<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question of the Day: Does the 0 &#8211; 60 Stat Suck?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:54:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cretinx</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-2/#comment-401952</link>
		<dc:creator>cretinx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-401952</guid>
		<description>0-200 km/h tells me everything I need to know about a car&#039;s power band.

the slalom figure tells me everything I need to know about how the car handles.

most people tend to focus on the utterly useless 0-60 and skidpad.

and then, of course - there&#039;s the joy of driving.  Drive a 115 hp Miata.  Ignore the numbers - you&#039;ll have more fun than in almost any other car on the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->0-200 km/h tells me everything I need to know about a car&#8217;s power band.</p>
<p>the slalom figure tells me everything I need to know about how the car handles.</p>
<p>most people tend to focus on the utterly useless 0-60 and skidpad.</p>
<p>and then, of course &#8211; there&#8217;s the joy of driving.  Drive a 115 hp Miata.  Ignore the numbers &#8211; you&#8217;ll have more fun than in almost any other car on the planet.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LUNDQIK</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-2/#comment-401422</link>
		<dc:creator>LUNDQIK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-401422</guid>
		<description>Two stats I look for that are sometimes hard to find:

70 to 0 braking distance
Road Holding / Skip Pad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Two stats I look for that are sometimes hard to find:</p>
<p>70 to 0 braking distance<br />
Road Holding / Skip Pad<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Karesh</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-2/#comment-400411</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Karesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 13:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-400411</guid>
		<description>I like C&amp;D&#039;s 5-60 &quot;street start&quot; stat. I don&#039;t like ways that the 0-5 in the typical 0-60 test can be gamed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I like C&amp;D&#8217;s 5-60 &#8220;street start&#8221; stat. I don&#8217;t like ways that the 0-5 in the typical 0-60 test can be gamed.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robstar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-2/#comment-400252</link>
		<dc:creator>Robstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-400252</guid>
		<description>0-60 times for motorcycles are even more misleading than cars.

From several sources my 600cc sportbike goes 0-60 somewhere in the 3&#039;s...(I&#039;ve seen 3.2-3.6).  a zx-14/hayabusa goes from 2.9-3.5.

0-100 in my bike is 8&#039;ish.  A hyabusa can do it in under 5.  That is a significant difference!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->0-60 times for motorcycles are even more misleading than cars.</p>
<p>From several sources my 600cc sportbike goes 0-60 somewhere in the 3&#8217;s&#8230;(I&#8217;ve seen 3.2-3.6).  a zx-14/hayabusa goes from 2.9-3.5.</p>
<p>0-100 in my bike is 8&#8242;ish.  A hyabusa can do it in under 5.  That is a significant difference!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Farago</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-2/#comment-400212</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Farago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 09:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-400212</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Wolven:

The only reason they’re here is to spread their religious dogma… they hate cars\ people\ society… I find it sad that Farago apparently leans their way.&lt;/em&gt;

Not true. Personally, I am an agnostic Darwinian pro-military AGW-denier and free marketeer somewhere to the right of Attila the Hun. But I do not consider mine the only valuable perspective.

While it is true that there are plenty of  Bush-bashing tree huggers hereabouts, there are just as many writers and commentators who see things... differently.

I allow any and all opinions here as long as they conform to our anti-flaming policy. I am impressed by the passionate intelligence of those whose opinions I do not share. I consider my close encounter with their POV an honor and a privilege.  And although I do not see them as &quot;my enemy,&quot; I like keeping them close, if you know what I mean...

Anyway, anyone wishing to write for TTAC on an automotive issue from any angle is invited to do so in the comments section or in an editorial, review or blog. For the latter three, email robert.farago@thetruthaboutcars.com for our guidelines.

Left, right, environmentalist or no, thanks for putting food on my table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Wolven:</p>
<p>The only reason they’re here is to spread their religious dogma… they hate cars\ people\ society… I find it sad that Farago apparently leans their way.</em></p>
<p>Not true. Personally, I am an agnostic Darwinian pro-military AGW-denier and free marketeer somewhere to the right of Attila the Hun. But I do not consider mine the only valuable perspective.</p>
<p>While it is true that there are plenty of  Bush-bashing tree huggers hereabouts, there are just as many writers and commentators who see things&#8230; differently.</p>
<p>I allow any and all opinions here as long as they conform to our anti-flaming policy. I am impressed by the passionate intelligence of those whose opinions I do not share. I consider my close encounter with their POV an honor and a privilege.  And although I do not see them as &#8220;my enemy,&#8221; I like keeping them close, if you know what I mean&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, anyone wishing to write for TTAC on an automotive issue from any angle is invited to do so in the comments section or in an editorial, review or blog. For the latter three, email <a href="mailto:robert.farago@thetruthaboutcars.com">robert.farago@thetruthaboutcars.com</a> for our guidelines.</p>
<p>Left, right, environmentalist or no, thanks for putting food on my table.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolven</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-2/#comment-400151</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 04:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-400151</guid>
		<description>So, if you eliminated the 0 to 60 stat, what are you going to replace it with?  Take off weight? MPG?  CO2 output? 


I&#039;m feeling the same as losgatosCA and thetopdog.

I discovered TTAC way back at it&#039;s beginning and fell in love with the witty, sarcastic, torpedoes be damned truth telling... 

Unfortunately it seems to be turning into another left wing, global hoaxing, ANTI CAR website.  I&#039;m beginning to wonder if maybe that wasn&#039;t the goal all along???  Calling all the global warming CO2 expelling environazis on here &quot;car enthusiasts&quot; is like calling Ann Coulter liberal.  

The only reason they&#039;re here is to spread their religious dogma...  they hate cars\ people\ society...  I find it sad that Farago apparently leans their way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->So, if you eliminated the 0 to 60 stat, what are you going to replace it with?  Take off weight? MPG?  CO2 output? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m feeling the same as losgatosCA and thetopdog.</p>
<p>I discovered TTAC way back at it&#8217;s beginning and fell in love with the witty, sarcastic, torpedoes be damned truth telling&#8230; </p>
<p>Unfortunately it seems to be turning into another left wing, global hoaxing, ANTI CAR website.  I&#8217;m beginning to wonder if maybe that wasn&#8217;t the goal all along???  Calling all the global warming CO2 expelling environazis on here &#8220;car enthusiasts&#8221; is like calling Ann Coulter liberal.  </p>
<p>The only reason they&#8217;re here is to spread their religious dogma&#8230;  they hate cars\ people\ society&#8230;  I find it sad that Farago apparently leans their way.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davey49</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-399441</link>
		<dc:creator>davey49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 02:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-399441</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never seen anyone accelerate to 60 faster than 12 seconds on normal roads. That&#039;s normal driving, not street racing. My car has a reported 10 second 0-60 time and I pretty much beat anyone from a light who doesn&#039;t think they&#039;re a race car driver.
Most people take over 20 seconds to get to 50!
I like ybnorml&#039;s idea, except make it 75mph to 30mph and back to 75. That way it would also test how well your tranny shifts. A lot of automatics take so long to react that there&#039;s a huge lag when trying to pull in top gear from low speeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;ve never seen anyone accelerate to 60 faster than 12 seconds on normal roads. That&#8217;s normal driving, not street racing. My car has a reported 10 second 0-60 time and I pretty much beat anyone from a light who doesn&#8217;t think they&#8217;re a race car driver.<br />
Most people take over 20 seconds to get to 50!<br />
I like ybnorml&#8217;s idea, except make it 75mph to 30mph and back to 75. That way it would also test how well your tranny shifts. A lot of automatics take so long to react that there&#8217;s a huge lag when trying to pull in top gear from low speeds.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpn453</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-399231</link>
		<dc:creator>rpn453</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-399231</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;ash78 : 
May 2nd, 2008 at 3:53 pm 

How about 5-60 with a mandatory 2nd-gear start?

I know very few people who would actually force their car into 1st while moving forward. Apart from Autocrossing, maybe.&lt;/em&gt;

You don&#039;t have to force it.  You barely even have to blip the throttle during the double clutch to sync it.

I like knowing 0-60, and 0-30, and 5-60, and 1/4 mile, and 30-50, and, well, the more information the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>ash78 :<br />
May 2nd, 2008 at 3:53 pm </p>
<p>How about 5-60 with a mandatory 2nd-gear start?</p>
<p>I know very few people who would actually force their car into 1st while moving forward. Apart from Autocrossing, maybe.</em></p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to force it.  You barely even have to blip the throttle during the double clutch to sync it.</p>
<p>I like knowing 0-60, and 0-30, and 5-60, and 1/4 mile, and 30-50, and, well, the more information the better.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy Hagar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-398791</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy Hagar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 14:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-398791</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but it&#039;s not nearly as sucky as mpg.  The feds ought to copy the Euros and give us a ratio of gallons-to-drive-62-miles, or similar benchmark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Yeah, but it&#8217;s not nearly as sucky as mpg.  The feds ought to copy the Euros and give us a ratio of gallons-to-drive-62-miles, or similar benchmark.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B-Rad</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-398481</link>
		<dc:creator>B-Rad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 11:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-398481</guid>
		<description>hokuto:

Yeah, the same thing occurred to me.  But I&#039;m not as convinced as you are that the Merc would win in a 5-60 mph sprint.  I&#039;d bet the Merc&#039;s tires still wouldn&#039;t have enough traction, unless there are some electrons on board doing the actual driving.  And that just takes away the whole point (for me, at least).

That&#039;s why I don&#039;t like the new Nissan GT-R.  I mean, it&#039;s an awesome feat of engineering.  But what&#039;s the point when it&#039;s the electronics that are keeping the car on the track and not the driver&#039;s skills?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->hokuto:</p>
<p>Yeah, the same thing occurred to me.  But I&#8217;m not as convinced as you are that the Merc would win in a 5-60 mph sprint.  I&#8217;d bet the Merc&#8217;s tires still wouldn&#8217;t have enough traction, unless there are some electrons on board doing the actual driving.  And that just takes away the whole point (for me, at least).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t like the new Nissan GT-R.  I mean, it&#8217;s an awesome feat of engineering.  But what&#8217;s the point when it&#8217;s the electronics that are keeping the car on the track and not the driver&#8217;s skills?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronin</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-398411</link>
		<dc:creator>ronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 10:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-398411</guid>
		<description>Not so much that it sucks as that it is just one statistic that has to be taken into account.

Take the much maligned (here) current model Impala SS with FWD and 4-speed auto.  The WRX STI handily beats it from a dig- 4.9 sec vs say 5.8 sec.

Take the same two vehicles 5-60 and the STI is well into the 6&#039;s, with the Impala still pulling sub-6&#039;s.  See ya, Subaru.

For day-to-day driving the Impala will be cheaper, more comfortable, have much more room (fold-flat seats), be cheaper to buy and cheaper to insure.  FWD with good tires will deal fine with most snowy streets.

It&#039;s hard to overcome the torquiness of extra cylinders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Not so much that it sucks as that it is just one statistic that has to be taken into account.</p>
<p>Take the much maligned (here) current model Impala SS with FWD and 4-speed auto.  The WRX STI handily beats it from a dig- 4.9 sec vs say 5.8 sec.</p>
<p>Take the same two vehicles 5-60 and the STI is well into the 6&#8217;s, with the Impala still pulling sub-6&#8217;s.  See ya, Subaru.</p>
<p>For day-to-day driving the Impala will be cheaper, more comfortable, have much more room (fold-flat seats), be cheaper to buy and cheaper to insure.  FWD with good tires will deal fine with most snowy streets.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to overcome the torquiness of extra cylinders.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hokuto</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-398362</link>
		<dc:creator>hokuto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 05:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-398362</guid>
		<description>0-60 stat is deceptive. As ttac pointed out the corvette has a better 0-60 time than the 700-odd Hp brabus, I&#039;m confident the brabus would be much faster than the vette in a rolling start acceleration test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->0-60 stat is deceptive. As ttac pointed out the corvette has a better 0-60 time than the 700-odd Hp brabus, I&#8217;m confident the brabus would be much faster than the vette in a rolling start acceleration test.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetopdog</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-398331</link>
		<dc:creator>thetopdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-398331</guid>
		<description>mfgreen40 : 

That makes sense, I&#039;m only 24 so perhaps my priorities are not the same as someone a little bit older</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->mfgreen40 : </p>
<p>That makes sense, I&#8217;m only 24 so perhaps my priorities are not the same as someone a little bit older<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whuffo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-398321</link>
		<dc:creator>Whuffo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-398321</guid>
		<description>The problem with statistics like these is that they only capture a very small part of what makes a vehicle better. 

And to make things worse, the manufacturers look at the market&#039;s response to these stats and alter their designs to make cars that excel in the current &quot;stat of the day&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The problem with statistics like these is that they only capture a very small part of what makes a vehicle better. </p>
<p>And to make things worse, the manufacturers look at the market&#8217;s response to these stats and alter their designs to make cars that excel in the current &#8220;stat of the day&#8221;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mfgreen40</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-398311</link>
		<dc:creator>mfgreen40</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-398311</guid>
		<description>thetopdog

    I think I can answer your question. Being a piston head does not have age limits. I have owned and driven drag racers and open wheel circle track cars many years ago, and still enjoy riding my motor cycle on the tail of the dragon. But horse power and handeling are not that important any more. Yes your needs may change with time. Thats how we end up with this group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->thetopdog</p>
<p>    I think I can answer your question. Being a piston head does not have age limits. I have owned and driven drag racers and open wheel circle track cars many years ago, and still enjoy riding my motor cycle on the tail of the dragon. But horse power and handeling are not that important any more. Yes your needs may change with time. Thats how we end up with this group.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasAg03</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-398171</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasAg03</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-398171</guid>
		<description>I think the 0-60 statistic will stay due to its historical use.  You can compare cars from the 1960s with cars of today in terms of that time.  You can also use the quarter mile, but most people never accelerate to that speed.  On the other hand, 0-60 is a time anyone can use for a comparison.

Having said that, I think there are other tests that are better.  Why not 0-70 or 0-80?  Those are speeds you see on the freeway.  I also think the rolling start is a good test since most people, even gear heads, don&#039;t do a &quot;proper&quot; start when driving on the street.  A 5-60 or 5-70 time would give a better indication of the real world.

I would use the following:

0-60, 60-0, skidpad, &amp; quarter mile due to historical significance

5-70 (or 5-80) since it represents real world takeoff and speed on the freeway

70-0 (or 80-0) to show the distance from highway speed

Emergency lane change - fastest speed to do it safely

Repeat all of the above on wet pavement and with 10 psi under and over tire pressures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think the 0-60 statistic will stay due to its historical use.  You can compare cars from the 1960s with cars of today in terms of that time.  You can also use the quarter mile, but most people never accelerate to that speed.  On the other hand, 0-60 is a time anyone can use for a comparison.</p>
<p>Having said that, I think there are other tests that are better.  Why not 0-70 or 0-80?  Those are speeds you see on the freeway.  I also think the rolling start is a good test since most people, even gear heads, don&#8217;t do a &#8220;proper&#8221; start when driving on the street.  A 5-60 or 5-70 time would give a better indication of the real world.</p>
<p>I would use the following:</p>
<p>0-60, 60-0, skidpad, &amp; quarter mile due to historical significance</p>
<p>5-70 (or 5-80) since it represents real world takeoff and speed on the freeway</p>
<p>70-0 (or 80-0) to show the distance from highway speed</p>
<p>Emergency lane change &#8211; fastest speed to do it safely</p>
<p>Repeat all of the above on wet pavement and with 10 psi under and over tire pressures.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoweAS</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-398022</link>
		<dc:creator>RoweAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-398022</guid>
		<description>thet = that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->thet = that<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoweAS</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-398012</link>
		<dc:creator>RoweAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-398012</guid>
		<description>We are a community of car loving people. We all have different ideas of what constitutes the ideal car. For some it&#039;s speed, for others handling, for other luxury etc etc etc.  The important thing to remember is thet this gives us a forum to examine and exchange ideas so we can best decide based on other people&#039;s experiences what is the direction we might wish to take for future purchases. Buying a car for us is an emotional gut feeling thing, but it is better to go to war prepared than not. Thank you TTAC for helping me in my decisions, and thank you folks who participate in the forum. Democracy at its finest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->We are a community of car loving people. We all have different ideas of what constitutes the ideal car. For some it&#8217;s speed, for others handling, for other luxury etc etc etc.  The important thing to remember is thet this gives us a forum to examine and exchange ideas so we can best decide based on other people&#8217;s experiences what is the direction we might wish to take for future purchases. Buying a car for us is an emotional gut feeling thing, but it is better to go to war prepared than not. Thank you TTAC for helping me in my decisions, and thank you folks who participate in the forum. Democracy at its finest.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetopdog</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-397781</link>
		<dc:creator>thetopdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-397781</guid>
		<description>losgatosCa : 

I have been asking myself the same thing.  I personally don&#039;t understand (I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s wrong, I just don&#039;t understand it) how somebody that willingly spends time on a car website &lt;em&gt;isn&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; interested in performance above all else, but apparently there are plenty of people here that feel differently</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->losgatosCa : </p>
<p>I have been asking myself the same thing.  I personally don&#8217;t understand (I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s wrong, I just don&#8217;t understand it) how somebody that willingly spends time on a car website <em>isn&#8217;t</em> interested in performance above all else, but apparently there are plenty of people here that feel differently<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanman111</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-397701</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanman111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-397701</guid>
		<description>0-60 tells you so little about a car today that it really is a pointless statistic, especially the way that buff books claculate it. 20-70 is definitely a better metric. It would at least give you an idea of on ramp/ passing power. However, I think a full power curve is the only way to get a real idea of where power comes in. This is especially true with the greater level of forced induction and variable valve timed engines. Am I going to be falling out of the power range in everyday driving? I think the best way to gauge the usefulness of the 0-60 statistic is to look at the listed times for the Honda s2000 and then read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/honda-s2000/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mr. Farago&#039;s own review&lt;/a&gt;  of it to see where the disparity comes in. I love the car, but not as a commuter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->0-60 tells you so little about a car today that it really is a pointless statistic, especially the way that buff books claculate it. 20-70 is definitely a better metric. It would at least give you an idea of on ramp/ passing power. However, I think a full power curve is the only way to get a real idea of where power comes in. This is especially true with the greater level of forced induction and variable valve timed engines. Am I going to be falling out of the power range in everyday driving? I think the best way to gauge the usefulness of the 0-60 statistic is to look at the listed times for the Honda s2000 and then read <a href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/honda-s2000/" rel="nofollow">Mr. Farago&#39;s own review</a>  of it to see where the disparity comes in. I love the car, but not as a commuter.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimwit</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-397671</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimwit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-397671</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sooo with Chuck, above. I find it funny that all those 0-60 mavens keep being stuck at the traffic light while I&#039;m far ahead of them. That pavement rippling 100 hp from my Jetta TDI is far, far more useful than overwrought v8&#039;s. 
Yes, in a *real* race they&#039;d blow me in the weeds but who drives like that all the time? And if they did, get away from me!
0-60 is a bogus stat that makes no sense in the normal day-to-day life everyone has to drive in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m sooo with Chuck, above. I find it funny that all those 0-60 mavens keep being stuck at the traffic light while I&#8217;m far ahead of them. That pavement rippling 100 hp from my Jetta TDI is far, far more useful than overwrought v8&#8217;s.<br />
Yes, in a *real* race they&#8217;d blow me in the weeds but who drives like that all the time? And if they did, get away from me!<br />
0-60 is a bogus stat that makes no sense in the normal day-to-day life everyone has to drive in.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarcaustic</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-397592</link>
		<dc:creator>sarcaustic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-397592</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious and my eyebrows are raised a bit:  Is TTAC a site for pistonheads that appreciate what a well engineered car can do and hearing the truth about all the iterations out there that we may have seen or read about, but not driven?  Or is it about who has the best idea to save gas, the planet, etc.?  Both have merit and neither is better/worse than the other, but I&#039;m kinda on the hair-on-fire side and if I need to move on, then so be it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m curious and my eyebrows are raised a bit:  Is TTAC a site for pistonheads that appreciate what a well engineered car can do and hearing the truth about all the iterations out there that we may have seen or read about, but not driven?  Or is it about who has the best idea to save gas, the planet, etc.?  Both have merit and neither is better/worse than the other, but I&#8217;m kinda on the hair-on-fire side and if I need to move on, then so be it.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-397512</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-397512</guid>
		<description>Freeway on-ramp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Freeway on-ramp.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beetlebug</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-397472</link>
		<dc:creator>beetlebug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-397472</guid>
		<description>All statistics are useful if measured in a standard fashion under standard or adjusted conditions. The question is do we give too much weight to it? I think yes, as many have pointed out. But most of the time a review includes other statistics with the grand ol&#039; 0-60. A full set of performance results is really what you want. However, time has shown that 0-60 is what people want and whether they weight it properly or not really isn&#039;t going to bother those who look at the big picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->All statistics are useful if measured in a standard fashion under standard or adjusted conditions. The question is do we give too much weight to it? I think yes, as many have pointed out. But most of the time a review includes other statistics with the grand ol&#8217; 0-60. A full set of performance results is really what you want. However, time has shown that 0-60 is what people want and whether they weight it properly or not really isn&#8217;t going to bother those who look at the big picture.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B-Rad</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-397462</link>
		<dc:creator>B-Rad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-does-the-0-60-stat-suck/#comment-397462</guid>
		<description>I like it.  If no one measures a vehicle&#039;s accelerative prowess (or lack thereof) how else will we know if a Vette can put its 500 horses down to the tarmac better than a 730 Merc?  And even though the Merc has more power, the Vette is faster in this benchmark.  

However, 30-50 and 50-70, or just 30-70 acceleration is also an important measure.  The Merc probably beats the Vette there, unless, of course, the tires are still spinning (which would be sick!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I like it.  If no one measures a vehicle&#8217;s accelerative prowess (or lack thereof) how else will we know if a Vette can put its 500 horses down to the tarmac better than a 730 Merc?  And even though the Merc has more power, the Vette is faster in this benchmark.  </p>
<p>However, 30-50 and 50-70, or just 30-70 acceleration is also an important measure.  The Merc probably beats the Vette there, unless, of course, the tires are still spinning (which would be sick!).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 49/158 queries in 0.174 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 03:49:34 -->