Montezemolo Out As Fiat Moves Towards Auto Spin-Off

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: April 20th, 2010

montezemolo out as fiat moves towards auto spin off

Fiat Chairman Luca Cordero Di Montezemolo will be leaving the firm to pursue a career in Italian politics, according to Automotive News [sub]. Montezemolo will remain on Fiat’s board, and will continue to serve as chairman of Ferrari, but he will be replaced atop the Fiat empire by vice-chairman and Agnelli family heir John Elkann. Fiat’s shares rallied considerably this morning, according to Bloomberg Businessweek, but not because Montezemolo is on the way out. Rather, Fiat has finally announced the news that speculators have been waiting patiently for: the firm now confirms that it plans to spin off its auto business.

Details of the spin-off are not immediately available, as Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne will not be presenting Fiat’s five-year plan until tomorrow. The spin-off is almost certain to center around Fiat, Abarth, Alfa-Romeo, and Lancia, although it appears that there may be a chance that Maserati could be bundled with Fiat Auto as well, despite being traditionally run as part of Ferrari. Fiat’s other industrial ventures, including its farm- and heavy-equipment manufacturing as well as its Iveco commercial vehicle unit will remain behind with the conglomerate. The main benefit of spinning-off Fiat’s auto business lays in future alliances: with a smaller market cap than the entire Fiat empire, a Fiat Auto unit could more easily enter equity exchanges and other alliances. Already holding a 20 percent stake in Chrysler (with up to 35 percent available for free), Fiat will likely use the spin-off to pursue greater control over the Auburn Hills-based automaker. And with Fiat’s auto business already generating half of the sprawling Fiat Group’s revenue according to the NYT, Marchionne clearly expects the newly spun-off unit to be leaner and more profitable. For now though, the most important variable in the future of Fiat auto isn’t even its spin-off or the replacement of its Chairman. Breaking Chrysler’s downward slump is key to Marchionne’s 5m-unit global survival strategy, and the gambit is far from paying off.

#Alfa #Chrysler #Ferarri #Fiat #HighFinance #Industry #Lancia #LucaDiMontezemolo #SergioMarchionne

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 10 comments

Robert Schwartz on Apr 20, 2010

I see the hands of the parent company trying to throw the cargo overboard as the storm rages. Fiat-Chrysler is roadkill and they want it to go under without them. P.S. It was Johnny's brother who had the "adventures".

Like Reply
Fred schumacher on May 13, 2010

Until China took over, the U.S. was the world's largest car market, and Fiat got back into it for a song. There really wasn't much risk for Fiat. For Chrysler there was no choice. Daimler had ruined what was once a profitable and fast-to-market car company. It's easy to make jokes about the reliability of older Chryslers and Fiats, but that's not backed by reality. The most common old vehicles on the road today, other than domestic pickups, are Mopar minivans. And today's Fiats have cutting edge technology and reliability. Gas prices are going back up. They're over $3 in many states, and small cars will be looking good again.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Wolfwagen Pennsylvania - Two long straights, 1 medium straight, 1 super short straight and a bunch of curves all on one end
Haze3 EV median weight is in the range of 4500-5500lbs, similar to the low end of full size pickup trucks and SUV's or typical mid-size PU's and SUV's. Obviously, EV Hummers and PU's are heavier but, on average, EV=PU or mid/full SUV is about right. EV's currently account for ~1% of the cars on the road. PU's account for 17% and SUV's count for over 40%. If we take out light SUV's, then call it 30% SUV or so. So, large-ish PU's and SUV's, together, account for ~50% of the US fleet vs 1% for EV's. As such, the fleet is ALREADY heavy. The problem is that EV's will be making the currently lighter 50% heavier, not that PU/SUV haven't already done most of the damage on avg mass.Sure, the issue is real but EV responsibility is not. If you want to get after heavies, that means getting after PU/SUV's (the current problem by 40-50x) first and foremost.
Redapple2 Telluride over Acadian (sic-tip cap-canada). 1 better car. 2 60 % us/can content vs 39 THIRTY NINE for an "American" car. 3 no UAW labor. Smart people drive Tellurides. Not so smart for the GMC. Dont support the Evil GM Vampire.!
Theflyersfan My dad had a 1998 C280 that was rock solid reliable until around 80,000 miles and then it wasn't. Corey might develop a slight right eyelid twitch right about now, but it started with a sunroof that leaked. And the water likely damaged some electric components because soon after the leaks developed, the sunroof stopped working. And then the electrical gremlins took hold. Displays that flickered at times, lights that sometimes decided illumination was for wimps so stayed home, and then the single wiper issue. That thing decided to eat motors. He loved that car but knew when to fold the hand. So he bought a lightly used, off lease E-class. Had that for less than two years before he was ready to leave it in South Philly, keys in the ignition, doors unlocked, and a "Take it please" sign on the windshield. He won't touch another Benz now.
Detlump A lot of people buy SUVs because they're easier to get in and out of. After decades of longer, lower, wider it was refreshing to have easier ingress/egress offered by an SUV.Ironically, the ease of getting in and out of my Highlander is very similar to my 56 Cadillac.