<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of&#8230; Regular Gas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:47:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: darcyb62</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-543031</link>
		<dc:creator>darcyb62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-543031</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clarifying Mike66Chryslers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Thanks for clarifying Mike66Chryslers.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike66Chryslers</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-542122</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike66Chryslers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-542122</guid>
		<description>@pman: There are many variables in engine design, aside from simply the compression ratio, that will determine how tolerant it will be to running on lower octane fuel.

@darcyb62: There is no &quot;octane sensor&quot; as such.  What you are referring to is the engine knock sensor.  If the computer doesn&#039;t detect any preignition (knock) it will advance the ignition timing, which will increase available torque.

@westhighgoalie: If you want to increase CR, you may be able to get a thinner head gasket, or remove the cylinder head(s) and have an engine machine shop remove some material from the face, or disassemble the engine and replace the pistons.  A good starting place would be to find an enthusiast website for these motorcycles and inquire there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@pman: There are many variables in engine design, aside from simply the compression ratio, that will determine how tolerant it will be to running on lower octane fuel.</p>
<p>@darcyb62: There is no &#8220;octane sensor&#8221; as such.  What you are referring to is the engine knock sensor.  If the computer doesn&#8217;t detect any preignition (knock) it will advance the ignition timing, which will increase available torque.</p>
<p>@westhighgoalie: If you want to increase CR, you may be able to get a thinner head gasket, or remove the cylinder head(s) and have an engine machine shop remove some material from the face, or disassemble the engine and replace the pistons.  A good starting place would be to find an enthusiast website for these motorcycles and inquire there.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: westhighgoalie</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-541752</link>
		<dc:creator>westhighgoalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-541752</guid>
		<description>I have a question, I have a honda motorcycle (Honda Shadow VT1100) Its a simple twin carb set up.... Can I alter the engines compression ratio&#039;s to get better performance... I don&#039;t want to get a bigger bike for a little more horsepower!  A Turbo perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I have a question, I have a honda motorcycle (Honda Shadow VT1100) Its a simple twin carb set up&#8230;. Can I alter the engines compression ratio&#8217;s to get better performance&#8230; I don&#8217;t want to get a bigger bike for a little more horsepower!  A Turbo perhaps?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darcyb62</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-541732</link>
		<dc:creator>darcyb62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-541732</guid>
		<description>My 2008 Mustang Bullitt has a sensor for octane and adjusts timing appropriately.  Using a higher octane will provide a bump in torque.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My 2008 Mustang Bullitt has a sensor for octane and adjusts timing appropriately.  Using a higher octane will provide a bump in torque.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: limmin</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-541081</link>
		<dc:creator>limmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-541081</guid>
		<description>This subject has been constantly debated on the internet for a decade.

But this article is the most useful and informative I&#039;ve yet seen. Nicely done.

I can&#039;t see the logic in using premium for any pushrod engine...but I&#039;m no expert. It&#039;s funny that few seem to buy the mid-grade. It&#039;s either 87 or 93.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This subject has been constantly debated on the internet for a decade.</p>
<p>But this article is the most useful and informative I&#8217;ve yet seen. Nicely done.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see the logic in using premium for any pushrod engine&#8230;but I&#8217;m no expert. It&#8217;s funny that few seem to buy the mid-grade. It&#8217;s either 87 or 93.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kluttz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-539921</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kluttz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-539921</guid>
		<description>MM:

&lt;em&gt;On the other side, a Honda Accord is set up to use 87 octane. The environment inside Accord cylinders is not going push that fuel beyond its limits, so it can’t take advantage of the extra resilience of the more expensive brew. It’s added cost with no added advantage. Who wants to waste an extra cent on their fuel?&lt;/em&gt;

Honda Accords (at least the one I drive, a 2001 EX) have a knock sensor.  I had one replaced under warranty.  And YES, it DOES make a noticeable difference in this case.  Same goes for my 1988 Grand Prix with knock sensor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->MM:</p>
<p><em>On the other side, a Honda Accord is set up to use 87 octane. The environment inside Accord cylinders is not going push that fuel beyond its limits, so it can’t take advantage of the extra resilience of the more expensive brew. It’s added cost with no added advantage. Who wants to waste an extra cent on their fuel?</em></p>
<p>Honda Accords (at least the one I drive, a 2001 EX) have a knock sensor.  I had one replaced under warranty.  And YES, it DOES make a noticeable difference in this case.  Same goes for my 1988 Grand Prix with knock sensor.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 50merc</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-539511</link>
		<dc:creator>50merc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-539511</guid>
		<description>Gottleib said, &quot;My favorite gasoline back then was sold in the midwest and had a Dinosaur on the sign.&quot;

You must be thinking of Sinclair, the company founded by famed oilman Harry Sinclair, who spent six months in prison on contempt of court charges related to the Teapot Dome scandal during the Harding administration. The green dinosaur&#039;s name is, naturally, Dino.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Gottleib said, &#8220;My favorite gasoline back then was sold in the midwest and had a Dinosaur on the sign.&#8221;</p>
<p>You must be thinking of Sinclair, the company founded by famed oilman Harry Sinclair, who spent six months in prison on contempt of court charges related to the Teapot Dome scandal during the Harding administration. The green dinosaur&#8217;s name is, naturally, Dino.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Holzman</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-538881</link>
		<dc:creator>David Holzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-538881</guid>
		<description>Very interesting editorial</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Very interesting editorial<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ruddell</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-538612</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ruddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-538612</guid>
		<description>Regarding the chemistry of this whole business, n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (the longer the hydrocarbon chain, the lower the octane rating).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Regarding the chemistry of this whole business, n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (the longer the hydrocarbon chain, the lower the octane rating).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pman</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-538282</link>
		<dc:creator>pman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-538282</guid>
		<description>I think that in many instances manufacturers&#039; calls to use premium is a crock. Why does a BMW 328 with a compression ratio of 10.8:1 call for premium but a CTS with a compression of 11.4:1 NOT need premium? The CTS produces more hp per liter on regular gas and with a higher compression ratio than the BMW on premium. The CTS proves that a high compression engine can be tuned to produce high power using regular gas. When BMW, Lexus, Infiniti and other companies require premium in engines with less compression than the CTS engine, they&#039;re either doing it for image reasons, or they could have tuned the car to use regular with no loss of performance but chose not to, or they need to revisit their engine control technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think that in many instances manufacturers&#8217; calls to use premium is a crock. Why does a BMW 328 with a compression ratio of 10.8:1 call for premium but a CTS with a compression of 11.4:1 NOT need premium? The CTS produces more hp per liter on regular gas and with a higher compression ratio than the BMW on premium. The CTS proves that a high compression engine can be tuned to produce high power using regular gas. When BMW, Lexus, Infiniti and other companies require premium in engines with less compression than the CTS engine, they&#8217;re either doing it for image reasons, or they could have tuned the car to use regular with no loss of performance but chose not to, or they need to revisit their engine control technology.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thoots</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-538241</link>
		<dc:creator>thoots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-538241</guid>
		<description>E10 is required in my area -- it&#039;ll be mandatory state-wide within a few more months.

It seems to me that the ethanol in E10 could be considered &quot;the super additive&quot; -- surely, nothing will clean your fuel system as well as 10% ethanol in your gasoline, right?

So, if the difference between &quot;Tier 1&quot; and any other brand of gasoline lies all in the additive packages, then with E10 in the equation, &quot;all bets are off.&quot;  Anything with E10 ought to clean the begeesuz out of your fuel system.  So, buy the cheapest stuff you can find, and &quot;Don&#039;t worry, be happy.&quot;

Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->E10 is required in my area &#8212; it&#8217;ll be mandatory state-wide within a few more months.</p>
<p>It seems to me that the ethanol in E10 could be considered &#8220;the super additive&#8221; &#8212; surely, nothing will clean your fuel system as well as 10% ethanol in your gasoline, right?</p>
<p>So, if the difference between &#8220;Tier 1&#8243; and any other brand of gasoline lies all in the additive packages, then with E10 in the equation, &#8220;all bets are off.&#8221;  Anything with E10 ought to clean the begeesuz out of your fuel system.  So, buy the cheapest stuff you can find, and &#8220;Don&#8217;t worry, be happy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gottleib</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-538142</link>
		<dc:creator>Gottleib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-538142</guid>
		<description>In my childhood it was regular or ethyl.  Then Richfield out west added a high test called Boron.  Of course back then the difference in cost was just pennies.  29.9 for regular, 31.9 for ethyl, and 33.9 for Boron.  What exactly is Boron anyway?  

Richfield became Arco which I think is now Exxon.  

My favorite gasoline back then was sold in the midwest and had a Dinosaur on the sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->In my childhood it was regular or ethyl.  Then Richfield out west added a high test called Boron.  Of course back then the difference in cost was just pennies.  29.9 for regular, 31.9 for ethyl, and 33.9 for Boron.  What exactly is Boron anyway?  </p>
<p>Richfield became Arco which I think is now Exxon.  </p>
<p>My favorite gasoline back then was sold in the midwest and had a Dinosaur on the sign.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronin</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-538082</link>
		<dc:creator>ronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-538082</guid>
		<description>I know someone who used 100% premium in a G35 until last summer.  Then they switched to regular every third fill-up.

Last winter they ramped it to regular every other fill-up.

Now they only do premium every third fill-up.

No discerned effect whatsoever in acceleration.  No knocking ever, including under heavier load.  No change in mpg.

There are lots of internet people who will warn of dire effects, but I would really like to hear their empirical, tested results.  The case I&#039;m citing is an actual tested result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I know someone who used 100% premium in a G35 until last summer.  Then they switched to regular every third fill-up.</p>
<p>Last winter they ramped it to regular every other fill-up.</p>
<p>Now they only do premium every third fill-up.</p>
<p>No discerned effect whatsoever in acceleration.  No knocking ever, including under heavier load.  No change in mpg.</p>
<p>There are lots of internet people who will warn of dire effects, but I would really like to hear their empirical, tested results.  The case I&#8217;m citing is an actual tested result.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-538052</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-538052</guid>
		<description>RTZ, as I understand discussions  on  this  subject on BITOG, tankers carry just 87 and 93 octane. Intermediate grades are  blended at  the pump. 
 Additive packs are added  to individual tanker loads of generic gas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->RTZ, as I understand discussions  on  this  subject on BITOG, tankers carry just 87 and 93 octane. Intermediate grades are  blended at  the pump.<br />
 Additive packs are added  to individual tanker loads of generic gas<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morea</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-538041</link>
		<dc:creator>Morea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-538041</guid>
		<description>Not to be excessively pedantic, but the editorial should be edited for conciseness, to wit:

&quot;Octane (a.k.a. 2,2,4 trimethylpentane)&quot;

Should read &quot;&lt;em&gt;iso-&lt;/em&gt;Octane (a.k.a. 2,2,4 trimethylpentane)&quot;

(This was already pointed out by a previous psoter.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Not to be excessively pedantic, but the editorial should be edited for conciseness, to wit:</p>
<p>&#8220;Octane (a.k.a. 2,2,4 trimethylpentane)&#8221;</p>
<p>Should read &#8220;<em>iso-</em>Octane (a.k.a. 2,2,4 trimethylpentane)&#8221;</p>
<p>(This was already pointed out by a previous psoter.)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bomber991</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-537791</link>
		<dc:creator>bomber991</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-537791</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know where you guys live, but here it seems like there&#039;s a 15 cent difference between regular and midgrade, and then an additional 10 cent difference between mid and premium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I don&#8217;t know where you guys live, but here it seems like there&#8217;s a 15 cent difference between regular and midgrade, and then an additional 10 cent difference between mid and premium.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-537471</link>
		<dc:creator>rtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-537471</guid>
		<description>&quot;A force-fed SAAB asking for 93 octane fuel really needs it&quot;

If it&#039;s got a proper knock sensor, it should detect and compensate(reduce timing) to handle the lower octane fuel.

&quot;On the other side, a Honda Accord is set up to use 87 octane&quot;

You should hear these cars in the summer time driving up my street(I live on a hill).  Ping city.  Pretty bad when I can hear it clearly ~50&#039; away.

---

The gas stations are another matter.  I guess the fuel truck has compartments for the various octanes?  I guess the guy puts the proper fuel in the proper tank at the station?

I wonder how many times they have gotten mixed up?  Accidentally put 87 in the 91 tank.

Has some shady station ever filled all their tanks(87/89/91) with only 87 and sold and advertised the other two grades as usual?

Have you ever been to a station that sold five grades(I have)?  87, 88, 89, 90, 91.  Insanity.  I think the trucks only hold 10,000 gallons.  How many separate tanks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;A force-fed SAAB asking for 93 octane fuel really needs it&#8221;</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s got a proper knock sensor, it should detect and compensate(reduce timing) to handle the lower octane fuel.</p>
<p>&#8220;On the other side, a Honda Accord is set up to use 87 octane&#8221;</p>
<p>You should hear these cars in the summer time driving up my street(I live on a hill).  Ping city.  Pretty bad when I can hear it clearly ~50&#8242; away.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>The gas stations are another matter.  I guess the fuel truck has compartments for the various octanes?  I guess the guy puts the proper fuel in the proper tank at the station?</p>
<p>I wonder how many times they have gotten mixed up?  Accidentally put 87 in the 91 tank.</p>
<p>Has some shady station ever filled all their tanks(87/89/91) with only 87 and sold and advertised the other two grades as usual?</p>
<p>Have you ever been to a station that sold five grades(I have)?  87, 88, 89, 90, 91.  Insanity.  I think the trucks only hold 10,000 gallons.  How many separate tanks?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beelzebubba</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-537401</link>
		<dc:creator>Beelzebubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-537401</guid>
		<description>One of my best friends has an &#039;06 Acura TL that &#039;requires&#039; premium fuel.  When she bought the car in 8/06, gas was in the low $2 range per gallon and the added cost of premium wasn&#039;t so painful to the budget.  

As prices went up, she decided to experiment with lower-octane fuel.  She dropped from 93 (Super) to 89 (Plus) with no noticeable impact on performance, economy and no audible pinging from the engine.  The drop down to 87-octane (Regular) caused some intermittent issues under part-throttle, low-speed acceleration.  So she&#039;s been using 89-octane for the past year or so.  It saves about $.15 per gallon.

I wonder if carmakers will work to make all/most of their vehicles compatible with regular unleaded with current fuel prices?  A few months back, I was considering an &#039;08 Acura TSX until I discovered that it required premium fuel.  After visiting a few Acura enthusiast sites, it seems the TSX was not as forgiving as the TL in it&#039;s appetite for premium. =(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->One of my best friends has an &#8216;06 Acura TL that &#8216;requires&#8217; premium fuel.  When she bought the car in 8/06, gas was in the low $2 range per gallon and the added cost of premium wasn&#8217;t so painful to the budget.  </p>
<p>As prices went up, she decided to experiment with lower-octane fuel.  She dropped from 93 (Super) to 89 (Plus) with no noticeable impact on performance, economy and no audible pinging from the engine.  The drop down to 87-octane (Regular) caused some intermittent issues under part-throttle, low-speed acceleration.  So she&#8217;s been using 89-octane for the past year or so.  It saves about $.15 per gallon.</p>
<p>I wonder if carmakers will work to make all/most of their vehicles compatible with regular unleaded with current fuel prices?  A few months back, I was considering an &#8216;08 Acura TSX until I discovered that it required premium fuel.  After visiting a few Acura enthusiast sites, it seems the TSX was not as forgiving as the TL in it&#8217;s appetite for premium. =(<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-537122</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-537122</guid>
		<description>&quot;After having seen the line of branded tanker trucks lined up for refueling from the same lines while working at several Philly area refineries, I have to disagree about the difference between gasoline brands. I did actually ask one of the petro-engineers what gives. &quot;

They get different gas. Most of the name brand firms get Tier 1 gas while nearly all the discount gas firms get Tier 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;After having seen the line of branded tanker trucks lined up for refueling from the same lines while working at several Philly area refineries, I have to disagree about the difference between gasoline brands. I did actually ask one of the petro-engineers what gives. &#8221;</p>
<p>They get different gas. Most of the name brand firms get Tier 1 gas while nearly all the discount gas firms get Tier 2.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinu Uscatu</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-536911</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinu Uscatu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-536911</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Gardiner Westbound

&lt;/em&gt;I would be interested in learning more about gas in the GTA. Do you have any links for further reading? Thanks!

Dinu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Gardiner Westbound</p>
<p></em>I would be interested in learning more about gas in the GTA. Do you have any links for further reading? Thanks!</p>
<p>Dinu<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James2</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-536801</link>
		<dc:creator>James2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-536801</guid>
		<description>The Placebo Effect. When I inherited mom&#039;s &#039;86 Mazda 626, and occasionally decided to &#039;splurge&#039; and put in the high octane stuff (this of course when gas was &#039;cheap&#039;), I would have placed my hand on a bible and swore that the engine ran smoother and quieter (not that I was hearing any pinging) but just in overall operation. Shrug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The Placebo Effect. When I inherited mom&#8217;s &#8216;86 Mazda 626, and occasionally decided to &#8217;splurge&#8217; and put in the high octane stuff (this of course when gas was &#8216;cheap&#8217;), I would have placed my hand on a bible and swore that the engine ran smoother and quieter (not that I was hearing any pinging) but just in overall operation. Shrug.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miked</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-536451</link>
		<dc:creator>miked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-536451</guid>
		<description>@mel23 and essen - The lower octane out here in Colorado is due to less atmospheric pressure, not less oxygen.  Just like the author of the article said, higher compression means higher cylinder temps which means earlier detonation.  At sea level you have about 14.7 PSI of air pressure, that means in a 10:1 compression engine (at full throttle and no restriction in the intake), the cylinder pressure at TDC is 147 PSI and at 147 PSI you can get away with 87 octane gas.  Now out in Colorado at, say 1 mile high in Denver, our air pressure is only 12.2 PSI, so in a 10:1 compression engine we only have 122 PSI.  Since the pressure is lower you can get away with lower octane gas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@mel23 and essen &#8211; The lower octane out here in Colorado is due to less atmospheric pressure, not less oxygen.  Just like the author of the article said, higher compression means higher cylinder temps which means earlier detonation.  At sea level you have about 14.7 PSI of air pressure, that means in a 10:1 compression engine (at full throttle and no restriction in the intake), the cylinder pressure at TDC is 147 PSI and at 147 PSI you can get away with 87 octane gas.  Now out in Colorado at, say 1 mile high in Denver, our air pressure is only 12.2 PSI, so in a 10:1 compression engine we only have 122 PSI.  Since the pressure is lower you can get away with lower octane gas.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: racebeer</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-536222</link>
		<dc:creator>racebeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-536222</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;bolhuijo&lt;/em&gt;

That was Sunoco back in the old days.  If I remember correctly, they had Sunoco 200 to 260, with the 260 being the 104 octane juice.  All the knob did was blend the 200 and 260 grades to get the desired inbetween octance rating out of the hose.  Good marketing trick at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>bolhuijo</em></p>
<p>That was Sunoco back in the old days.  If I remember correctly, they had Sunoco 200 to 260, with the 260 being the 104 octane juice.  All the knob did was blend the 200 and 260 grades to get the desired inbetween octance rating out of the hose.  Good marketing trick at the time.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZoomZoom</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-536221</link>
		<dc:creator>ZoomZoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-536221</guid>
		<description>I put regular unleaded in my Prius.

I wish I could buy gasoline that was &quot;Guarantted Ethanol Free.&quot;  Oh how I wish my motto could be &quot;Corn is for eating!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I put regular unleaded in my Prius.</p>
<p>I wish I could buy gasoline that was &#8220;Guarantted Ethanol Free.&#8221;  Oh how I wish my motto could be &#8220;Corn is for eating!&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike66Chryslers</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-536191</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike66Chryslers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/in-defense-of-regular-gas/#comment-536191</guid>
		<description>wookie76: +1 what bolhuijo said, and I&#039;ll add that I am a customer at the 89 octane pump; the engine in one of my cars (without EFI) will ping with 87 but not with 89, so why should I pay extra for 91+ octane gas which I don&#039;t need?

night driver: Depending on the engine design, aluminum-headed engines can safely run up to an extra point of CR versus iron-headed engines without having detonation problems.

Overall a very good article IMO.  I have a few minor quibbles with it, but other commenters have already pointed them out.

Regarding engines getting &quot;carboned-up&quot;, this became a big problem when MMT and MTBE replaced lead as an octane modifier.  Combustion deposits from these chemicals don&#039;t flake off the cylinder head and pistons as deposits from leaded fuel did.  I suppose this is one advantage of ethanol being used as an octane modifier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->wookie76: +1 what bolhuijo said, and I&#8217;ll add that I am a customer at the 89 octane pump; the engine in one of my cars (without EFI) will ping with 87 but not with 89, so why should I pay extra for 91+ octane gas which I don&#8217;t need?</p>
<p>night driver: Depending on the engine design, aluminum-headed engines can safely run up to an extra point of CR versus iron-headed engines without having detonation problems.</p>
<p>Overall a very good article IMO.  I have a few minor quibbles with it, but other commenters have already pointed them out.</p>
<p>Regarding engines getting &#8220;carboned-up&#8221;, this became a big problem when MMT and MTBE replaced lead as an octane modifier.  Combustion deposits from these chemicals don&#8217;t flake off the cylinder head and pistons as deposits from leaded fuel did.  I suppose this is one advantage of ethanol being used as an octane modifier.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 60/162 queries in 0.139 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 10:51:19 -->