Comments on: OK Then, What’s Wrong with THIS Picture?

By: CRConrad

CRConrad — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:14:11 +0000

Easy: Those Ford Mondeo rear lights are mounted upside down.

By: IOtheworldaliving

IOtheworldaliving — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:43:18 +0000

@Bruce: I downloaded the pic and zoomed in and there’s not enough resolution to see what’s there. For all I know there’s a matching plate on the front and they both say 3M TA3.

By: Bruce Banner

Bruce Banner — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:23:30 +0000

Is there some kind of sex add on the license plate?

By: maniceightball

maniceightball — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:20:39 +0000

So, RF, what is it? I’m stumped, personally.

By: Durishin

Durishin — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:47:04 +0000

RF, I think we have a winner:

“..there is a car in the picture and the photo was taken too far away from the Subject”

By: Facebook User

Facebook User — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:45:55 +0000

The ugly car is distracting? Poor lighting? A photographer that doesn’t understand lighting? A car designer that doesn’t understand complimentary colors? Stop me when I get to the “right” answer.

By: dougjp

dougjp — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:29:46 +0000

Two things – there is a car in the picture and the photo was taken too far away from the Subject.

By: Blunozer

Blunozer — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:22:37 +0000

From “The 40 Year-Old Virgin”

Steve Carrell: There’s something wrong with her underwear!

Seth Rogan: Yeah, they’re not in my mouth…

By: barberoux

barberoux — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:38:10 +0000

The dress is shapeless and ugly. The model is not. The car’s rear is garish and looks like it was treated to aftermarket stick-on plastic panels from JC Whitney. The model’s rear is not shown. White is not a good color for the car. The hall is empty. The overall shape of the car is appealing but the black out details look really cheap. Maserati got a good deal on rear lights from Hyundai.

By: matthewsimmons

matthewsimmons — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:29:06 +0000

She is wearing two ankle monitors both there from her grand theft auto charges, and she’s standing next to a Maserati that I’m guessing isn’t her own.

By: stepon

stepon — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:06:25 +0000

Isn’t Maserati supposed to stay dignified and leave the gold chains and hair jell to Ferrari? Like Clarkson said, ‘If you’re an Italian car, going faster than a Ferrari would be like throwing up in the Pope’s lap’ (paraphrased). I would have to agree in this case. Birdcage meets Rice-rocket is almost grotesque I feel.

As for the lady, the lighting/shadow along with the blue tint make her look like Bizzaro, muscle bound and wearing a satin potato bag only reinforces this impression. Though as a branding message, classy athletic girl = classy athletic car hopefully works better in person.

Hey, froggy, what’s the deal with the “Where’s Waldo” gimmick? Seems to be working, got me off the wall.

By: DearS

DearS — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:32:38 +0000

Whats up with her modesty, she ought to be naked in the car feeling the leather against her skin. I swear women started wearing clothing around the time the wheel was invented. I feel forced to become a better person, I wanna negotiate some things with her.

By: thoots

thoots — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:58:02 +0000

No headlights.

By: charleywhiskey

charleywhiskey — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:53:01 +0000

The blonde with the lug wrench is gone.

By: ZoomZoom

ZoomZoom — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:58:02 +0000

Not enough leg!

Half-seriously, you guys have it all wrong. Although her outfit may not be as flattering to her middle as it could be, it’s all there and it’s plenty enough for any real man with an eye, experience, and the imagination of anything smarter than a goldfish!

No, I’ll tell ya’ll, the thing wrong is that her beautiful smile is obscured by shadow. For shame!

Plus, the “enlarged” pic is no bigger than the thumbnail. WTF, indeed!

By: gpatmac

gpatmac — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:13:46 +0000

The video on the big screens is showing footage of the model from earlier when she was supporting herself with both hands while bent over the car…inspecting its marvelous finish?

By: Durishin

Durishin — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:11:37 +0000

Where to start…

Black wheels and sill panel on a Maser? Modena, not LA!

Cheap satin sack dress on the model makes her stomach look bigger than her breasts, but guarantees a shot in “What not to wear”

Love the ankle shackle thing.

Best “wrong” though are the woman’s hands “calling Tokyo” on the flat panels in the back.

By: victoriacoffees

victoriacoffees — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:58:01 +0000

There’s no one there…

By: willman

willman — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:52:24 +0000

-She’s wearing anything else besides shoes?

By: chuckR

chuckR — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:46:24 +0000

Well, the car has three portholes in the fender, so it must be one of those Chinese Buicks. That’s just wrong, isn’t it?

By: Sajeev Mehta

Sajeev Mehta — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:40:03 +0000

Spoiler? I just met her!

By: MrCrumbles

MrCrumbles — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:15:55 +0000

It’s a tranny, and I’m not talking about the gearbox.

By: mtypex

mtypex — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:14:35 +0000

The problem is that this kind of photo is not in line with the New Depression Sensibility. Or, maybe it is. Carry on.

By: Your old pal Bob

Your old pal Bob — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:59:45 +0000

She’s wearing a sack and she locked her keys in the car. She’s only smiling because the photographer is wearing AAA uniform.

[needlessly crass joke alert:] “Is that a slim jim in your pocket?” [/crass]

By: enicideme

enicideme — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:58:55 +0000

That car would look awesome in black or at least a darker color. Looks bad in white, imho.