Review: 2009 Toyota Venza

Michael Martineck
by Michael Martineck

If I didn’t know better, I’d bet carmakers choose model names via a Google simulation. A computer identifies search words that can be punted to page four within days of launch. In this case, it’s only a matter of a week or so before lornezovenza.com and Jac Venza slip into double digit obscurity. At the same time, I suppose Toyota settled on “Venza” because it sounds vaguely Italian– perfect for a car built in Georgetown Kentucky on a Camry platform. In truth, I don’t know what it is: the word, the car, the point. All I know is after spending time in the new Toyota Venza I’ve become a cautious and reluctant fan.

The Toyota Venza is either a jacked-up touring car or scaled down SUV. Depends on what you’re getting out of. Built on a Camry platform, it rides awfully high for a sedan. It can be crossed-shopped with a zillion cross-overs. Toyota put it in the ‘car’ section of its Web site.

Your opinion of just what the Venza is changes on angle of approach. From the front, it’s a Camry with edema. I actually walked passed my tester without noticing it tucked between other Toyotas. From the side it’s a Highlander with a couple yards of cargo space sliced off. The back is distinctive, swoopy but strong. You’d think something this unique wouldn’t come off so bland. And you’d be wrong.

On the inside, the engineers did much better. The interior swirls around the driver and passenger. It’s modern without being show car crazy. It’s dramatic without gimmickry. Gauges are centered, large and multicolored. The gear selector pops out of a plunging dash, putting the shifter and steering wheel racecar close.

Never having been in the car before, I immediately knew where all the functional gizmos were and how to work them. As for other things, like your iPod or sunglasses, write yourself a note. There are so many trap doors and secret compartments second owners are guaranteed a new flash light or breath mints on delivery.

There is no cruel third row seat. For this, the car gets an extra star. There is a curved rear roofline, with a cost of 12 cubic feet of cargo capacity. Star gone. Nice NC-17 back seats, though. You could drive your adults friends to a movie and not feel shame.

Our test Venza was a well-equipped, V6, all-wheel drive version. In an affable departure for Toyota, there are no arcane trim levels to confuse and bemuse. Pick front or four wheels to power from four or six cylinders. Option packages are the usual value meal menu that inevitably leaves me feeling like I could’ve made a better deal. Overall, Toyota made this easier to buy than other Toyotas or competitors.

Toyota’s 3.5-liter double overhead cam 24-valve dual VVT-i V6 reportedly makes 268 hp and 246 lb.-ft. of torque. The engine revs up quickly, with icy calm. A loaded Venza’s got 600 pounds on the Camry, though. After two entrance ramps you want to drive this to Weight Watchers. The 2.7-liter four won’t be available for another month. Dropping down 80 horses won’t be fun. Still, 2.7 is pretty fat for a four, promising 20 percent improvement in mileage. We’ll check back.

The six-speed electronically controlled automatic overdrive transmission with intelligence and sequential shift mode is the perfect servant. Competent and unobtrusive. The drive train is so enthusiastic, its easy to think the Venza might be thrashable. Don’t kid yourself.

Handling off-track, in normal conditions, this is a porky wagon on 20” wheels. It does ride lower than typical SUVs, or most current crossovers, and the center of gravity is beneath any minivan. When it’s tight – or more appropriately – in an emergency ball-in-the-street dodge, it keeps its composure. As the 4,000 pounds list, you’re reminded that lower would be better.

In not making a more traditional Camry wagon, Toyota gave in to prevailing misconceptions that higher is safer. The opposite is true. The Camry handles better and Venza’s extra inches aren’t enough for the driver to see over the Escalade in front. Lose, lose. Toyota compensates with electronics. It’s not fully effective.

I did test the electronic nannies, though. Luckily for you – not me – I had some seat time in a disgusting frozen rainstorm. The brakes (Anti-lock Brake System with Electronic Brake-force Distribution and Brake Assist) are exceptional. The all wheel drive, traction control and stability control performed admirably. In fact, the whole safety package prevented me from doing stupid things in the name of journalism. The car is a mom.

That realization reshaped my opinion of the Venza. It’s not perfect, but that’s because, like many moms, it’s trying to balance so much. It’s a pack of compromises, but: It carries more peat moss than a Camry, parks easier than a Highlander, seems more mature than a RAV 4, more svelte than a Seinna. No, it can’t perform butch SUV stunts. Why should it? That’s not what the Venza’s about. The riddle of the Venza is not what it is, but what it does. It does a lot. For a lot of people, that’s everything.

Michael Martineck
Michael Martineck

More by Michael Martineck

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 68 comments
  • Revolver1978 Revolver1978 on Feb 15, 2009

    I took a look at this at the Pittsburgh Auto show. Sometime early next year I'll be shopping for a car that can haul 3 dogs and 3-4 people. My current Mini Cooper S isn't cutting it in this regard. The sig other was along for the tire kicking. I reservedly liked the Venza too, especially the generous leg room in the back seats. The dash materials are much less impressive up close than in photos; odd grains of plastic and vinyl, oily sheens here and there. I like the option of the 4cyl/AWD combination. Generous hatch area. Coming away from the Auto show, we came away with these favorites - Ford Edge (used of course, given rapid depreciation) Toyota Venza (new or used, in a year?) MB GLK (used or off lease? Again, likely rapid depreciation.) Subaru Outback Wagon (My preference for the Turbo, better half prefers the fuel economy of the 2.5i; This was a surprise, I like it better than the new Forester) X3 (compared to any Infiniti product we looked at, it is roomy by comparison. The EX hatch area is a joke, and the FX isn't much better. Again, used.) There was no new A4 wagon to poke around at, but I'd like to see it. I had a ford escape a while back and I still like them, but sig other find them to "Trucky", yet still likes the GLK. Go figure. One thing that my brother pointed out - 20" wheels. For a family vehicle, those are some pricey tires. Especially for a non-sporting vehicle. They look nice, but man, what a bill to pay every couple of years. . . And then 33k for a well optioned 6cyl? Doesn't bode well with a GLK 4Matic starting at 35,900 a few stalls over.

  • Schmidty86 Schmidty86 on Apr 25, 2009

    Not sure where people are getting all of these tire replacement cost numbers. I'm looking at tirerack.com right now and OEM replacement Goodyear Eagle RS-A 245/50R20 tires are only $99 each. Add mounting, shipping, and all that and you are maybe looking at $550-$600 for all 4, OTD. I paid over 400 for tires @ Discount Tire for my 2004 Jetta 4 cyl a couple years ago (those were 16's i believe)...I'm not really seeing the problem here. My wife has her heart set on a Buick Enclave right now, I'm hoping I might be able to sway her towards something like the Venza, smaller, more efficient, and easier to park. Not to mention cheaper.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next