<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Suzuki Aerio Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:13:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stever00</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1538788</link>
		<dc:creator>stever00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-1538788</guid>
		<description>I have one of these cars. I bought it to commute 100 a day in. No, it&#039;s not a BMW nor was it made to be one. It is less expensive than Honda or Toyota simililar cars. It has 77000 miles and no problems. The motor has plenty of power. The handling can be improved by adding tower strut bars and stronger sway bar which I did. The price was 14,000. You get heated mirrors, auto climate contol, 6 disc changer (Mp3) capable, cruise, tilt and 5 year 100000 mile warranty. It gets 30MPG and 100% Japanese made. I really don&#039;t know what you can buy for that price that is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I have one of these cars. I bought it to commute 100 a day in. No, it&#8217;s not a BMW nor was it made to be one. It is less expensive than Honda or Toyota simililar cars. It has 77000 miles and no problems. The motor has plenty of power. The handling can be improved by adding tower strut bars and stronger sway bar which I did. The price was 14,000. You get heated mirrors, auto climate contol, 6 disc changer (Mp3) capable, cruise, tilt and 5 year 100000 mile warranty. It gets 30MPG and 100% Japanese made. I really don&#8217;t know what you can buy for that price that is better.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minotaur770615</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-207262</link>
		<dc:creator>minotaur770615</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-207262</guid>
		<description>First of all. Suzuki Aerio looks OK. It looks great for me. As for power, it is one of the top HP and Torque in its class. As for acceralation, it is much faster then 10 sec on 0-60. I&#039;m not sure where the figures are from, but it isn&#039;t the truth and definitely, incorrect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->First of all. Suzuki Aerio looks OK. It looks great for me. As for power, it is one of the top HP and Torque in its class. As for acceralation, it is much faster then 10 sec on 0-60. I&#8217;m not sure where the figures are from, but it isn&#8217;t the truth and definitely, incorrect.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: subuclayton</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-166552</link>
		<dc:creator>subuclayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-166552</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t let that reviewer badmouth Aerio.  I love my &#039;05, bought new, even though I&#039;ll get nothing for it used.  Very zippy, if not whisper quiet, engine.(I like a little rumble). Excellent headroom (I am 5&#039;11&quot;)Easily accesible knobs and buttons on instrument panel, loaded to the gills with options and the l5&quot; tires might not look too sporty but you can damned near make a U turn in a bathtub with this car. There is no car on the market easier to enter or exit than Aerio, with the high seats, which also give good road vision.
I have received many compliments on the styling of my SX. If Suzuki had ever spent a dime advertising the thing it might have sold.  But they spent their budget on a lame compaign featuring a couple hot broads going to exercise in a Forester, which can&#039;t hold a candle to Aerio.  I made damned sure I didn&#039;t buy one of the Korean Suzukis (Forester, Verona, et. al.)Aerio is made in Japan and I make certain minimum assumpions about Japanese quality. For $14k, I have no complaints.  Put that in your pipe, Mr. Syed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I can&#8217;t let that reviewer badmouth Aerio.  I love my &#8216;05, bought new, even though I&#8217;ll get nothing for it used.  Very zippy, if not whisper quiet, engine.(I like a little rumble). Excellent headroom (I am 5&#8242;11&#8243;)Easily accesible knobs and buttons on instrument panel, loaded to the gills with options and the l5&#8243; tires might not look too sporty but you can damned near make a U turn in a bathtub with this car. There is no car on the market easier to enter or exit than Aerio, with the high seats, which also give good road vision.<br />
I have received many compliments on the styling of my SX. If Suzuki had ever spent a dime advertising the thing it might have sold.  But they spent their budget on a lame compaign featuring a couple hot broads going to exercise in a Forester, which can&#8217;t hold a candle to Aerio.  I made damned sure I didn&#8217;t buy one of the Korean Suzukis (Forester, Verona, et. al.)Aerio is made in Japan and I make certain minimum assumpions about Japanese quality. For $14k, I have no complaints.  Put that in your pipe, Mr. Syed.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dream 50</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53630</link>
		<dc:creator>Dream 50</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53630</guid>
		<description>In terms of non-kei (sub 660 cc) cars, Toyota has always had between 35-40% of Japanese Domestic Market share in the recent past. Honda and Nissan always duke it out for the number two spot. With a little research, I might be able to find exact recent numbers. 

Once you include kei cars, JDM numbers are a little more complicated to figure out since Toyota sells no kei cars, but Daihatsu, a Toyota subsidiary sells a number of models. 

With regard to the people who think Suzuki has always made crap cars, I nominate the original Swift GTi as one of the greatest  street-legal gokarts of all time. 

Keith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->In terms of non-kei (sub 660 cc) cars, Toyota has always had between 35-40% of Japanese Domestic Market share in the recent past. Honda and Nissan always duke it out for the number two spot. With a little research, I might be able to find exact recent numbers. </p>
<p>Once you include kei cars, JDM numbers are a little more complicated to figure out since Toyota sells no kei cars, but Daihatsu, a Toyota subsidiary sells a number of models. </p>
<p>With regard to the people who think Suzuki has always made crap cars, I nominate the original Swift GTi as one of the greatest  street-legal gokarts of all time. </p>
<p>Keith<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoKrpan</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53578</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoKrpan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 05:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53578</guid>
		<description>Suzuki is so competent at motorcycles.  Sooner or later it will show in their cars.  It sounds like they lead the Kei car segment in Japan.  I think it would be great to have Kei cars here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Suzuki is so competent at motorcycles.  Sooner or later it will show in their cars.  It sounds like they lead the Kei car segment in Japan.  I think it would be great to have Kei cars here.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53557</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53557</guid>
		<description>Honestly, this car is a joke.  When was the last time you saw one...-crickets-.  Exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Honestly, this car is a joke.  When was the last time you saw one&#8230;-crickets-.  Exactly.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53431</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 05:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53431</guid>
		<description>When I visited a dealer auction in Concord, MA, there were literally a thousand used Aerios in the lot. 

The Aerio was the ultimate un-sellable car. No one knew the car, no one knew the dealers, and there was nothing about it that was distinguishable in a good way.

The first gen had these digital gauges that looked straight out of the 1980&#039;s. The dashboards were even more idiosyncratic than the ones in a Subaru XT. 

The Aerio was a weird bird... and now it&#039;s a dodo bird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->When I visited a dealer auction in Concord, MA, there were literally a thousand used Aerios in the lot. </p>
<p>The Aerio was the ultimate un-sellable car. No one knew the car, no one knew the dealers, and there was nothing about it that was distinguishable in a good way.</p>
<p>The first gen had these digital gauges that looked straight out of the 1980&#8217;s. The dashboards were even more idiosyncratic than the ones in a Subaru XT. </p>
<p>The Aerio was a weird bird&#8230; and now it&#8217;s a dodo bird.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samir Syed</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53244</link>
		<dc:creator>Samir Syed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 14:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53244</guid>
		<description>mat 51:

You&#039;re spot on. The pre-refresh (2003-2001) Aerio, particularly in the SX / Premium trim offers outstanding value as a used car. 

A 2001 Aerio isn&#039;t much worse than a 2001 Civic.

A 2006 Aerio and a 2006 Civic though is not a fair comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->mat 51:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re spot on. The pre-refresh (2003-2001) Aerio, particularly in the SX / Premium trim offers outstanding value as a used car. </p>
<p>A 2001 Aerio isn&#8217;t much worse than a 2001 Civic.</p>
<p>A 2006 Aerio and a 2006 Civic though is not a fair comparison.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ERIKKFI</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53203</link>
		<dc:creator>ERIKKFI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 09:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53203</guid>
		<description>Sometimes it&#039;s not such a bad idea to dispense with the Dennis Miller-like similes.. &quot;...is about as...&quot;, &quot;...is classier than...&quot;

They sometimes detract from your overall point, and aren&#039;t humorous in a ha-ha, laugh out loud sort of way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Sometimes it&#8217;s not such a bad idea to dispense with the Dennis Miller-like similes.. &#8220;&#8230;is about as&#8230;&#8221;, &#8220;&#8230;is classier than&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>They sometimes detract from your overall point, and aren&#8217;t humorous in a ha-ha, laugh out loud sort of way.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wsn</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53200</link>
		<dc:creator>wsn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 05:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53200</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Robert Farago:
May 30th, 2007 at 4:40 pm

Suzuki is number two in Japan.&lt;/i&gt;

What metric do you use, Robert?

In terms of units sold, Toyota/Honda/Nissan are the top 3, in that order. I have HMC in my stock portfolio, so Google always put related news items to my attention---that&#039;s how I learned it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>Robert Farago:<br />
May 30th, 2007 at 4:40 pm</p>
<p>Suzuki is number two in Japan.</i></p>
<p>What metric do you use, Robert?</p>
<p>In terms of units sold, Toyota/Honda/Nissan are the top 3, in that order. I have HMC in my stock portfolio, so Google always put related news items to my attention&#8212;that&#8217;s how I learned it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theflyersfan</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53196</link>
		<dc:creator>theflyersfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 03:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53196</guid>
		<description>100% agree with other readers&#039; comments - I too greatly enjoy reading the cars we can&#039;t get in the US and also the &quot;they are still around?&quot; cars like this could have had a chance Suzuki.  It is entertaining to jog the memory on what we crammed ourselves into while getting hopelessly lost in the middle of nowhere Europe!

I still think Suzuki had zero to no chance to recover after the Samurai disaster.  Remember Audi in 1984 or so?  Weren&#039;t their sales several years later under 10,000 or so?  I wonder at that time if their backing with VW (and I&#039;m guessing they were under the VW family by the early 1990s but don&#039;t know for certain) was the only thing that kept them alive in the US.  
I remember Suzuki replaced the tippy-mobile with that two-seater SXsomething that had no cargo room, no power, and a hardtop that came off.  Add to that the Swift thingy that became less than interesting when they dumped the lightweight body, rice-rocket engine model, the Verona with a whopping 150 hp from a 6, and a few and far between dealer network.  Yup - Isuzu and Suzuki cars can&#039;t make it much longer.  I can see Isuzu still selling their heavy duty equipment and Suzuki selling their crotch rockets that we drool over.  
At least the Sidekick (2-door) was a decent off-roader as shown in a rather challenging and exciting mud and snow series of trails in the Cascades by Mount Saint Helens.  A little too much body flex though - I had to explain the crack in the windshield...and thankfully the coverage picked up the tab!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->100% agree with other readers&#8217; comments &#8211; I too greatly enjoy reading the cars we can&#8217;t get in the US and also the &#8220;they are still around?&#8221; cars like this could have had a chance Suzuki.  It is entertaining to jog the memory on what we crammed ourselves into while getting hopelessly lost in the middle of nowhere Europe!</p>
<p>I still think Suzuki had zero to no chance to recover after the Samurai disaster.  Remember Audi in 1984 or so?  Weren&#8217;t their sales several years later under 10,000 or so?  I wonder at that time if their backing with VW (and I&#8217;m guessing they were under the VW family by the early 1990s but don&#8217;t know for certain) was the only thing that kept them alive in the US.<br />
I remember Suzuki replaced the tippy-mobile with that two-seater SXsomething that had no cargo room, no power, and a hardtop that came off.  Add to that the Swift thingy that became less than interesting when they dumped the lightweight body, rice-rocket engine model, the Verona with a whopping 150 hp from a 6, and a few and far between dealer network.  Yup &#8211; Isuzu and Suzuki cars can&#8217;t make it much longer.  I can see Isuzu still selling their heavy duty equipment and Suzuki selling their crotch rockets that we drool over.<br />
At least the Sidekick (2-door) was a decent off-roader as shown in a rather challenging and exciting mud and snow series of trails in the Cascades by Mount Saint Helens.  A little too much body flex though &#8211; I had to explain the crack in the windshield&#8230;and thankfully the coverage picked up the tab!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LamborghiniZ</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53184</link>
		<dc:creator>LamborghiniZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 23:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53184</guid>
		<description>I love this review. I love it because I don&#039;t think I ever saw the Aerio reviewed anywhere--even when it was new. It&#039;s reviews like this that make TTAC such an awesome site, I really do enjoy how you guys review cars that most people don&#039;t, or aren&#039;t brand new, or slip under the radar. Cars like this Aerio, the Lincoln LS, etc, cars that you aren&#039;t seeing on the news stands this very moment. Good stuff guys</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I love this review. I love it because I don&#8217;t think I ever saw the Aerio reviewed anywhere&#8211;even when it was new. It&#8217;s reviews like this that make TTAC such an awesome site, I really do enjoy how you guys review cars that most people don&#8217;t, or aren&#8217;t brand new, or slip under the radar. Cars like this Aerio, the Lincoln LS, etc, cars that you aren&#8217;t seeing on the news stands this very moment. Good stuff guys<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53159</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 22:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53159</guid>
		<description>Hello! It never ceases to amaze me that Suzuki, a maker of exciting sportbikes and  co-designer of the Mazda 2.5 KL V6 DOHC rev-happy engine, can bring such boring forgettable cars to the US market. 
  Contrast them with Honda, who perfected their motorcycles and applied the same methods to their automobiles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Hello! It never ceases to amaze me that Suzuki, a maker of exciting sportbikes and  co-designer of the Mazda 2.5 KL V6 DOHC rev-happy engine, can bring such boring forgettable cars to the US market.<br />
  Contrast them with Honda, who perfected their motorcycles and applied the same methods to their automobiles.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajeev Mehta</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53157</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajeev Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 21:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53157</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, that&#039;s the stuff: Star Trek spizzarkle without the cyclops tach and monster dash of the Civic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Oh yeah, that&#8217;s the stuff: Star Trek spizzarkle without the cyclops tach and monster dash of the Civic.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starlightmica (Richard Chen)</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53155</link>
		<dc:creator>starlightmica (Richard Chen)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 21:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53155</guid>
		<description>Picture of the original Aerio funky dash:

http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/hl/images/02aerio_dash.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Picture of the original Aerio funky dash:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/hl/images/02aerio_dash.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/hl/images/02aerio_dash.jpg</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Farago</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53153</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Farago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 20:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53153</guid>
		<description>Suzuki is number two in Japan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Suzuki is number two in Japan.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlisimo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53149</link>
		<dc:creator>carlisimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 20:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53149</guid>
		<description>Suzuki&#039;s a major player in the Japanese kei-car market (600cc minicars, usually boxy, that are cheaper to register).  They&#039;re also strong in the slight-bigger-than-minicar segment.  That covers much of the current Japanese market, sadly enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Suzuki&#8217;s a major player in the Japanese kei-car market (600cc minicars, usually boxy, that are cheaper to register).  They&#8217;re also strong in the slight-bigger-than-minicar segment.  That covers much of the current Japanese market, sadly enough.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxrent</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53148</link>
		<dc:creator>maxrent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 20:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53148</guid>
		<description>I read recently that Suzuki is the most popular auto make in Japan(in terms of sales) - particularly passenger cars.  Anyone know if that statement is still current, or even true?  While in Europe I found the Suzuki Swift is really being portrayed as a &quot;poor-man&#039;s Mini&quot; in terms of styling.  Never drove one, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I read recently that Suzuki is the most popular auto make in Japan(in terms of sales) &#8211; particularly passenger cars.  Anyone know if that statement is still current, or even true?  While in Europe I found the Suzuki Swift is really being portrayed as a &#8220;poor-man&#8217;s Mini&#8221; in terms of styling.  Never drove one, though.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat51</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53147</link>
		<dc:creator>mat51</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53147</guid>
		<description>Verona was a rebadged Daewoo, with a 150 hp small straight 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Verona was a rebadged Daewoo, with a 150 hp small straight 6.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat51</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53146</link>
		<dc:creator>mat51</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 19:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53146</guid>
		<description>I bought a 1 year old Aerio for 7,000 US dollars for my daughter. Was loaded with every option. The car has been 100% reliable - maybe that is why Suzuki is still around. Seats are correctly shaped and comfortable, something GM can never figure out. After several years the bright red paint still looks almost new. I have no complaints with this car, except its relatively short wheelbase does not provide the same stability on highways that a Civic would. But it is not a bad commuter car, and they are a complete bargain compared to a comparable used Civic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I bought a 1 year old Aerio for 7,000 US dollars for my daughter. Was loaded with every option. The car has been 100% reliable &#8211; maybe that is why Suzuki is still around. Seats are correctly shaped and comfortable, something GM can never figure out. After several years the bright red paint still looks almost new. I have no complaints with this car, except its relatively short wheelbase does not provide the same stability on highways that a Civic would. But it is not a bad commuter car, and they are a complete bargain compared to a comparable used Civic.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omnivore</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53140</link>
		<dc:creator>omnivore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53140</guid>
		<description>SherbornSean: Well, put it this way, the 5-door Focus hatchback is pretty much the only Ford I&#039;d consider owning at this point.  And that was even more true back in 2002 when it was new.  I thought it was a pretty nice ride ... handsome, space efficient, good handling, etc.  The 2.3L engine also got some nice reviews.

But actually, that&#039;s not point (and it would probably be a pretty thankless job to be the Focus&#039;s defender on this site).  My point is that both Suzuki and Ford seem to be really misreading the way the market is moving.  American drivers have been rediscovering the hatchback since about 2001.  When you think about the small cars that have produced the most buzz in the past 4 or 5 years, they&#039;ve pretty much all been hatches ... Matrix/Vibe, Protege5/Mazda[speed]3, xA, xB, Fit, Rabbit/GTI, A3, etc.  Even Dodge is in the game, even if the Caliber&#039;s a piece of junk.  Americans seem to be realizing that sedans just don&#039;t make much sense (from a space-efficiency standpoint) on the small-car scale.  It seems weird that this is the moment that Suzuki and Ford choose to discontinue their small hatches.  At least Suzuki is replacing the dead Aerio hatch with the SX4 hatch (which is by all accounts a much better car).  Which leads us once again to the conclusion that Dearborn is one of the world headquarters of Lights-On-But-Nobody-Home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->SherbornSean: Well, put it this way, the 5-door Focus hatchback is pretty much the only Ford I&#8217;d consider owning at this point.  And that was even more true back in 2002 when it was new.  I thought it was a pretty nice ride &#8230; handsome, space efficient, good handling, etc.  The 2.3L engine also got some nice reviews.</p>
<p>But actually, that&#8217;s not point (and it would probably be a pretty thankless job to be the Focus&#8217;s defender on this site).  My point is that both Suzuki and Ford seem to be really misreading the way the market is moving.  American drivers have been rediscovering the hatchback since about 2001.  When you think about the small cars that have produced the most buzz in the past 4 or 5 years, they&#8217;ve pretty much all been hatches &#8230; Matrix/Vibe, Protege5/Mazda[speed]3, xA, xB, Fit, Rabbit/GTI, A3, etc.  Even Dodge is in the game, even if the Caliber&#8217;s a piece of junk.  Americans seem to be realizing that sedans just don&#8217;t make much sense (from a space-efficiency standpoint) on the small-car scale.  It seems weird that this is the moment that Suzuki and Ford choose to discontinue their small hatches.  At least Suzuki is replacing the dead Aerio hatch with the SX4 hatch (which is by all accounts a much better car).  Which leads us once again to the conclusion that Dearborn is one of the world headquarters of Lights-On-But-Nobody-Home.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Tenenbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53139</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Tenenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53139</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t the Verona have an inline 6?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Doesn&#8217;t the Verona have an inline 6?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan Benoit</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53138</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Benoit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53138</guid>
		<description>Wow.  My &#039;teg was the same weight, less horsepower, better gas mileage, and went 0-60 in 7 seconds.  How can they make it so slow, indeed.  But I&#039;m not surprised -- my sister&#039;s Verona is such a sluggish beast I thought it was a 4-banger... my jaw hit the dash when sis told me it was a V6.  That Verona is the biggest piece of junk car ever... 1100 miles isn&#039;t far enough away from that atrocity.  But my sister was right about one thing.  From the outside, it is cute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Wow.  My &#8216;teg was the same weight, less horsepower, better gas mileage, and went 0-60 in 7 seconds.  How can they make it so slow, indeed.  But I&#8217;m not surprised &#8212; my sister&#8217;s Verona is such a sluggish beast I thought it was a 4-banger&#8230; my jaw hit the dash when sis told me it was a V6.  That Verona is the biggest piece of junk car ever&#8230; 1100 miles isn&#8217;t far enough away from that atrocity.  But my sister was right about one thing.  From the outside, it is cute.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave M.</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53130</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53130</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Isuzu’s still around? How can you tell?&lt;/i&gt;

I have an &#039;01 Trooper that I adore - perfectly sized, hugely reliable, tremendously comfortable, and goes anywhere.  My only disappointment is the 16 mpg.

When I shopped around in &#039;00, my local Isuzu dealer (also a Lincoln-Mercury dealer - talk about a sales trifecta of suck) had hundreds of L-Ms on the lot, and dozens and dozens of Troopers, Axioms, Rodeos and even a few of that freaky space thing, the Vehicross.  From all indications, business was VERY good.

Starting around &#039;04, the back dealer lot got thinner and thinner concerning inventory.  By &#039;06, there was no need for use of the back lot.....dozens of L-M&#039;s were parked out front, and a handful of Isuzu Ascender and i370 models were available.  

I was in for service a few days  ago - they had 3 Ascenders (one and &#039;06 model) and 2 i370s.....and maybe 120 or so L-Ms.  The back lot was packed to the hilt again....the Toyota dealer down the street was leasing the space for his additional inventory.  Truthfully, I&#039;m surprised the dealer still handles Isuzu, although there always is a smattering of older Troopers and Rodeos around for service.  

Isuzu blew it big time when they went to rebadged GMs for their product.  The Trooper should have been updated - owners are generally rabid when it comes to loyalty.  A turbodiesel or hybrid crossover would be a welcomed addition, as well as a reliable (non-GM clone) small pickup.  

Alas, though, I&#039;d be surprised if Isuzu retail sees 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>Isuzu’s still around? How can you tell?</i></p>
<p>I have an &#8216;01 Trooper that I adore &#8211; perfectly sized, hugely reliable, tremendously comfortable, and goes anywhere.  My only disappointment is the 16 mpg.</p>
<p>When I shopped around in &#8216;00, my local Isuzu dealer (also a Lincoln-Mercury dealer &#8211; talk about a sales trifecta of suck) had hundreds of L-Ms on the lot, and dozens and dozens of Troopers, Axioms, Rodeos and even a few of that freaky space thing, the Vehicross.  From all indications, business was VERY good.</p>
<p>Starting around &#8216;04, the back dealer lot got thinner and thinner concerning inventory.  By &#8216;06, there was no need for use of the back lot&#8230;..dozens of L-M&#8217;s were parked out front, and a handful of Isuzu Ascender and i370 models were available.  </p>
<p>I was in for service a few days  ago &#8211; they had 3 Ascenders (one and &#8216;06 model) and 2 i370s&#8230;..and maybe 120 or so L-Ms.  The back lot was packed to the hilt again&#8230;.the Toyota dealer down the street was leasing the space for his additional inventory.  Truthfully, I&#8217;m surprised the dealer still handles Isuzu, although there always is a smattering of older Troopers and Rodeos around for service.  </p>
<p>Isuzu blew it big time when they went to rebadged GMs for their product.  The Trooper should have been updated &#8211; owners are generally rabid when it comes to loyalty.  A turbodiesel or hybrid crossover would be a welcomed addition, as well as a reliable (non-GM clone) small pickup.  </p>
<p>Alas, though, I&#8217;d be surprised if Isuzu retail sees 2008.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NICKNICK</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/suzuki-aerio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53115</link>
		<dc:creator>NICKNICK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 17:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=3844#comment-53115</guid>
		<description>HEATHROI:
&quot;why is it that there is no decent 2 litre compact availible. can anyone name one?&quot;

Mazda 3, Impreza, maybe VW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->HEATHROI:<br />
&#8220;why is it that there is no decent 2 litre compact availible. can anyone name one?&#8221;</p>
<p>Mazda 3, Impreza, maybe VW<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 49/163 queries in 0.124 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 22:14:29 -->