By Paul Niedermeyer
January 31, 2007 -
Back in the day, Subaru couldn’t afford to build a new vehicle to compete in the smoking hot SUV sector. So they took an Impreza, jacked it up a couple of inches, raised the roof and reskinned the body. The result was a hit, and helped define the modern small CUV. Ten years later, the Subaru Forester battles on, facing its third gen competitors (Honda CRV and Toyota RAV4) with nothing more than a few questionable sheet metal creases, a spiffed up interior, and the addition of the turbocharged XT model. The CUV pool’s getting more crowded by the day, and, compared to the Subie’s well-worn REI fleece, the competition looks like its wearing designer duds. We checked out an XT to answer a simple question: is it a classic or a relic?
The basic package hasn’t changed, nor should it. The Popemobile proportions (tall windshield and high roof) are a motorized mitzvah for tall drivers. While the result flies in the face of history– when Chrysler President K. T. Keller insisted that tall men should be able to wear fedoras in his cars, he almost killed the company—the resulting visibility is virtually unparalleled. Swoopy cars, low angle windshields and obese pillars be damned; Forester owners want to see who they’re cutting off where they’re parking.
The Forester’s boxy exterior has suffered a reverse face lift (a face drop?): folds and lines have replaced youthful smoothness. Or is it just aging naturally? Something short, ugly and Russian comes to mind; either a Lada Niva or an old babushka. Who cares; the Forester was born ugly, but it remains true to its mother’s wise admonition: “It’s what’s inside that counts.”
And mother’s advice has been well heeded. Compared to lesser Foresters of yore, stepping into the ’07 XT is like visiting your favorite old diner after it’s been turned into the Trattoria de Toscano. Subaru’s replaced the old fabric booth with heated leather seats that wouldn’t be out of place in a German motor. The steering wheel is like putting on expensive leather gloves. The instruments are clean and classic; no trendy gimmicks. The aluminesque center panel is a la mode, but the controls are logical and obvious. Workmanship: a solid B+. A good thing too, because with that lovely big sky-light overhead, flaws have no place to hide.
Unfortunately, there’s one less-then-salubrious carryover: rear leg room. The Forester’s second row is as ergonomically challenged as the third row of a transplant CUV. My teenage son’s solution: stretch his feet out between the front seats. How safe (and smelly) is that?
The Forrester XT’s inner beauty really shines in the engine compartment. The 2.5 liter flat four cranks out 224 horsepower and 226 ft/lbs of torque, and with its inherent nigh-perfect balance, it always stays cool and smooth. It lets you know it’s there with that turbo-whistle, but it’s never objectionable, unless Lexus is your benchmark.
Like most turbos, it’s a little coy at low revs, but once past 3000rpm the sex bomb explodes all the way to its 6500rpm redline. With AWD keeping the XT’s footwear firmly in contact with the pavement, redlining first gear is like high school hot-rod antics for grown-ups: all the fun, but none of the attention-grabbing tell-tale of burning rubber. Second gear takes you to 60mph in just 5.3 seconds. Keep rowing and the quarter mile arrives in 13.8. There’s more bang on offer than you’ll find at a percussionist’s convention.
The XT’s traction, ride and handling are up to the accelerative challenge. The all-season 17” rubber sing their surrender to lateral g-forces too early, but that’s a fair trade-off for getting to the ski lodge. With its low center of gravity (a la boxer engine), SUV vertigo is noticeable by its absence. Whether throwing the machine sideways on blind-corner gravel logging roads, bumping down a rocky path to a hiking trail, making high speed runs on deserted desert roads or barreling through snow, ice, wind and rain; the XT is always supple, accomplished and confident.
When cruising the freeway, the XT’s low gearing is a lot less helpful. I kept reaching out to the shifter in hopes that it had miraculously grown a sixth gear. At 75mph or so, an extra cog would put the revs right at the intersection of turbo-plateau and turbo-boost, in that preferred state of restful alertness rather than futile restlessness. Sigh.
After the styling miscalculation with the B9 Tribeca, trepidation as to what Subaru will throw our way with the next gen Forester is warranted. They seem to be chasing an Audi/Volvoesque styling direction, with highly uneven results. The current Forester may well end up being the last in a long lineage of Subaru funky boxes. Buy or wait? My take: better the devil you know.
90 Responses to “ Subaru Forester 2.5 XT Review ”
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 » Show All Reverse Order
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 » Show All Reverse Order
Leave a Reply
Back to Top
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Subscribe to Newsletter
More Reviews

Digg
del.icio.us
Blinklist
Furl
Netscape
Google
NewsVine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
Windows Live
POWERED
January 31st, 2007 at 1:04 pm
Coming soon: The Forester STI.
And yes I agree about the gearing. It’s a jackrabbit, but if you’ve got a highway commute…
January 31st, 2007 at 1:25 pm
For all that room, you think they could have moved the second row back a few inches. It’s rare flaw on what is otherwise a good vehicle, but I know a friend of mine specifically did not buy a Forester for that reason. Any word on this being fixed in the future?
January 31st, 2007 at 1:30 pm
Cowbell: It shares Impreza platform/hard-body points; it would have been impossible to move the seat back without major surgery. I assume the next gen will presumably be a bit better in that regard??
January 31st, 2007 at 1:36 pm
5.3 secs to 60? really? The gearing is short and the power is a plenty, but this car is not that light. So this number is amazing. And the 1/4 miles too.
My onl gripe with Subaru is the price. It’s not inexpensive. I’m willing to bet that more than one will exclaim: “How much? for a subaru?”
January 31st, 2007 at 1:37 pm
Why the French pics? Just curious…from a Japanese company with huge US market.
I like these a lot, but the rear seat room was a shocker to me. The vehicle just seems large enough, but I was unaware that it was just an Impreza, not a Legacy base. That’s too bad, because we need to see more of these instead of SUVs. Great cars, and that thing is really quick!
January 31st, 2007 at 1:42 pm
subarus, for all their inherent goodness, have gotta be the homliest line of cars in existance. This from the company that produced the SVX, one of the most gorgeous cars ever!. I wonder if Guigaro pissed them off.
January 31st, 2007 at 1:44 pm
“How much? for a Subaru” My tester was about $29k. Not bad, if you can see it as a poor man’s Cayenne Turbo.
January 31st, 2007 at 1:48 pm
60 mph in 5.3s/13.8s quarter?? You mean from the point when you hit 2nd gear right? If not, I crown this the ultimate stock sleeper!
January 31st, 2007 at 2:03 pm
It’s been wearing the crown for several years now.
January 31st, 2007 at 2:04 pm
guyincognito, the XT beats the Legacy GT in 0-60 time. The GT will do the job in about 5.8. This is irritating to GT owners, but we get it back in increased composure through corners. A well-driven XT on aftermarket tires is able to surprise and annoy many Audi and BMW owners.