<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question of the Day: Where Will Carmageddon End?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:14:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Horner</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-483592</link>
		<dc:creator>John Horner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-483592</guid>
		<description>&quot;It will be the 1980’s all over again.&quot;

I doubt it.  What is different this time is the rising consumer economies inside China and India.  India has about 1.1M people.  China about 1.3M.  The US, just over 0.3M.  Between them a population about 8 times the size of the US&#039; is buying gasoline powered transportation, many for the first time. Those who can afford it are getting refrigeration and air conditioning. Presently those populations use less than 10% the energy per capita as the US does.  All they have to do is to inch up from 10% to 20% to keep the world supply:demand equation out of balance.  Prices don&#039;t fall in a seller&#039;s market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;It will be the 1980’s all over again.&#8221;</p>
<p>I doubt it.  What is different this time is the rising consumer economies inside China and India.  India has about 1.1M people.  China about 1.3M.  The US, just over 0.3M.  Between them a population about 8 times the size of the US&#8217; is buying gasoline powered transportation, many for the first time. Those who can afford it are getting refrigeration and air conditioning. Presently those populations use less than 10% the energy per capita as the US does.  All they have to do is to inch up from 10% to 20% to keep the world supply:demand equation out of balance.  Prices don&#8217;t fall in a seller&#8217;s market.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-483571</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-483571</guid>
		<description>All automakers are bought out and taken over by Milo the Wonder Dog.

Dogs start wearing hats, berets, and scarves while driving their loyal and loving owners wherever they like. All cars come with &#039;I-Bark&#039; which allow cars to understand the dog&#039;s commands. However most dogs can&#039;t stand the little bone that&#039;s used to direct all the 75,876,321 commands. The bone is replaced with a squishy toy.

All front and rear consoles are replaced with fire hydrants.

Clinton&#039;s old cat Socks comes back from the dead. Socks overthrows the government and puts GWB and Dick Cheney back in power.

The United States invades Mars... and loses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->All automakers are bought out and taken over by Milo the Wonder Dog.</p>
<p>Dogs start wearing hats, berets, and scarves while driving their loyal and loving owners wherever they like. All cars come with &#8216;I-Bark&#8217; which allow cars to understand the dog&#8217;s commands. However most dogs can&#8217;t stand the little bone that&#8217;s used to direct all the 75,876,321 commands. The bone is replaced with a squishy toy.</p>
<p>All front and rear consoles are replaced with fire hydrants.</p>
<p>Clinton&#8217;s old cat Socks comes back from the dead. Socks overthrows the government and puts GWB and Dick Cheney back in power.</p>
<p>The United States invades Mars&#8230; and loses.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geeber</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-483212</link>
		<dc:creator>geeber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-483212</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;toxicroach: But seriously, American tanks in WW2 were raw shit in a tin box compared to German and Soviet tanks. Possibly because the design was limited to what could be produced in a Lincoln plant converted into a Sherman factory.&lt;/i&gt;

Tanks were produced in Chrysler facilities, and Cadillac facilities, as well.

The M5 Stuart tank used a modified version of Hydramatic, which was the most advanced transmission of its day. Two of the transmissions were mated to twin Cadillac V8 engines, which were some of the most rugged, reliable engines of that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>toxicroach: But seriously, American tanks in WW2 were raw shit in a tin box compared to German and Soviet tanks. Possibly because the design was limited to what could be produced in a Lincoln plant converted into a Sherman factory.</i></p>
<p>Tanks were produced in Chrysler facilities, and Cadillac facilities, as well.</p>
<p>The M5 Stuart tank used a modified version of Hydramatic, which was the most advanced transmission of its day. Two of the transmissions were mated to twin Cadillac V8 engines, which were some of the most rugged, reliable engines of that time.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKM</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-482861</link>
		<dc:creator>AKM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-482861</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m also an armchair general, wargamer, and fan of WWII tanks, let&#039;s keep in mind that:
- nowadays, the quantity of heavy material in the army is far lower than during WWII
- said material is built mostly by specialized companies, not large carmakers
- the real strategic industry is in electronics, not in in ground vehicle building.

A single predator drone flight now uses more bandwidth and computing power than the entire air campaign during desert Strom in 1991. 

The idea of building thousands of tanks and launch them at another army of tanks crashed along with the Berlin wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->While I&#8217;m also an armchair general, wargamer, and fan of WWII tanks, let&#8217;s keep in mind that:<br />
- nowadays, the quantity of heavy material in the army is far lower than during WWII<br />
- said material is built mostly by specialized companies, not large carmakers<br />
- the real strategic industry is in electronics, not in in ground vehicle building.</p>
<p>A single predator drone flight now uses more bandwidth and computing power than the entire air campaign during desert Strom in 1991. </p>
<p>The idea of building thousands of tanks and launch them at another army of tanks crashed along with the Berlin wall.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynamic88</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-482741</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynamic88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-482741</guid>
		<description>Ford survives on it&#039;s own.   GM survives with some loan guarantees.   Chrysler is sold for it&#039;s (questionable) value as a dealer network for it&#039;s foreign buyer.  


Re: Tanks. 

&lt;b&gt; But seriously, American tanks in WW2 were raw shit in a tin box compared to German and Soviet tanks. Possibly because the design was limited to what could be produced in a Lincoln plant converted into a Sherman factory.&lt;/b&gt; 

True.  But German tanks were over-engineered, more costly to produce, more difficult to repair, and the Germans couldn&#039;t make enough of them.    For all it&#039;s technical prowess, Germany was still carting a good bit of it&#039;s war materiel around in horse drawn wagons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Ford survives on it&#8217;s own.   GM survives with some loan guarantees.   Chrysler is sold for it&#8217;s (questionable) value as a dealer network for it&#8217;s foreign buyer.  </p>
<p>Re: Tanks. </p>
<p><b> But seriously, American tanks in WW2 were raw shit in a tin box compared to German and Soviet tanks. Possibly because the design was limited to what could be produced in a Lincoln plant converted into a Sherman factory.</b> </p>
<p>True.  But German tanks were over-engineered, more costly to produce, more difficult to repair, and the Germans couldn&#8217;t make enough of them.    For all it&#8217;s technical prowess, Germany was still carting a good bit of it&#8217;s war materiel around in horse drawn wagons.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DearS</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-482642</link>
		<dc:creator>DearS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-482642</guid>
		<description>I say comfy and roomy small cars will take a big leap forward and up market. Camry and Accord Hybrids will be the most popular cars. Cars similar to the Euro Focus and TSX will be second. Americans dont quite want smaller cars, so medium sized cars with decent acceleration and good mileage will dominate. Same as it is now, with Civic and Camrys just with better economy, and probably a little less power.  Crossovers will also get better mileage, and have a good chunk of the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I say comfy and roomy small cars will take a big leap forward and up market. Camry and Accord Hybrids will be the most popular cars. Cars similar to the Euro Focus and TSX will be second. Americans dont quite want smaller cars, so medium sized cars with decent acceleration and good mileage will dominate. Same as it is now, with Civic and Camrys just with better economy, and probably a little less power.  Crossovers will also get better mileage, and have a good chunk of the market.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eh_political</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-482501</link>
		<dc:creator>eh_political</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 03:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-482501</guid>
		<description>@thoots

peak oil is somewhat mitigated by US coal reserves, the real loser here is the environment.

much like any large debtor, the US is somewhat insulated by the sheer level of debt it owes.  on the one hand, business as usual is over, but on the other, Asian nations in particular cannot trash the dollar to the extent it deserves. they would be damaging themselves structurally to do so.

it is unfortunate that the US military has to some degree shredded its conventional superiority, but by taking some lessons from the British Empire they can still salvage some control in the Middle East.  Playing a cynical balance of power game, they can pretty much obtain whatever results they desire.  Iran is a natural ally in the region if the ruling apparatus can be cut out in some way.  Arab Gulf States seem reasonably disposed towards the US, and the others, less relevant in the long run can be punished or rewarded as necessary.

If I was an American, I would purchase some gold, the physical metal-not certificates, and put some money in the resource rich Toronto Stock Exchange--use a Canadian dollar account.  This should hedge against inflation and any further declines in the USD.  I suspect that plugging someone with a gun will still result in serious jail time for the foreseeable future, so shoot to maim, and keep those guns under lock and key, especially if there are little ones around.

I&#039;m gonna go clean my 30.06 just in case...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@thoots</p>
<p>peak oil is somewhat mitigated by US coal reserves, the real loser here is the environment.</p>
<p>much like any large debtor, the US is somewhat insulated by the sheer level of debt it owes.  on the one hand, business as usual is over, but on the other, Asian nations in particular cannot trash the dollar to the extent it deserves. they would be damaging themselves structurally to do so.</p>
<p>it is unfortunate that the US military has to some degree shredded its conventional superiority, but by taking some lessons from the British Empire they can still salvage some control in the Middle East.  Playing a cynical balance of power game, they can pretty much obtain whatever results they desire.  Iran is a natural ally in the region if the ruling apparatus can be cut out in some way.  Arab Gulf States seem reasonably disposed towards the US, and the others, less relevant in the long run can be punished or rewarded as necessary.</p>
<p>If I was an American, I would purchase some gold, the physical metal-not certificates, and put some money in the resource rich Toronto Stock Exchange&#8211;use a Canadian dollar account.  This should hedge against inflation and any further declines in the USD.  I suspect that plugging someone with a gun will still result in serious jail time for the foreseeable future, so shoot to maim, and keep those guns under lock and key, especially if there are little ones around.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m gonna go clean my 30.06 just in case&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thoots</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-482402</link>
		<dc:creator>thoots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 03:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-482402</guid>
		<description>Well, gas prices will probably have doubled, maybe tripled, by 2010.  Same (or worse) for diesel.  I expect that we might be fighting wholesale &lt;b&gt;ARMAGEDDON&lt;/b&gt; by then, not just some simple bantering about some irrelevant corporations....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Well, gas prices will probably have doubled, maybe tripled, by 2010.  Same (or worse) for diesel.  I expect that we might be fighting wholesale <b>ARMAGEDDON</b> by then, not just some simple bantering about some irrelevant corporations&#8230;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taxman100</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-482341</link>
		<dc:creator>taxman100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-482341</guid>
		<description>I think gas prices will moderate (in spite of Washington&#039;s best efforts to wreck our energy supplies, and our economy), and consumers will grow tired of driving little tin cans for vehicles. 

It will be the 1980&#039;s all over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think gas prices will moderate (in spite of Washington&#8217;s best efforts to wreck our energy supplies, and our economy), and consumers will grow tired of driving little tin cans for vehicles. </p>
<p>It will be the 1980&#8217;s all over again.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bozoer Rebbe</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-482281</link>
		<dc:creator>Bozoer Rebbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-482281</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;But seriously, American tanks in WW2 were raw shit in a tin box compared to German and Soviet tanks. Possibly because the design was limited to what could be produced in a Lincoln plant converted into a Sherman factory.&lt;/em&gt;

I believe most of the Shermans were made by Chrysler, not FoMoCo or GM. While the Sherman was inferior to the Panther and Tiger tanks, in both quality of armor and size of the main gun, in a fascist system, the government tells corporations what to do. The Nazis assigned tank construction, in part, to heavy equipment mfgs who were used to building, for example, a half dozen large cranes a year. The US, on the other hand, let companies bid on work.

The Germans built about 25,000 main battle tanks during WWII. The US built about 75,000 Shermans.

The question of quantity vs quality in military hardware exists until today. Do you want to buy one very expensive F-22 or for the same money buy a few F-35s? Of course, the critical component is the pilot, who is expensive to train and hard to replace, which is what really crippled the Japanese after Midway, when they lost over 400 naval aviators.

I suspect as UAVs become more commonplace we may see more countries go with quantity over high performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>But seriously, American tanks in WW2 were raw shit in a tin box compared to German and Soviet tanks. Possibly because the design was limited to what could be produced in a Lincoln plant converted into a Sherman factory.</em></p>
<p>I believe most of the Shermans were made by Chrysler, not FoMoCo or GM. While the Sherman was inferior to the Panther and Tiger tanks, in both quality of armor and size of the main gun, in a fascist system, the government tells corporations what to do. The Nazis assigned tank construction, in part, to heavy equipment mfgs who were used to building, for example, a half dozen large cranes a year. The US, on the other hand, let companies bid on work.</p>
<p>The Germans built about 25,000 main battle tanks during WWII. The US built about 75,000 Shermans.</p>
<p>The question of quantity vs quality in military hardware exists until today. Do you want to buy one very expensive F-22 or for the same money buy a few F-35s? Of course, the critical component is the pilot, who is expensive to train and hard to replace, which is what really crippled the Japanese after Midway, when they lost over 400 naval aviators.</p>
<p>I suspect as UAVs become more commonplace we may see more countries go with quantity over high performance.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eh_political</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-482182</link>
		<dc:creator>eh_political</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 01:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-482182</guid>
		<description>Chrysler will go for a song to one, or a consortium of Chinese automakers.  They will slice and dice management, unlocking what is left of the product and engineering excellence at the corporation.  Minivans, select Jeeps, the 300, the Caliber and both pickups survive and evolve in rationalized form in North America, Chrysler products flourish in China.  Pride of ownership, dontcha know.

US government develops protectionist policy of unknown effectiveness.  It should increase the cost of imports by 10-30% initially, depending on the balance of trade and other factors--a case by case, nation by nation basis.

GM gets loan guarantees under new management. Offshoring is curtailed, incentives established for favoring domestic suppliers.  Models and production are rationalized, Volt ends up being a badge engineered Prius with a lot of face saving window dressing.  Union gets cut down to size--they will whine, but be secretly relieved.

Ford is punished for rationalizing its operations prior to the carmageddon, gets similar deal to GM, but benefits less, because it was healthier to begin with.  Ford products are almost exclusively based on European and Japanese platforms.

Toyota becomes the undisputed market leader in the US.  Its flex factories are capable of building a Yaris after a Tundra after a Camry after a Sienna, and profitability soars.

Honda sells one million Fits per year in gas, hybrid and diesel variations.  Honda becomes an American based corporation.

Nissan succumbs to the resurgence of domestic style and quality.  Dies or reinvents itself.

Mazda is strictly a Ford badged product.  Subaru is strictly a Toyota model.

The Europeans smarten up or cease to exist in North America.  Possibly BMW eclipses Mercedes entirely, Audi might replace VW entirely here.  Without quality and reliability improvements, it&#039;s game over for arrogant automakers.

The US goes through a protracted period of reinventing itself, after shedding counterproductive political and economic idologization.  It&#039;s eye of the needle time, but America dazzles when the chips are down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Chrysler will go for a song to one, or a consortium of Chinese automakers.  They will slice and dice management, unlocking what is left of the product and engineering excellence at the corporation.  Minivans, select Jeeps, the 300, the Caliber and both pickups survive and evolve in rationalized form in North America, Chrysler products flourish in China.  Pride of ownership, dontcha know.</p>
<p>US government develops protectionist policy of unknown effectiveness.  It should increase the cost of imports by 10-30% initially, depending on the balance of trade and other factors&#8211;a case by case, nation by nation basis.</p>
<p>GM gets loan guarantees under new management. Offshoring is curtailed, incentives established for favoring domestic suppliers.  Models and production are rationalized, Volt ends up being a badge engineered Prius with a lot of face saving window dressing.  Union gets cut down to size&#8211;they will whine, but be secretly relieved.</p>
<p>Ford is punished for rationalizing its operations prior to the carmageddon, gets similar deal to GM, but benefits less, because it was healthier to begin with.  Ford products are almost exclusively based on European and Japanese platforms.</p>
<p>Toyota becomes the undisputed market leader in the US.  Its flex factories are capable of building a Yaris after a Tundra after a Camry after a Sienna, and profitability soars.</p>
<p>Honda sells one million Fits per year in gas, hybrid and diesel variations.  Honda becomes an American based corporation.</p>
<p>Nissan succumbs to the resurgence of domestic style and quality.  Dies or reinvents itself.</p>
<p>Mazda is strictly a Ford badged product.  Subaru is strictly a Toyota model.</p>
<p>The Europeans smarten up or cease to exist in North America.  Possibly BMW eclipses Mercedes entirely, Audi might replace VW entirely here.  Without quality and reliability improvements, it&#8217;s game over for arrogant automakers.</p>
<p>The US goes through a protracted period of reinventing itself, after shedding counterproductive political and economic idologization.  It&#8217;s eye of the needle time, but America dazzles when the chips are down.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 97escort</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-482111</link>
		<dc:creator>97escort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-482111</guid>
		<description>Carmageddon does not end.  This is just the beginning of the Post Peak Oil decline.  As oil production falls and oil importing countries try to outbid each other for the remaining oil available, gas prices will continue to rise.

At some point gas taxes will finally have to be increased to provide funds for road maintenance and discourage consumption of a finite resource: oil.  When it happens another nail will have been pounded into the auto industry coffin.  A few may survive who are ahead of the curve i.e. Toyota.

We are experiencing the most important change of the 21st century: Peak Oil and its implications.  Cheap liquid fuel energy is a thing of the past.

The USA is poorly prepared.  It will come as a shock to those who have been living in a business as usual fantasy land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Carmageddon does not end.  This is just the beginning of the Post Peak Oil decline.  As oil production falls and oil importing countries try to outbid each other for the remaining oil available, gas prices will continue to rise.</p>
<p>At some point gas taxes will finally have to be increased to provide funds for road maintenance and discourage consumption of a finite resource: oil.  When it happens another nail will have been pounded into the auto industry coffin.  A few may survive who are ahead of the curve i.e. Toyota.</p>
<p>We are experiencing the most important change of the 21st century: Peak Oil and its implications.  Cheap liquid fuel energy is a thing of the past.</p>
<p>The USA is poorly prepared.  It will come as a shock to those who have been living in a business as usual fantasy land.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mcloud1</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-482011</link>
		<dc:creator>Mcloud1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 01:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-482011</guid>
		<description>Easy.

Ford will be the last man standing. 2010 will come, and the Taurus, Fusion, Flex, and Fiesta will bring it back to profitability. Alan Mulally will become this generation&#039;s Lee Iacocca. Mercury will be dead, Volvo will be sold, and Lincoln will be on its way back up, while big Al has Ford running lean. In a nutshell, it will be happy days again in Dearborn.

GM will limp along for a little while longer, until it eventually runs out of money and goes the way of British Leyland. By that, I mean that the company will dissolve. Buick, Cadillac, and Chevrolet will survive as either independant companies or will be bought up by Chinese and Indian automakers, to be used as trademarks to sell their vehicles under in the US. Red Ink Rick and GM will go down in history as the poster child for corporate arrogance and mismanagement.

Before both of these events, Chrysler would have filed for chapter 11. After this happened, all that was left of their customers will run away in droves, and sales will tank. (Considering how Oldsmobile sales tanked after GM announced that they were discontinuing the brand. Anybody considering an Oldsmobile shopped elseware, despite the fact that there was still a large parent company to still provide parts and support long after Olds had gone), so, Chrysler sales will drop to less than 10,000 units a month. Cerberus would just throw its arms in the air and say &quot;fuck it&quot;, and will put Chrysler up for sale. And then, their fate will be exactly like that of RCA.

So you will get my point, here is a brief history of how the end came for RCA: They ran out of money, and in the late 80s, was bought by rival GE and broken up, the pieces sold to other electronics companies. French electronics maker Thonpson SA bought and to this day own the rights to the RCA name. Today, they sell their products here under the RCA brand name instead of their own due to the fact that it has a strong history and is well known in this country. So essentially, RCA still lives on after the original corporation has died, albeit as just a brand name for a foreign company. With that out of the way, here is what will happen to Chrysler:

Ford will buy Chrysler from Cerberus fir just pocket change, and will break it up, selling its pieces for a profit. Jeep will be spun off and will soldier on as an independent company. The Chrysler and Dodge brands will be completely scraped hollow, and sold to Chinese automakers as just empty brand names under which to sell their vehicles in the US. I will put my money on that Chery will by Dodge, and Geely will buy Chrysler. Then, Chery and Geely will completely eschew their brand names here, and will instead just sell their vehicles in the US as Dodges and Chryslers. So essentially, their fate will be exactly just like RCA: They will be bought by a much bigger and healthier rival, and broken up and sold to foreign companies. Dodge and Chrysler, just like RCA, will still live on, however just as a US brand name for Chinese made vehicles.


I hope my post has provided an interesting look at how the big three will be in a couple years from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Easy.</p>
<p>Ford will be the last man standing. 2010 will come, and the Taurus, Fusion, Flex, and Fiesta will bring it back to profitability. Alan Mulally will become this generation&#8217;s Lee Iacocca. Mercury will be dead, Volvo will be sold, and Lincoln will be on its way back up, while big Al has Ford running lean. In a nutshell, it will be happy days again in Dearborn.</p>
<p>GM will limp along for a little while longer, until it eventually runs out of money and goes the way of British Leyland. By that, I mean that the company will dissolve. Buick, Cadillac, and Chevrolet will survive as either independant companies or will be bought up by Chinese and Indian automakers, to be used as trademarks to sell their vehicles under in the US. Red Ink Rick and GM will go down in history as the poster child for corporate arrogance and mismanagement.</p>
<p>Before both of these events, Chrysler would have filed for chapter 11. After this happened, all that was left of their customers will run away in droves, and sales will tank. (Considering how Oldsmobile sales tanked after GM announced that they were discontinuing the brand. Anybody considering an Oldsmobile shopped elseware, despite the fact that there was still a large parent company to still provide parts and support long after Olds had gone), so, Chrysler sales will drop to less than 10,000 units a month. Cerberus would just throw its arms in the air and say &#8220;fuck it&#8221;, and will put Chrysler up for sale. And then, their fate will be exactly like that of RCA.</p>
<p>So you will get my point, here is a brief history of how the end came for RCA: They ran out of money, and in the late 80s, was bought by rival GE and broken up, the pieces sold to other electronics companies. French electronics maker Thonpson SA bought and to this day own the rights to the RCA name. Today, they sell their products here under the RCA brand name instead of their own due to the fact that it has a strong history and is well known in this country. So essentially, RCA still lives on after the original corporation has died, albeit as just a brand name for a foreign company. With that out of the way, here is what will happen to Chrysler:</p>
<p>Ford will buy Chrysler from Cerberus fir just pocket change, and will break it up, selling its pieces for a profit. Jeep will be spun off and will soldier on as an independent company. The Chrysler and Dodge brands will be completely scraped hollow, and sold to Chinese automakers as just empty brand names under which to sell their vehicles in the US. I will put my money on that Chery will by Dodge, and Geely will buy Chrysler. Then, Chery and Geely will completely eschew their brand names here, and will instead just sell their vehicles in the US as Dodges and Chryslers. So essentially, their fate will be exactly just like RCA: They will be bought by a much bigger and healthier rival, and broken up and sold to foreign companies. Dodge and Chrysler, just like RCA, will still live on, however just as a US brand name for Chinese made vehicles.</p>
<p>I hope my post has provided an interesting look at how the big three will be in a couple years from now.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny ro</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-481961</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny ro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 01:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-481961</guid>
		<description>Cant rebuild a tank blown to smithereens or melted or buried.  Can patch a hole and rebuild if you own the territory.

War-wise, next big war with industrial opponent will be like the WW3 that never happened, we will fight with what we bring on day one, no serious replacements that are not alreacy in supply pipeline.  

Don&#039;t bother laying down keels on day 2 of a hot war with China.

I would like GM ford and Chrysler to live, but only Ford makes a vehicle I would even consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Cant rebuild a tank blown to smithereens or melted or buried.  Can patch a hole and rebuild if you own the territory.</p>
<p>War-wise, next big war with industrial opponent will be like the WW3 that never happened, we will fight with what we bring on day one, no serious replacements that are not alreacy in supply pipeline.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t bother laying down keels on day 2 of a hot war with China.</p>
<p>I would like GM ford and Chrysler to live, but only Ford makes a vehicle I would even consider.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James2</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-481831</link>
		<dc:creator>James2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-481831</guid>
		<description>I guess nobody here watches The Military Channel. The Army rebuilds its tanks. They send the worn-out M1A1/2 Abrams tank (low mileage! only one owner!!) to an army depot in Alabama, where workers there strip it down completely. The chassis is sand-blasted, the turbine engine is rebuilt, new electronics and other upgrades are installed, then the Abrams is put back together and tested, including a nice, refreshing bath where they look for leaks. Good use of taxpayer money, if I say so myself, versus buying new. 

As for cars, by 2020 Mazda will rule the world :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I guess nobody here watches The Military Channel. The Army rebuilds its tanks. They send the worn-out M1A1/2 Abrams tank (low mileage! only one owner!!) to an army depot in Alabama, where workers there strip it down completely. The chassis is sand-blasted, the turbine engine is rebuilt, new electronics and other upgrades are installed, then the Abrams is put back together and tested, including a nice, refreshing bath where they look for leaks. Good use of taxpayer money, if I say so myself, versus buying new. </p>
<p>As for cars, by 2020 Mazda will rule the world :-)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mel23</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-481562</link>
		<dc:creator>mel23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-481562</guid>
		<description>eggsalad:

&lt;b&gt;Anyone who knows any history...&lt;/b&gt;

Yeah, but that&#039;s the problem, who does? Even if they know the history, can they apply the wisdom that should have been gleaned? Certainly nobody on high at GM, and certainly not many in DC from what I can see. 

Before the transplants arrived, the Big 3 succeeded by taking turns failing. Durant ran GM into the wall a couple of times, then Old Henry ran Ford into the wall, etc. while the others did the same and died off. But they haven&#039;t been able to compete with Toyota here, and for all of Wagoner&#039;s chest thumping about GM&#039;s success abroad, let&#039;s wait until Toyota and Honda ramp up production and iron out early issues before judging the ultimate outcome. While the European offerings of Ford and GM seem to compare favorably with their US crops, will they stack up well against the Civic, Fit and diesel and hybrid variations? I have doubts.

It&#039;s amazing to think about the huge assets GM has sold off over the past decade plus under Wagoner et al. Without this cushion the company would have been long gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->eggsalad:</p>
<p><b>Anyone who knows any history&#8230;</b></p>
<p>Yeah, but that&#8217;s the problem, who does? Even if they know the history, can they apply the wisdom that should have been gleaned? Certainly nobody on high at GM, and certainly not many in DC from what I can see. </p>
<p>Before the transplants arrived, the Big 3 succeeded by taking turns failing. Durant ran GM into the wall a couple of times, then Old Henry ran Ford into the wall, etc. while the others did the same and died off. But they haven&#8217;t been able to compete with Toyota here, and for all of Wagoner&#8217;s chest thumping about GM&#8217;s success abroad, let&#8217;s wait until Toyota and Honda ramp up production and iron out early issues before judging the ultimate outcome. While the European offerings of Ford and GM seem to compare favorably with their US crops, will they stack up well against the Civic, Fit and diesel and hybrid variations? I have doubts.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing to think about the huge assets GM has sold off over the past decade plus under Wagoner et al. Without this cushion the company would have been long gone.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-481381</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-481381</guid>
		<description>Egg salad , I used to  think  the same thing  about ships and  the infrastructure required to  build them.  I predict that  in 2010, my 20 yr  old 528es will still be running  fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Egg salad , I used to  think  the same thing  about ships and  the infrastructure required to  build them.  I predict that  in 2010, my 20 yr  old 528es will still be running  fine.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJ_San_Fran</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-481332</link>
		<dc:creator>EJ_San_Fran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-481332</guid>
		<description>Toyota will reach 25% worldwide market share relatively quickly, including in the US.

They will be the first to sell large volumes of hybrid vehicles, electric cars and robotic cars that drive themselves.
Toyota also establishes a large 2nd business with the production of cellulosic biofuel.

Honda is Toyota&#039;s fiercest competitor and will be the runner up in US market share.

Chery and Tata will grow strongly as the world&#039;s budget brands.

The Detroit 3 continue on the same path of endless restructuring and market share slide, until maybe they are able to reinvent themselves. Or maybe not.

(this is a prediction for 2015-2020)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Toyota will reach 25% worldwide market share relatively quickly, including in the US.</p>
<p>They will be the first to sell large volumes of hybrid vehicles, electric cars and robotic cars that drive themselves.<br />
Toyota also establishes a large 2nd business with the production of cellulosic biofuel.</p>
<p>Honda is Toyota&#8217;s fiercest competitor and will be the runner up in US market share.</p>
<p>Chery and Tata will grow strongly as the world&#8217;s budget brands.</p>
<p>The Detroit 3 continue on the same path of endless restructuring and market share slide, until maybe they are able to reinvent themselves. Or maybe not.</p>
<p>(this is a prediction for 2015-2020)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mullholland</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-481282</link>
		<dc:creator>Mullholland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-481282</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if you can handle my vision of Carmageddon.

Ford survives as the only remaining domestic auto maker.

Chrysler&#039;s business is revitalized by an infusion of cash from the Chinese and the successful development and introduction of the solar powered bicycle.

GM is bailed out by the government and converted into the largest U.S. defense contractor. This arrangement allows it to flourish while still rewarding the levels of greed and incompetence that the country expects from the General. 

GM&#039;s big breakthrough comes from the creation of a revolutionary new weapon of mass destruction that was commissioned to keep the Russians, Chinese and  Iranians in line. This system equips GM&#039;s massive former dealer inventory stockpile of GM Silverado pick-ups and Tahoe SUVs with aftermarket solid- fuel rocket boosters and computer guidance systems designed to launch them on an unsuspecting populace. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I don&#8217;t know if you can handle my vision of Carmageddon.</p>
<p>Ford survives as the only remaining domestic auto maker.</p>
<p>Chrysler&#8217;s business is revitalized by an infusion of cash from the Chinese and the successful development and introduction of the solar powered bicycle.</p>
<p>GM is bailed out by the government and converted into the largest U.S. defense contractor. This arrangement allows it to flourish while still rewarding the levels of greed and incompetence that the country expects from the General. </p>
<p>GM&#8217;s big breakthrough comes from the creation of a revolutionary new weapon of mass destruction that was commissioned to keep the Russians, Chinese and  Iranians in line. This system equips GM&#8217;s massive former dealer inventory stockpile of GM Silverado pick-ups and Tahoe SUVs with aftermarket solid- fuel rocket boosters and computer guidance systems designed to launch them on an unsuspecting populace.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimwit</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-481201</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimwit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-481201</guid>
		<description>As been said, Ford will right size itself. Chrysler is on borrowed time. On the horizon I can&#039;t see anyone available that&#039;s both willing and able to pick up the slack. Even the Indians are watching Tata choke down LR/Jag and I should think that would give them serious pause. China is just anathema to the US.
GM will stumble along. If they get a few hits, and no, I don&#039;t mean the Volt, they might survive as is but it&#039;s dicey. Reality means that probably it gets broken up. GM Americas with GMCanada propping up the US (it&#039;s quite profitable and making sales gains), GMEurope stumbling but able to survive as a number 4, 5 or 6 player so is worth something to a Euro manu and GMAus/Asia which is worth a mint. Probably enough that it could become a cash cow if GM kept a minority stake in the venture but let the Chinese become the senior partners. Spin off the subsidiaries and come back to the table leaner and meaner for 2015. If they still have money and enough product in the tank the cycle will have turned and they&#039;ll be rich. 
Just very small.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->As been said, Ford will right size itself. Chrysler is on borrowed time. On the horizon I can&#8217;t see anyone available that&#8217;s both willing and able to pick up the slack. Even the Indians are watching Tata choke down LR/Jag and I should think that would give them serious pause. China is just anathema to the US.<br />
GM will stumble along. If they get a few hits, and no, I don&#8217;t mean the Volt, they might survive as is but it&#8217;s dicey. Reality means that probably it gets broken up. GM Americas with GMCanada propping up the US (it&#8217;s quite profitable and making sales gains), GMEurope stumbling but able to survive as a number 4, 5 or 6 player so is worth something to a Euro manu and GMAus/Asia which is worth a mint. Probably enough that it could become a cash cow if GM kept a minority stake in the venture but let the Chinese become the senior partners. Spin off the subsidiaries and come back to the table leaner and meaner for 2015. If they still have money and enough product in the tank the cycle will have turned and they&#8217;ll be rich.<br />
Just very small.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Schwoerer</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-481172</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Schwoerer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-481172</guid>
		<description>I prefer not to make predictions, in particular concerning the future. But I&#039;ll be hedging my bets, driving a more economical car than I need, and stay invested in liquid assets. No, I don&#039;t drink that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I prefer not to make predictions, in particular concerning the future. But I&#8217;ll be hedging my bets, driving a more economical car than I need, and stay invested in liquid assets. No, I don&#8217;t drink that much.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gardiner Westbound</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-481111</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardiner Westbound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-481111</guid>
		<description>Ford&#039;s capable new management will ensure its survival by assembling and selling European models in North America. The U.S. and Canadian governments will force management changes and bail out GM with enough money to keep Chevrolet and Cadillac alive. Chrysler will disappear, and nobody will care. 

Toyota&#039;s quality and reputation have crested. It is heading for No. 2. Slow and steady Honda will supplant it as No. 1. Innovative, feisty Nissan will be No. 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Ford&#8217;s capable new management will ensure its survival by assembling and selling European models in North America. The U.S. and Canadian governments will force management changes and bail out GM with enough money to keep Chevrolet and Cadillac alive. Chrysler will disappear, and nobody will care. </p>
<p>Toyota&#8217;s quality and reputation have crested. It is heading for No. 2. Slow and steady Honda will supplant it as No. 1. Innovative, feisty Nissan will be No. 3.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stein X Leikanger</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-481092</link>
		<dc:creator>Stein X Leikanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-481092</guid>
		<description>@ eggsalad

&lt;em&gt;If GM &amp; Ford go under, who’s gonna make tanks?&lt;/em&gt;

I guess General Dynamics, same way that they do today? :-)
GM and Ford aren&#039;t that involved in the ground systems that the military uses. 
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/index.html

What next?

Let&#039;s hope management is thrown out over at GM, because they couldn&#039;t have done a worse job if they had been sent there by a competitor.
Which means that people who have been chafing at the bit may get a chance -- and then let&#039;s hope they realize that the future is energy lean, and that they have to rethink the transportation equation completely.
They can still leapfrog a generation, and really provide tomorrow&#039;s solutions, but they&#039;re starting to lag because of their insanely delusional ways.

Most of my comments hold for GM, Ford is better off, because they did get rid of old management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@ eggsalad</p>
<p><em>If GM &amp; Ford go under, who’s gonna make tanks?</em></p>
<p>I guess General Dynamics, same way that they do today? :-)<br />
GM and Ford aren&#8217;t that involved in the ground systems that the military uses.<br />
<a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/index.html</a></p>
<p>What next?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope management is thrown out over at GM, because they couldn&#8217;t have done a worse job if they had been sent there by a competitor.<br />
Which means that people who have been chafing at the bit may get a chance &#8212; and then let&#8217;s hope they realize that the future is energy lean, and that they have to rethink the transportation equation completely.<br />
They can still leapfrog a generation, and really provide tomorrow&#8217;s solutions, but they&#8217;re starting to lag because of their insanely delusional ways.</p>
<p>Most of my comments hold for GM, Ford is better off, because they did get rid of old management.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mj0lnir</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-481082</link>
		<dc:creator>Mj0lnir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-481082</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;KatiePuckrik : 
June 4th, 2008 at 5:05 pm 

P.S Eggsalad, if war machines must be made by a domestic company, why do the US military do business with BAE systems (British company) and EADS (European company)?&lt;/em&gt;

That&#039;s an excellent question, and there are no good answers.

In many ways, our politicians in Washington are no smarter than GM management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>KatiePuckrik :<br />
June 4th, 2008 at 5:05 pm </p>
<p>P.S Eggsalad, if war machines must be made by a domestic company, why do the US military do business with BAE systems (British company) and EADS (European company)?</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s an excellent question, and there are no good answers.</p>
<p>In many ways, our politicians in Washington are no smarter than GM management.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toxicroach</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/comment-page-1/#comment-481061</link>
		<dc:creator>toxicroach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-where-will-carmageddon-end/#comment-481061</guid>
		<description>Who would make tanks?

The guys who currently make tanks perhaps.

But seriously, American tanks in WW2 were raw shit in a tin box compared to German and Soviet tanks.  Possibly because the design was limited to what could be produced in a Lincoln plant converted into a Sherman factory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Who would make tanks?</p>
<p>The guys who currently make tanks perhaps.</p>
<p>But seriously, American tanks in WW2 were raw shit in a tin box compared to German and Soviet tanks.  Possibly because the design was limited to what could be produced in a Lincoln plant converted into a Sherman factory.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 87/165 queries in 0.190 seconds using apc

Served from: autoforums.com @ 2010-03-17 22:14:29 -->