<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PT Cruiser?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:42:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grant I</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-2/#comment-1392371</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-1392371</guid>
		<description>Very sorry all in the US the best model&#039;s only available here in Europe http://www.edmunds.com/news/column/carmudgeon/72740/article.html.  40+ MPG, great performance and a Mercedes engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Very sorry all in the US the best model&#8217;s only available here in Europe <a href="http://www.edmunds.com/news/column/carmudgeon/72740/article.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.edmunds.com/news/column/carmudgeon/72740/article.html</a>.  40+ MPG, great performance and a Mercedes engine<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aggie</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-2/#comment-1132672</link>
		<dc:creator>aggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-1132672</guid>
		<description>I have a 2008 pt cruiser touring model with automatic transmission. I&#039;ve only had it for two weeks at first I loved it. It&#039;s a comfortable ride and you can do so many things with it. Then one evening I noticed my headlights were flickering. The dash board too. They even went totally out at one point and then came back on. I never know when this is going to happen. It&#039;s very scarey driving at night and the lights go out, but a girls gotta work right. I&#039;ve taken it to the dealer who cannot find the problem so I&#039;m stuck driving it this way. So much for having a factory warranty. If I had any money I&#039;d get rid of it immediatly and never own another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I have a 2008 pt cruiser touring model with automatic transmission. I&#8217;ve only had it for two weeks at first I loved it. It&#8217;s a comfortable ride and you can do so many things with it. Then one evening I noticed my headlights were flickering. The dash board too. They even went totally out at one point and then came back on. I never know when this is going to happen. It&#8217;s very scarey driving at night and the lights go out, but a girls gotta work right. I&#8217;ve taken it to the dealer who cannot find the problem so I&#8217;m stuck driving it this way. So much for having a factory warranty. If I had any money I&#8217;d get rid of it immediatly and never own another.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTFrank</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-2/#comment-558712</link>
		<dc:creator>CTFrank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-558712</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing how so many ignorant people jump in to badmouth the PT Cruiser when most of them have obviously never driven one much less owned one. Our current PT (&#039;07 Touring w/ auto) gives us 22 to 25 MPG around town and close to 30 on the highway. Last summer on a round trip from Connecticut to western Pennsylvania we averaged 32MPG on the highway with the cruise set at 75 and the AC on full. With it&#039;s interior room and ergonomics it is the most comfortable small car I have ever driven. You can have your cookie cutter fugly Toyondas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It&#8217;s amazing how so many ignorant people jump in to badmouth the PT Cruiser when most of them have obviously never driven one much less owned one. Our current PT (&#8217;07 Touring w/ auto) gives us 22 to 25 MPG around town and close to 30 on the highway. Last summer on a round trip from Connecticut to western Pennsylvania we averaged 32MPG on the highway with the cruise set at 75 and the AC on full. With it&#8217;s interior room and ergonomics it is the most comfortable small car I have ever driven. You can have your cookie cutter fugly Toyondas.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JuniorMint</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-2/#comment-555912</link>
		<dc:creator>JuniorMint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-555912</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;davey49 :  Interesting that everyone who claims the PT is a horrible car has only had one as a rental.&lt;/em&gt;

My rental PT had only 2000 miles on it, and I had it for two weeks while my xB was being bent back into a square.  Believe me, two weeks is MORE than enough time to notice that a car is actively trying to kill you.

If that time period wasn&#039;t enough, the second I got back into my xB would have told me all I needed to know.  Not as much power, but a hell of a lot more room, and not &lt;em&gt;nearly&lt;/em&gt; as much tendency to end up facing random, non-standard directions in traffic after simple steering maneuvers.

I would have drawn a different conclusion from the fact that a lot of people stopped at a rental: some of us are more perceptive than others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>davey49 :  Interesting that everyone who claims the PT is a horrible car has only had one as a rental.</em></p>
<p>My rental PT had only 2000 miles on it, and I had it for two weeks while my xB was being bent back into a square.  Believe me, two weeks is MORE than enough time to notice that a car is actively trying to kill you.</p>
<p>If that time period wasn&#8217;t enough, the second I got back into my xB would have told me all I needed to know.  Not as much power, but a hell of a lot more room, and not <em>nearly</em> as much tendency to end up facing random, non-standard directions in traffic after simple steering maneuvers.</p>
<p>I would have drawn a different conclusion from the fact that a lot of people stopped at a rental: some of us are more perceptive than others.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davey49</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-2/#comment-555252</link>
		<dc:creator>davey49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-555252</guid>
		<description>Versa? Only on price, the PT is about 50% larger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Versa? Only on price, the PT is about 50% larger.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-2/#comment-552342</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-552342</guid>
		<description>Yep, I also think the Versa is the most direct competitor to the PT Cruiser. Although Nissan does not have the reliability record of Honda and Toyota, I have found that their vehicles tend to be better than the Chrysler models... especially as it pertains to durability.

You also have the Scion Xd which has a design that can kindly be described as unique. If Chrysler saw fit to do the modifications I mentioned earlier, they would have a vehicle capable of providing them in excess of 200,000 units given the demand for that type of design. Unfortunately the die was cast when gas was still cheap, and the resources to make those changes happen are no longer there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Yep, I also think the Versa is the most direct competitor to the PT Cruiser. Although Nissan does not have the reliability record of Honda and Toyota, I have found that their vehicles tend to be better than the Chrysler models&#8230; especially as it pertains to durability.</p>
<p>You also have the Scion Xd which has a design that can kindly be described as unique. If Chrysler saw fit to do the modifications I mentioned earlier, they would have a vehicle capable of providing them in excess of 200,000 units given the demand for that type of design. Unfortunately the die was cast when gas was still cheap, and the resources to make those changes happen are no longer there.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlphaWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-2/#comment-551941</link>
		<dc:creator>AlphaWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-551941</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Alpha, I’ve seen the Versa for sale with an automatic at 12k, and the Yaris at $11,500. The Fit seems to be the only one at the moment that seems immune to the pricing pressures.&lt;/em&gt;

I do not disagree with your observations at all. Still I think the PT has some value left at the right price. The Versa is a good option, especially for the gas mileage, although Nissan has had some hit or miss reliability just like Chrysler.

Both the Lancer and the Focus with automatic are at about 14k minimum, at least in my area. I cannot fit in the the Yaris, too small. The Fit is probably worth the price premium in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Alpha, I’ve seen the Versa for sale with an automatic at 12k, and the Yaris at $11,500. The Fit seems to be the only one at the moment that seems immune to the pricing pressures.</em></p>
<p>I do not disagree with your observations at all. Still I think the PT has some value left at the right price. The Versa is a good option, especially for the gas mileage, although Nissan has had some hit or miss reliability just like Chrysler.</p>
<p>Both the Lancer and the Focus with automatic are at about 14k minimum, at least in my area. I cannot fit in the the Yaris, too small. The Fit is probably worth the price premium in the end.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landcrusher</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-2/#comment-550972</link>
		<dc:creator>Landcrusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-550972</guid>
		<description>JT,

I just want to congratulate you on raising a daughter of obvious intellect and good taste. Well done, sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->JT,</p>
<p>I just want to congratulate you on raising a daughter of obvious intellect and good taste. Well done, sir.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-2/#comment-549532</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-549532</guid>
		<description>Alpha, I&#039;ve seen the Versa for sale with an automatic at 12k, and the Yaris at $11,500. The Fit seems to be the only one at the moment that seems immune to the pricing pressures.

On the second tier level, the Cobalt can be had for $9995, the Focus for around $12k, and the Lancer for $12k as well.

If Chrysler had decided to revise the chassis for better structural rigidity, offered a far more fuel efficient engine, and took care of some of their susbstandard components (long list), the PT Cruiser would most likely become a popular vehicle. It&#039;s far better looking than anything except the Fit, and it has brand equity that&#039;s &#039;hip&#039; and yet attractive to mature consumers.

To put it another way, if this were the mid-90&#039;s Chrysler the PT Cruiser would be a world class product.

The fact that they&#039;ve neglected it and cheaped it out is proof positive of the challenges Chrysler will continue to face. Cheap is no longer a profitable option for an American manufacturer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Alpha, I&#8217;ve seen the Versa for sale with an automatic at 12k, and the Yaris at $11,500. The Fit seems to be the only one at the moment that seems immune to the pricing pressures.</p>
<p>On the second tier level, the Cobalt can be had for $9995, the Focus for around $12k, and the Lancer for $12k as well.</p>
<p>If Chrysler had decided to revise the chassis for better structural rigidity, offered a far more fuel efficient engine, and took care of some of their susbstandard components (long list), the PT Cruiser would most likely become a popular vehicle. It&#8217;s far better looking than anything except the Fit, and it has brand equity that&#8217;s &#8216;hip&#8217; and yet attractive to mature consumers.</p>
<p>To put it another way, if this were the mid-90&#8217;s Chrysler the PT Cruiser would be a world class product.</p>
<p>The fact that they&#8217;ve neglected it and cheaped it out is proof positive of the challenges Chrysler will continue to face. Cheap is no longer a profitable option for an American manufacturer.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlphaWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-2/#comment-548891</link>
		<dc:creator>AlphaWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-548891</guid>
		<description>Just drove a new 2008 and they really are not that bad at all. Roomy and the PT handles well. Gas mileage is where they dropped the ball.

I am not sure the imminent demise of Chrysler is a given, even though it makes for good articles on here. So the warranty should be there 3 years from now. On the other hand parts are cheap.

Looking around for a replacement car the choices seem to be a high mileage used Honda or Toyotas vs a brand new PT Cruiser with automatic, Sirius satellite and side airbags for under $13k.

What else can you get at $13k, a Kia or something? Then I would not even fit into the car, I am a tall guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Just drove a new 2008 and they really are not that bad at all. Roomy and the PT handles well. Gas mileage is where they dropped the ball.</p>
<p>I am not sure the imminent demise of Chrysler is a given, even though it makes for good articles on here. So the warranty should be there 3 years from now. On the other hand parts are cheap.</p>
<p>Looking around for a replacement car the choices seem to be a high mileage used Honda or Toyotas vs a brand new PT Cruiser with automatic, Sirius satellite and side airbags for under $13k.</p>
<p>What else can you get at $13k, a Kia or something? Then I would not even fit into the car, I am a tall guy.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seabrjim</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-2/#comment-548121</link>
		<dc:creator>seabrjim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-548121</guid>
		<description>windswords, you need to leave allpar.com alone for 15 minutes and go to ptcruiserproblems.com. Not that I dont like allpar, I go there for old info as I am a roadrunner,-gtx guy from the 70&#039;s. It IS a chrysler site after all, so cheerleading is gonna happen.I found the latter site 2 years ago when my rental broke a tierod on a ramp  (no hooning, normal speed) and I nearly flipped. Now I dont know what allpar.com would say about this unique handling trick, but with 11,000 miles on it the front suspension should be breaking in not breaking! Never drove another PT cruiser after that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->windswords, you need to leave allpar.com alone for 15 minutes and go to ptcruiserproblems.com. Not that I dont like allpar, I go there for old info as I am a roadrunner,-gtx guy from the 70&#8217;s. It IS a chrysler site after all, so cheerleading is gonna happen.I found the latter site 2 years ago when my rental broke a tierod on a ramp  (no hooning, normal speed) and I nearly flipped. Now I dont know what allpar.com would say about this unique handling trick, but with 11,000 miles on it the front suspension should be breaking in not breaking! Never drove another PT cruiser after that.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrb00st</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-2/#comment-546172</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrb00st</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-546172</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand the PT hate.  The only downside to it was the gasmileage.  Mom got one, a 2001 back in 2002 that was &quot;used&quot; but only had 1200 miles on it.  Limited model with sunroof, leather/suede seats, seat heaters, cruise, automatic, etc etc.  Sure, it was awful to drive.  It had no power and not enough gears, and not enough brains in the transmission to power a lightbulb.  But it was useful, comfortable, and relatively reliable.  Yes it went through brakes and tierods.  Cheap, cheap to buy and cheap to fix.  And the amount of stuff you can cram in a PT Cruiser is amazing.


It really needed a 5-speed automatic though...  cruise control got REALLY annoying on the hills on some of the highways in Virginia, where it couldn&#039;t make up its mind on a gear and would just keep shifting between 3rd and OD.  retarded.

Still, great car

but yeah residuals were ridiculously awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I don&#8217;t understand the PT hate.  The only downside to it was the gasmileage.  Mom got one, a 2001 back in 2002 that was &#8220;used&#8221; but only had 1200 miles on it.  Limited model with sunroof, leather/suede seats, seat heaters, cruise, automatic, etc etc.  Sure, it was awful to drive.  It had no power and not enough gears, and not enough brains in the transmission to power a lightbulb.  But it was useful, comfortable, and relatively reliable.  Yes it went through brakes and tierods.  Cheap, cheap to buy and cheap to fix.  And the amount of stuff you can cram in a PT Cruiser is amazing.</p>
<p>It really needed a 5-speed automatic though&#8230;  cruise control got REALLY annoying on the hills on some of the highways in Virginia, where it couldn&#8217;t make up its mind on a gear and would just keep shifting between 3rd and OD.  retarded.</p>
<p>Still, great car</p>
<p>but yeah residuals were ridiculously awful.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iNeon</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-546131</link>
		<dc:creator>iNeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-546131</guid>
		<description>PT, for those of you that don&#039;t know-- comes from the chassis designation.

neon sedan/coupe were PL; wagon variant-- PT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->PT, for those of you that don&#8217;t know&#8211; comes from the chassis designation.</p>
<p>neon sedan/coupe were PL; wagon variant&#8211; PT.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davey49</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-545121</link>
		<dc:creator>davey49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-545121</guid>
		<description>Interesting that everyone who claims the PT is a horrible car has only had one as a rental.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Interesting that everyone who claims the PT is a horrible car has only had one as a rental.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davey49</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-545112</link>
		<dc:creator>davey49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-545112</guid>
		<description>I think the PT Cruiser is on the old Caravan platform.
I suspect some of the poor fuel mileage is due to drive train inefficiency as opposed to weight and aerodynamics. The Chevy HHR is essentially the same size weight and shape and it&#039;s EPA rated at 21/30</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think the PT Cruiser is on the old Caravan platform.<br />
I suspect some of the poor fuel mileage is due to drive train inefficiency as opposed to weight and aerodynamics. The Chevy HHR is essentially the same size weight and shape and it&#8217;s EPA rated at 21/30<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SherbornSean</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-545001</link>
		<dc:creator>SherbornSean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-545001</guid>
		<description>Given Chrysler&#039;s fondness for badge engineering (at least until recently) I was shocked that Chrysler never put the PT Cruiser&#039;s bodywork on the Caliber&#039;s chassis.  Maybe they thought the Neon was a better foundation?  Incredible.

I guess the issue for me is that even if I really did like the PT(and I don&#039;t), why on earth would I buy a new one if I could get a nicely optioned 3 year old for $5K?  

I guess if I were truly desperate to drop $10K, I could buy a 3 year old Mazda3, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Given Chrysler&#8217;s fondness for badge engineering (at least until recently) I was shocked that Chrysler never put the PT Cruiser&#8217;s bodywork on the Caliber&#8217;s chassis.  Maybe they thought the Neon was a better foundation?  Incredible.</p>
<p>I guess the issue for me is that even if I really did like the PT(and I don&#8217;t), why on earth would I buy a new one if I could get a nicely optioned 3 year old for $5K?  </p>
<p>I guess if I were truly desperate to drop $10K, I could buy a 3 year old Mazda3, no?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menno</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-543892</link>
		<dc:creator>menno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-543892</guid>
		<description>(Heavy sarcasm on)

Well, windswords, that&#039;s when I go out and borrow money - when I don&#039;t need it, what about you?!  

(Sarcasm off)

Man, did you notice that the 19.1% owner (Daimler) backed 75% of the $2 billion loan?!  

I wonder how you say &quot;WTF, this POS millstone is killing our credit rating even though we dumped 4/5ths of it!&quot; in German?  

Which Chrysler exec slipped the truth out and retracted it a few months ago when he said the company was functionally bankrupt?  

What the heck does that mean if not &quot;we&#039;re dead, but there are still some twitches in the body so nobody&#039;s noticed yet.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->(Heavy sarcasm on)</p>
<p>Well, windswords, that&#8217;s when I go out and borrow money &#8211; when I don&#8217;t need it, what about you?!  </p>
<p>(Sarcasm off)</p>
<p>Man, did you notice that the 19.1% owner (Daimler) backed 75% of the $2 billion loan?!  </p>
<p>I wonder how you say &#8220;WTF, this POS millstone is killing our credit rating even though we dumped 4/5ths of it!&#8221; in German?  </p>
<p>Which Chrysler exec slipped the truth out and retracted it a few months ago when he said the company was functionally bankrupt?  </p>
<p>What the heck does that mean if not &#8220;we&#8217;re dead, but there are still some twitches in the body so nobody&#8217;s noticed yet.&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windswords</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-543511</link>
		<dc:creator>windswords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-543511</guid>
		<description>&quot;nano seconds from self destruct&quot;

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080625/AUTO01/806250361/1148/AUTO01</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;nano seconds from self destruct&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080625/AUTO01/806250361/1148/AUTO01" rel="nofollow">http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080625/AUTO01/806250361/1148/AUTO01</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronin317</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-543482</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronin317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-543482</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;vento97: Yeah, those Honda drivers have submitted their forms, checked in their identities, and became one of the masses of me-too clones:
“I own a Honda.”
“Me too…”&lt;/em&gt;

Unless you don&#039;t really care what other people drive...I certainly didn&#039;t buy my car based on what other people, whom I don&#039;t know or care to,  have...

I just never understood that type of thought. It&#039;s like the fanboyism that goes on in the Video Game market - why do you care what system someone you don&#039;t know buys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>vento97: Yeah, those Honda drivers have submitted their forms, checked in their identities, and became one of the masses of me-too clones:<br />
“I own a Honda.”<br />
“Me too…”</em></p>
<p>Unless you don&#8217;t really care what other people drive&#8230;I certainly didn&#8217;t buy my car based on what other people, whom I don&#8217;t know or care to,  have&#8230;</p>
<p>I just never understood that type of thought. It&#8217;s like the fanboyism that goes on in the Video Game market &#8211; why do you care what system someone you don&#8217;t know buys?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menno</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-543381</link>
		<dc:creator>menno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-543381</guid>
		<description>Lookie here - my local Chrysler dealer has one left.  It&#039;s Kermit the Frog Green!  Check out the price!  

2008 CHRYSLER

PT Cruiser Touring
MSRP: $19,870.00
 Bill Marsh Price: $19,870.00
 Ext. Color: PPL_Melbourne Green Pearl Coat

I think they made a typo on &quot;their&quot; price and left the&quot;1&quot; on there, eh?  

Somebody&#039;d have to be totally nuts to buy one of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Lookie here &#8211; my local Chrysler dealer has one left.  It&#8217;s Kermit the Frog Green!  Check out the price!  </p>
<p>2008 CHRYSLER</p>
<p>PT Cruiser Touring<br />
MSRP: $19,870.00<br />
 Bill Marsh Price: $19,870.00<br />
 Ext. Color: PPL_Melbourne Green Pearl Coat</p>
<p>I think they made a typo on &#8220;their&#8221; price and left the&#8221;1&#8243; on there, eh?  </p>
<p>Somebody&#8217;d have to be totally nuts to buy one of these.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menno</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-543371</link>
		<dc:creator>menno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-543371</guid>
		<description>Nooooooo!  Don&#039;t do iiiiiit!  

Buying a PT Cruiser means you actually would be buying a car from a company which is about nanoseconds from self-destruct.

So kiss your warrantee goodbye, and your $2.99 gas promise, and parts availablility (which you&#039;ll need LOTS of since I speak from experience, having had a Dodge Neon).  

The ONLY way I&#039;d buy a PT would be if gas was actually at $1 a gallon again, likely to stay that for at least a decade, and I could get the car for 1/3 retail.  I&#039;d consider paying $4500 for a brand new car.  Maybe.  After a few stiff drinks of stuff I don&#039;t drink any more.  

You get the picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Nooooooo!  Don&#8217;t do iiiiiit!  </p>
<p>Buying a PT Cruiser means you actually would be buying a car from a company which is about nanoseconds from self-destruct.</p>
<p>So kiss your warrantee goodbye, and your $2.99 gas promise, and parts availablility (which you&#8217;ll need LOTS of since I speak from experience, having had a Dodge Neon).  </p>
<p>The ONLY way I&#8217;d buy a PT would be if gas was actually at $1 a gallon again, likely to stay that for at least a decade, and I could get the car for 1/3 retail.  I&#8217;d consider paying $4500 for a brand new car.  Maybe.  After a few stiff drinks of stuff I don&#8217;t drink any more.  </p>
<p>You get the picture.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.J. McCombs</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-543241</link>
		<dc:creator>P.J. McCombs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-543241</guid>
		<description>The PT is one of the saddest examples of Chrysler pissing away its potential as a brand over the past decade.

Yes, the ride and handling are coarse in today&#039;s competitive set, but the thing&#039;s rolling on a ten-year-old platform, with an even older drivetrain. Given that Chrysler hasn&#039;t so much as checked its pulse in years, it&#039;s amazing that it&#039;s held up as well as it has. 

Perhaps even more amazing is that it&#039;s still a better car than the Caliber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The PT is one of the saddest examples of Chrysler pissing away its potential as a brand over the past decade.</p>
<p>Yes, the ride and handling are coarse in today&#8217;s competitive set, but the thing&#8217;s rolling on a ten-year-old platform, with an even older drivetrain. Given that Chrysler hasn&#8217;t so much as checked its pulse in years, it&#8217;s amazing that it&#8217;s held up as well as it has. </p>
<p>Perhaps even more amazing is that it&#8217;s still a better car than the Caliber.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toxicroach</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-542882</link>
		<dc:creator>toxicroach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-542882</guid>
		<description>Wait they still make the Rabbit?

My mom has been cursing the Rabbit for 30 years.

Still the worst car she ever had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Wait they still make the Rabbit?</p>
<p>My mom has been cursing the Rabbit for 30 years.</p>
<p>Still the worst car she ever had.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cretinx</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-542672</link>
		<dc:creator>cretinx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-542672</guid>
		<description>The Rabbit?

C&#039;mon.

I test drove one of those - what a dud.  The Fit blows it away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The Rabbit?</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon.</p>
<p>I test drove one of those &#8211; what a dud.  The Fit blows it away.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windswords</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/comment-page-1/#comment-542121</link>
		<dc:creator>windswords</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pt-cruiser/#comment-542121</guid>
		<description>topdog,

There must have been something wrong with your rental (surprise). I have never heard of owners complaining about poor (or even dangerous)  handling, not that it&#039;s a corner carver.

Allpar&#039;s review in 2001 said, &quot;Steering is precise and easy to control. The turning radius is fairly tight.&quot;, and &quot;The Cruiser stays composed and steady on sharp turns&quot;.

Edmunds review of the 2008 says &quot;It handles well, with superlative steering feel and smooth overall ride quality&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->topdog,</p>
<p>There must have been something wrong with your rental (surprise). I have never heard of owners complaining about poor (or even dangerous)  handling, not that it&#8217;s a corner carver.</p>
<p>Allpar&#8217;s review in 2001 said, &#8220;Steering is precise and easy to control. The turning radius is fairly tight.&#8221;, and &#8220;The Cruiser stays composed and steady on sharp turns&#8221;.</p>
<p>Edmunds review of the 2008 says &#8220;It handles well, with superlative steering feel and smooth overall ride quality&#8221;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 38/145 queries in 0.114 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 09:47:16 -->