<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capsule History: Chevrolet Camaro LS1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:39:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Run4TheShadows</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-2/#comment-1507185</link>
		<dc:creator>Run4TheShadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1507185</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m definitely part of the younger generation and I have to say, for me, Mustang, Camaro, Firebird, and Challenger are the only cars that matter.  To say that &quot;the younger people have moved on&quot; is false, I wouldn&#039;t buy an import in a million years.  Sure imports have come a long way over the years, but they are all business and zero charm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m definitely part of the younger generation and I have to say, for me, Mustang, Camaro, Firebird, and Challenger are the only cars that matter.  To say that &#8220;the younger people have moved on&#8221; is false, I wouldn&#8217;t buy an import in a million years.  Sure imports have come a long way over the years, but they are all business and zero charm.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktm</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-2/#comment-1502211</link>
		<dc:creator>ktm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1502211</guid>
		<description>Your 1977 Corvette had 180 hp because they choked it with a small carb.  A simple carb upgrade would have resulted in significant power increase.  It had 5.7L of displacement but was only allowed to breath through a straw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Your 1977 Corvette had 180 hp because they choked it with a small carb.  A simple carb upgrade would have resulted in significant power increase.  It had 5.7L of displacement but was only allowed to breath through a straw.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatsanobeen</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-2/#comment-1500513</link>
		<dc:creator>whatsanobeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1500513</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always found the redundant Pontiac Trans Am to be the more appealing of the two GM ponies, but I digress. 
I never really understood either the intentions of the Camaro/Trans Am during the late &#039;90s- early &#039;00s. People have told me that these cars are legendary, even in stock (V8) spec, but when I drove a 2001 Camaro SS coupe example, it felt like a muscled-up Buick. Don&#039;t get me wrong, the power of the car was immense but so was the size, and the suspension tuning seemed too disconnected and floaty. The transmission gear ratios seemed to fall out of the engine&#039;s power reach with every upshift unless you stood on the gas. It just felt too lazy to be a proper muscle car, or even a GT for that matter.

I hope the 2010 examples, sold now, are a whole-hearted improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;ve always found the redundant Pontiac Trans Am to be the more appealing of the two GM ponies, but I digress.<br />
I never really understood either the intentions of the Camaro/Trans Am during the late &#8217;90s- early &#8217;00s. People have told me that these cars are legendary, even in stock (V8) spec, but when I drove a 2001 Camaro SS coupe example, it felt like a muscled-up Buick. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, the power of the car was immense but so was the size, and the suspension tuning seemed too disconnected and floaty. The transmission gear ratios seemed to fall out of the engine&#8217;s power reach with every upshift unless you stood on the gas. It just felt too lazy to be a proper muscle car, or even a GT for that matter.</p>
<p>I hope the 2010 examples, sold now, are a whole-hearted improvement.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeveto3</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-2/#comment-1500186</link>
		<dc:creator>joeveto3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1500186</guid>
		<description>I had a disco blue 77 Corvette (Corvette Light Blue was the official color) that I restored a few years ago.  I yanked the worn out small block, that brand new barely had 180hp, and rebuilt it with some modern bits that cranked up the heat to around 300.  It was a fun car that brought with it more than its fair share of stereotypes.  But what, with the sound up (Styx, Journey, Zeppelin), and the t-tops off...it was a time machine that flat out rocked, critics be damned.

I believe these older pony cars have the same magic about them. Pick one up for cheap, take care of it, and then rip off the tops, crank up the tunes, and hammer the gas.

What better way is there to forget about today&#039;s &quot;cars-as-appliances&quot; and today&#039;s problems?

Give me a late 90&#039;s Z-28 or a Formula Firebird.  Black or Mystic Teal.  

And a Soundgarden CD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I had a disco blue 77 Corvette (Corvette Light Blue was the official color) that I restored a few years ago.  I yanked the worn out small block, that brand new barely had 180hp, and rebuilt it with some modern bits that cranked up the heat to around 300.  It was a fun car that brought with it more than its fair share of stereotypes.  But what, with the sound up (Styx, Journey, Zeppelin), and the t-tops off&#8230;it was a time machine that flat out rocked, critics be damned.</p>
<p>I believe these older pony cars have the same magic about them. Pick one up for cheap, take care of it, and then rip off the tops, crank up the tunes, and hammer the gas.</p>
<p>What better way is there to forget about today&#8217;s &#8220;cars-as-appliances&#8221; and today&#8217;s problems?</p>
<p>Give me a late 90&#8217;s Z-28 or a Formula Firebird.  Black or Mystic Teal.  </p>
<p>And a Soundgarden CD.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canucknucklehead</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-2/#comment-1499980</link>
		<dc:creator>Canucknucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1499980</guid>
		<description>While working as a GM service advisor, we had a rather picky customer with a six speed LS1, which, surprise of all surprises, had a bad dash rattle. They all had dash rattles because the Frogs (sorry, French Canadians) who assembled them in St Therese were either drunk, stoned, hungover or all three about 90% of the time. The only exception to this rule was the day before payday, but I digress....

So anyway, Picky Man comes in and says, &quot;I&#039;m going on vacation for a month. When I come back, it had better not rattle, so drive it until it fixed!&quot;

Well, who could turn down such an invitation? We did drive it. It even had a full tank of gas! Boy, did that thing have power to burn and since it wasn&#039;t ours, we drove the snot out of it. I personally never did hear the dash rattle because I had AC/DC or Motorhead blasting on the stereo but I did manage to burn the entire tank of gas on the weekend and come back on Monday with a sheepish grin. OK, the car was a total POS like practically everything we sold but at least this POS went like stink. I also emptied the gas tank in like 250 km.

We never did fix the rattle because since when we found one, another immediately took it&#039;s place. Picky Man was really pissed but since the car had like 59,000 km on it we knew we would never see him again.

I know, my bad, this kind of thing NEVER happens at dealerships.......The only other time was then I was at Chrysler when our tower operator took his eight year old out in a Viper and crashed into the  local Bank of Montreal branch.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->While working as a GM service advisor, we had a rather picky customer with a six speed LS1, which, surprise of all surprises, had a bad dash rattle. They all had dash rattles because the Frogs (sorry, French Canadians) who assembled them in St Therese were either drunk, stoned, hungover or all three about 90% of the time. The only exception to this rule was the day before payday, but I digress&#8230;.</p>
<p>So anyway, Picky Man comes in and says, &#8220;I&#8217;m going on vacation for a month. When I come back, it had better not rattle, so drive it until it fixed!&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, who could turn down such an invitation? We did drive it. It even had a full tank of gas! Boy, did that thing have power to burn and since it wasn&#8217;t ours, we drove the snot out of it. I personally never did hear the dash rattle because I had AC/DC or Motorhead blasting on the stereo but I did manage to burn the entire tank of gas on the weekend and come back on Monday with a sheepish grin. OK, the car was a total POS like practically everything we sold but at least this POS went like stink. I also emptied the gas tank in like 250 km.</p>
<p>We never did fix the rattle because since when we found one, another immediately took it&#8217;s place. Picky Man was really pissed but since the car had like 59,000 km on it we knew we would never see him again.</p>
<p>I know, my bad, this kind of thing NEVER happens at dealerships&#8230;&#8230;.The only other time was then I was at Chrysler when our tower operator took his eight year old out in a Viper and crashed into the  local Bank of Montreal branch&#8230;..<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dolorean23</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-2/#comment-1499483</link>
		<dc:creator>dolorean23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1499483</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I never did get why the SN95 sold so well. They’re really, really mediocre and ugly. On the other hand, I also think that the 4th gen Camaro was really good-looking, even if a bit 90s-futuristic (see also: the GM dustbuster vans).&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; 

I know its been a long time, but think back some. The &#039;87-93 &quot;Fox body&quot; Mustang&#039;s styling had grown long in the tooth by &#039;93. Also remember that Ford had a huge fight on its hands as the majority of the company wanted to stop producing the iconic Mustang for the front drive Probe. A viscious backlash ensued, Mustang owners petitioning the company, that prompted the SN-95. The 5.0L soldiered on for two more years until the Modular 4.6L took over in 1996.

I own and love my 1995 Mustang Cobra convertible with the optional hardtop and the last 5.0L made in Cleveland, OH, like God intended. Its got panel gaps so large that you could stick a pencil eraser through and has leather seating designed for durability not for comfort. But I don&#039;t care. I bought an American Icon and Supercar that on its own was able to blast to 60 in 5.5 secs. For a little over $3K, I&#039;ve redone the suspension, tweaked the engine and exhaust and now am a proud owner of a 12.5 sec car. The paint is still in great shape, no cancerous GM paintjob here, a major problem for GM at the time.

Simply put. Ford never lost focus as the Mustang being a pony car. It has always been relatively inexpensive to buy in basic form and for relatively little extra money becomes a fast car with that American V8 baritone that even Europeans envy. The Camaro simply lost its MoJo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em></em><em><strong>I never did get why the SN95 sold so well. They’re really, really mediocre and ugly. On the other hand, I also think that the 4th gen Camaro was really good-looking, even if a bit 90s-futuristic (see also: the GM dustbuster vans).</strong></em> </p>
<p>I know its been a long time, but think back some. The &#8216;87-93 &#8220;Fox body&#8221; Mustang&#8217;s styling had grown long in the tooth by &#8216;93. Also remember that Ford had a huge fight on its hands as the majority of the company wanted to stop producing the iconic Mustang for the front drive Probe. A viscious backlash ensued, Mustang owners petitioning the company, that prompted the SN-95. The 5.0L soldiered on for two more years until the Modular 4.6L took over in 1996.</p>
<p>I own and love my 1995 Mustang Cobra convertible with the optional hardtop and the last 5.0L made in Cleveland, OH, like God intended. Its got panel gaps so large that you could stick a pencil eraser through and has leather seating designed for durability not for comfort. But I don&#8217;t care. I bought an American Icon and Supercar that on its own was able to blast to 60 in 5.5 secs. For a little over $3K, I&#8217;ve redone the suspension, tweaked the engine and exhaust and now am a proud owner of a 12.5 sec car. The paint is still in great shape, no cancerous GM paintjob here, a major problem for GM at the time.</p>
<p>Simply put. Ford never lost focus as the Mustang being a pony car. It has always been relatively inexpensive to buy in basic form and for relatively little extra money becomes a fast car with that American V8 baritone that even Europeans envy. The Camaro simply lost its MoJo.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattftoo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-2/#comment-1499253</link>
		<dc:creator>mattftoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1499253</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had a 99 SS since new.

The comments made about &quot;most performance for the money&quot; applies here.  My car ran 11.89 with an all stock internal engine.  It has headers, intake, catback exhaust, and 4.10 rear axle ratio.

It has been retired from drag racing (with well over 200 passes down the track) and I&#039;ve been taking it to road courses, where it doesn&#039;t get much attention until after the first few sessions.

That is the time that the vette owners, porsche owners, bmw owners come over to ask &quot;what have you done to that thing to make it run so good (or well)?&quot;  I must admit that I have made a few improvements since retiring from the drag days, but I haven&#039;t spent over $30,000 including the original purchase of the car.  Aside from a problem with O2 sensors blowing a fuse (caused by extended periods at full throttle), this car has been bulletproof, rattle free, and fast as hell.  I&#039;m probably going to turn it into a daily driver, as I&#039;m saving my pennies for a lightly used Zo6.

The car may not be for everyone, but I&#039;m sure glad they built one for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;ve had a 99 SS since new.</p>
<p>The comments made about &#8220;most performance for the money&#8221; applies here.  My car ran 11.89 with an all stock internal engine.  It has headers, intake, catback exhaust, and 4.10 rear axle ratio.</p>
<p>It has been retired from drag racing (with well over 200 passes down the track) and I&#8217;ve been taking it to road courses, where it doesn&#8217;t get much attention until after the first few sessions.</p>
<p>That is the time that the vette owners, porsche owners, bmw owners come over to ask &#8220;what have you done to that thing to make it run so good (or well)?&#8221;  I must admit that I have made a few improvements since retiring from the drag days, but I haven&#8217;t spent over $30,000 including the original purchase of the car.  Aside from a problem with O2 sensors blowing a fuse (caused by extended periods at full throttle), this car has been bulletproof, rattle free, and fast as hell.  I&#8217;m probably going to turn it into a daily driver, as I&#8217;m saving my pennies for a lightly used Zo6.</p>
<p>The car may not be for everyone, but I&#8217;m sure glad they built one for me.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threeer</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-2/#comment-1499071</link>
		<dc:creator>threeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1499071</guid>
		<description>My father-in-law has squirreled away a final year Firebird Firehawk in his garage for the eventual handing over to my son.  Burnt orange metallic, leather, t-tops, etc...not my cup of tea, but drove it once and have to admit that once you look past the crappy interior and build quality, stomping on the gas in a straight away sure is fun.  I agree, however, that I would not want to drive it every day.  So, it&#039;ll remain a low mileage garage queen, even once my son inherits it (maybe in four years when he graduates from the Air Force Academy and my F-I-L is no longer able to drive it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My father-in-law has squirreled away a final year Firebird Firehawk in his garage for the eventual handing over to my son.  Burnt orange metallic, leather, t-tops, etc&#8230;not my cup of tea, but drove it once and have to admit that once you look past the crappy interior and build quality, stomping on the gas in a straight away sure is fun.  I agree, however, that I would not want to drive it every day.  So, it&#8217;ll remain a low mileage garage queen, even once my son inherits it (maybe in four years when he graduates from the Air Force Academy and my F-I-L is no longer able to drive it).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spasticnapjerk</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-2/#comment-1499006</link>
		<dc:creator>spasticnapjerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1499006</guid>
		<description>My &#039;98 Z-28 6MT T-top Camaro has 183,000 miles on it. Yep, you read that right. 

It&#039;s white, with the black b-pillars, window tint, and factory chrome wheels. I get complements on it all the time. 

2nd clutch, 2nd water pump, 2nd thermostat. 2nd driver&#039;s side window motor and 2nd windshield. Oh, and the AC compressor ate itself three years ago. You would think that this car would be a hunk of junk (maybe it is) but it&#039;s held up pretty well.

She burns oil, especially at WOT (so the owner of the other car tells me...that&#039;s the view they get!)but what do you expect, that engine has a lot of wear. Someone once told me that the LS1&#039;s CADD design and manufacturing allowed the internal engine tolerances to be much tighter, and this is why this motor has such a long life.

I was going to get rid of this car, but then I put an exhaust system on it a couple of years ago. The car starts up with a quick turn of the key, and sounds great doing it. 

Yes, the live rear axle is a pain. There is more than one story about someone wiping out on a mid-corner bump. BMW-like it isn&#039;t.

It refuses to drive in a straight line any more. Maybe it&#039;s worn bushings or the fact that I&#039;m on the original springs and shocks. Yep, rides like an ox-cart. 

But when I nail it, I can tell that the awesome power of the mighty LS1 is twisting the chassis, because it twists back during the 1-2 shift. I have to steer one way and the other to keep it in a straight line. No one can really appreciate how fast this car is until halfway through 3rd, when it&#039;s pulling stronger than any car they&#039;ve ever been in, most likely. It&#039;s a seriously fun car to drive. In fact, I think I&#039;ll go drive it, right now! 

Long live the LS1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My &#8216;98 Z-28 6MT T-top Camaro has 183,000 miles on it. Yep, you read that right. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s white, with the black b-pillars, window tint, and factory chrome wheels. I get complements on it all the time. </p>
<p>2nd clutch, 2nd water pump, 2nd thermostat. 2nd driver&#8217;s side window motor and 2nd windshield. Oh, and the AC compressor ate itself three years ago. You would think that this car would be a hunk of junk (maybe it is) but it&#8217;s held up pretty well.</p>
<p>She burns oil, especially at WOT (so the owner of the other car tells me&#8230;that&#8217;s the view they get!)but what do you expect, that engine has a lot of wear. Someone once told me that the LS1&#8217;s CADD design and manufacturing allowed the internal engine tolerances to be much tighter, and this is why this motor has such a long life.</p>
<p>I was going to get rid of this car, but then I put an exhaust system on it a couple of years ago. The car starts up with a quick turn of the key, and sounds great doing it. </p>
<p>Yes, the live rear axle is a pain. There is more than one story about someone wiping out on a mid-corner bump. BMW-like it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>It refuses to drive in a straight line any more. Maybe it&#8217;s worn bushings or the fact that I&#8217;m on the original springs and shocks. Yep, rides like an ox-cart. </p>
<p>But when I nail it, I can tell that the awesome power of the mighty LS1 is twisting the chassis, because it twists back during the 1-2 shift. I have to steer one way and the other to keep it in a straight line. No one can really appreciate how fast this car is until halfway through 3rd, when it&#8217;s pulling stronger than any car they&#8217;ve ever been in, most likely. It&#8217;s a seriously fun car to drive. In fact, I think I&#8217;ll go drive it, right now! </p>
<p>Long live the LS1!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kluttz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-2/#comment-1498979</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kluttz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498979</guid>
		<description>Oops, too late.  Sorry, Sunnyvale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Oops, too late.  Sorry, Sunnyvale.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kluttz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-2/#comment-1498976</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kluttz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498976</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t get in or out of a car, any car, at 55.  I would wait until it came to a complete stop.  

I&#039;ll be in town all week, if RF will let me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I wouldn&#8217;t get in or out of a car, any car, at 55.  I would wait until it came to a complete stop.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be in town all week, if RF will let me.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistrernee</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-2/#comment-1498906</link>
		<dc:creator>mistrernee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498906</guid>
		<description>@rudiger

The optispark ignition was modified in 95 models with a vacuum line attached to the distributor to remove moisture.  This greatly improved its durability.

The LS1 got a coil pack ignition system which completely removed the distributor and any issues accociated with it.

The older LT1 can be modified with an aftermarket coil pack system for not a whole lot of money (about the same as replacing the optispark distributor).  It continues to use the optispark optical sensor but bypasses the distributor attached to it, which was the cause of the problems.

The imsproved 95+ distributor doesn&#039;t fit the older LT1 engines, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@rudiger</p>
<p>The optispark ignition was modified in 95 models with a vacuum line attached to the distributor to remove moisture.  This greatly improved its durability.</p>
<p>The LS1 got a coil pack ignition system which completely removed the distributor and any issues accociated with it.</p>
<p>The older LT1 can be modified with an aftermarket coil pack system for not a whole lot of money (about the same as replacing the optispark distributor).  It continues to use the optispark optical sensor but bypasses the distributor attached to it, which was the cause of the problems.</p>
<p>The imsproved 95+ distributor doesn&#8217;t fit the older LT1 engines, of course.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1498815</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498815</guid>
		<description>Some people JUST DON&#039;T GET IT!  And NEVER WILL!  So let&#039;s do some math.  Awesome V8 motor + huge tires/rims + stout 6-speed tranny (5-speed in Mustang) + impressive brakes (at least on Camaro - 4 wheel discs) + performance tuned suspension + stainless steel exhaust (On Mustang, not sure about Camaro) = close to the cost of a typical small car.  In other words, close to the final cost of purchasing one of these cars back then....  So what&#039;s my point?  Simple, you&#039;re not going to have a lot of money left for non-plastic/squeak free interiors.  AND WE DIDN&#039;T CARE!!!!  In the early 90&#039;s you could get a Mustang LX 5.0 (at invoice with typical rebates) for around $12,000.  Let me repeat, $12,000!!!!  And a V8 Camaro wasn&#039;t that much more...  Not to mention the aftermarket was full of go-fast parts that could transform either into a 12 second car for 2-3 grand (give or take).  I MISS THESE DAYS!!!!  Not only did you have to spend DOUBLE to match the performance, but TRIPLE!!!  A Twin Turbo 300Z was mid 30&#039;s and the Supra Turbo even more (Remember how Toyota had to drop the price 10 grand cause no one was buying...).  Many of us could not afford that type of cash, so we were more than happy to hang with these cars at a third of the price.  Plastics and all!!  I long for these days, as V8 power is no longer cheap.  If you adust for inflation, $12,000 in 1993 is now $18,000.  But a V8 Mustang is approaching 30G&#039;s (if not more), and the Camaro is priced even higher.  At these prices people have a RIGHT to complain about sub-par materials.  But back in the early 90&#039;s, you knew you were paying for the performance and nothing else....  And you loved every minute...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Some people JUST DON&#8217;T GET IT!  And NEVER WILL!  So let&#8217;s do some math.  Awesome V8 motor + huge tires/rims + stout 6-speed tranny (5-speed in Mustang) + impressive brakes (at least on Camaro &#8211; 4 wheel discs) + performance tuned suspension + stainless steel exhaust (On Mustang, not sure about Camaro) = close to the cost of a typical small car.  In other words, close to the final cost of purchasing one of these cars back then&#8230;.  So what&#8217;s my point?  Simple, you&#8217;re not going to have a lot of money left for non-plastic/squeak free interiors.  AND WE DIDN&#8217;T CARE!!!!  In the early 90&#8217;s you could get a Mustang LX 5.0 (at invoice with typical rebates) for around $12,000.  Let me repeat, $12,000!!!!  And a V8 Camaro wasn&#8217;t that much more&#8230;  Not to mention the aftermarket was full of go-fast parts that could transform either into a 12 second car for 2-3 grand (give or take).  I MISS THESE DAYS!!!!  Not only did you have to spend DOUBLE to match the performance, but TRIPLE!!!  A Twin Turbo 300Z was mid 30&#8217;s and the Supra Turbo even more (Remember how Toyota had to drop the price 10 grand cause no one was buying&#8230;).  Many of us could not afford that type of cash, so we were more than happy to hang with these cars at a third of the price.  Plastics and all!!  I long for these days, as V8 power is no longer cheap.  If you adust for inflation, $12,000 in 1993 is now $18,000.  But a V8 Mustang is approaching 30G&#8217;s (if not more), and the Camaro is priced even higher.  At these prices people have a RIGHT to complain about sub-par materials.  But back in the early 90&#8217;s, you knew you were paying for the performance and nothing else&#8230;.  And you loved every minute&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkSpork</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1498522</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkSpork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498522</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I remember sitting in a Camaro at the Detroit Auto Show back in 1993/4 when the Camaro was new. I was the target market but as soon as I sat in it I thought “I could never drive this, let alone drive it fast” as I couldn’t figure out where the corners were. It felt like sitting in a 20 ft long bathtub. That and the GM bubbletastic interior had me heading over to the Mustang to take a look.&lt;/em&gt;

My thoughts exactly. I thought it would be a really cool car to own up until I sat in one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>I remember sitting in a Camaro at the Detroit Auto Show back in 1993/4 when the Camaro was new. I was the target market but as soon as I sat in it I thought “I could never drive this, let alone drive it fast” as I couldn’t figure out where the corners were. It felt like sitting in a 20 ft long bathtub. That and the GM bubbletastic interior had me heading over to the Mustang to take a look.</em></p>
<p>My thoughts exactly. I thought it would be a really cool car to own up until I sat in one.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noreserve</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1498386</link>
		<dc:creator>noreserve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498386</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;fincar1 :
June 14th, 2009 at 12:05 pm

Ended up doing it himself, and wasn’t fit to talk to for a week and a half.&lt;/em&gt;

That&#039;s funny! I haven&#039;t replaced a fuel pump, but replaced the spark plugs on the LT-1. What a nightmare. There are a couple that are a major pain in the ass to reach - we&#039;re talking underneath the car and reaching up into positions your arm was never meant to see. It was a multi-hour job at a minimum. I remember getting almost claustrophobic when my arm got stuck once. One of the worst engines to get to in that application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>fincar1 :<br />
June 14th, 2009 at 12:05 pm</p>
<p>Ended up doing it himself, and wasn’t fit to talk to for a week and a half.</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s funny! I haven&#8217;t replaced a fuel pump, but replaced the spark plugs on the LT-1. What a nightmare. There are a couple that are a major pain in the ass to reach &#8211; we&#8217;re talking underneath the car and reaching up into positions your arm was never meant to see. It was a multi-hour job at a minimum. I remember getting almost claustrophobic when my arm got stuck once. One of the worst engines to get to in that application.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fincar1</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1498350</link>
		<dc:creator>fincar1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498350</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed the hell out of my 1980 Firebird Formula even though it had the small V8 and automatic. Nice riding, good handling car, red in and out. I even test-drove a 1980 Camaro that was a six with three-speed, and it gave a good account of itself; surprised the hell out of me.

I have no idea what they were thinking with the 82-up Camaros and Firebirds, with their long front overhang and the front wheels tucked right back next to the doors. Were they originally thinking of making them front-wheel-drive?

Any of you guys with a 80&#039;s or later Firebird or Camaro ever had to replace the fuel pump? My neighbor did - he about fell down when he found out what the dealer wanted for the job. Ended up doing it himself, and wasn&#039;t fit to talk to for a week and a half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I enjoyed the hell out of my 1980 Firebird Formula even though it had the small V8 and automatic. Nice riding, good handling car, red in and out. I even test-drove a 1980 Camaro that was a six with three-speed, and it gave a good account of itself; surprised the hell out of me.</p>
<p>I have no idea what they were thinking with the 82-up Camaros and Firebirds, with their long front overhang and the front wheels tucked right back next to the doors. Were they originally thinking of making them front-wheel-drive?</p>
<p>Any of you guys with a 80&#8217;s or later Firebird or Camaro ever had to replace the fuel pump? My neighbor did &#8211; he about fell down when he found out what the dealer wanted for the job. Ended up doing it himself, and wasn&#8217;t fit to talk to for a week and a half.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudiger</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1498278</link>
		<dc:creator>rudiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498278</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;noreserve: &lt;em&gt;I bought a 95 Camaro Z28 new simply because I wanted the fastest thing I could afford at the time...Gotta love that adjustable plate Borla cat-back.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;I think I paid around $16k for a brand-new, low-option, six-speed &#039;94 Formula. It wasn&#039;t perfect but there was tremendous value for someone that wanted a relatively competent performance car on the cheap. It was simply a modern musclecar that actually handled and braked as well as it went in a straight line.

An aftermarket shifter, opened intake and exhaust (I used the Borla plate with the smallest hole) were the equivalent of what used to be the three H&#039;s in the sixties - &lt;b&gt;H&lt;/b&gt;urst (shifter), &lt;b&gt;H&lt;/b&gt;olley (carburator), and &lt;b&gt;H&lt;/b&gt;ooker (headers).

A problem with those early LT1 V8 engines was that the GM engineers moved the standard distributor from the normal, above engine location to a crank-trigger magneto underneath the water pump at the front of the engine to keep the hood low. Should the pump develop a leak, coolant would get into the magneto - not a good thing. I believe they corrected the problem with the later LS1 version but I don&#039;t remember how.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<blockquote>noreserve: <em>I bought a 95 Camaro Z28 new simply because I wanted the fastest thing I could afford at the time&#8230;Gotta love that adjustable plate Borla cat-back.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I think I paid around $16k for a brand-new, low-option, six-speed &#8216;94 Formula. It wasn&#8217;t perfect but there was tremendous value for someone that wanted a relatively competent performance car on the cheap. It was simply a modern musclecar that actually handled and braked as well as it went in a straight line.</p>
<p>An aftermarket shifter, opened intake and exhaust (I used the Borla plate with the smallest hole) were the equivalent of what used to be the three H&#8217;s in the sixties &#8211; <b>H</b>urst (shifter), <b>H</b>olley (carburator), and <b>H</b>ooker (headers).</p>
<p>A problem with those early LT1 V8 engines was that the GM engineers moved the standard distributor from the normal, above engine location to a crank-trigger magneto underneath the water pump at the front of the engine to keep the hood low. Should the pump develop a leak, coolant would get into the magneto &#8211; not a good thing. I believe they corrected the problem with the later LS1 version but I don&#8217;t remember how.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reclusive_in_nature</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1498253</link>
		<dc:creator>reclusive_in_nature</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 06:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498253</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s my love of sleepers and &quot;q-cars&quot;, but there&#039;s something about completely obliterating cars that cost twice as yours from a stoplight that makes every insult someone gives your car worth it. Some may call it a turd, but most are going to be doing so while watching your taillights fade in the distance. Greatest feeling ever. The best I way I can describe it is like being a low tier MMA fighter getting to take on Floyd Mayweather in an MMA santioned fight and beating the living shit out of him in a packed arena, but not getting paid a dime. For some, that wouldn&#039;t be enough, but for others it&#039;s everything. Just depends on the person I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Maybe it&#8217;s my love of sleepers and &#8220;q-cars&#8221;, but there&#8217;s something about completely obliterating cars that cost twice as yours from a stoplight that makes every insult someone gives your car worth it. Some may call it a turd, but most are going to be doing so while watching your taillights fade in the distance. Greatest feeling ever. The best I way I can describe it is like being a low tier MMA fighter getting to take on Floyd Mayweather in an MMA santioned fight and beating the living shit out of him in a packed arena, but not getting paid a dime. For some, that wouldn&#8217;t be enough, but for others it&#8217;s everything. Just depends on the person I guess.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blindfaith</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1498185</link>
		<dc:creator>blindfaith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498185</guid>
		<description>A lady that wanted one all her life test drove it and killed herself. She foolishly hammered it down when she was out of site and jumped lanes.

It&#039;s power is way to much for a normal person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->A lady that wanted one all her life test drove it and killed herself. She foolishly hammered it down when she was out of site and jumped lanes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s power is way to much for a normal person.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Power6</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1498151</link>
		<dc:creator>Power6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498151</guid>
		<description>The 4th gen Camaro was great but also hugely flawed. Some people get over those flaws, some people don&#039;t. No surprise there are so many polarized opinions. 

Pretty much the fate of every &quot;pony car&quot; in one way or another. I have yet to read a review of a Camaro concluding it to be an &quot;all around good car&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The 4th gen Camaro was great but also hugely flawed. Some people get over those flaws, some people don&#8217;t. No surprise there are so many polarized opinions. </p>
<p>Pretty much the fate of every &#8220;pony car&#8221; in one way or another. I have yet to read a review of a Camaro concluding it to be an &#8220;all around good car&#8221;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ihatetrees</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1498098</link>
		<dc:creator>ihatetrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498098</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;mikey:
I prefer mulllet mobile myself.&lt;/i&gt;

How about &#039;Fuzzy-Dice Firebird&#039;?

A friend&#039;s older brother had one. Black, 5 speed, V8. When he married in the late 90&#039;s he sold it. And regrets it.

Great car, but like you said, ignore the interior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>mikey:<br />
I prefer mulllet mobile myself.</i></p>
<p>How about &#8216;Fuzzy-Dice Firebird&#8217;?</p>
<p>A friend&#8217;s older brother had one. Black, 5 speed, V8. When he married in the late 90&#8217;s he sold it. And regrets it.</p>
<p>Great car, but like you said, ignore the interior.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SunnyvaleCA</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1498094</link>
		<dc:creator>SunnyvaleCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498094</guid>
		<description>Mikey writes: &quot;At 55 getting in and out can be a challenge.&quot;

May I suggest you come to a complete stop before trying to get in or out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Mikey writes: &#8220;At 55 getting in and out can be a challenge.&#8221;</p>
<p>May I suggest you come to a complete stop before trying to get in or out?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noreserve</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1498081</link>
		<dc:creator>noreserve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498081</guid>
		<description>I bought a 95 Camaro Z28 new simply because I wanted the fastest thing I could afford at the time. That was it. No traction control or active handling here. Taught me a lot about pulling out into traffic at a turn with too much boot. You could roast the meats off that thing all day long. A test drive in the rain taught me to respect it initially, but I&#039;d always forget and get overly confident until the next time I would feel the ass-end start to sway like it was on stage.

It was horrendous in its interior use of space. Had to be the largest car from the outside that had the least amount of room once in. Yes, the plastics and seats were terrible. If it didn&#039;t make it go fast, I didn&#039;t really care at the time. It had a V-shaped gas tank that left me stranded twice. The gauge would simply drop like a rock below half-full.

I thought it looked pretty good from a styling standpoint. Pretty mean looking from the front, with a space-age rounded rear. I did hate and quickly change out those vacuum cleaner exhaust nozzles. Gotta love that adjustable plate Borla cat-back. It was easily in the 13s at the 1/4-mile with only intake/exhaust.

I was an IT geek who could care less about stereotypes. It was a fun car to mod and take to the strip. It was a stepping stone to a Corvette in 99. I probably should have kept it. Like nearly all past cars. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I bought a 95 Camaro Z28 new simply because I wanted the fastest thing I could afford at the time. That was it. No traction control or active handling here. Taught me a lot about pulling out into traffic at a turn with too much boot. You could roast the meats off that thing all day long. A test drive in the rain taught me to respect it initially, but I&#8217;d always forget and get overly confident until the next time I would feel the ass-end start to sway like it was on stage.</p>
<p>It was horrendous in its interior use of space. Had to be the largest car from the outside that had the least amount of room once in. Yes, the plastics and seats were terrible. If it didn&#8217;t make it go fast, I didn&#8217;t really care at the time. It had a V-shaped gas tank that left me stranded twice. The gauge would simply drop like a rock below half-full.</p>
<p>I thought it looked pretty good from a styling standpoint. Pretty mean looking from the front, with a space-age rounded rear. I did hate and quickly change out those vacuum cleaner exhaust nozzles. Gotta love that adjustable plate Borla cat-back. It was easily in the 13s at the 1/4-mile with only intake/exhaust.</p>
<p>I was an IT geek who could care less about stereotypes. It was a fun car to mod and take to the strip. It was a stepping stone to a Corvette in 99. I probably should have kept it. Like nearly all past cars. Sigh.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1498019</link>
		<dc:creator>mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1498019</guid>
		<description>Turd on wheels eh.I prefer mulllet mobile myself.
 My fun car is a fourth gen 3800 Firebird rag top.
F bodies are rattle traps and ragtops are worse.At 55 getting in and out can be a challenge.
The interior after detailing is ok,but fragile.The ashtray is closed forever after the spring broke.I can&#039;t recall when the seatbelt retracter worked.One has to take great care when raising the top,the bezel behind the switch moves with the switch.I&#039;m going to have to order a new front air dam its cracked and held up with tie straps.
 On a smooth road the Firebird drives like a dream.The 200hp 3800 has lots of power and gets 27mpg.

 The original owner has managed to hit curbs with all four wheels.He also used to slam the door without retracting the seat belt. Then some moron used a spray can to cover the paint chips on the rocker panels.I replaced and repaired everything .White with a black top,and with lots of TLC it looks good. I get lots of compliments.

  The F body sure woudn&#039;t be the choice of everybody.I really coudn&#039;t care,its my little baby and I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Turd on wheels eh.I prefer mulllet mobile myself.<br />
 My fun car is a fourth gen 3800 Firebird rag top.<br />
F bodies are rattle traps and ragtops are worse.At 55 getting in and out can be a challenge.<br />
The interior after detailing is ok,but fragile.The ashtray is closed forever after the spring broke.I can&#8217;t recall when the seatbelt retracter worked.One has to take great care when raising the top,the bezel behind the switch moves with the switch.I&#8217;m going to have to order a new front air dam its cracked and held up with tie straps.<br />
 On a smooth road the Firebird drives like a dream.The 200hp 3800 has lots of power and gets 27mpg.</p>
<p> The original owner has managed to hit curbs with all four wheels.He also used to slam the door without retracting the seat belt. Then some moron used a spray can to cover the paint chips on the rocker panels.I replaced and repaired everything .White with a black top,and with lots of TLC it looks good. I get lots of compliments.</p>
<p>  The F body sure woudn&#8217;t be the choice of everybody.I really coudn&#8217;t care,its my little baby and I love it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaker</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-chevrolet-camaro-ls1/comment-page-1/#comment-1497997</link>
		<dc:creator>shaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=318988#comment-1497997</guid>
		<description>I waited until the 3800 V6 roller-cam motor with 200HP (yeah, just 200HP, but I hate paying insurance bills) became available. With the 5-speed, it nearly matched the performance of the stock 5.0 V8 available in the earlier Fox Mustangs. I used the rear hatch often enough (once hauling a 32&quot; flat screen, surround-sound system and the unassembled stand back from Best Buy - the hatch was open about a foot, tied with twine).
The car was heavy, but drove surprisingly &quot;light&quot; when pushed (Edit: Thanks to the low COG) - driver entry/exit was a bitch, but once settled in, the driving position was quite good, though being tall, you had to forgo the &quot;T-Tops&quot;.
I drove her for 11 years, but my bad back and knees kinda pushed me into a more upright vehicle (Elantra).

God, I miss that Camaro. Maybe next year, I&#039;ll say &quot;To Hell With It All&quot; and buy a heavy, tiny-trunked pony car that doesn&#039;t look like anything else in the parking lot.

Edit: I had an RS model, and yes, the &quot;cowcatcher&quot; front spoiler scraped A LOT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I waited until the 3800 V6 roller-cam motor with 200HP (yeah, just 200HP, but I hate paying insurance bills) became available. With the 5-speed, it nearly matched the performance of the stock 5.0 V8 available in the earlier Fox Mustangs. I used the rear hatch often enough (once hauling a 32&#8243; flat screen, surround-sound system and the unassembled stand back from Best Buy &#8211; the hatch was open about a foot, tied with twine).<br />
The car was heavy, but drove surprisingly &#8220;light&#8221; when pushed (Edit: Thanks to the low COG) &#8211; driver entry/exit was a bitch, but once settled in, the driving position was quite good, though being tall, you had to forgo the &#8220;T-Tops&#8221;.<br />
I drove her for 11 years, but my bad back and knees kinda pushed me into a more upright vehicle (Elantra).</p>
<p>God, I miss that Camaro. Maybe next year, I&#8217;ll say &#8220;To Hell With It All&#8221; and buy a heavy, tiny-trunked pony car that doesn&#8217;t look like anything else in the parking lot.</p>
<p>Edit: I had an RS model, and yes, the &#8220;cowcatcher&#8221; front spoiler scraped A LOT!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 67/161 queries in 0.255 seconds using apc

Served from: autoforums.com @ 2010-03-19 00:50:09 -->