<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: 2010 Ferrari California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:25:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: justin.82</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-1523258</link>
		<dc:creator>justin.82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-1523258</guid>
		<description>I never thought Ferrari would go so radical with there designs! Enzo must be rolling over in his grave! You go from cars like the 328, 512, Testarossa, F40, F50, 360, F430, and the Enso to this! It&#039;s kind of a radical styling change! Yeah when the Testarossa came out it was a radical change but not like this. I dont get it, they don&#039;t need to over style like to many car companies today are doing! Look at the Porsche 911 - it&#039;s kept the same shape since the 60&#039;s and it still sells to any auto enthusiast!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I never thought Ferrari would go so radical with there designs! Enzo must be rolling over in his grave! You go from cars like the 328, 512, Testarossa, F40, F50, 360, F430, and the Enso to this! It&#8217;s kind of a radical styling change! Yeah when the Testarossa came out it was a radical change but not like this. I dont get it, they don&#8217;t need to over style like to many car companies today are doing! Look at the Porsche 911 &#8211; it&#8217;s kept the same shape since the 60&#8217;s and it still sells to any auto enthusiast!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jstnspin82</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-1030492</link>
		<dc:creator>jstnspin82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-1030492</guid>
		<description>It reminds me of the 369 GTB/4 Daytona from Miami Vice. The back could look better but with Ferrari you pay for engineering at it&#039;s best. The 599 GTB looks better to me but it&#039;s a Ferrari, can&#039;t argue with it much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It reminds me of the 369 GTB/4 Daytona from Miami Vice. The back could look better but with Ferrari you pay for engineering at it&#8217;s best. The 599 GTB looks better to me but it&#8217;s a Ferrari, can&#8217;t argue with it much.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: info@carsinpedia.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-911781</link>
		<dc:creator>info@carsinpedia.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 03:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-911781</guid>
		<description>Overall nice profile and proportions  but a bit too many scoops/vents.
Rims are pretty nice too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Overall nice profile and proportions  but a bit too many scoops/vents.<br />
Rims are pretty nice too.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigChiefMuffin</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-907772</link>
		<dc:creator>BigChiefMuffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-907772</guid>
		<description>I think people are being way too harsh on Ferrari for launching this car. Looks aside, I think it&#039;s concept and execution are spot on. Ferrari have every right to expand. They could not do this by building more F430 - the demand simply isn&#039;t there and flooding the market would have ruined the resales, ultimately damaging the brand ( not that they are that strong these days as is ). 

They needed a 4th model line to expand. They could have made something more extreme, but between the 430 Scuds and the various limited editions ( Enzo et al ) they pretty much have this covered. A 4 door or off roader wouldn&#039;t be accepted. So it had to be softer, more luxiourous and easier to live with coupe. Bentley sell far more GT&#039;s then Ferrari will ever do of Californias and, at this level, the price difference is not too important.

This is the right car for Ferrari to make. The xx years waiting list ( which I am sure is slightly inflated ) suggests that they called the market correctly. This car is really the successor to the Mondial T convertible, which was never liked by those who deem themselves to be cognesti, but did very well for Ferrari ( and, in coupe form, is actually a very good car )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think people are being way too harsh on Ferrari for launching this car. Looks aside, I think it&#8217;s concept and execution are spot on. Ferrari have every right to expand. They could not do this by building more F430 &#8211; the demand simply isn&#8217;t there and flooding the market would have ruined the resales, ultimately damaging the brand ( not that they are that strong these days as is ). </p>
<p>They needed a 4th model line to expand. They could have made something more extreme, but between the 430 Scuds and the various limited editions ( Enzo et al ) they pretty much have this covered. A 4 door or off roader wouldn&#8217;t be accepted. So it had to be softer, more luxiourous and easier to live with coupe. Bentley sell far more GT&#8217;s then Ferrari will ever do of Californias and, at this level, the price difference is not too important.</p>
<p>This is the right car for Ferrari to make. The xx years waiting list ( which I am sure is slightly inflated ) suggests that they called the market correctly. This car is really the successor to the Mondial T convertible, which was never liked by those who deem themselves to be cognesti, but did very well for Ferrari ( and, in coupe form, is actually a very good car )<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinx</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-893261</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-893261</guid>
		<description>What a shame...  245K puts it out of the league of most enthusiasts who would buy one because they really wanted one.  I think the last Ferrari that was at an approachable price point was the 348 - not cheap, but a reasonably successful chap like your doctor could get one if he really wanted to, and not feel too worried about driving it regularly.

It will be interesting to see whether Ferrari&#039;s move to the stratospheric end of the market is sustainable, since the &#039;free money&#039; economy is toast.  Would be a shame to see them implode because they priced themselves out of the 150K market and have an in-house Maserati brand occupying that space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->What a shame&#8230;  245K puts it out of the league of most enthusiasts who would buy one because they really wanted one.  I think the last Ferrari that was at an approachable price point was the 348 &#8211; not cheap, but a reasonably successful chap like your doctor could get one if he really wanted to, and not feel too worried about driving it regularly.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see whether Ferrari&#8217;s move to the stratospheric end of the market is sustainable, since the &#8216;free money&#8217; economy is toast.  Would be a shame to see them implode because they priced themselves out of the 150K market and have an in-house Maserati brand occupying that space.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discoholic</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-881521</link>
		<dc:creator>discoholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-881521</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame that Ferrari are now making so much more money than they ever did in the past - when I compare the new California to, say, a 275 GTS, I want to cry.
The GTS evokes mental images of Grace Kelly in a headscarf motoring serenely down the Côte d&#039;Azur - all I can see when I look at the California is overpaid footballers at a McDonald&#039;s drive-thru. The old Ferraris may have been crap cars with reliability measured in hours rather than years, but they had grace, beauty, and style in spades, sorely missing from the latest ones. The profile shot of the California looks like someone welded an aircraft hangar to the back of the car and thought it might do. Great legs, shame about the face...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It&#8217;s a shame that Ferrari are now making so much more money than they ever did in the past &#8211; when I compare the new California to, say, a 275 GTS, I want to cry.<br />
The GTS evokes mental images of Grace Kelly in a headscarf motoring serenely down the Côte d&#8217;Azur &#8211; all I can see when I look at the California is overpaid footballers at a McDonald&#8217;s drive-thru. The old Ferraris may have been crap cars with reliability measured in hours rather than years, but they had grace, beauty, and style in spades, sorely missing from the latest ones. The profile shot of the California looks like someone welded an aircraft hangar to the back of the car and thought it might do. Great legs, shame about the face&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetopdog</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-880501</link>
		<dc:creator>thetopdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-880501</guid>
		<description>I find it funny that when this car was in development, everybody thought Ferrari was bringing back the Dino. It looked like they were making a (relatively) small, front-engined car with the existing 4.3 V8.  The car would also be slower and poorer-handling than anything else in the Ferrari lineup.  It looked like an entry-level Ferrari to everybody.

Ferrari adamantly denied reports that they were moving downmarket.  There would be no cheap, entry-level Ferrari.  Of course, this didn&#039;t make sense, since everybody knew they were developing a small, front-engined, slower Ferrari with worse handling than anything else.  Since the car looked a lot like a Corvette on paper (the base car or possibly the Z06, this is definitely not in the same league as the ZR1), everybody figured Ferrari would have to price the new car somewhere between a Vette and an F430

So what does Ferrari do?  Create a car that&#039;s screams &#039;entry-level Ferrari&#039; in every way, but price it HIGHER than the F430.  This is either a stroke of genius, or one of the most egregious displays of automotive arrogance in recent memory</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I find it funny that when this car was in development, everybody thought Ferrari was bringing back the Dino. It looked like they were making a (relatively) small, front-engined car with the existing 4.3 V8.  The car would also be slower and poorer-handling than anything else in the Ferrari lineup.  It looked like an entry-level Ferrari to everybody.</p>
<p>Ferrari adamantly denied reports that they were moving downmarket.  There would be no cheap, entry-level Ferrari.  Of course, this didn&#8217;t make sense, since everybody knew they were developing a small, front-engined, slower Ferrari with worse handling than anything else.  Since the car looked a lot like a Corvette on paper (the base car or possibly the Z06, this is definitely not in the same league as the ZR1), everybody figured Ferrari would have to price the new car somewhere between a Vette and an F430</p>
<p>So what does Ferrari do?  Create a car that&#8217;s screams &#8216;entry-level Ferrari&#8217; in every way, but price it HIGHER than the F430.  This is either a stroke of genius, or one of the most egregious displays of automotive arrogance in recent memory<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BEAT</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-878451</link>
		<dc:creator>BEAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-878451</guid>
		<description>I wonder how come Ferrari never made a car for Boston or New York.

How about Ferrari Big Apple or Ferrari New England? 

What is so special about California? The sunny weather or the unpredictable earthquake, the foreclosure or wild fires with a twist of gang bang.

Beyonce is pretty but I prefer Rihanna!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I wonder how come Ferrari never made a car for Boston or New York.</p>
<p>How about Ferrari Big Apple or Ferrari New England? </p>
<p>What is so special about California? The sunny weather or the unpredictable earthquake, the foreclosure or wild fires with a twist of gang bang.</p>
<p>Beyonce is pretty but I prefer Rihanna!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NulloModo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-877061</link>
		<dc:creator>NulloModo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-877061</guid>
		<description>I like the dead on front view, and the dead on back, but the side view is very busy, some of those lines need to go, and the front 3/4 view is atrocious.  How did this car get through the design stages without anyone noticing that the abrupt flatness of the grill makes this car look like a big mouth bass?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I like the dead on front view, and the dead on back, but the side view is very busy, some of those lines need to go, and the front 3/4 view is atrocious.  How did this car get through the design stages without anyone noticing that the abrupt flatness of the grill makes this car look like a big mouth bass?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usta Bee</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-876421</link>
		<dc:creator>Usta Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-876421</guid>
		<description>I like the fender vents, they&#039;re such an original styling touch.

What this thing needs is a three-on-the-tree column shifter. Why ?, it&#039;d just be damned funny in a Ferrari.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I like the fender vents, they&#8217;re such an original styling touch.</p>
<p>What this thing needs is a three-on-the-tree column shifter. Why ?, it&#8217;d just be damned funny in a Ferrari.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEC</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-875961</link>
		<dc:creator>JEC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-875961</guid>
		<description>Upon reading this, I&#039;ve decided that when I win the lottery (a very big lottery. Multiple times.), I will buy a Ferrari spider. A 1967 275 GTB NART Spyder. Not this poseur atrocity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Upon reading this, I&#8217;ve decided that when I win the lottery (a very big lottery. Multiple times.), I will buy a Ferrari spider. A 1967 275 GTB NART Spyder. Not this poseur atrocity.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rokovak</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-875881</link>
		<dc:creator>Rokovak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-875881</guid>
		<description>No matter how hard TTAC readers slam the car, there&#039;s no escaping the fact that the quarter-mil Lexus 430 California SC is sold out for another 2-3 years. If that doesn&#039;t speak volumes about the sheer brilliance of Ferrari AND the sheer stupidity of Ferrari owners, I dunno what does.

Bravo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->No matter how hard TTAC readers slam the car, there&#8217;s no escaping the fact that the quarter-mil Lexus 430 California SC is sold out for another 2-3 years. If that doesn&#8217;t speak volumes about the sheer brilliance of Ferrari AND the sheer stupidity of Ferrari owners, I dunno what does.</p>
<p>Bravo.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meanpants555</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-875861</link>
		<dc:creator>meanpants555</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-875861</guid>
		<description>The wheels are heinous and the aluminum center console just begs for me to place my jimmy dangles on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The wheels are heinous and the aluminum center console just begs for me to place my jimmy dangles on it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psarhjinian</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-875801</link>
		<dc:creator>psarhjinian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-875801</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;1735 kg = 3,825 lb. That’s goddamn fat for a &lt;strong&gt;non-German&lt;/strong&gt; sports car.&lt;/em&gt;

Fixed that for you.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>1735 kg = 3,825 lb. That’s goddamn fat for a <strong>non-German</strong> sports car.</em></p>
<p>Fixed that for you.  :)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: argentla</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-875771</link>
		<dc:creator>argentla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-875771</guid>
		<description>1735 kg = 3,825 lb. That&#039;s goddamn fat for a sports car.

I would really like to see Ferrari lead the charge for some weight control. They can afford new technologies and exotic material, and their customers aren&#039;t going to blink at a few extra grand for carbon fiber, aluminum, etc. 

I&#039;d love to see an &quot;entry-level&quot; 308 weighing at least 600 pounds less than the California, with a new small V8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->1735 kg = 3,825 lb. That&#8217;s goddamn fat for a sports car.</p>
<p>I would really like to see Ferrari lead the charge for some weight control. They can afford new technologies and exotic material, and their customers aren&#8217;t going to blink at a few extra grand for carbon fiber, aluminum, etc. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see an &#8220;entry-level&#8221; 308 weighing at least 600 pounds less than the California, with a new small V8.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arapaima</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-875221</link>
		<dc:creator>arapaima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-875221</guid>
		<description>I only just noticed the pentagram wheels.

Aside from that the design is starting to grow on me, the proportions look somewhat better as I mull over the car more. The rear is still ugly, and the blue should never see production; but it isn&#039;t that bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I only just noticed the pentagram wheels.</p>
<p>Aside from that the design is starting to grow on me, the proportions look somewhat better as I mull over the car more. The rear is still ugly, and the blue should never see production; but it isn&#8217;t that bad.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-875191</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-875191</guid>
		<description>Hardly the Ferrari that I grew up lusting after.  Particularly at $244k, the only reason this will sell is the name Ferrari.  Sad and disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Hardly the Ferrari that I grew up lusting after.  Particularly at $244k, the only reason this will sell is the name Ferrari.  Sad and disappointing.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GiddyHitch</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-874941</link>
		<dc:creator>GiddyHitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-874941</guid>
		<description>Wow, it&#039;s like someone went over the real design with a planer and this is the result.  The comparisons to the SL65, both in terms of spec sheet and side profile, are dead on but the surcharge will make most people balk.  I predict that this one will go the way of the 612 and start stacking up at dealers for list price (or lower in this economy, or lack thereof).  You buy one of these first to get entrance to the Ferrari club so that you can buy a 430 later.  But let me set the record straight, the 599 is Beyonce Knowles while the California is Victoria Beckham.

&lt;i&gt;Also, I thought it would be cheaper than the F430…&lt;/i&gt;

JJ, the California will eventually be the cheap Ferrari when the 430 successor comes out.  One begins to suspect that the timing of Ferrari&#039;s move further upmarket will prove to be poor.

And consider me once again amazed that a Delphi-sourced part (magnetic dampers) even made it onto a Ferrari build sheet, let alone became a model highlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Wow, it&#8217;s like someone went over the real design with a planer and this is the result.  The comparisons to the SL65, both in terms of spec sheet and side profile, are dead on but the surcharge will make most people balk.  I predict that this one will go the way of the 612 and start stacking up at dealers for list price (or lower in this economy, or lack thereof).  You buy one of these first to get entrance to the Ferrari club so that you can buy a 430 later.  But let me set the record straight, the 599 is Beyonce Knowles while the California is Victoria Beckham.</p>
<p><i>Also, I thought it would be cheaper than the F430…</i></p>
<p>JJ, the California will eventually be the cheap Ferrari when the 430 successor comes out.  One begins to suspect that the timing of Ferrari&#8217;s move further upmarket will prove to be poor.</p>
<p>And consider me once again amazed that a Delphi-sourced part (magnetic dampers) even made it onto a Ferrari build sheet, let alone became a model highlight.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psarhjinian</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-874841</link>
		<dc:creator>psarhjinian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-874841</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;This is simply inexcusable. I am disappointed and terrified by Ferrari’s use of this cosmetic trick.&lt;/em&gt;

Well, then prepare to be disappointed by the Audi R8, Lamborghini LP640, several Bentleys and the Veyron.  For some reason, though, only Lexus gets called on it.  Brand snobbery at it&#039;s finest.

Any car that has an exhaust moulded into the bumper is going to use this kind of stylistic fakery.  Why?  You can&#039;t attach a hot, moving part like an exhaust pipe to a fixed, plastic bumper.  Either you:
* Have tips attached to the exhaust that float in the bumper and leave a gap, which is what most cars do.
* Run the pipe under the bumper and look like an econocar.
* Have a fake molding in the bumper that surrounds the exhaust.  This, at least, looks clean and finished, unless you shine a light into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>This is simply inexcusable. I am disappointed and terrified by Ferrari’s use of this cosmetic trick.</em></p>
<p>Well, then prepare to be disappointed by the Audi R8, Lamborghini LP640, several Bentleys and the Veyron.  For some reason, though, only Lexus gets called on it.  Brand snobbery at it&#8217;s finest.</p>
<p>Any car that has an exhaust moulded into the bumper is going to use this kind of stylistic fakery.  Why?  You can&#8217;t attach a hot, moving part like an exhaust pipe to a fixed, plastic bumper.  Either you:<br />
* Have tips attached to the exhaust that float in the bumper and leave a gap, which is what most cars do.<br />
* Run the pipe under the bumper and look like an econocar.<br />
* Have a fake molding in the bumper that surrounds the exhaust.  This, at least, looks clean and finished, unless you shine a light into it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-874671</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-874671</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;“And then we have the Lexus cosmetic card trick: fake exhaust tail pipes.”&lt;/em&gt;

I&#039;ll just choose not to believe that&#039;s true for now and from now onwards act like I never read that.

Seriously, while the rest of the car is growing on me after the initial disappointment of seeing the first pictures, fake exhausts would be enough reason for me to opt for something else instead.

Also, I thought it would be cheaper than the F430...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>“And then we have the Lexus cosmetic card trick: fake exhaust tail pipes.”</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll just choose not to believe that&#8217;s true for now and from now onwards act like I never read that.</p>
<p>Seriously, while the rest of the car is growing on me after the initial disappointment of seeing the first pictures, fake exhausts would be enough reason for me to opt for something else instead.</p>
<p>Also, I thought it would be cheaper than the F430&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Elias</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-874601</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Elias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-874601</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ll sell every single unit at full pop,   regardless of what any of us think as to the vehicle aesthetics.  Guess no zero percent financing available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->They&#8217;ll sell every single unit at full pop,   regardless of what any of us think as to the vehicle aesthetics.  Guess no zero percent financing available?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolven</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-874461</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-874461</guid>
		<description>I, too, don&#039;t believe it&#039;s an Ugly Betty.  I actually think it looks pretty good, but it could be improved.  

And don&#039;t forget, some guys like big butts, fat bottomed girls, bubble hineys, etc...   

Not me, but some do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I, too, don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s an Ugly Betty.  I actually think it looks pretty good, but it could be improved.  </p>
<p>And don&#8217;t forget, some guys like big butts, fat bottomed girls, bubble hineys, etc&#8230;   </p>
<p>Not me, but some do.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LamborghiniZ</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-874101</link>
		<dc:creator>LamborghiniZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-874101</guid>
		<description>I thought I liked the styling at first, but I&#039;m really having second thoughts. The side view and back view are really busy, over-drawn nightmares, especially those air dams in the back and the faux exhaust.

And it&#039;s $244K??? SO overpriced. If it was, say, $180K it&#039;d have a market against something like the Bentley Continental GT, maybe steal some of the Gallardo Spyder&#039;s sales, but as it is now it&#039;s terribly overpriced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I thought I liked the styling at first, but I&#8217;m really having second thoughts. The side view and back view are really busy, over-drawn nightmares, especially those air dams in the back and the faux exhaust.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s $244K??? SO overpriced. If it was, say, $180K it&#8217;d have a market against something like the Bentley Continental GT, maybe steal some of the Gallardo Spyder&#8217;s sales, but as it is now it&#8217;s terribly overpriced.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guyincognito</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-873721</link>
		<dc:creator>guyincognito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-873721</guid>
		<description>&quot;And then we have the Lexus cosmetic card trick: fake exhaust tail pipes.&quot;

This is simply inexcusable. I am disappointed and terrified by Ferrari&#039;s use of this cosmetic trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;And then we have the Lexus cosmetic card trick: fake exhaust tail pipes.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is simply inexcusable. I am disappointed and terrified by Ferrari&#8217;s use of this cosmetic trick.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VFR800A</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2010-ferrari-california-spider/comment-page-1/#comment-873651</link>
		<dc:creator>VFR800A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=118281#comment-873651</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who think it looks a bit like a Maserati GT (particularly the second picture)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Am I the only one who think it looks a bit like a Maserati GT (particularly the second picture)&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 80/164 queries in 0.167 seconds using apc

Served from: autoforums.com @ 2010-03-20 01:46:05 -->