and the EVO has been fed a diet of MickeyD&#039;s and gotten both bigger, heavier and as far as I can see from the reviews plusher and too civilized... Why does all cars have to get bigger and softer? I&#039;m looking for something small and fun with some engine and possibly rally heritage. Anything out there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Are they ever going to make a Rally Homolagation version? Now when the WRX and the EVO has been fed a diet of MickeyD&#8217;s and gotten both bigger, heavier and as far as I can see from the reviews plusher and too civilized&#8230; Why does all cars have to get bigger and softer? I&#8217;m looking for something small and fun with some engine and possibly rally heritage. Anything out there?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mixbrix</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-2/#comment-65127</link>
		<dc:creator>mixbrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 23:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-65127</guid>
		<description>Presently drive an 06 Grand Vitara and love it. The SX4 will be my next one. I heard the &quot;cheap plastic&quot; comments about the GV interior also.  What are American cars, expensive plastic??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Presently drive an 06 Grand Vitara and love it. The SX4 will be my next one. I heard the &#8220;cheap plastic&#8221; comments about the GV interior also.  What are American cars, expensive plastic??<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: romancegirl</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-2/#comment-62628</link>
		<dc:creator>romancegirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 04:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-62628</guid>
		<description>No one compares to the Suzuki Motor company in customer service. I traded my 2003 Aerio in on 7/17/07 and purchased a bright red, stick shift, SX 4. It&#039;s fun to drive, peppy and turns heads when I drive by. 

I love Suzuki because their cars are not cookie cutter. They have original designs and they stand behind them. Great Value and customer service is paramount to them. 

Drive a SX 4 and you&#039;ll know what I mean. That is, if you can find one - they&#039;re selling fast!
Suzuki Rules!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->No one compares to the Suzuki Motor company in customer service. I traded my 2003 Aerio in on 7/17/07 and purchased a bright red, stick shift, SX 4. It&#8217;s fun to drive, peppy and turns heads when I drive by. </p>
<p>I love Suzuki because their cars are not cookie cutter. They have original designs and they stand behind them. Great Value and customer service is paramount to them. </p>
<p>Drive a SX 4 and you&#8217;ll know what I mean. That is, if you can find one &#8211; they&#8217;re selling fast!<br />
Suzuki Rules!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellen89</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-2/#comment-60248</link>
		<dc:creator>ellen89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-60248</guid>
		<description>We bought sx4 sport. We have compared with toyota Matrix and found sx4 has a lot more standarded than Matrix. We use it mainly for commute to office of a 8 miles drive (half of it in highway, half in local). Upto now it is about 28 mpg (drive with 2wd). Feel a little bit noiser when speed up before it reaches 50 miles. after that it is quite. It has enough space for 6&#039; man sit in front. The trunk space is great too. Before we have to borrow a pickup to buy a 40&quot; TV. With sx4 we can put it in the trunk. Another great thing is Suzuki provides 1.9% rate if you get loan from them (ASAF).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->We bought sx4 sport. We have compared with toyota Matrix and found sx4 has a lot more standarded than Matrix. We use it mainly for commute to office of a 8 miles drive (half of it in highway, half in local). Upto now it is about 28 mpg (drive with 2wd). Feel a little bit noiser when speed up before it reaches 50 miles. after that it is quite. It has enough space for 6&#8242; man sit in front. The trunk space is great too. Before we have to borrow a pickup to buy a 40&#8243; TV. With sx4 we can put it in the trunk. Another great thing is Suzuki provides 1.9% rate if you get loan from them (ASAF).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyn Vogel</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-2/#comment-52965</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyn Vogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 16:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-52965</guid>
		<description>Just spent a week in an auto-equipped AWDer. A very impressive car, all things considered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Just spent a week in an auto-equipped AWDer. A very impressive car, all things considered.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmberHope</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-2/#comment-52850</link>
		<dc:creator>AmberHope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 19:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-52850</guid>
		<description>I LOOOOOVE My sx-4! I traded in my Chevy Cobalt (TOTAL P.O.S.) for an SX-4 and am so happy I did!  First of all, I am a young, female college graduate.  So obviously, I can&#039;t afford some expensive BMW or nice luxury car.  Plus, I commute so I needed something both affordable AND gas-friendly.  I got both.  After driving it around, I realized it feels like a beach car.  Everytime I go for a ride with my friends, I feel like we&#039;re about to go surfing.  It&#039;s just a fun little car.  AND me and my fiance took the SX-4 (since he drives a Mustang GT and it definitely wouldn&#039;t fit in that tiny trunk) to pick up his new bowflex he purchased.  And we laid the whole passenger side down and fit the whole thing in the passenger side!  We looked like total nerds driving around with a boflex in one side and my fiance riding in the back seat behind me.  But then again, we are total hippie-nerds and love the idea of a driver-friendly car.  It&#039;s so fun to drive!  I agree a LITTLE more trunk space would be nice.  But, you win some you lose some.  There is always next time.  That is my only complaint so far.  And it&#039;s really no complaint.  Just less to have to wash and vacuum I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I LOOOOOVE My sx-4! I traded in my Chevy Cobalt (TOTAL P.O.S.) for an SX-4 and am so happy I did!  First of all, I am a young, female college graduate.  So obviously, I can&#8217;t afford some expensive BMW or nice luxury car.  Plus, I commute so I needed something both affordable AND gas-friendly.  I got both.  After driving it around, I realized it feels like a beach car.  Everytime I go for a ride with my friends, I feel like we&#8217;re about to go surfing.  It&#8217;s just a fun little car.  AND me and my fiance took the SX-4 (since he drives a Mustang GT and it definitely wouldn&#8217;t fit in that tiny trunk) to pick up his new bowflex he purchased.  And we laid the whole passenger side down and fit the whole thing in the passenger side!  We looked like total nerds driving around with a boflex in one side and my fiance riding in the back seat behind me.  But then again, we are total hippie-nerds and love the idea of a driver-friendly car.  It&#8217;s so fun to drive!  I agree a LITTLE more trunk space would be nice.  But, you win some you lose some.  There is always next time.  That is my only complaint so far.  And it&#8217;s really no complaint.  Just less to have to wash and vacuum I suppose.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnb</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-sx4/comment-page-2/#comment-47491</link>
		<dc:creator>bnb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=2901#comment-47491</guid>
		<description>Nice review, and it&#039;s good to know its from an Impreza driver; I&#039;ve finally started seeing these on the road as well. (Suzuki&#039;s dealer network isn&#039;t helping...)
Two points - the comments about the dorky &#039;brothers&#039; is a little off base. There are no other Suzuki cars sold in North America at the moment. The SUVs are Suzukis, but the cars sold by Suzuki are all Daewoos. (GM sells the same ones as Chevies, and in Canada as Pontiacs.) The Suzuki Swift in the rest of the world is quite cool and distinctive looking (and I think on the same platform as the SX4?)
Second, it&#039;s not a Fiat Sedici; the Sedici is a Suzuki (built in Hungary by Suzuki on a Suzuki platform and just sold by Fiat). 
And yes to another poster, they are certainly available in Canada, but not the diesel version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Nice review, and it&#8217;s good to know its from an Impreza driver; I&#8217;ve finally started seeing these on the road as well. (Suzuki&#8217;s dealer network isn&#8217;t helping&#8230;)<br />
Two points &#8211; the comments about the dorky &#8216;brothers&#8217; is a little off base. There are no other Suzuki cars sold in North America at the moment. The SUVs are Suzukis, but the cars sold by Suzuki are all Daewoos. (GM sells the same ones as Chevies, and in Canada as Pontiacs.) The Suzuki Swift in the rest of the world is quite cool and distinctive looking (and I think on the same platform as the SX4?)<br />
Second, it&#8217;s not a Fiat Sedici; the Sedici is a Suzuki (built in Hungary by Suzuki on a Suzuki platform and just sold by Fiat).<br />
And yes to another poster, they are certainly available in Canada, but not the diesel version.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 16/153 queries in 0.138 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 16:52:41 -->