By Edward Niedermeyer on October 16, 2009

The public plan is 19 percent and change. That is what everything is being based on

GM board member Steven Girsky repeats Fritz Henderson’s assumption that GM’s market share will be stable and predictable . Of course, if that’s the case, someone’s got some ’splainin to do about the last 30 years. Luckily though, we’ve got some good news for Messrs Girsky and Henderson. According to Autoobserver:

Edmunds.com, the premier online resource for automotive information, has preliminarily forecast General Motors (GM) retail market share for October to rise to 22.4 percent from the third-quarter retail average of 19.1 percent

Wait, Edmunds’ forecast is based on unique pageviews for GM models at Edmunds.com? Never mind then. Let’s go instead to TTAC’s unique sales forecasting and analysis department and see  if GM will hit 22.4 percent market share in October. Forecasters? Shakes vigorously. What’s that? “Signs point to no?” Aw, too bad.

10 Comments on “Quote Of The Day: Gravity Always Wins Edition...”


  • Segmentation Fault
    segfault

    No mention of how accurate Edmunds’ formula has been?

  • Dennis Dose
    Bunter1

    It really doesn’t matter what GM’s share is for any given month. In Sept 08 they bought/fleet packed up to 29%. That mattered in what way?

    GM’s month to month share fluctuates more than any other major. In late 07 they fleet packed three straight months and the MSM and run of the mill car journo’s (like Edmunds) were all excited about a “turnaround”. Wonder how that worked out.

    What is the long term trend?

    I also have my money on gravity.

    Bunter

  • CarPerson

    General Motors will probably end 2009 with 14-16% of a 9.350M market.

    General Motors will probably end 2010 with 12-14% of a 10.625M market.

  • gslippy

    I want what Edmunds is smoking.

  • Dennis Anderson
    Bubba Gump

    Last months 4 core were 18.7 and Old and New combined were 20. This month is looking better than last from what I hear. 19 isn’t a stretch.

  • CarPerson

    If the past is any indication, General Motors will channel-stuff as many cars and trucks as it takes to paint whatever picture they want you to believe.

    The REAL numbers are taken from new car registrations. Look for it.

    By the way, the North Kent Rail-to-Autocarrier lot is empty. The South lot is at about 20% capacity. Don’t remember the Kent, WA lots? That’s where a BN engine speared a Caddy as a hood ornament about 6 months ago.

  • Dennis Anderson
    Bubba Gump

    There is no past at GM. Thats dead gone doesn’t exist anymore. Channel stuffing ain’t happening. In fact channel stuffing ain’t gonna happen even if someone wanted it to because theres a serious steel shortage. The steel reduction during the downturn is 4 months minimum from comming back online. When many of the steel furnaces went offline the refractory bricks in the furnaces cracked and have to be replaced. Once thats done the furnaces take 3 months to come up to temp before a single run of steel can be made.

  • DearS

    I like Comparing Old GM and new GM to past empires. Trying to get GM back to even a 30% market share is like asking Rome, Germany, or Japan to become an empire again.

  • CarPerson

    Steel is a world-wide commodity. Your order will be on your receiving dock two weeks after your check clears.

    Sorry to hear about your bricks.

  • Dennis Anderson
    Bubba Gump

    we want the kind that doesn’t rust :) Oh Snap!


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can also login using Facebook Connect. Connect with Facebook

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Tesla IPO in the works?

    Daanii2 - I think Tesla’s main attraction to investors is its success in sucking on the government teat. An investment in Tesla is a gamble. But the way it is set...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    bumpy ii - Hmmm, I’d have to say a second-gen Honda CRX with a drivetrain swap from a mid-90s non-turbo diesel Jetta. Reasonably light, reasonably torquey, not...
  • Re: Tata Defends JLR Acquisition

    Ion - I wonder if SAIC is still intrested in the Rover moniker, Tata may be able to sell that. They probably could sell Land Rover and Jaguar to GM, once GM drops the...
  • Re: EPA: New Car Fuel Economy Continues to Improve; Back to Early 1980’s Level

    Nutsaboutcars - There was nothing speculative in what I said. It was based on tons of past data that prove my point,...
  • Re: Tata Defends JLR Acquisition

    Nutsaboutcars - I have a ton of respect for Mr. Ratan Tata,  but his Jaguar remarks are wishful thinking and whistling in the dark. Jag and L-R could not make a dime well...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    Nutsaboutcars - After Driving the previous Prius for 3 days in the LAX area in April and June, my opinion of the car went up by a huge amount. Well behaved,...
  • Re: Take Two: 2009 Honda Accord LX Review

    bollocks - Sherman lin “I had a 91 EX with automatic and I miss it dearly. That car was head and shoulders above every other midsize offering then. I wish I had...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Mercedes Benz 190E 2.3-16

    Bulldog Drummond - Hi there, driving in the uk is hardly the same as hammering the back roads but interested to read your comments on the Merc steering....
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    oldowl - Was: mid-1980s Saab 99L (lime green) Am: 2010 Prius IV (winter gray)
  • Re: Review: Porsche GT3

    bollocks - I think some of you are being too hard on Sajeev.  Until a few years ago, I never understood why people went gaga over the 911.  It’s archaic.  It’s not...

 


Auto Insurance GPS Navigation
Car Loans Auto Parts
Car Warranty Wheels
Automotive Tires Car Care