By Edward Niedermeyer on March 5, 2008

dodge_caliber_se_2007_dashboard_dashboard_640×480.jpgPlastech may not have done so well in the plastics molding business lately, but it sure knows how to play the doormat with aplomb. In a touchingly "stand-by-your-man" moment, Plastech General Counsel Kelvin Scott confirmed yesterday that the bankrupt firm would continue supplying Chrysler with parts "indefinitely." This announcement comes despite the fact that the Pentastarred lawyers are currently working on their second attempt to legally extricate the very tooling Plastech uses to produce Chrysler parts. So why is Plastech eliminating the threat of work stoppages at Chrysler plants and thereby losing all of its negotiation leverage? Is it playing nice for Judge Shefferly, who has already staved-off round one of Chrysler's legal predation? Our theory? Plastech knows it's products are of such poor quality that the best way to hurt Chrysler is to keep 'em rolling into their plants. Just kidding. I think.

5 Comments on “Plastech To Supply Chrysler “Indefinitely”...”


  • Orian
    Orian

    Color me confused.

    http://www.plastecheng.com/

    Is this the same Plastech in question here? If so they seem to do reasonably well on their Ford F-150 and Lincoln plastic bits.

  • Landcrusher
    Landcrusher

    In order to understand a member of the bar, you have to BE a member of the bar.

    What did he NOT say? What parts of what he said are out of his control? What parts of what he said are actionable? Could he be in any way harmed if he anything he said is false? Would he be liable if he promised anything he could not deliver? Intentionally does not deliver? etc.

    IOW. He said diddly.

  • ScottGSO
    ScottGSO

    “So why is Plastech eliminating the threat of work stoppages at Chrysler plants and thereby losing all of its negotiation leverage? Is it playing nice for Judge Shefferly, who has already staved-off round one of Chrysler’s legal predation?”

    The whole point of Chrysler’s motion in the BR proceeding was to get back their tools. Plastech fought it saying we can’t reorganize without the tools, which can only be used to supply Chysler. If Plastech says to Chrysler “we’re not going to supply you anymore” or even hints at it, the rationale for preventing Chrysler to grab back their tools disappears and Chrysler gets want they wanted in the first place. IOW, Plastech cannot play hardball with Chrysler without the BR judge lifting the stay and allowing Chrysler to get their tools back.

  • Mike66Chryslers
    Mike66Chryslers

    Indefinitely means for an unknown amount of time, not an infinite amount of time.

    I could see the judge ruling more in Plastech’s favor (ie: they get to keep the tooling) if they act in good faith towards Chrysler.

  • Doug
    dougw

    It would do everybody good to see the AutolineDetroit segment from last week on plastics surfacing, and hear what the Chrysler interiors fellow says about the current state-of-the art of making lovable interior surfaces. It is quite eye opening and fascinating stuff. The bottom line is that it is all about incredibly intricate etching of the die surfaces.

    If I can say it here, they have a website where you can see the archived video.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can also login using Facebook Connect. Connect with Facebook

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Cadillac: What Is This GM You Speak Of?

    TriShield - I wouldn’t call any of the Japanese luxury brands “world-class”. Lexus doesn’t sell well outside of the US, even at home in...
  • Re: Curbside Classic: 1976 Toyota Corolla Liftback

    Robert.Walter - That’s because Brake-Overide does not prevent SUA, and absence of Brake-Overide does not guarantee SUA. The prevention and cause of SUA...
  • Re: New Titan-Based Nissan Vans Debut

    Dimwit - That actually might have legs. The Econoline is ancient but decent but the GM van is a danger to all. The Sprinter is heading for the orphanage. MB through...
  • Re: Power: What Is It Good For?

    porschespeed - @psarjinian, Perhaps this will solve your dilemma. Take “Stadium Pal” and remove the bag (or just get a condom cath like we did in the old days)....
  • Re: Power: What Is It Good For?

    Chuck Goolsbee - Gasp! A Diesel-positive story on TTAC! Surely the end is nigh! krhodes1 is right. With stock fuel tanks the CDI would have arrived about 45 minutes before the...
  • Re: Power: What Is It Good For?

    wsn - Well, to extend the point, if an E63 AMG isn’t any better (in real life driving) than an E200 CDI, at more than double the price, in the US, is an E350 any better...
  • Re: Power: What Is It Good For?

    carguy - I agree – the power wars have led to some car so over powered that it detracts from their drivability. Some of the blame needs to go to the automotive...
  • Re: Cadillac: What Is This GM You Speak Of?

    Dimwit - You all know that this “radical reworking” will change once again when they do another shuffle. It’s a joke but nobody’s laughing.
  • Re: Curbside Classic: 1976 Toyota Corolla Liftback

    Robert.Walter - Bob Elton wrote elsewhere on ttac, that from his time at GM he recalls that GM took special care to develop this off-set pedal relationship.
  • Re: Cadillac: What Is This GM You Speak Of?

    gslippy - If you remember the Cimarron, then Cimarron II will be the Converj, based upon the upcoming Chevy Volt. I don’t think people will want a $60k...

 


Auto Insurance GPS Navigation
Car Loans Auto Parts
Car Warranty Wheels
Automotive Tires Car Care