<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: 2010 Honda Insight Take Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bebaziled</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1515396</link>
		<dc:creator>bebaziled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1515396</guid>
		<description>I have test driven the 2010 Prius and 2010 Insight 2 times.

To me the Prius has the worst visibility not only from the rear but the front and side.  The &quot;velvet&quot; fabric reminds me of the horrible American car fabrics of the late 90&#039;s (or the velvet ceiling material that always seemed to be falling down on my friends cars back when I was in college (late 80&#039;s early 90&#039;s)).  I ignored the dash area- too much info to glance through to find what you wanted, felt the nav system had way too many menus and screens- thank goodness my passenger was fiddling with it so we could find radio functions, etc..  I do like the extra space in the rear seating, extra glove box, under floor storage in the hatch area and thought the solar/ sunroof was a neat gadget, however, I was really uncomfortable driving this vehicle.  Both times I felt like I wasn&#039;t connected to my surroundings.  I had the road noise and bumps but honestly couldn&#039;t feel the road in the steering.  I truly want to love the Prius but don&#039;t.

When I drove the Insight I felt like I was in a car.  That&#039;s the best way I can describe it.  It didn&#039;t have the get-up-and-go of a normal Honda, but it&#039;s a hybrid and I was prepared for this.  The fabric reminds me of my old Element (sort of), I love the steering wheel - did I mention I could feel the road while steering?  It is laking a few items and the nav looks like it was just shoved in, but overall it&#039;s a good little car.  I like the grill, the alloy wheels and the ipod/phone connection.

I may be a bit biased toward Honda as I did grow up in a Honda household - my mom&#039;s 1st was in &#039;76 - and I have owned my fair share...  &#039;83 Accord hatchback, &#039;94 Civic 5-speed, (&#039;96 4-runner), &#039;05 Pilot (for 6 months-yuck!), &#039;03 Element (loved it!).  I currently own an &#039;06 Infinit FX35- it&#039;s nice with loads of power but not nearly as fun as my old Element.  Most people think I&#039;m a bit crazy for wanting a hybrid over my current car but I&#039;m sick of $45 fill-ups and sending so much money to OPEC.  I normally never buy a car unless it is used but I am seriously considering the Insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I have test driven the 2010 Prius and 2010 Insight 2 times.</p>
<p>To me the Prius has the worst visibility not only from the rear but the front and side.  The &#8220;velvet&#8221; fabric reminds me of the horrible American car fabrics of the late 90&#8217;s (or the velvet ceiling material that always seemed to be falling down on my friends cars back when I was in college (late 80&#8217;s early 90&#8217;s)).  I ignored the dash area- too much info to glance through to find what you wanted, felt the nav system had way too many menus and screens- thank goodness my passenger was fiddling with it so we could find radio functions, etc..  I do like the extra space in the rear seating, extra glove box, under floor storage in the hatch area and thought the solar/ sunroof was a neat gadget, however, I was really uncomfortable driving this vehicle.  Both times I felt like I wasn&#8217;t connected to my surroundings.  I had the road noise and bumps but honestly couldn&#8217;t feel the road in the steering.  I truly want to love the Prius but don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>When I drove the Insight I felt like I was in a car.  That&#8217;s the best way I can describe it.  It didn&#8217;t have the get-up-and-go of a normal Honda, but it&#8217;s a hybrid and I was prepared for this.  The fabric reminds me of my old Element (sort of), I love the steering wheel &#8211; did I mention I could feel the road while steering?  It is laking a few items and the nav looks like it was just shoved in, but overall it&#8217;s a good little car.  I like the grill, the alloy wheels and the ipod/phone connection.</p>
<p>I may be a bit biased toward Honda as I did grow up in a Honda household &#8211; my mom&#8217;s 1st was in &#8216;76 &#8211; and I have owned my fair share&#8230;  &#8216;83 Accord hatchback, &#8216;94 Civic 5-speed, (&#8216;96 4-runner), &#8216;05 Pilot (for 6 months-yuck!), &#8216;03 Element (loved it!).  I currently own an &#8216;06 Infinit FX35- it&#8217;s nice with loads of power but not nearly as fun as my old Element.  Most people think I&#8217;m a bit crazy for wanting a hybrid over my current car but I&#8217;m sick of $45 fill-ups and sending so much money to OPEC.  I normally never buy a car unless it is used but I am seriously considering the Insight.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karn</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1512775</link>
		<dc:creator>karn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 08:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1512775</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m driving the Insight in Japan and the fuel economy is around 19-20km per liter (45-48 mpg).
The Prius is more popular like in the States, though.
I can say, &quot;So far, so good,&quot; for my new vehicle, and yet, I am also interested in the Fusion Hybrid, which is not yet available here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m driving the Insight in Japan and the fuel economy is around 19-20km per liter (45-48 mpg).<br />
The Prius is more popular like in the States, though.<br />
I can say, &#8220;So far, so good,&#8221; for my new vehicle, and yet, I am also interested in the Fusion Hybrid, which is not yet available here.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toyster</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1508595</link>
		<dc:creator>Toyster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1508595</guid>
		<description>I just purchased the Insight and I love it.  I am not into how fast a car goes but how well it drives.  So far I have averaged 47 to 48 mpg on the Streets of Chicago even though it is advertised to go up 40 mpg in the city.

It is a fun car to drive, I do not have any complaints.  I have received great compliments and people inquiring about it at the gas station.  

I use to have the 2006 Civic Hybrid and I do like the Insight better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I just purchased the Insight and I love it.  I am not into how fast a car goes but how well it drives.  So far I have averaged 47 to 48 mpg on the Streets of Chicago even though it is advertised to go up 40 mpg in the city.</p>
<p>It is a fun car to drive, I do not have any complaints.  I have received great compliments and people inquiring about it at the gas station.  </p>
<p>I use to have the 2006 Civic Hybrid and I do like the Insight better.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bytor</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1489623</link>
		<dc:creator>Bytor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1489623</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see a lot more cars get the XFE treatment. I am no fan of the Cobalt but with a much bigger engine and much more weight is get&#039;s better highway MPG than Hondas tiny Fit. 

On top of which I am sure the manual in the Cobalt cruises at a nice low RPM on the highway at real highway speeds, while the FIT is in the high 3K rpm range (close 4K rpm?) at real highway speeds (75 mph).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;d like to see a lot more cars get the XFE treatment. I am no fan of the Cobalt but with a much bigger engine and much more weight is get&#8217;s better highway MPG than Hondas tiny Fit. </p>
<p>On top of which I am sure the manual in the Cobalt cruises at a nice low RPM on the highway at real highway speeds, while the FIT is in the high 3K rpm range (close 4K rpm?) at real highway speeds (75 mph).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ponchoman49</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1489610</link>
		<dc:creator>ponchoman49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1489610</guid>
		<description>My friend and I test drove one of these last weekend. We couldn&#039;t wait to bring it back. From the mail slot rear window you can&#039;t see out to the wafer thin out door carpeting to the pathetic seats, sloth slow acceleration and the Star Trek to the second power dash it was one of the worst most forgettable new cars we have ever driven. We were actually glad to get back in his 2009 Cobalt LT XFE which routinely sees over 40 MPG on the open road and has a far superior drivetrain, dash, seats and performance to this turd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My friend and I test drove one of these last weekend. We couldn&#8217;t wait to bring it back. From the mail slot rear window you can&#8217;t see out to the wafer thin out door carpeting to the pathetic seats, sloth slow acceleration and the Star Trek to the second power dash it was one of the worst most forgettable new cars we have ever driven. We were actually glad to get back in his 2009 Cobalt LT XFE which routinely sees over 40 MPG on the open road and has a far superior drivetrain, dash, seats and performance to this turd.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1489572</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1489572</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Just a comment about the Honda&#039;s Insite marketing...&lt;/strong&gt;

There is an Insite billboard on my way home that I have noticed over the last week. The billboard is a clean design and has a simple message, but the message&#039;s font is narrow, small, and light colored on a white background, and so it&#039;s rather hard to read without taking my eyes off the road more then I should (so much so that after looking at it &lt;em&gt;three or four times&lt;/em&gt; I can&#039;t tell you what it says?).

I understand branding and all (as I use to work in corporate marketing), but didn&#039;t their marketing group consider making the billboard message easy to read for drivers? IMHO the billboard is not as effective as it could be and therefore &lt;em&gt;wasted marketing dollars.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><strong>Just a comment about the Honda&#8217;s Insite marketing&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There is an Insite billboard on my way home that I have noticed over the last week. The billboard is a clean design and has a simple message, but the message&#8217;s font is narrow, small, and light colored on a white background, and so it&#8217;s rather hard to read without taking my eyes off the road more then I should (so much so that after looking at it <em>three or four times</em> I can&#8217;t tell you what it says?).</p>
<p>I understand branding and all (as I use to work in corporate marketing), but didn&#8217;t their marketing group consider making the billboard message easy to read for drivers? IMHO the billboard is not as effective as it could be and therefore <em>wasted marketing dollars.</em><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finderskeepers</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1488137</link>
		<dc:creator>finderskeepers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1488137</guid>
		<description>Thanks for making this car Honda, it proves that the engineers at Ford can still make a better all around product with the fusion hybrid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Thanks for making this car Honda, it proves that the engineers at Ford can still make a better all around product with the fusion hybrid.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PukaDog</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1487927</link>
		<dc:creator>PukaDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 07:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1487927</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had the car for about a month and a half...
Here&#039;s my two cents:

I do hate cars in general, and I have been riding around in and sometimes driving a 2nd gen Prius for a little over 3 years.  The car seats in the Prius hurt my tail bone.  While they may be soft to the touch and cushy feeling, there is no support. 

My Insight seating is not cushy at all, but has way more support than other cars I&#039;ve test driven including the Fit. So far my passengers have commented that it was &quot;comfortable&quot;. IMHO it is quite fun to drive. It handles well around corners&amp; U-turns quite well. As an added bonus I have been able to achieve better gas mileage than its EPA estimates.  I&#039;ve gone to the gas station a total of three times since I&#039;ve owned it (about $18 per tank) and have averaged about 47-52 mpg per tank.

The only two complaints so far are the tiny back seat and the plastic like feel of the dash.  One or two cleanings from the car wash and it already has swirl-like scratches :(
Since I mostly only transport my dog in the back seat,  the fact that it doesn&#039;t have any headroom doesn&#039;t bother me that much.

I was originally going to purchase a Fit since I couldn&#039;t afford a Prius.  When the Insight became available I jumped at the chance to own it and I am still quite happy with my purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;ve had the car for about a month and a half&#8230;<br />
Here&#8217;s my two cents:</p>
<p>I do hate cars in general, and I have been riding around in and sometimes driving a 2nd gen Prius for a little over 3 years.  The car seats in the Prius hurt my tail bone.  While they may be soft to the touch and cushy feeling, there is no support. </p>
<p>My Insight seating is not cushy at all, but has way more support than other cars I&#8217;ve test driven including the Fit. So far my passengers have commented that it was &#8220;comfortable&#8221;. IMHO it is quite fun to drive. It handles well around corners&amp; U-turns quite well. As an added bonus I have been able to achieve better gas mileage than its EPA estimates.  I&#8217;ve gone to the gas station a total of three times since I&#8217;ve owned it (about $18 per tank) and have averaged about 47-52 mpg per tank.</p>
<p>The only two complaints so far are the tiny back seat and the plastic like feel of the dash.  One or two cleanings from the car wash and it already has swirl-like scratches :(<br />
Since I mostly only transport my dog in the back seat,  the fact that it doesn&#8217;t have any headroom doesn&#8217;t bother me that much.</p>
<p>I was originally going to purchase a Fit since I couldn&#8217;t afford a Prius.  When the Insight became available I jumped at the chance to own it and I am still quite happy with my purchase.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome10</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1487908</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 04:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1487908</guid>
		<description>Seen a few of these on the road now.  The proportions are just hideous.  I hate to say it, but even the current Prius, much less the next one, look way better.

And get used to reviews like this.  With the latest CAFE standards, these things should be polluting our dealers over the coming years.  Whether or not anyone actually buys them is anyone&#039;s guess.

And so what about it being the best selling car in Japan.  They&#039;re notorious for wanting the latest &quot;gadget&quot; and this is the biggest right now.  Same thing we saw with the Prius a few years ago in the US...It was the &quot;cool&quot; car to have.  That&#039;s why only the Prius seems to have taken off while no other hybrids did.  And somehow the Prius wasn&#039;t the exception, it was the hybrid rule in this country.

I tell ya, I grew up in the 90&#039;s with Hondas.  Civics and early 90&#039;s accords (before they blew up into Crown Vics), friends had Integras.  We LOVED our cars.  They were cheap as hell to run, didn&#039;t break, got great mileage, were zippy handling and light on their feet with sharp reflexes, and the engines were a ton of fun to wind out (even though the power wasn&#039;t so amazing).  Then the 2000&#039;s hit and Honda started going downhill.  The Civic got fat and out of proportion and lost its zippy handling.  The Integra became the RSX, which actually wasn&#039;t too bad, but it just didn&#039;t have nearly the feel of the old GSR.  The Accord got huge and ugly and lost its zippy feel.  I started driving Mazdas and VWs.  Other friends moved on too, mostly to Mazda and those who bought Hondas because they were bulletproof commuter cars got Toyotas.  

Maybe they know something I don&#039;t, but Honda got where it is by offering fun, cheap, bulletproof cars with decent styling and what they&#039;re turning into is about as far from that as they could possibly get.  I suspect my future days as a car owner are likely to be Honda-less.  Its a shame.  Alienating your customer base is a dangerous gamble.....look what the domestics did in the 70&#039;s and 80s....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Seen a few of these on the road now.  The proportions are just hideous.  I hate to say it, but even the current Prius, much less the next one, look way better.</p>
<p>And get used to reviews like this.  With the latest CAFE standards, these things should be polluting our dealers over the coming years.  Whether or not anyone actually buys them is anyone&#8217;s guess.</p>
<p>And so what about it being the best selling car in Japan.  They&#8217;re notorious for wanting the latest &#8220;gadget&#8221; and this is the biggest right now.  Same thing we saw with the Prius a few years ago in the US&#8230;It was the &#8220;cool&#8221; car to have.  That&#8217;s why only the Prius seems to have taken off while no other hybrids did.  And somehow the Prius wasn&#8217;t the exception, it was the hybrid rule in this country.</p>
<p>I tell ya, I grew up in the 90&#8217;s with Hondas.  Civics and early 90&#8217;s accords (before they blew up into Crown Vics), friends had Integras.  We LOVED our cars.  They were cheap as hell to run, didn&#8217;t break, got great mileage, were zippy handling and light on their feet with sharp reflexes, and the engines were a ton of fun to wind out (even though the power wasn&#8217;t so amazing).  Then the 2000&#8217;s hit and Honda started going downhill.  The Civic got fat and out of proportion and lost its zippy handling.  The Integra became the RSX, which actually wasn&#8217;t too bad, but it just didn&#8217;t have nearly the feel of the old GSR.  The Accord got huge and ugly and lost its zippy feel.  I started driving Mazdas and VWs.  Other friends moved on too, mostly to Mazda and those who bought Hondas because they were bulletproof commuter cars got Toyotas.  </p>
<p>Maybe they know something I don&#8217;t, but Honda got where it is by offering fun, cheap, bulletproof cars with decent styling and what they&#8217;re turning into is about as far from that as they could possibly get.  I suspect my future days as a car owner are likely to be Honda-less.  Its a shame.  Alienating your customer base is a dangerous gamble&#8230;..look what the domestics did in the 70&#8217;s and 80s&#8230;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honda insight review</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1487045</link>
		<dc:creator>honda insight review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1487045</guid>
		<description>[...] Review - MSN Autos [2] Honda Insight LX 4-door Hatchback - Unbiased Review at Edmunds.com [3] Review: 2010 Honda Insight Take Two &#124; The Truth About Cars [4] 2010 Honda Insight - Overview &#124; Hybrid Cars [5] Honda Insight Review - Edmunds.com [6] 2010 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] Review &#8211; MSN Autos [2] Honda Insight LX 4-door Hatchback &#8211; Unbiased Review at Edmunds.com [3] Review: 2010 Honda Insight Take Two | The Truth About Cars [4] 2010 Honda Insight &#8211; Overview | Hybrid Cars [5] Honda Insight Review &#8211; Edmunds.com [6] 2010 [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1487039</link>
		<dc:creator>jmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1487039</guid>
		<description>skysharad,

Worse than a Vega or a Trabant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->skysharad,</p>
<p>Worse than a Vega or a Trabant?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skysharad</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1486711</link>
		<dc:creator>skysharad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1486711</guid>
		<description>I test drove this car---shittiest car ever made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I test drove this car&#8212;shittiest car ever made.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bytor</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-2/#comment-1486621</link>
		<dc:creator>Bytor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1486621</guid>
		<description>If you think CVT is reliable. Google Honda CVT problems. Or just google Mini CVT failure for a real horror show. 

Nissan seems to be doing a good job. For everyone else it seems to be the least reliable solution available. 

Toyotas Orbital gear power couple is bullet proof in comparison (not to mention being much more versatile).

If I was in this market, it would be the 2010 prius all the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->If you think CVT is reliable. Google Honda CVT problems. Or just google Mini CVT failure for a real horror show. </p>
<p>Nissan seems to be doing a good job. For everyone else it seems to be the least reliable solution available. </p>
<p>Toyotas Orbital gear power couple is bullet proof in comparison (not to mention being much more versatile).</p>
<p>If I was in this market, it would be the 2010 prius all the way.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Donley</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-1486593</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Donley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 11:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1486593</guid>
		<description>The bias repoted here is among blasphemy.  The 2010 Honda Insight is a great car.  I agree that it is slow, it&#039;s not meant to be a race car.  It is meant to get great mileage and it does.  If you follow the tutorial this machine can get upwards of 55 MPG.  As for the CVT transmission, obviously the writer of this review has never had the chance or the willingness to learn how to use one.  When you drive a CVT, you don&#039;t mash the gas down.  You gradually add more pressure and it slowly increases the speed of the car.  I have not read alot of reviews from this author, but chances are really good that he is a novice of how to drive a new technology.  Nissan has had a CVT in their cars for a few years and there is one thing that can be said for them.  They don&#039;t seem to break down very much.  Of course, when you are looking for a race car, then a HYBRID is definately out of the running.  They are not meant to be fast, they are meant to get outstanding fuel economy

I have driven both the new Insight and the 2010 Toyota Prius.  They are both really good cars for what they are designed to do.  Efficiently move around town and keep away from the gas pump.  I do tend to like the Insight a little better in the fact that it&#039;s dash is in front of the driver instead of being in the middle of the dash where you have to take your eyes off the road to see how fast or slow you are going.

One thing is for certian, the US. automakers need to get their head out of the sand and smell the coffee before it&#039;s too late and come up with something that people want instead of giving us what they want us to buy.  OOPS, too late they are already dying and are going to hold on to the same philosophy that has them where they are now.  The concept that the auto industry is too big to fail is wrong.  They need to fail if they are going to keep putting crappy cars out and expect us to buy them just because they are made here.  They need to cut back on production of monster trucks and start building smaller more efficient vehicles before gas hits $4.00 again.  Follow the Japaneese into lower fuel efficient cars with a few trucks as a bonus.  Build them with the upmost care and use the highest quality materials.  And for goodness sakes, stop using the cheapest plastic that can be found for the dasboards of the cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The bias repoted here is among blasphemy.  The 2010 Honda Insight is a great car.  I agree that it is slow, it&#8217;s not meant to be a race car.  It is meant to get great mileage and it does.  If you follow the tutorial this machine can get upwards of 55 MPG.  As for the CVT transmission, obviously the writer of this review has never had the chance or the willingness to learn how to use one.  When you drive a CVT, you don&#8217;t mash the gas down.  You gradually add more pressure and it slowly increases the speed of the car.  I have not read alot of reviews from this author, but chances are really good that he is a novice of how to drive a new technology.  Nissan has had a CVT in their cars for a few years and there is one thing that can be said for them.  They don&#8217;t seem to break down very much.  Of course, when you are looking for a race car, then a HYBRID is definately out of the running.  They are not meant to be fast, they are meant to get outstanding fuel economy</p>
<p>I have driven both the new Insight and the 2010 Toyota Prius.  They are both really good cars for what they are designed to do.  Efficiently move around town and keep away from the gas pump.  I do tend to like the Insight a little better in the fact that it&#8217;s dash is in front of the driver instead of being in the middle of the dash where you have to take your eyes off the road to see how fast or slow you are going.</p>
<p>One thing is for certian, the US. automakers need to get their head out of the sand and smell the coffee before it&#8217;s too late and come up with something that people want instead of giving us what they want us to buy.  OOPS, too late they are already dying and are going to hold on to the same philosophy that has them where they are now.  The concept that the auto industry is too big to fail is wrong.  They need to fail if they are going to keep putting crappy cars out and expect us to buy them just because they are made here.  They need to cut back on production of monster trucks and start building smaller more efficient vehicles before gas hits $4.00 again.  Follow the Japaneese into lower fuel efficient cars with a few trucks as a bonus.  Build them with the upmost care and use the highest quality materials.  And for goodness sakes, stop using the cheapest plastic that can be found for the dasboards of the cars.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psarhjinian</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-1486237</link>
		<dc:creator>psarhjinian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1486237</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;has anyone made a diesel hybrid yet? diesels get amazing mileage at highway speeds and with an electric motor to save diesel around town would be the best of both worlds i’d think.&lt;/em&gt;

The problem is multifold:
* A turbodiesel is really expensive, rather heavy and quite complex next to a gas engine.  A normal diesel is slightly less expensive and significantly more gutless.
* A diesel doesn&#039;t handle stop/start as easy or as seamlessly as a small gas engine
* Fuel efficiency and power of a small gas engine versus a similarly small diesel isn&#039;t significant, especially when paired to a system like Toyota&#039;s HSD, which keeps the gas engine running at it&#039;s most efficient.

It doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense to hybridize a passenger car diesel.  It&#039;s more sensible to hybridize a rotary or turbine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>has anyone made a diesel hybrid yet? diesels get amazing mileage at highway speeds and with an electric motor to save diesel around town would be the best of both worlds i’d think.</em></p>
<p>The problem is multifold:<br />
* A turbodiesel is really expensive, rather heavy and quite complex next to a gas engine.  A normal diesel is slightly less expensive and significantly more gutless.<br />
* A diesel doesn&#8217;t handle stop/start as easy or as seamlessly as a small gas engine<br />
* Fuel efficiency and power of a small gas engine versus a similarly small diesel isn&#8217;t significant, especially when paired to a system like Toyota&#8217;s HSD, which keeps the gas engine running at it&#8217;s most efficient.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense to hybridize a passenger car diesel.  It&#8217;s more sensible to hybridize a rotary or turbine.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psarhjinian</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-1486224</link>
		<dc:creator>psarhjinian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1486224</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I see no compelling reason to get this over a Civic Hybrid other than price.&lt;/em&gt;

Cargo space.  The Civic hybrid has about as much as the Pontiac Solstice and a little less than the Smart Fortwo, where the Insight can fit actual stuff.

The Camry and Prius are similar: the Camry has 10 awkwardly-shaped cubic feet, or about enough for a small grocery run or an overnight stay for one.  The Prius can take a family for the weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>I see no compelling reason to get this over a Civic Hybrid other than price.</em></p>
<p>Cargo space.  The Civic hybrid has about as much as the Pontiac Solstice and a little less than the Smart Fortwo, where the Insight can fit actual stuff.</p>
<p>The Camry and Prius are similar: the Camry has 10 awkwardly-shaped cubic feet, or about enough for a small grocery run or an overnight stay for one.  The Prius can take a family for the weekend.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Honda Insight trashed -review - Page 2 - Unofficial Honda FIT Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-1486170</link>
		<dc:creator>New Honda Insight trashed -review - Page 2 - Unofficial Honda FIT Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1486170</guid>
		<description>[...] found another unflattering review on TTAC  Review: 2010 Honda Insight Take Two &#124; The Truth About Cars  I drove the new Insight before I finally bought the Fit and I didn&#039;t think it was that bad, I was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] found another unflattering review on TTAC  Review: 2010 Honda Insight Take Two | The Truth About Cars  I drove the new Insight before I finally bought the Fit and I didn&#8217;t think it was that bad, I was [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirko Reinhardt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-1485849</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirko Reinhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 07:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1485849</guid>
		<description>@V6:
A diesel hybrid as a production model? In fact yes, Audi had one. It went in production in 1997, was based on the A4 wagon and had a 1.9 TDI, a 29hp electric motor. a manual gearbox and lead acid batteries.
Here&#039;s the interesting part: It was a plug-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@V6:<br />
A diesel hybrid as a production model? In fact yes, Audi had one. It went in production in 1997, was based on the A4 wagon and had a 1.9 TDI, a 29hp electric motor. a manual gearbox and lead acid batteries.<br />
Here&#8217;s the interesting part: It was a plug-in.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V6</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-1485848</link>
		<dc:creator>V6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 06:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1485848</guid>
		<description>has anyone made a diesel hybrid yet? diesels get amazing mileage at highway speeds and with an electric motor to save diesel around town would be the best of both worlds i&#039;d think.

regardless, i&#039;d take a diesel over a regular gas  hybrid. hybrids are pretty much a massive wank-fest imo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->has anyone made a diesel hybrid yet? diesels get amazing mileage at highway speeds and with an electric motor to save diesel around town would be the best of both worlds i&#8217;d think.</p>
<p>regardless, i&#8217;d take a diesel over a regular gas  hybrid. hybrids are pretty much a massive wank-fest imo<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-1485803</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1485803</guid>
		<description>Two things: the exterior feels derivative in relation to the Prius, and this thing really doesn&#039;t get the same millage as other, albeit non-American options, such as Diesel, in the Blu-Motion flavor or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Two things: the exterior feels derivative in relation to the Prius, and this thing really doesn&#8217;t get the same millage as other, albeit non-American options, such as Diesel, in the Blu-Motion flavor or not.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quasimondo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-1485802</link>
		<dc:creator>quasimondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1485802</guid>
		<description>Up next:

The Mazda Miatus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Up next:</p>
<p>The Mazda Miatus<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phinance</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-1485749</link>
		<dc:creator>Phinance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1485749</guid>
		<description>The Prius still wins to me, but the Insight looks gorgeous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The Prius still wins to me, but the Insight looks gorgeous.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bytor</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-1485723</link>
		<dc:creator>Bytor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1485723</guid>
		<description>@erics4 

I think this whole thing about gallons per mile doesn&#039;t really change anything besides being less intuitive to most people. 

I know in Canada where we are heavily metric, many people still have issues with l/100km not because of the units but because of the less intuitive arrangement. 

40mpg to 50mpg is still a 25% difference in fuel usage whether it is in mpg or gpm. 

The main thing I see people use GPM is to highlight the difference in a paired comparison. as in: &quot;You save more gas moving from a Hummer to a Enclave you &quot;save&quot; more more gas than moving from a Prius to a Camry.&quot;

But those kinds of comparison are pointless. The guy in the Prius is still using much less gas than the guy in the Enclave.

If you are just comparing between two cars. MPG or GPM is just about irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@erics4 </p>
<p>I think this whole thing about gallons per mile doesn&#8217;t really change anything besides being less intuitive to most people. </p>
<p>I know in Canada where we are heavily metric, many people still have issues with l/100km not because of the units but because of the less intuitive arrangement. </p>
<p>40mpg to 50mpg is still a 25% difference in fuel usage whether it is in mpg or gpm. </p>
<p>The main thing I see people use GPM is to highlight the difference in a paired comparison. as in: &#8220;You save more gas moving from a Hummer to a Enclave you &#8220;save&#8221; more more gas than moving from a Prius to a Camry.&#8221;</p>
<p>But those kinds of comparison are pointless. The guy in the Prius is still using much less gas than the guy in the Enclave.</p>
<p>If you are just comparing between two cars. MPG or GPM is just about irrelevant.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A is A</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-1485703</link>
		<dc:creator>A is A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1485703</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Inside the Insight, the hyper-plastic sci-fi theme of other recent Honda interiors has advanced even deeper into the absurd. If any attempt was made at a clean, cohesive, rational design, it’s not evident&lt;/em&gt;

It is. There are no controls placed in front of the gear stick. All controls are in the same horizontal plane. Like in 1980s ergonomy conscious Saabs. 

One of the (few) things I hate about my Toyota Avensis are the rather complex heating/AC/fan controls placed in front of the gear stick. A place you must look at while you are driving.

&lt;em&gt;This tester couldn’t wait to escape from the prominent, non-adjustable lumbar bulge and head-prodding headrests&lt;/em&gt;

The head-prodding headrests is the best design. Volvo has been using that design since late 1990s.

It takes some time, but you really get accustomed to those headrests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Inside the Insight, the hyper-plastic sci-fi theme of other recent Honda interiors has advanced even deeper into the absurd. If any attempt was made at a clean, cohesive, rational design, it’s not evident</em></p>
<p>It is. There are no controls placed in front of the gear stick. All controls are in the same horizontal plane. Like in 1980s ergonomy conscious Saabs. </p>
<p>One of the (few) things I hate about my Toyota Avensis are the rather complex heating/AC/fan controls placed in front of the gear stick. A place you must look at while you are driving.</p>
<p><em>This tester couldn’t wait to escape from the prominent, non-adjustable lumbar bulge and head-prodding headrests</em></p>
<p>The head-prodding headrests is the best design. Volvo has been using that design since late 1990s.</p>
<p>It takes some time, but you really get accustomed to those headrests.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quasimondo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-honda-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-1485700</link>
		<dc:creator>quasimondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=315487#comment-1485700</guid>
		<description>This is the future of CAFE.  Prius-clones.  You wanted it, Obama made it happen.  Embrace the Insight.  There&#039;s plenty more where that came from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This is the future of CAFE.  Prius-clones.  You wanted it, Obama made it happen.  Embrace the Insight.  There&#8217;s plenty more where that came from.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 56/150 queries in 0.191 seconds using apc

Served from: autoforums.com @ 2010-03-19 03:20:32 -->