<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pontiac Grand Prix Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:10:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: j.gennaro1</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-1321362</link>
		<dc:creator>j.gennaro1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-1321362</guid>
		<description>I brought my 2006 Grand Prix in August 2007.  I chose recently used since a new car always takes the biggest drop value immediately after driving it off the lot.  Unlike a majority of the responses above, I was also very impressed with it’s styling.  I have also received a number of compliments from others about that.
When I initially went car shopping, its Japanese competitors were not even on my radar.  I can’t see what so appealing about their Asiatic styling, which always is either coma inducing blandness or stomach churning ugliness.  It’s the one thing they all excel at.  Also, I take no credence in the ones that have higher resale value either.  Why pay a few thousand more dollars for a car that will deteriorate just as quickly, on average are not backed by better warranties, and have noisy anemic four bangers as base engines. 
I even question their reliability.  A friend’s 2005 Camry she brought new had that engine seize after she had it for two years due to a shattered piston ring at around 20,000 miles.  I spent a week with a rental Camry two years ago that had automatic headlamp function that did not work, climate control knobs ready to fall of the dash and a steering column that started vibrating the second day. A girl I work with had purchased new 2004 Maxima and after only three days it had to be towed due to a blown transmission.  Later on the moon roof fell off it’s track twice.
My Grand Prix is a base model with the aspirated 3800 V6.   So what if it’s an older OHV type engine.  Because of that type of engine’s simplicity, GM could offer a V6 for the same average price versus its foreign competitor’s four cylinder models.  The extra ponies and extreme smoothness, more than make up for the average two-mile per gallon less mileage than the typical four cylinder midsize car gets.  3800’s and even the older and if somewhat crude 3.8 carbureted version where also extremely durable.  
All of the instrumentation is very easy to understand and I can operate every button and knob while wearing gloves.  The information/settings screen is a convenient featureI also like the FM radio and it’s information display along with its ability to automatically adjust the volume for background noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I brought my 2006 Grand Prix in August 2007.  I chose recently used since a new car always takes the biggest drop value immediately after driving it off the lot.  Unlike a majority of the responses above, I was also very impressed with it’s styling.  I have also received a number of compliments from others about that.<br />
When I initially went car shopping, its Japanese competitors were not even on my radar.  I can’t see what so appealing about their Asiatic styling, which always is either coma inducing blandness or stomach churning ugliness.  It’s the one thing they all excel at.  Also, I take no credence in the ones that have higher resale value either.  Why pay a few thousand more dollars for a car that will deteriorate just as quickly, on average are not backed by better warranties, and have noisy anemic four bangers as base engines.<br />
I even question their reliability.  A friend’s 2005 Camry she brought new had that engine seize after she had it for two years due to a shattered piston ring at around 20,000 miles.  I spent a week with a rental Camry two years ago that had automatic headlamp function that did not work, climate control knobs ready to fall of the dash and a steering column that started vibrating the second day. A girl I work with had purchased new 2004 Maxima and after only three days it had to be towed due to a blown transmission.  Later on the moon roof fell off it’s track twice.<br />
My Grand Prix is a base model with the aspirated 3800 V6.   So what if it’s an older OHV type engine.  Because of that type of engine’s simplicity, GM could offer a V6 for the same average price versus its foreign competitor’s four cylinder models.  The extra ponies and extreme smoothness, more than make up for the average two-mile per gallon less mileage than the typical four cylinder midsize car gets.  3800’s and even the older and if somewhat crude 3.8 carbureted version where also extremely durable.<br />
All of the instrumentation is very easy to understand and I can operate every button and knob while wearing gloves.  The information/settings screen is a convenient featureI also like the FM radio and it’s information display along with its ability to automatically adjust the volume for background noise.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ponchoman49</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-1056561</link>
		<dc:creator>ponchoman49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-1056561</guid>
		<description>I would not call 8 seconds to 60 slow. The bland generic Camry with it&#039;s stunning 158 HP 2.4 and sluggish hesitating 5 speed automatic can only muster 9 seconds to 60. Chevys own new style Malibu with a base 2.4 and 6 speed automatic can only mamage 8.7 seconds to 60, a Dodge Caravan SE with 175 HP 3.3 V6 needed 11.0 seconds to reach 60 and the pathetic Honda Fit needs 11.0 seconds with 4 speed automatic to reach 60. I&#039;ll agree the 3800 is not the quietest engine around and GM would have been better off with the stronger 242 HP 3900 V6 as in the Impala. The biggest three things I have trouble with in the current GP is the park bench hard back seat, lack of back seat legroom and the terrible designed interior which makes the 97-03 version look pretty good in comparison. I actually prefer the exterior styling of the current GP to the mediocre bland import G8 which is just another BMW 5 series rehash like the new Accord. It takes Pontiac in the wrong direction style wise with it&#039;s boring plain slab sides and &quot;I can&#039;t tell what it is foreign Asian brand car look&quot;. It&#039;s really comical to see this BMW wannabe with it&#039;s retro Pontiac twin nostrils jutting out of the hood trying oh so hard to be a Pontiac. A shame really as the rest of the G8 is pretty good other than it&#039;s lack of AWD and high price tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I would not call 8 seconds to 60 slow. The bland generic Camry with it&#8217;s stunning 158 HP 2.4 and sluggish hesitating 5 speed automatic can only muster 9 seconds to 60. Chevys own new style Malibu with a base 2.4 and 6 speed automatic can only mamage 8.7 seconds to 60, a Dodge Caravan SE with 175 HP 3.3 V6 needed 11.0 seconds to reach 60 and the pathetic Honda Fit needs 11.0 seconds with 4 speed automatic to reach 60. I&#8217;ll agree the 3800 is not the quietest engine around and GM would have been better off with the stronger 242 HP 3900 V6 as in the Impala. The biggest three things I have trouble with in the current GP is the park bench hard back seat, lack of back seat legroom and the terrible designed interior which makes the 97-03 version look pretty good in comparison. I actually prefer the exterior styling of the current GP to the mediocre bland import G8 which is just another BMW 5 series rehash like the new Accord. It takes Pontiac in the wrong direction style wise with it&#8217;s boring plain slab sides and &#8220;I can&#8217;t tell what it is foreign Asian brand car look&#8221;. It&#8217;s really comical to see this BMW wannabe with it&#8217;s retro Pontiac twin nostrils jutting out of the hood trying oh so hard to be a Pontiac. A shame really as the rest of the G8 is pretty good other than it&#8217;s lack of AWD and high price tag.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grand_Prix</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-886551</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand_Prix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 04:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-886551</guid>
		<description>the grand prix has been around since 1962 the oldest pontiac still alive to this day gm will regret the day they offed the GP the new g8 sucks ass you think the GP is big you should see the g8 its huge bulky shity trunk room pathatic guage cluster and the 4 spoke stearing wheel has got to go and already gm is talkin bout offing the g8 the 2009-2010 g8 gxp will be the last g8s to come out the fucked up plain and simple the interior of my 07 GP is fuckin beatuifal sexy as hell every where i go my GP gets stared at people see me get out and ask if i really own such a hot car they see the interior and they decide right then and there they want one the Grand Prix is the best car on the road to day reliable quick as fuck 8 sec yeah right more like 6 i smoke superchargers in my base 3800 v6 people see my taillights for they even know i went past em</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->the grand prix has been around since 1962 the oldest pontiac still alive to this day gm will regret the day they offed the GP the new g8 sucks ass you think the GP is big you should see the g8 its huge bulky shity trunk room pathatic guage cluster and the 4 spoke stearing wheel has got to go and already gm is talkin bout offing the g8 the 2009-2010 g8 gxp will be the last g8s to come out the fucked up plain and simple the interior of my 07 GP is fuckin beatuifal sexy as hell every where i go my GP gets stared at people see me get out and ask if i really own such a hot car they see the interior and they decide right then and there they want one the Grand Prix is the best car on the road to day reliable quick as fuck 8 sec yeah right more like 6 i smoke superchargers in my base 3800 v6 people see my taillights for they even know i went past em<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kluttz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-713662</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kluttz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-713662</guid>
		<description>fallout:
Grand Prixs have had rear disc brakes since 1988.  Even on the base model.  I&#039;m reluctantly driving one right now until something better that I can afford comes along.  Now the &#039;88 IS a piece of crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->fallout:<br />
Grand Prixs have had rear disc brakes since 1988.  Even on the base model.  I&#8217;m reluctantly driving one right now until something better that I can afford comes along.  Now the &#8216;88 IS a piece of crap.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kluttz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-713652</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kluttz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-713652</guid>
		<description>Drove a rental 2008 GP while our 2001 Accord EX had some minor body work done...I&#039;m a diehard Honda fanatic, but that GP would kick its butt in almost every aspect...except those interior materials and the perceived quality down the road...I doube I&#039;d get 185000 trouble-free miles out of a GP like this wonderful Accord has given me, but for a cheap &quot;RenCen&quot; car, that GP was awesome!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Drove a rental 2008 GP while our 2001 Accord EX had some minor body work done&#8230;I&#8217;m a diehard Honda fanatic, but that GP would kick its butt in almost every aspect&#8230;except those interior materials and the perceived quality down the road&#8230;I doube I&#8217;d get 185000 trouble-free miles out of a GP like this wonderful Accord has given me, but for a cheap &#8220;RenCen&#8221; car, that GP was awesome!!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ekulwyo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-169982</link>
		<dc:creator>ekulwyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-169982</guid>
		<description>According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fleet-central.com/af/stats2007/cars_web.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fleet Central&lt;/a&gt;, 77% of Grand Prixs made are part of fleets, even more than the lovely Aveo or famously fleeted Sebring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->According to <a href="http://www.fleet-central.com/af/stats2007/cars_web.pdf" rel="nofollow">Fleet Central</a>, 77% of Grand Prixs made are part of fleets, even more than the lovely Aveo or famously fleeted Sebring.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phewop118</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-82477</link>
		<dc:creator>phewop118</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 03:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-82477</guid>
		<description>I know I&#039;m posting in a month-old comment section, but I will do so anyway.  The Grand Prix isn&#039;t nearly as bad as the review makes it out to be (most people that read ttac and post are asian-car lovers).  The 3800, while not the newest engine on the market, is one of the best ever, with great torque and respectable horsepower.  It&#039;s also very smooth, incredibly fuel efficient, and has to be the most reliable engine ever made.  Even though it is ancient, it is still competitive with new engines, especially when you&#039;re talking about the supercharged model. The V8 is even better, with power at all speeds. The 4 speed auto is probably older than the engine, but lack of gears and all, it&#039;s still decent enough with firm enough, but not jarring shifts. 

While the exterior does look bloated and the interior has quite an odd-looking air about it, it is quite functional.  The doors open really wide and the trunk opening is large.  Inside, everything is placed in the perfect location, save for the trunk release which is on the lock switch.  Also, most of the interior plastics are actually soft touch and feel quality, unlike those in the new gen Camry&#039;s or outgoing gen Accords, which are cheap, hollow, hard shit.  The center stack in the GP has this plastic, but everywhere else is a nice, rubberized, soft material.  Who the hell said the seats suck - the seats are INCREDIBLE! Tons of side-support and good lumbar support and they have a very wide range of adjustments.  What gets me, for a car so damn big, the back seat is so damn small, though it&#039;s still large enough for someone my size (6&#039; 215 lbs) to sit in for 30 min, maximum.  

While some 04 GP&#039;s had slightly clunky steering as the miles got on (umm just about every camry, highlander, etc from that platform&#039;s last generation has very clunky steering, which is way worse than this pontiac&#039;s), the steering&#039;s pretty solid.  Good effort levels, especially with the Magnasteer II, but as most have said, it is numb, which isn&#039;t a bad thing, as it won&#039;t turn on its own when you hit a bump, unlike some (CAMRY).  It&#039;s better suited for regular driving than sporty driving.

Then there&#039;s the suspension.  On the base models, it is very soft, giving a nice ride, but not too pillowy.  In the corners, it does lean way too much and understeers too early.  The mid-level suspension does a much better job of keeping things even-keeled, without having a jarring ride.  The GXP suspension is actually sporty and exhibits very little understeer, which is mainly do the unequal tire sizes in the front and back. 

Now to address the creaks/rattles.  Some early build models had some creaks in the seats, console, and sunroof (if equipped), but now, these damn things are more solid and quiet than any honda or toyota or even other gm w-bodies.

Anybody taking the time to read this post probably wonders how I can compare vehicles like this.  I&#039;m sure most of those who posted and compared probably haven&#039;t driven more than 5 or 6 different vehicle made in the last 10 years.  I have driven almost every car on the market currently or that was on the market within the past 10 years - I do valet parking.  I know what they are all about and which ones are hyped and which are much better than most people think.  I see all the flaws in vehicles that get nothing but praise and can&#039;t understand why the hell people think they are so great, for example, Camry, Accord, the entire Lexus lineup, Passat, Jetta, Rabbit, A4, Fusion, Pilot, Odyssey, Ridgline, Mustang, etc.  Then there are the way underrated vehicles, such as the Grand Prix, Galant, SRX, Lucerne, 7-series, Avalanche, and so on.  Then there are vehicles that have praising reviews by some and horrid reviews by others, such as the Malibu (which is horrible), or the GTO (which is incredible). I have a well-formulated opinion on every car, which unlike most people, is based on a first-hand experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I know I&#8217;m posting in a month-old comment section, but I will do so anyway.  The Grand Prix isn&#8217;t nearly as bad as the review makes it out to be (most people that read ttac and post are asian-car lovers).  The 3800, while not the newest engine on the market, is one of the best ever, with great torque and respectable horsepower.  It&#8217;s also very smooth, incredibly fuel efficient, and has to be the most reliable engine ever made.  Even though it is ancient, it is still competitive with new engines, especially when you&#8217;re talking about the supercharged model. The V8 is even better, with power at all speeds. The 4 speed auto is probably older than the engine, but lack of gears and all, it&#8217;s still decent enough with firm enough, but not jarring shifts. </p>
<p>While the exterior does look bloated and the interior has quite an odd-looking air about it, it is quite functional.  The doors open really wide and the trunk opening is large.  Inside, everything is placed in the perfect location, save for the trunk release which is on the lock switch.  Also, most of the interior plastics are actually soft touch and feel quality, unlike those in the new gen Camry&#8217;s or outgoing gen Accords, which are cheap, hollow, hard shit.  The center stack in the GP has this plastic, but everywhere else is a nice, rubberized, soft material.  Who the hell said the seats suck &#8211; the seats are INCREDIBLE! Tons of side-support and good lumbar support and they have a very wide range of adjustments.  What gets me, for a car so damn big, the back seat is so damn small, though it&#8217;s still large enough for someone my size (6&#8242; 215 lbs) to sit in for 30 min, maximum.  </p>
<p>While some 04 GP&#8217;s had slightly clunky steering as the miles got on (umm just about every camry, highlander, etc from that platform&#8217;s last generation has very clunky steering, which is way worse than this pontiac&#8217;s), the steering&#8217;s pretty solid.  Good effort levels, especially with the Magnasteer II, but as most have said, it is numb, which isn&#8217;t a bad thing, as it won&#8217;t turn on its own when you hit a bump, unlike some (CAMRY).  It&#8217;s better suited for regular driving than sporty driving.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the suspension.  On the base models, it is very soft, giving a nice ride, but not too pillowy.  In the corners, it does lean way too much and understeers too early.  The mid-level suspension does a much better job of keeping things even-keeled, without having a jarring ride.  The GXP suspension is actually sporty and exhibits very little understeer, which is mainly do the unequal tire sizes in the front and back. </p>
<p>Now to address the creaks/rattles.  Some early build models had some creaks in the seats, console, and sunroof (if equipped), but now, these damn things are more solid and quiet than any honda or toyota or even other gm w-bodies.</p>
<p>Anybody taking the time to read this post probably wonders how I can compare vehicles like this.  I&#8217;m sure most of those who posted and compared probably haven&#8217;t driven more than 5 or 6 different vehicle made in the last 10 years.  I have driven almost every car on the market currently or that was on the market within the past 10 years &#8211; I do valet parking.  I know what they are all about and which ones are hyped and which are much better than most people think.  I see all the flaws in vehicles that get nothing but praise and can&#8217;t understand why the hell people think they are so great, for example, Camry, Accord, the entire Lexus lineup, Passat, Jetta, Rabbit, A4, Fusion, Pilot, Odyssey, Ridgline, Mustang, etc.  Then there are the way underrated vehicles, such as the Grand Prix, Galant, SRX, Lucerne, 7-series, Avalanche, and so on.  Then there are vehicles that have praising reviews by some and horrid reviews by others, such as the Malibu (which is horrible), or the GTO (which is incredible). I have a well-formulated opinion on every car, which unlike most people, is based on a first-hand experience.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pb35</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-78927</link>
		<dc:creator>pb35</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-78927</guid>
		<description>I recently reserved a Premium car at my hometown Budget for a week. It&#039;s always been a Crown Vic or a Grand Marquis. Or better, sometimes a Town Car. When I got to the counter last Saturday I was told that they had a GP for me. After a brief discussion about how a GP is not a Premium ride my wallet was $35 lighter.  

First impression, formed while reading my rental agreement while walking: &quot;Holy crap, this thing has almost 19k miles!&quot; It&#039;s going to be bad I said to myself.  The Charcoal Pontiac didn&#039;t look bad sitting there with twin spoke 17&quot; rims and a &quot;GT&quot; badge on the trunk. The interior reminds me of an 88 Grand Am that I drove for a bit back in 89. Same feel and smell too. Weird. Auto down on only the drivers window! It doesn&#039;t get any cheaper than that. The drive is shaky/shuddery while accelerating as well as stopping. This probably has a lot to do with the fact that my car is about at the end of it&#039;s rental life. The stereo sounds good as long as you don&#039;t turn it up too high. The car drives well enough as long as you don&#039;t go too fast. I think I can smell the catalytic converter. I got a flat. In short, I can&#039;t wait to dump this thing and go home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I recently reserved a Premium car at my hometown Budget for a week. It&#8217;s always been a Crown Vic or a Grand Marquis. Or better, sometimes a Town Car. When I got to the counter last Saturday I was told that they had a GP for me. After a brief discussion about how a GP is not a Premium ride my wallet was $35 lighter.  </p>
<p>First impression, formed while reading my rental agreement while walking: &#8220;Holy crap, this thing has almost 19k miles!&#8221; It&#8217;s going to be bad I said to myself.  The Charcoal Pontiac didn&#8217;t look bad sitting there with twin spoke 17&#8243; rims and a &#8220;GT&#8221; badge on the trunk. The interior reminds me of an 88 Grand Am that I drove for a bit back in 89. Same feel and smell too. Weird. Auto down on only the drivers window! It doesn&#8217;t get any cheaper than that. The drive is shaky/shuddery while accelerating as well as stopping. This probably has a lot to do with the fact that my car is about at the end of it&#8217;s rental life. The stereo sounds good as long as you don&#8217;t turn it up too high. The car drives well enough as long as you don&#8217;t go too fast. I think I can smell the catalytic converter. I got a flat. In short, I can&#8217;t wait to dump this thing and go home.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redbarchetta</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-75648</link>
		<dc:creator>Redbarchetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-75648</guid>
		<description>Haha very funny. That lousy POS almost killed my wife twice, with my daughter another kid in the back. I hope that car became manhole covers or sewer pipe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Haha very funny. That lousy POS almost killed my wife twice, with my daughter another kid in the back. I hope that car became manhole covers or sewer pipe.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redbarchetta</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-75370</link>
		<dc:creator>Redbarchetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-75370</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;blueandgold&lt;/em&gt;  Wait until your Grand Prix decides it wants to just shut off while trying to merge from an on ramp onto a very busy interstate with 80 mph trucks charging on you. You wont like it so much after that, if you life to tell about it. Having my wifes Grand Prix crushed was the most satisfying day of ownership on that POS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>blueandgold</em>  Wait until your Grand Prix decides it wants to just shut off while trying to merge from an on ramp onto a very busy interstate with 80 mph trucks charging on you. You wont like it so much after that, if you life to tell about it. Having my wifes Grand Prix crushed was the most satisfying day of ownership on that POS.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blueandgold</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-74949</link>
		<dc:creator>blueandgold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-74949</guid>
		<description>I have owned 2 Grand Prixs and they are very reliable with a good amount of power. Considering all of the more expensive cars out there spend more time in the shop and cost 2 to 3 times more, why would you waste your time and money. Also, as far as the car taking 8 seconds to get from 0-60, someone needs a new stop watch. These cars are much quicker then that due to their torque. These ar nice looking fun to drive cars. I am only 25 and traded in my Camaro Z28 to have a Grand Prix. Best decision I have ever made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I have owned 2 Grand Prixs and they are very reliable with a good amount of power. Considering all of the more expensive cars out there spend more time in the shop and cost 2 to 3 times more, why would you waste your time and money. Also, as far as the car taking 8 seconds to get from 0-60, someone needs a new stop watch. These cars are much quicker then that due to their torque. These ar nice looking fun to drive cars. I am only 25 and traded in my Camaro Z28 to have a Grand Prix. Best decision I have ever made.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajeev Mehta</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-74313</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajeev Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 22:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-74313</guid>
		<description>Noley: I don&#039;t know the exact numbers, but I bet the Cooper S is churning out more boost than the GTP. Not to mention the rev happy motor, lighter car, etc. 

But it&#039;s a conservative tune for a lawsuit averse GM family sedan: you can boost the heck outta the 3.8L with a smaller pulley and ECU recalibration, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if its on par with the gains you see with your Saab. 

Not that I&#039;m recommending you tweak a GTP and sell your Saab. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Noley: I don&#8217;t know the exact numbers, but I bet the Cooper S is churning out more boost than the GTP. Not to mention the rev happy motor, lighter car, etc. </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s a conservative tune for a lawsuit averse GM family sedan: you can boost the heck outta the 3.8L with a smaller pulley and ECU recalibration, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if its on par with the gains you see with your Saab. </p>
<p>Not that I&#8217;m recommending you tweak a GTP and sell your Saab. :)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.J. McCombs</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-74301</link>
		<dc:creator>P.J. McCombs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-74301</guid>
		<description>I had one of these as a rental recently, too (who hasn&#039;t?).

My favorite part was the uniquely hoary, gurgly, hole-in-the-muffler exhaust note that Pontiac (still) seems to equate with &quot;sport.&quot; 1980s Firebirds with the 2.8 V6 sounded almost identical.

The drive wasn&#039;t bad compared to a like-priced Camry. Aside from the bobbly, oversprung ride (ooh, sporty!), it went where it was aimed and didn&#039;t take much acclimation. The ancient four-speed didn&#039;t even bother me; its crisp gearchanges and lack of torque-converter slop offset its missing gear vs. Toyota&#039;s five-speed, IMO. That said, I&#039;d like to know how GM judged a 200-inch-long car with sub-Corolla-sized rear-seat and trunk space competitive.

Any &quot;revival&quot; cred Pontiac might have gained with the Solstice and upcoming G8 was largely squandered when they coughed up the G5 and Torrent for whining dealers. Classic Roger Smith stuff. 

For the forseeable future, I can&#039;t see how Pontiac will be viewed as anything but GM&#039;s chest-wig division. Or is that Hummer now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I had one of these as a rental recently, too (who hasn&#8217;t?).</p>
<p>My favorite part was the uniquely hoary, gurgly, hole-in-the-muffler exhaust note that Pontiac (still) seems to equate with &#8220;sport.&#8221; 1980s Firebirds with the 2.8 V6 sounded almost identical.</p>
<p>The drive wasn&#8217;t bad compared to a like-priced Camry. Aside from the bobbly, oversprung ride (ooh, sporty!), it went where it was aimed and didn&#8217;t take much acclimation. The ancient four-speed didn&#8217;t even bother me; its crisp gearchanges and lack of torque-converter slop offset its missing gear vs. Toyota&#8217;s five-speed, IMO. That said, I&#8217;d like to know how GM judged a 200-inch-long car with sub-Corolla-sized rear-seat and trunk space competitive.</p>
<p>Any &#8220;revival&#8221; cred Pontiac might have gained with the Solstice and upcoming G8 was largely squandered when they coughed up the G5 and Torrent for whining dealers. Classic Roger Smith stuff. </p>
<p>For the forseeable future, I can&#8217;t see how Pontiac will be viewed as anything but GM&#8217;s chest-wig division. Or is that Hummer now?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rollingwreck</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-73933</link>
		<dc:creator>rollingwreck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-73933</guid>
		<description>adidas --

what a coincidence, i rented one of these last week, and my wife also cut herself not only on the trunklid, but also on the edge of the door.  Exposed metal everywhere.

Truly terrible, and GM execs wonder why people think their cars are trash.  Note to GM: rentals are free advertising. Treat them as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->adidas &#8211;</p>
<p>what a coincidence, i rented one of these last week, and my wife also cut herself not only on the trunklid, but also on the edge of the door.  Exposed metal everywhere.</p>
<p>Truly terrible, and GM execs wonder why people think their cars are trash.  Note to GM: rentals are free advertising. Treat them as such.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blue adidas</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-73911</link>
		<dc:creator>blue adidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-73911</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve rented this car, and I&#039;d put it on par with the driving dynamics and overall appeal of a base Camry. They&#039;re both miserable appliances, but some cars get a pass while some do not. I found the engine to actually be very good, the interior was terrible and the overall intelligence and thoughtfulness of the design is very poor. But what really irked me had nothing to do with any of that. When I reached inside to grab the inside of the trunk lid to pull it down, I was scraped by the edge of unfinished metal. My Audi is lined with a handle and so are many other GM vehicles. This car deserves to go away forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;ve rented this car, and I&#8217;d put it on par with the driving dynamics and overall appeal of a base Camry. They&#8217;re both miserable appliances, but some cars get a pass while some do not. I found the engine to actually be very good, the interior was terrible and the overall intelligence and thoughtfulness of the design is very poor. But what really irked me had nothing to do with any of that. When I reached inside to grab the inside of the trunk lid to pull it down, I was scraped by the edge of unfinished metal. My Audi is lined with a handle and so are many other GM vehicles. This car deserves to go away forever.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noley</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-73810</link>
		<dc:creator>noley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-73810</guid>
		<description>Sajeev:
Thanks for the clarification on superchargers. I guess I just expected more, having driven Mini Cooper S models with belt-driven blowers. (I know, apples and oranges). The full atmosphere of boost I get in my Saab is straight from the factory. Much more is available with tweaks to the ECU. Guess it has me spoiled.

And Ashy Larry:
Couldn&#039;t agree more on the seats... in the GP or anything.  I don&#039;t know why more manufacturers don&#039;t put in decent seats. Saab and Volvo have done it for years, and German car seats are generally quite good, too. I&#039;ve had German or Swedish cars for 40 years and find domestics and Japanese cars sorely lacking (pardon the pun) in the seat department. There are exceptions, but darn few.

I&#039;m told seats are expensive to engineer and build, something I find hard to believe since there&#039;s not a whole lot of technology involved and how to make them is well known. IMHO it&#039;s just something most manufacturer&#039;s don&#039;t care about. And that makes me not care about buying their cars. I&#039;ve walked out of dealerships because the seats in models I&#039;ve been looking at were not up to what I&#039;ve gotten used to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Sajeev:<br />
Thanks for the clarification on superchargers. I guess I just expected more, having driven Mini Cooper S models with belt-driven blowers. (I know, apples and oranges). The full atmosphere of boost I get in my Saab is straight from the factory. Much more is available with tweaks to the ECU. Guess it has me spoiled.</p>
<p>And Ashy Larry:<br />
Couldn&#8217;t agree more on the seats&#8230; in the GP or anything.  I don&#8217;t know why more manufacturers don&#8217;t put in decent seats. Saab and Volvo have done it for years, and German car seats are generally quite good, too. I&#8217;ve had German or Swedish cars for 40 years and find domestics and Japanese cars sorely lacking (pardon the pun) in the seat department. There are exceptions, but darn few.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m told seats are expensive to engineer and build, something I find hard to believe since there&#8217;s not a whole lot of technology involved and how to make them is well known. IMHO it&#8217;s just something most manufacturer&#8217;s don&#8217;t care about. And that makes me not care about buying their cars. I&#8217;ve walked out of dealerships because the seats in models I&#8217;ve been looking at were not up to what I&#8217;ve gotten used to.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdub</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-73708</link>
		<dc:creator>pdub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-73708</guid>
		<description>This vehicle deserves 2 stars - tops.  The one positive described, its roominess, is actually a negative.  The interior is much smaller than it should be.  Put an adult in the backseat and be instantly astounded at how little head and leg room there is in a car as large as this.  Blame the ultra long hood - it&#039;s a terrible car to park.  Also, the creaks and groans also have the familiar GM steering column clunk to go along with them.  I can&#039;t get over what a terrible vehicle this is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This vehicle deserves 2 stars &#8211; tops.  The one positive described, its roominess, is actually a negative.  The interior is much smaller than it should be.  Put an adult in the backseat and be instantly astounded at how little head and leg room there is in a car as large as this.  Blame the ultra long hood &#8211; it&#8217;s a terrible car to park.  Also, the creaks and groans also have the familiar GM steering column clunk to go along with them.  I can&#8217;t get over what a terrible vehicle this is.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajeev Mehta</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-73672</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajeev Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-73672</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I’m used to a Saab turbo with 14 lbs of boost that jumps from 60 to 90, but the GP just eased on up to a higher speed with no eagerness or urgency. It just felt like it had extra power, not what you’d expect from a boosted motor.&lt;/em&gt;

Noley: what you noted is typical of a low boost, roots-type supercharger. They make awesome amounts of torque, but HP is not their strong point. (unlike most turbo applications) 

I&#039;m pretty sure the blown 3.8L doesn&#039;t churn out 14psi from the factory, but you can get it there and make highway passing a lot more interesting. Once you do that (and address the weak points of the FWD layout) I&#039;ve seen GTPs run 12s in the quarter mile. That&#039;s seriously fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>I’m used to a Saab turbo with 14 lbs of boost that jumps from 60 to 90, but the GP just eased on up to a higher speed with no eagerness or urgency. It just felt like it had extra power, not what you’d expect from a boosted motor.</em></p>
<p>Noley: what you noted is typical of a low boost, roots-type supercharger. They make awesome amounts of torque, but HP is not their strong point. (unlike most turbo applications) </p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure the blown 3.8L doesn&#8217;t churn out 14psi from the factory, but you can get it there and make highway passing a lot more interesting. Once you do that (and address the weak points of the FWD layout) I&#8217;ve seen GTPs run 12s in the quarter mile. That&#8217;s seriously fast.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davey49</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-73642</link>
		<dc:creator>davey49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-73642</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to figure out where everyone got the idea that Pontiacs are sports cars. When I was growing up we had a 1972 Pontiac Grand Safari wagon. Definitely unsporty. I suppose they had the Firebird and Fiero and now the Solstice but nearly every car company has their pseudo-sporty models. They were vastly outnumbered by Catalinas, Bonnevilles, Grand Ams, Grand Prixs, Safaris and Sunbirds.
Anyone remember the Ventura?
I think if they made a retro Grand Prix they should copy the 1969 model</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m trying to figure out where everyone got the idea that Pontiacs are sports cars. When I was growing up we had a 1972 Pontiac Grand Safari wagon. Definitely unsporty. I suppose they had the Firebird and Fiero and now the Solstice but nearly every car company has their pseudo-sporty models. They were vastly outnumbered by Catalinas, Bonnevilles, Grand Ams, Grand Prixs, Safaris and Sunbirds.<br />
Anyone remember the Ventura?<br />
I think if they made a retro Grand Prix they should copy the 1969 model<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashy Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-73602</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashy Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-73602</guid>
		<description>Regardsing the GP seats, they were not the usual horrible GM foam, but they were not good.

When carmakers like Volvo can create incredibly comfortable, supportive, throne-like seats in their cars, why can&#039;t GM get with the program?  Of all the things to cost-cut, why go for the one thing that is most likely to make people happy -- comfy seats?  Chrysler and Ford are also incredibly guilty here.  I tend to find the Japanese of varying quality, and the Germans are good if you opt for sport seats, but base seats in German cars are barely a step above coach class airlines seats.

Whenever I car shop I rule out scads of cars based simply on the fact that my back and a** can&#039;t stand to sit more than ten minutes in them whethout aching, let along 5-8 hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Regardsing the GP seats, they were not the usual horrible GM foam, but they were not good.</p>
<p>When carmakers like Volvo can create incredibly comfortable, supportive, throne-like seats in their cars, why can&#8217;t GM get with the program?  Of all the things to cost-cut, why go for the one thing that is most likely to make people happy &#8212; comfy seats?  Chrysler and Ford are also incredibly guilty here.  I tend to find the Japanese of varying quality, and the Germans are good if you opt for sport seats, but base seats in German cars are barely a step above coach class airlines seats.</p>
<p>Whenever I car shop I rule out scads of cars based simply on the fact that my back and a** can&#8217;t stand to sit more than ten minutes in them whethout aching, let along 5-8 hours.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indi500fan</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-73564</link>
		<dc:creator>indi500fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-73564</guid>
		<description>My two favorite engines are the GM 3800 and the Jeep 4.0 (now China only).

You can have all the aluminum parts, camshafts and valves you want, I&#039;ll take cast iron.

My lawn tractor is a one lung Cub Cadet Kohler iron flathead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My two favorite engines are the GM 3800 and the Jeep 4.0 (now China only).</p>
<p>You can have all the aluminum parts, camshafts and valves you want, I&#8217;ll take cast iron.</p>
<p>My lawn tractor is a one lung Cub Cadet Kohler iron flathead.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stimpy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-73545</link>
		<dc:creator>stimpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-73545</guid>
		<description>It is forgivable that GM wishes to limp across the finish line with this car, albeit in last place, as they were never competing seriously in this race in the first place.  Clearly, this is one car in need of discontinuation and discontinued it shall soon be.  Mercifully.  So why bother putting a DIME into the thing for its last model year?  If there are suckers out there who somehow can bring themselves to purchase the thing, so be it.  I only hope they get a smokin&#039; deal on it.

Yes, the &quot;preformance&quot; marque at GM is an entirely hollow proposition.  Yes, this vehicle is rental fleet fodder.  What else do you expect from such a struggling brand?  Perhaps this is yet another brand that GM plans to kill off.  Clearly, Pontiac hasn&#039;t meant much of anything for decades now, other than retarded design and execution.  I have never been so repulsed by any other brand&#039;s interior and exterior design.  Never mind how it drives, because you could never get me in one.  I have never seen a more clueless attempt at &quot;performance&quot; styling and execution than what Pontiac has crapped out, year after year, for as long as I can remember.

I don&#039;t even blame GM&#039;s engineers.  They are undoubtedly struggling along, with no leadership, no budget, no direction.   Rather, GM has some real lackluster folks in their marketing department, that&#039;s for sure.  And their auto stylists ain&#039;t so hot, either.  If you&#039;re going to just re-skin an aging platform that screams third-rate status, at least do it in a compelling way!  I don&#039;t care if it&#039;s retro or futuristic or outlandish, or whatever.  Just don&#039;t put out another bloated Circus Peanut-looking monstrosity (with bulging this and humpbacked that) and have these blaring, &quot;performance&quot;-oriented commercials with the Matt Dillon voice-over, pretending like you&#039;ve got this line-up of bad ass rides.  It&#039;s just kinda embarrassing and sad that this huge flagship manufacturer, with such a rich history, has come to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It is forgivable that GM wishes to limp across the finish line with this car, albeit in last place, as they were never competing seriously in this race in the first place.  Clearly, this is one car in need of discontinuation and discontinued it shall soon be.  Mercifully.  So why bother putting a DIME into the thing for its last model year?  If there are suckers out there who somehow can bring themselves to purchase the thing, so be it.  I only hope they get a smokin&#8217; deal on it.</p>
<p>Yes, the &#8220;preformance&#8221; marque at GM is an entirely hollow proposition.  Yes, this vehicle is rental fleet fodder.  What else do you expect from such a struggling brand?  Perhaps this is yet another brand that GM plans to kill off.  Clearly, Pontiac hasn&#8217;t meant much of anything for decades now, other than retarded design and execution.  I have never been so repulsed by any other brand&#8217;s interior and exterior design.  Never mind how it drives, because you could never get me in one.  I have never seen a more clueless attempt at &#8220;performance&#8221; styling and execution than what Pontiac has crapped out, year after year, for as long as I can remember.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even blame GM&#8217;s engineers.  They are undoubtedly struggling along, with no leadership, no budget, no direction.   Rather, GM has some real lackluster folks in their marketing department, that&#8217;s for sure.  And their auto stylists ain&#8217;t so hot, either.  If you&#8217;re going to just re-skin an aging platform that screams third-rate status, at least do it in a compelling way!  I don&#8217;t care if it&#8217;s retro or futuristic or outlandish, or whatever.  Just don&#8217;t put out another bloated Circus Peanut-looking monstrosity (with bulging this and humpbacked that) and have these blaring, &#8220;performance&#8221;-oriented commercials with the Matt Dillon voice-over, pretending like you&#8217;ve got this line-up of bad ass rides.  It&#8217;s just kinda embarrassing and sad that this huge flagship manufacturer, with such a rich history, has come to this.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fallout11</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-73537</link>
		<dc:creator>fallout11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-73537</guid>
		<description>Tiger Commanche said:
&quot;I can’t believe I just read “pushrod” and “fI can’t believe I just read “pushrod” and “four speed automatic” in a new car review in 2007. It’s like we went back in time to the early ’90s. What’s next? Will I turn on the TV and see that O.J. Simpson has been arrested?&quot;

I could not agree more.
My friend, the 3800 V6 dates to 1988, and shares much in common with the ancient 231cu Buick 3.8L it was based on, dating back to the mid 1970&#039;s (eg 1975 Skyhawk, Apollo, Century, Regal, Skylark), right down to its 90 degree layout.

What decade are we in?  
Why can&#039;t Pontiac ditch corrugated plastic?  
Or the 1000 tiny plastic buttons and knobs that fill the cockpit?
Drum brakes in a &#039;performance&#039; car?
Or the chronic understeer?
Sheesh!

Damaged brand, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Tiger Commanche said:<br />
&#8220;I can’t believe I just read “pushrod” and “fI can’t believe I just read “pushrod” and “four speed automatic” in a new car review in 2007. It’s like we went back in time to the early ’90s. What’s next? Will I turn on the TV and see that O.J. Simpson has been arrested?&#8221;</p>
<p>I could not agree more.<br />
My friend, the 3800 V6 dates to 1988, and shares much in common with the ancient 231cu Buick 3.8L it was based on, dating back to the mid 1970&#8217;s (eg 1975 Skyhawk, Apollo, Century, Regal, Skylark), right down to its 90 degree layout.</p>
<p>What decade are we in?<br />
Why can&#8217;t Pontiac ditch corrugated plastic?<br />
Or the 1000 tiny plastic buttons and knobs that fill the cockpit?<br />
Drum brakes in a &#8216;performance&#8217; car?<br />
Or the chronic understeer?<br />
Sheesh!</p>
<p>Damaged brand, indeed.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: durailer</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-73524</link>
		<dc:creator>durailer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-73524</guid>
		<description>This post might be a little off topic, but on the subject of reviving Pontiac from it&#039;s mediocrity, this website has shown the way in past editorials. Performance is easy to understand amongst the buying public. TTAC has said that Pontiac should RWD everything and keep improving the Solstice. The G8 will be a step in the right direction.

Here&#039;s something I&#039;d like to add to the debate: make Pontiac GM&#039;s TUNERZ division. Design platforms so that they are simple and serviceable (RWD). Clean up the junk under the hood -those ancient GM crate-engines will find a home here. Keep costs down by avoiding techno-gizmos (leave those for another division), and cultivate a wide range of after-market parts (at a premium price). Offer base models as stripper cars for future hot-rod customization.

Think of converting &#039;68 Tempests into fake (but desirable) GTOs and you get the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This post might be a little off topic, but on the subject of reviving Pontiac from it&#8217;s mediocrity, this website has shown the way in past editorials. Performance is easy to understand amongst the buying public. TTAC has said that Pontiac should RWD everything and keep improving the Solstice. The G8 will be a step in the right direction.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s something I&#8217;d like to add to the debate: make Pontiac GM&#8217;s TUNERZ division. Design platforms so that they are simple and serviceable (RWD). Clean up the junk under the hood -those ancient GM crate-engines will find a home here. Keep costs down by avoiding techno-gizmos (leave those for another division), and cultivate a wide range of after-market parts (at a premium price). Offer base models as stripper cars for future hot-rod customization.</p>
<p>Think of converting &#8216;68 Tempests into fake (but desirable) GTOs and you get the idea.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Jefferson</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/pontiac-grand-prix-review/comment-page-2/#comment-73510</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Jefferson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=5343#comment-73510</guid>
		<description>I see Grand Prixs falling apart at red lights in my town.  Faded plastics, parts flapping in the wind, not enough owner pride to even wash the thing once per year.

One of the housekeepers here at work showed up in a new Grand Prix.  She was so proud.  We all felt sorry or her ignorance.  It&#039;s been a constant source of suffering and horror for her.  She now hates it.  We tried to warn her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I see Grand Prixs falling apart at red lights in my town.  Faded plastics, parts flapping in the wind, not enough owner pride to even wash the thing once per year.</p>
<p>One of the housekeepers here at work showed up in a new Grand Prix.  She was so proud.  We all felt sorry or her ignorance.  It&#8217;s been a constant source of suffering and horror for her.  She now hates it.  We tried to warn her.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 47/159 queries in 0.138 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-23 00:10:40 -->