<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: 2008 Lexus IS-F Take Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:54:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lbart</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-2/#comment-1199582</link>
		<dc:creator>Lbart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1199582</guid>
		<description>Fake tailpipes, Fake hood scoops and vents.  They all seem to try to imply something they are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Fake tailpipes, Fake hood scoops and vents.  They all seem to try to imply something they are not.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-2/#comment-1190372</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1190372</guid>
		<description>Now that CORVETTE is SWEEEEEET. LIKE the challenger also. That Japanese car sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Now that CORVETTE is SWEEEEEET. LIKE the challenger also. That Japanese car sucks.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnthacker</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-2/#comment-1143461</link>
		<dc:creator>johnthacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1143461</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Also, I agree with the previous posters about the backseat. Totally useless. I don’t get cars like the IS or Audi A4 that have four doors but totally useless back seats.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I take it you don&#039;t get the A3 either?

Well, if you&#039;re 5&#039;6&quot; like me and you always move the front seat up, then it&#039;s not totally useless (and you have more rear leg room than measured).  And since some drivers are short, there&#039;s a market for these cars; other people can always buy larger cars.  That sort of excuse seems more valid in the case of Japanese-designed cars (where average height is closer to mine) than German cars, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<blockquote>Also, I agree with the previous posters about the backseat. Totally useless. I don’t get cars like the IS or Audi A4 that have four doors but totally useless back seats.</p></blockquote>
<p>I take it you don&#8217;t get the A3 either?</p>
<p>Well, if you&#8217;re 5&#8242;6&#8243; like me and you always move the front seat up, then it&#8217;s not totally useless (and you have more rear leg room than measured).  And since some drivers are short, there&#8217;s a market for these cars; other people can always buy larger cars.  That sort of excuse seems more valid in the case of Japanese-designed cars (where average height is closer to mine) than German cars, though.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meefer</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-2/#comment-1141571</link>
		<dc:creator>meefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1141571</guid>
		<description>Disclosure, I own the maddeningly slow IS250.

For all the fake pipes people, let it go - get the tanabe aftermarket if that&#039;s all that&#039;s stopping you.

I would have loved to get one instead of the 250 but in a car I put 25K miles a year on, $60K is silly (for now).  

That being said, I want to get a C6 next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Disclosure, I own the maddeningly slow IS250.</p>
<p>For all the fake pipes people, let it go &#8211; get the tanabe aftermarket if that&#8217;s all that&#8217;s stopping you.</p>
<p>I would have loved to get one instead of the 250 but in a car I put 25K miles a year on, $60K is silly (for now).  </p>
<p>That being said, I want to get a C6 next.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkim23</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-2/#comment-1132991</link>
		<dc:creator>jkim23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1132991</guid>
		<description>Yeah I don&#039;t understand this car either. If I&#039;m going to buy a Lexus, I&#039;d want that buttery smooth ride and cocooon-like silence. If I want a midsize rocket I&#039;d have to go with an M3 or CTS-V. 

Also, I agree with the previous posters about the backseat. Totally useless. I don&#039;t get cars like the IS or Audi A4 that have four doors but totally useless back seats. I&#039;ve had coupes that had more rear seat room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Yeah I don&#8217;t understand this car either. If I&#8217;m going to buy a Lexus, I&#8217;d want that buttery smooth ride and cocooon-like silence. If I want a midsize rocket I&#8217;d have to go with an M3 or CTS-V. </p>
<p>Also, I agree with the previous posters about the backseat. Totally useless. I don&#8217;t get cars like the IS or Audi A4 that have four doors but totally useless back seats. I&#8217;ve had coupes that had more rear seat room.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ihatetrees</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-2/#comment-1131832</link>
		<dc:creator>ihatetrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1131832</guid>
		<description>I can overlook poor styling if the handling makes up for it, but, Wow, the handling better go all the way to 11. 

&lt;i&gt;MTeator:
The truth is, any exhaust other than a freaking straight pipe and a simple muffler is for show.&lt;/i&gt;

Are you certain? Engines are (essentially) air pumps. More small tubes are often more efficient than one big tube. And don&#039;t forget the emissions dance - who knows how that&#039;s engineered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I can overlook poor styling if the handling makes up for it, but, Wow, the handling better go all the way to 11. </p>
<p><i>MTeator:<br />
The truth is, any exhaust other than a freaking straight pipe and a simple muffler is for show.</i></p>
<p>Are you certain? Engines are (essentially) air pumps. More small tubes are often more efficient than one big tube. And don&#8217;t forget the emissions dance &#8211; who knows how that&#8217;s engineered.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vorenus</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-2/#comment-1130152</link>
		<dc:creator>Vorenus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1130152</guid>
		<description>So... if this car&#039;s so great, why isn&#039;t there a less-lux Toyota equivalent? 

Oh, that&#039;s right; having one would comprimise Toyota&#039;s commitment to produce uninspiring transportation appliances *only*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->So&#8230; if this car&#8217;s so great, why isn&#8217;t there a less-lux Toyota equivalent? </p>
<p>Oh, that&#8217;s right; having one would comprimise Toyota&#8217;s commitment to produce uninspiring transportation appliances *only*.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: like.a.kite</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1130092</link>
		<dc:creator>like.a.kite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1130092</guid>
		<description>psarhjinian:

You misunderstand! I have nothing at all against the IS-F or F-anything. If they can build something that beats the Germans at their own game, more power to them, and to the brand.

That said, vertical tailpipes look really stupid. That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->psarhjinian:</p>
<p>You misunderstand! I have nothing at all against the IS-F or F-anything. If they can build something that beats the Germans at their own game, more power to them, and to the brand.</p>
<p>That said, vertical tailpipes look really stupid. That is all.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noreserve</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1129912</link>
		<dc:creator>noreserve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1129912</guid>
		<description>A few other things...

It&#039;s IS F, not IS-F. Not sure why, but that&#039;s what Lexus uses on their website.

The problem I have with the tailpipes is not that they are cosmetic/fake, but that they are stacked and look ridiculous. As in something only the Japanese could love.

And those IS cars are too cramped inside. My friend and I took an IS 350 out for a short test drive that had both of us feeling like we were getting into a suit a size too small. That dark black interior didn&#039;t help at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->A few other things&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s IS F, not IS-F. Not sure why, but that&#8217;s what Lexus uses on their website.</p>
<p>The problem I have with the tailpipes is not that they are cosmetic/fake, but that they are stacked and look ridiculous. As in something only the Japanese could love.</p>
<p>And those IS cars are too cramped inside. My friend and I took an IS 350 out for a short test drive that had both of us feeling like we were getting into a suit a size too small. That dark black interior didn&#8217;t help at all.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noreserve</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1129891</link>
		<dc:creator>noreserve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1129891</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Bunter1:
Imagine if they cut the platform a foot, pushed the engine back a bit and gave it swoopy body work and a 6M trans option. The resulting car (Supra?) would spank a base ‘Vette, might give a Z06 a run.&lt;/em&gt;

And this would magically cut several tenths off of the 0-60 time how? The base C6 is 4.1 and the IS F is 4.4 in 0-60 (Car and Driver apples-to-apples testing). You&#039;re not going to do it with the manual. In fact, that would cost you time to the 0.10 sec upshifts from the SDS 8-speed dual-clutch potato slicer.

Move the engine all you want, but you better knock out some of that weight - around 600 lbs. The C6 is almost that much lighter and has 430 HP vs 416. Torque isn&#039;t the IS F&#039;s ballgame either at 371 - way up high in the curve. In fact, given the IS F&#039;s power-to-weight ratio, the only thing saving it in the 0-60 is the SDS tranny.

Nope, no spanking to be had here. I&#039;d venture to say that the &quot;base&quot; C6 would be doling out the licks - at the nearest track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Bunter1:<br />
Imagine if they cut the platform a foot, pushed the engine back a bit and gave it swoopy body work and a 6M trans option. The resulting car (Supra?) would spank a base ‘Vette, might give a Z06 a run.</em></p>
<p>And this would magically cut several tenths off of the 0-60 time how? The base C6 is 4.1 and the IS F is 4.4 in 0-60 (Car and Driver apples-to-apples testing). You&#8217;re not going to do it with the manual. In fact, that would cost you time to the 0.10 sec upshifts from the SDS 8-speed dual-clutch potato slicer.</p>
<p>Move the engine all you want, but you better knock out some of that weight &#8211; around 600 lbs. The C6 is almost that much lighter and has 430 HP vs 416. Torque isn&#8217;t the IS F&#8217;s ballgame either at 371 &#8211; way up high in the curve. In fact, given the IS F&#8217;s power-to-weight ratio, the only thing saving it in the 0-60 is the SDS tranny.</p>
<p>Nope, no spanking to be had here. I&#8217;d venture to say that the &#8220;base&#8221; C6 would be doling out the licks &#8211; at the nearest track.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ponchoman49</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1129102</link>
		<dc:creator>ponchoman49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1129102</guid>
		<description>You guys are killing me. 5 stars for a car that is condemned for ugly styling, has no interior room and not the best handling. Even the name is dumb. F stands for fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->You guys are killing me. 5 stars for a car that is condemned for ugly styling, has no interior room and not the best handling. Even the name is dumb. F stands for fail.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strippo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1129051</link>
		<dc:creator>Strippo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1129051</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Kinda like watching midget porn on the internet, but like with a car instead. You know?&lt;/em&gt;

Only too well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Kinda like watching midget porn on the internet, but like with a car instead. You know?</em></p>
<p>Only too well.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1128991</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1128991</guid>
		<description>I followed an IS-F about 2 months ago along the 401.  Looked interesting from behind, but I became hypnotised by the tailpipes. Everything around me became an insignificant blur. I was completely focused on those pipes.  It was a disturbing and pleasing sensation at the same time. Kinda like watching midget porn on the internet, but like with a car instead. You know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I followed an IS-F about 2 months ago along the 401.  Looked interesting from behind, but I became hypnotised by the tailpipes. Everything around me became an insignificant blur. I was completely focused on those pipes.  It was a disturbing and pleasing sensation at the same time. Kinda like watching midget porn on the internet, but like with a car instead. You know?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt.</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1128702</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1128702</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget the Yamaha in the Fords of the 80&#039;s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Don&#8217;t forget the Yamaha in the Fords of the 80&#8217;s&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1128682</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1128682</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Veyron, Muircelago, California, R8. All these cars have exhaust tips that are total and utter fakery. Shine a light through the car while it’s lifted and you’ll see the same thing.&lt;/em&gt;

The Murciélago as well? Only the LP640 or the original model too? I can&#039;t imagine the original 2001 Murciélago having fake exhaust tips...And, I think it&#039;s rather cool if the exhausts shakes and moves around a little(!) when you stomp on the gas, like you can see with a Ferrari 360/F430 for instance. I also think the 2* 2 exhausts on vintage Ferrari models hanging under the bumper look great. 
The problem with the Lexus (and California) is that this setup not only is fake but also looks fake, drawing more attention to the fakeness.

On another subject; Yamaha also made the V8 in the Volvo XC90/S80. They also tried their hand at making an F1 engine in the early 90s but the thing was notoriously unreliable and still not powerful enough. They pulled the project after just 2 or so years (it&#039;s likely that no team wanted their engines anymore). I doubt they&#039;d like to be reminded of that. They make some mean synthesizers though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Veyron, Muircelago, California, R8. All these cars have exhaust tips that are total and utter fakery. Shine a light through the car while it’s lifted and you’ll see the same thing.</em></p>
<p>The Murciélago as well? Only the LP640 or the original model too? I can&#8217;t imagine the original 2001 Murciélago having fake exhaust tips&#8230;And, I think it&#8217;s rather cool if the exhausts shakes and moves around a little(!) when you stomp on the gas, like you can see with a Ferrari 360/F430 for instance. I also think the 2* 2 exhausts on vintage Ferrari models hanging under the bumper look great.<br />
The problem with the Lexus (and California) is that this setup not only is fake but also looks fake, drawing more attention to the fakeness.</p>
<p>On another subject; Yamaha also made the V8 in the Volvo XC90/S80. They also tried their hand at making an F1 engine in the early 90s but the thing was notoriously unreliable and still not powerful enough. They pulled the project after just 2 or so years (it&#8217;s likely that no team wanted their engines anymore). I doubt they&#8217;d like to be reminded of that. They make some mean synthesizers though.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davey49</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1128541</link>
		<dc:creator>davey49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1128541</guid>
		<description>Pretty much the entire 2000GT was built by Yamaha, not just the engine, from what I&#039;ve read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Pretty much the entire 2000GT was built by Yamaha, not just the engine, from what I&#8217;ve read.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quasimondo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1128392</link>
		<dc:creator>quasimondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1128392</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Yamaha has been engineering and manufacturing engine bits (maybe even entire engines) to Toyota for decades. My 1988 Celica All-trac Turbo had “Yamaha” cast into the head. I think Toyota’s original 16v engine for the MR2 and Corolla GT-S was also Yamaha’s work. Not sure if the same is true for Toyota’s more pedestrian engines.
&lt;/em&gt;

A bit of clarification:

Toyota&#039;s history with Yamaha goes back to at least the late 60&#039;s.  Their first sports car, the 2000GT used a Yamaha built engine, and the cylinder heads of subsequent twin-cam four cylinder engines, many of which were never available to the U.S. market.

The 4A-GE used in the Corolla GT-S and MR2 on the other hand, is a reverse-engineered version of the BDA engines that Cosworth built for Ford back in the late 60&#039;s.  The dimensions for both engines are quite similar, including bore, stroke, valve diameter, and combustion chamber design.

With that said, I&#039;m kinda disappointed that this car doesn&#039;t have a proper stick-shift.  Even BMW relented and eventually offered up the M5 with a manual gearbox.  

Adding on to this gripe, eight is enough.  Only tractor trailers and F1 cars need this many gears to keep their engines in the sweet part of the power band.  If you need this many gears to keep that motor at full song, then perhaps they need to retune it for a bit more oomph on the low end.

&lt;em&gt;People get angry when Toyota doesn’t build a sporty car, then turn around and get picky and angry when they *do* build a sporty car. Though I don’t have a reason to own one (largely because I can’t afford one) I’m glad the IS-F exists.&lt;/em&gt;

I don&#039;t want a sport&lt;em&gt;y&lt;/em&gt; car, I want a &lt;em&gt;sports&lt;/em&gt; car.  You need more than a mega engine and shocks turned up to 11 to get there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Yamaha has been engineering and manufacturing engine bits (maybe even entire engines) to Toyota for decades. My 1988 Celica All-trac Turbo had “Yamaha” cast into the head. I think Toyota’s original 16v engine for the MR2 and Corolla GT-S was also Yamaha’s work. Not sure if the same is true for Toyota’s more pedestrian engines.<br />
</em></p>
<p>A bit of clarification:</p>
<p>Toyota&#8217;s history with Yamaha goes back to at least the late 60&#8217;s.  Their first sports car, the 2000GT used a Yamaha built engine, and the cylinder heads of subsequent twin-cam four cylinder engines, many of which were never available to the U.S. market.</p>
<p>The 4A-GE used in the Corolla GT-S and MR2 on the other hand, is a reverse-engineered version of the BDA engines that Cosworth built for Ford back in the late 60&#8217;s.  The dimensions for both engines are quite similar, including bore, stroke, valve diameter, and combustion chamber design.</p>
<p>With that said, I&#8217;m kinda disappointed that this car doesn&#8217;t have a proper stick-shift.  Even BMW relented and eventually offered up the M5 with a manual gearbox.  </p>
<p>Adding on to this gripe, eight is enough.  Only tractor trailers and F1 cars need this many gears to keep their engines in the sweet part of the power band.  If you need this many gears to keep that motor at full song, then perhaps they need to retune it for a bit more oomph on the low end.</p>
<p><em>People get angry when Toyota doesn’t build a sporty car, then turn around and get picky and angry when they *do* build a sporty car. Though I don’t have a reason to own one (largely because I can’t afford one) I’m glad the IS-F exists.</em></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want a sport<em>y</em> car, I want a <em>sports</em> car.  You need more than a mega engine and shocks turned up to 11 to get there.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strippo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1127821</link>
		<dc:creator>Strippo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1127821</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;People get angry when Toyota doesn’t build a&lt;/em&gt;[n affordable]&lt;em&gt; sporty car, then turn around and get picky and angry when they *do* build a &lt;/em&gt;[$60,000 merely]&lt;em&gt; sporty car&lt;/em&gt;.

Yeah. People are weird like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>People get angry when Toyota doesn’t build a</em>[n affordable]<em> sporty car, then turn around and get picky and angry when they *do* build a </em>[$60,000 merely]<em> sporty car</em>.</p>
<p>Yeah. People are weird like that.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Areitu</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1127801</link>
		<dc:creator>Areitu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1127801</guid>
		<description>People get angry when Toyota doesn&#039;t build a sporty car, then turn around and get picky and angry when they *do* build a sporty car. Though I don&#039;t have a reason to own one (largely because I can&#039;t afford one) I&#039;m glad the IS-F exists. 

4.2 seconds? I didn&#039;t know it was that fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->People get angry when Toyota doesn&#8217;t build a sporty car, then turn around and get picky and angry when they *do* build a sporty car. Though I don&#8217;t have a reason to own one (largely because I can&#8217;t afford one) I&#8217;m glad the IS-F exists. </p>
<p>4.2 seconds? I didn&#8217;t know it was that fast.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DearS</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1127791</link>
		<dc:creator>DearS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1127791</guid>
		<description>Well its cool he gave it 5 stars. If he had a good time, than good for him, while ruin that? 

Although by that token almost any car can get 5 stars. I do not have much of a problem with that. Objective reviews are bias anyhow. I do not get them, cannot get them. I want to learn to leave negatives aside long enough to get 5 stars worth of enjoyment. Than again I&#039;m not perfect, I have needs, I need balance. I have a hard time going from one extreme to the other. Although I think if I lighten up I can be much more nimble. If I expand my perspective and relating to things I can give myself more to focus and enjoy. So thank you (ME).....Mr. Farago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Well its cool he gave it 5 stars. If he had a good time, than good for him, while ruin that? </p>
<p>Although by that token almost any car can get 5 stars. I do not have much of a problem with that. Objective reviews are bias anyhow. I do not get them, cannot get them. I want to learn to leave negatives aside long enough to get 5 stars worth of enjoyment. Than again I&#8217;m not perfect, I have needs, I need balance. I have a hard time going from one extreme to the other. Although I think if I lighten up I can be much more nimble. If I expand my perspective and relating to things I can give myself more to focus and enjoy. So thank you (ME)&#8230;..Mr. Farago.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTeator</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1127721</link>
		<dc:creator>MTeator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1127721</guid>
		<description>My favorite part of the IS-F is the exhaust... simply because on nearly every forum and blog on the internet there&#039;s the chorus of the faux exhaust tips sucking... an entire car, and the exhaust is why it sucks.  The truth is, any exhaust other than a freaking straight pipe and a simple muffler is for show.  But if all anyone can hate on this car is the exhaust... the rest of it must be great.

I can understand not liking a car, but the intense focused hate on this car&#039;s exhaust is just weird, especially since much higher end cars have been there and done that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My favorite part of the IS-F is the exhaust&#8230; simply because on nearly every forum and blog on the internet there&#8217;s the chorus of the faux exhaust tips sucking&#8230; an entire car, and the exhaust is why it sucks.  The truth is, any exhaust other than a freaking straight pipe and a simple muffler is for show.  But if all anyone can hate on this car is the exhaust&#8230; the rest of it must be great.</p>
<p>I can understand not liking a car, but the intense focused hate on this car&#8217;s exhaust is just weird, especially since much higher end cars have been there and done that.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: argentla</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1127551</link>
		<dc:creator>argentla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1127551</guid>
		<description>I like the styling of the standard IS -- I think it&#039;s one of the better-looking sedans available in the U.S. at the moment, although perhaps that is damning it with faint praise. The boy racer body kit is kind of obnoxious, but if we compare it with the BMW 3-series sedan (not the new coupe, but the sedan, even the newly facelifted version), it fails to offend. I could do without the angry-Jack-O&#039;Lantern taillamps that have become the Lexus corporate look, and high-gloss colors are not its forte, but I am baffled by the &quot;it&#039;s hideously ugly&quot; charges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I like the styling of the standard IS &#8212; I think it&#8217;s one of the better-looking sedans available in the U.S. at the moment, although perhaps that is damning it with faint praise. The boy racer body kit is kind of obnoxious, but if we compare it with the BMW 3-series sedan (not the new coupe, but the sedan, even the newly facelifted version), it fails to offend. I could do without the angry-Jack-O&#8217;Lantern taillamps that have become the Lexus corporate look, and high-gloss colors are not its forte, but I am baffled by the &#8220;it&#8217;s hideously ugly&#8221; charges.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteMoran</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1127281</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteMoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1127281</guid>
		<description>Thanks RF! Great read.

Can you go out and test a GS450h next please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Thanks RF! Great read.</p>
<p>Can you go out and test a GS450h next please?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akatsuki</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1127202</link>
		<dc:creator>akatsuki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1127202</guid>
		<description>The base IS is a wonderful, elegant little car - best styling in the class as far as I am concerned. Not too much bling like the C-series, nor the unpurposeful business of the 3, and without the droopy lids of the A4.

The IS-F is just too bloated looking in comparison. I&#039;d rather just tune an IS350 for something close.

As for the interior, I like that the buttons are where they should be and &quot;boring&quot;... so much better than pointless gadgetry like iDrive and screens you need to look at to navigate.

Then again, I drive a Boxster which is pretty much pure functional sport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The base IS is a wonderful, elegant little car &#8211; best styling in the class as far as I am concerned. Not too much bling like the C-series, nor the unpurposeful business of the 3, and without the droopy lids of the A4.</p>
<p>The IS-F is just too bloated looking in comparison. I&#8217;d rather just tune an IS350 for something close.</p>
<p>As for the interior, I like that the buttons are where they should be and &#8220;boring&#8221;&#8230; so much better than pointless gadgetry like iDrive and screens you need to look at to navigate.</p>
<p>Then again, I drive a Boxster which is pretty much pure functional sport.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Baruth</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/review-2008-lexus-is-f-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1127131</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Baruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=209542#comment-1127131</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather have an RS4.

Make that an S4.

Make that an A4.

Make that a four-cylinder A4 and a solid punch to the left testicle. 

The sole mission statement Lexus has -- the relentless pursuit of cut-rate imitation Benzes -- falls a little short here, because the car isn&#039;t cheap enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;d rather have an RS4.</p>
<p>Make that an S4.</p>
<p>Make that an A4.</p>
<p>Make that a four-cylinder A4 and a solid punch to the left testicle. </p>
<p>The sole mission statement Lexus has &#8212; the relentless pursuit of cut-rate imitation Benzes &#8212; falls a little short here, because the car isn&#8217;t cheap enough.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 59/161 queries in 0.130 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 21:55:52 -->