Presidential Task Force Shuns Non-TARP Chrysler Bondholders

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

“Chrysler’s bankruptcy,” according to President Obama’s statement today, “is not a sign of weakness.” The goal is not to radically restructure the business of a firm that has been failing for decades and currently makes some of the least desirable vehicles on the market. No, for Obama and his task force, this is about going after evil speculators. After lauding the noble sacrifices of the UAW (which will own 55 percent of New New Chrysler), JP Morgan (recipient of $25 billion in TARP funds) and Daimler (who raped Chrysler in the first place), Obama glowers at the mean, nasty speculators who are “forcing” Chrysler into bankruptcy. “In particular,” explains Obama, “a group of investment firms and hedge funds decided to hold out for the prospect of an unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout. They were hoping that everybody else would make sacrifices and they would have to make none. Some demanded twice the return that other lenders were getting. I don’t stand with them.” So who are these shadowy money men who just won’t let Chrysler run free of their oppressive debts?

The Wall Street Journal reports that the holders of about $1 billion in Chrysler debt had offered to take 40 percent of their loans’ face value, and were “flatly rejected or ignored” by the ChryCo and the Treasury. These investors are calling themselves the “non-TARP” lenders, distinguishing themselves from the larger creditors like JP Morgan (which was praised for its “sacrifice” by Obama). Their argument is that, as first-lien creditors, they deserve the nearly 50 percent return they should see in a bankruptcy, an offer that the Obama administration wouldn’t match. The “Non-TARP Lenders” also say that General Motors Corp.’s senior secured lenders are being left with 100% of recoveries, and that GM’s unsecured bondholders would receive a far better recovery than Chrysler’s first-lien secured lenders.

One of these self-centered, American-economy-killing bloodsuckers is profiled by the WSJ. Geoffrey Gwin, who invests on behalf of some 80,000 retirement accounts is torn between taking a haircut on behalf of his clients’ retirements and being labeled as an unpatriotic money-grubber. And his personal history makes the predicament even more poignant. “It’s very hard for me to deal with this,” Gwin tells the WSJ. “As horrible as the situation looks for Chrysler’s employees, I keep thinking about how horrible my own family felt when Delta was going to file for bankruptcy and my father’s pension was going to take a hit. No task force or the federal government came to his aid then.”

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 41 comments
  • U mad scientist U mad scientist on May 01, 2009
    Is the USA still a nation of Law? They're perfectly entitled to go to court over this, and if they have the law on their side, they'll win (and it doesn't look like they will given the precedent in the law). Perhaps you should should learn this whole legal system thing works first. - Agenthex, so I guess that makes you a new gay basher? Am I the one making up baseless conspiracy theories?
  • Anonymous Anonymous on May 02, 2009

    [...] Some demanded twice the return that other lenders were getting. I don’t stand with them.” - Barak Obama “It stands to reason that where there’s sacrifice, there’s someone collecting sacrificial [...]

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next