<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hybrid and VW Diesel Sales Analysis: Prius Outsells Insight 8 to 1, Jetta TDI 4 to 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Norma</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1564720</link>
		<dc:creator>Norma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1564720</guid>
		<description>But VW diesel rattles like hell, if you&#039;re  inside the car next to it at the traffic light. 
If you really don&#039;t realise you&#039;re driving a diesel car, be careful not to put gas in. It has happened to many careless diesel drivers in the U.K. LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->But VW diesel rattles like hell, if you&#8217;re  inside the car next to it at the traffic light.<br />
If you really don&#8217;t realise you&#8217;re driving a diesel car, be careful not to put gas in. It has happened to many careless diesel drivers in the U.K. LOL.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norma</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1564718</link>
		<dc:creator>Norma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1564718</guid>
		<description>Honda still leads YTD hybrid sales 31,936 vs. 28,298 of Ford.
Maybe Ford should &#039;less focus&#039; its hybrid Escape/Mariner sales on Taxi, Gov&#039;t, life guard etc fleet sales and focus more on real customers.
At Oct.&#039;s selling rate, it&#039;ll take, um, 11.9 months to catch up to Honda. Shot, poor Ford is going to lose the BIG chance to brag its  second place in hybrid sales for 2009. Oh, poor Ford, may be its time to reinvent a year of 24 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Honda still leads YTD hybrid sales 31,936 vs. 28,298 of Ford.<br />
Maybe Ford should &#8216;less focus&#8217; its hybrid Escape/Mariner sales on Taxi, Gov&#8217;t, life guard etc fleet sales and focus more on real customers.<br />
At Oct.&#8217;s selling rate, it&#8217;ll take, um, 11.9 months to catch up to Honda. Shot, poor Ford is going to lose the BIG chance to brag its  second place in hybrid sales for 2009. Oh, poor Ford, may be its time to reinvent a year of 24 months.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-2/#comment-1560993</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560993</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;You find huge deposits of hydrocarbon deposits on Titan but no dead dinos or old rotting vegetation.&lt;/em&gt;
The reason for that is that hydrogen is the building block of the universe and there&#039;s a lot of carbon,too and they get together a lot.  The process is abiotic in the sense that biological processes as we think of them are probably non-existent in crucibles of most stars are planets. Gas giant planets like Saturn and Jupiter have atmospheres largely comprised of methane and, yes, it&#039;s a hydrocarbon gas and yes, no dinos.
But.
That doesn&#039;t mean that if you use up a substance that has an combustion energy potential (like oil) that more of it will be magically made because the Creator likes us and automobiles.
The only thing that would make more of it would be for energy to be reapplied to the building blocks again, as it was before and since the Cretaceous to make more of that substance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>You find huge deposits of hydrocarbon deposits on Titan but no dead dinos or old rotting vegetation.</em><br />
The reason for that is that hydrogen is the building block of the universe and there&#8217;s a lot of carbon,too and they get together a lot.  The process is abiotic in the sense that biological processes as we think of them are probably non-existent in crucibles of most stars are planets. Gas giant planets like Saturn and Jupiter have atmospheres largely comprised of methane and, yes, it&#8217;s a hydrocarbon gas and yes, no dinos.<br />
But.<br />
That doesn&#8217;t mean that if you use up a substance that has an combustion energy potential (like oil) that more of it will be magically made because the Creator likes us and automobiles.<br />
The only thing that would make more of it would be for energy to be reapplied to the building blocks again, as it was before and since the Cretaceous to make more of that substance.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteMoran</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-2/#comment-1560983</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteMoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560983</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;You find huge deposits of hydrocarbon deposits on Titan but no dead dinos or old rotting vedgetation.&lt;/em&gt;

Sure, look hard enough and the ingredients of cheese are there too.

&lt;em&gt;I can certainly see why so many geologists on oil company pay rolls keep perpetrating myths.&lt;/em&gt;

Oh yes, we&#039;re surrounded by conspirators. Did you check under the bed this morning?

Those within the oil industry want nothing more than to destroy it, inside the next 30 years preferably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>You find huge deposits of hydrocarbon deposits on Titan but no dead dinos or old rotting vedgetation.</em></p>
<p>Sure, look hard enough and the ingredients of cheese are there too.</p>
<p><em>I can certainly see why so many geologists on oil company pay rolls keep perpetrating myths.</em></p>
<p>Oh yes, we&#8217;re surrounded by conspirators. Did you check under the bed this morning?</p>
<p>Those within the oil industry want nothing more than to destroy it, inside the next 30 years preferably.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-2/#comment-1560977</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560977</guid>
		<description>Pete Moran

You may prefer donuts over danishes but you don&#039;t find either on Titan, Saturns moon. You find huge deposits of hydrocarbon deposits on Titan but no dead dinos or old rotting vedgetation.

Regards geologists looking for oil in million year old rocks i think you&#039;re confusing old rock with producing oil. We find oil bubbling to the surface. Is oil therefore 2 months old?

Namely oil is a product of the Earths mantle and pressure. It seeps up through rocks (passing million year old rock just for being there). Oil is found in rock formations nothing to do with dead Din or forest times. We have not only surpassed all possible quantities of dead Dinos and dead forests but we also discover oil wells are not finite, they just keep (self) refilling.

Regards 1,000 years (and counting) of oil left being &quot;laughable&quot; i think you should have a laugh at the worlds estimated world oil reserves. Every year we consumer more, every year the reserves seem to actually get larger. Yet we still hear the shrill cry of &quot;peak oil&quot;. This of course plays into the hands of those that like a high oil price for a basic commodity coming out of ears. 

The UK&#039;s stated oil reserves have been 4 years left. That&#039;s been for each of the last 40 years. We should have run out 36 times by now yet still we&#039;re pumping the black stuff and just increased license explorations for the North Sea to find more. This oil industry, just such a laugh isn&#039;t it? 

Saudis stated official reserves were 260 billion barrels. The Saudi oil minister admitted some years ago it was nearer 1.2 Trillion barrels. 

Are you disputing my estimates on Saudi or the oil sands or world demand or just calling them &quot;crap&quot; and laughing. If so can you state your estimates rather than reply to fact with laughing gas? 

If you can&#039;t see the motive behind the oil industry perpetrating limited reserves or the dead dino myth and hiding real oil reserves then stick to baking donuts. I may put cries of &quot;peak oil&quot; down to the loons of the left but I can certainly see why so many geologists on oil company pay rolls keep perpetrating myths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Pete Moran</p>
<p>You may prefer donuts over danishes but you don&#8217;t find either on Titan, Saturns moon. You find huge deposits of hydrocarbon deposits on Titan but no dead dinos or old rotting vedgetation.</p>
<p>Regards geologists looking for oil in million year old rocks i think you&#8217;re confusing old rock with producing oil. We find oil bubbling to the surface. Is oil therefore 2 months old?</p>
<p>Namely oil is a product of the Earths mantle and pressure. It seeps up through rocks (passing million year old rock just for being there). Oil is found in rock formations nothing to do with dead Din or forest times. We have not only surpassed all possible quantities of dead Dinos and dead forests but we also discover oil wells are not finite, they just keep (self) refilling.</p>
<p>Regards 1,000 years (and counting) of oil left being &#8220;laughable&#8221; i think you should have a laugh at the worlds estimated world oil reserves. Every year we consumer more, every year the reserves seem to actually get larger. Yet we still hear the shrill cry of &#8220;peak oil&#8221;. This of course plays into the hands of those that like a high oil price for a basic commodity coming out of ears. </p>
<p>The UK&#8217;s stated oil reserves have been 4 years left. That&#8217;s been for each of the last 40 years. We should have run out 36 times by now yet still we&#8217;re pumping the black stuff and just increased license explorations for the North Sea to find more. This oil industry, just such a laugh isn&#8217;t it? </p>
<p>Saudis stated official reserves were 260 billion barrels. The Saudi oil minister admitted some years ago it was nearer 1.2 Trillion barrels. </p>
<p>Are you disputing my estimates on Saudi or the oil sands or world demand or just calling them &#8220;crap&#8221; and laughing. If so can you state your estimates rather than reply to fact with laughing gas? </p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t see the motive behind the oil industry perpetrating limited reserves or the dead dino myth and hiding real oil reserves then stick to baking donuts. I may put cries of &#8220;peak oil&#8221; down to the loons of the left but I can certainly see why so many geologists on oil company pay rolls keep perpetrating myths.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteMoran</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-2/#comment-1560959</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteMoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560959</guid>
		<description>@ Spanner77

&lt;em&gt;I prefer the latest theory not the more dated one and hope you do too.&lt;/em&gt;

I &lt;em&gt;prefer&lt;/em&gt; donuts over danishes, but I know I&#039;m wrong.

EVERY petro geologist I&#039;ve worked with starts the oil exploration process looking for rock formations, at the very least, in the many many many millions of years old. Strangely enough they find oil at those ages, suggesting the &quot;crackpot&quot; carbon deposit theory is proving it&#039;s worth.

I&#039;m familiar with the abiogenic &quot;theory&quot;, and no-one has discovered anything resembling a commercial resource using that theory. Not to mention those inconvenient diamond-like crystals found in all oil deposits (oh, and the carbon dating) which tend to make the abiogenic theory harder to explain.

It&#039;s also based mostly on a false and unscientific premise from Kudryavtsev that &quot;no one had made oil like substances in the lab from organic matter&quot;.

&lt;em&gt;Even allowing for expodential growth in demand from upcoming Inida and China it’s going to be coming out of our ears for at least another 1,000 years.&lt;/em&gt;

This is just laughable. To think some people believe this carp is just incredible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@ Spanner77</p>
<p><em>I prefer the latest theory not the more dated one and hope you do too.</em></p>
<p>I <em>prefer</em> donuts over danishes, but I know I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
<p>EVERY petro geologist I&#8217;ve worked with starts the oil exploration process looking for rock formations, at the very least, in the many many many millions of years old. Strangely enough they find oil at those ages, suggesting the &#8220;crackpot&#8221; carbon deposit theory is proving it&#8217;s worth.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m familiar with the abiogenic &#8220;theory&#8221;, and no-one has discovered anything resembling a commercial resource using that theory. Not to mention those inconvenient diamond-like crystals found in all oil deposits (oh, and the carbon dating) which tend to make the abiogenic theory harder to explain.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also based mostly on a false and unscientific premise from Kudryavtsev that &#8220;no one had made oil like substances in the lab from organic matter&#8221;.</p>
<p><em>Even allowing for expodential growth in demand from upcoming Inida and China it’s going to be coming out of our ears for at least another 1,000 years.</em></p>
<p>This is just laughable. To think some people believe this carp is just incredible.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteMoran</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-2/#comment-1560938</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteMoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560938</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Oil is produced by the Abiotic process, a process deep in the Earths mantle. Namely it is constantly replenishing reserve for mans use. It is sustainable and infinite for mans purposes.&lt;/em&gt;

Phew, that&#039;s a relief. Is there anything we can do to make sure the &quot;replenishment&quot; rate is greater than ~85million barrels per day?

I have to say I&#039;m a bit surprised to discover we&#039;re still living in the Jurassic or Cretaceous periods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Oil is produced by the Abiotic process, a process deep in the Earths mantle. Namely it is constantly replenishing reserve for mans use. It is sustainable and infinite for mans purposes.</em></p>
<p>Phew, that&#8217;s a relief. Is there anything we can do to make sure the &#8220;replenishment&#8221; rate is greater than ~85million barrels per day?</p>
<p>I have to say I&#8217;m a bit surprised to discover we&#8217;re still living in the Jurassic or Cretaceous periods.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-2/#comment-1560919</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560919</guid>
		<description>Dear spanner77:
If you persist is treating other appenders as idiots, as you have above, will we either descend into flame wars and/or thoughtful people will go elsewhere than TTAC.  Your tone is that of Beck or Malkin or O&#039;Reilly: ferocious pejorative attack and not a whole lot of substance.  
I&#039;d love for you to be right, for there to be cheap petrochemicals forever...it&#039;d make things a lot easier for our kids.  But the vast majority of the *hard* science people are telling a different story.
Sure, you can always find a few scientists to sing your song and be deaf to the rest...  
Strive to be civil and reasonable and debate in some good faith.  Let&#039;s keep our enthusiasms from becoming holy wars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Dear spanner77:<br />
If you persist is treating other appenders as idiots, as you have above, will we either descend into flame wars and/or thoughtful people will go elsewhere than TTAC.  Your tone is that of Beck or Malkin or O&#8217;Reilly: ferocious pejorative attack and not a whole lot of substance.<br />
I&#8217;d love for you to be right, for there to be cheap petrochemicals forever&#8230;it&#8217;d make things a lot easier for our kids.  But the vast majority of the *hard* science people are telling a different story.<br />
Sure, you can always find a few scientists to sing your song and be deaf to the rest&#8230;<br />
Strive to be civil and reasonable and debate in some good faith.  Let&#8217;s keep our enthusiasms from becoming holy wars.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-2/#comment-1560899</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560899</guid>
		<description>Stewart Dean

&quot;Peak Oil&quot; is bunkum. Leftie loons appear every 40 years with shrill cries the end of the world in nigh. They came out of the long grass last year aided and abetted by the left leaning Western media as they did in the last big recession in the 70&#039;s. Where are these cretins now for their fabricated looney tunes?

Oil is produced by the Abiotic process, a process deep in the Earths mantle. Namely it is constantly replenishing reserve for mans use. It is sustainable and infinite for mans purposes. It will never run out. 

Large hydrocarbon deposits have been found on Titan, one of Saturns moons. Oil is not the result of dead forests or dead Dinos.

Many companies and mainly countries seek their own oil deposits for a novel idea called &quot;energy security&quot;. That&#039;s their choice, and their expense. There has been no danger to secure oil supplies, we&#039;ve enjoyed 100 years of reliable unbroken supply. You couldn&#039;t ask for a more secure or reliable energy source. McDonals will run out of chips before we have oil shortages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Stewart Dean</p>
<p>&#8220;Peak Oil&#8221; is bunkum. Leftie loons appear every 40 years with shrill cries the end of the world in nigh. They came out of the long grass last year aided and abetted by the left leaning Western media as they did in the last big recession in the 70&#8217;s. Where are these cretins now for their fabricated looney tunes?</p>
<p>Oil is produced by the Abiotic process, a process deep in the Earths mantle. Namely it is constantly replenishing reserve for mans use. It is sustainable and infinite for mans purposes. It will never run out. </p>
<p>Large hydrocarbon deposits have been found on Titan, one of Saturns moons. Oil is not the result of dead forests or dead Dinos.</p>
<p>Many companies and mainly countries seek their own oil deposits for a novel idea called &#8220;energy security&#8221;. That&#8217;s their choice, and their expense. There has been no danger to secure oil supplies, we&#8217;ve enjoyed 100 years of reliable unbroken supply. You couldn&#8217;t ask for a more secure or reliable energy source. McDonals will run out of chips before we have oil shortages.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560895</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560895</guid>
		<description>Peter Moran

What you do in Saudi is stick a straw in the sand and suck. Not very difficult is it and cheap as chips to extract? 

Where do your &quot;petro-connected/contracting clients&quot; get their costs from? Have they got gold plated platinum tipped straws? Looks to me like you&#039;re being shafted over a barrel by industry spin on their costs!

You adjusted for inflation graff is inaccurate. Oil has plodded around $25 a barrel for decades. Adjusted for inflation it should be over $100 a barrel as a matter average today. Instead it barely scrapes above $60 for brief periods.

One minute you argue the Saudis are holding out for higher prices, next you say they spurn cheap Chinese and Indian offers. Connect the dots!

Your average cost rise for oil is based on more expensive to extract (deep sea) oil. The truth is it&#039;s as cheap as ever but the Saudis choose to &#039;allow&#039; competitors to develop knowing full well they could put peddle to the floor at any point with their $1.50 cost base, flood the market with cheap oil and level the competitors inside a year.

Regards Saudi peak oil well we all know the &#039;strictly audited&#039; international oil reserves are a joke. This is a game of poker where everyone holds their cards to their chests. World reserves are colossal and getting higher every year. It pays not mention this fact of life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Peter Moran</p>
<p>What you do in Saudi is stick a straw in the sand and suck. Not very difficult is it and cheap as chips to extract? </p>
<p>Where do your &#8220;petro-connected/contracting clients&#8221; get their costs from? Have they got gold plated platinum tipped straws? Looks to me like you&#8217;re being shafted over a barrel by industry spin on their costs!</p>
<p>You adjusted for inflation graff is inaccurate. Oil has plodded around $25 a barrel for decades. Adjusted for inflation it should be over $100 a barrel as a matter average today. Instead it barely scrapes above $60 for brief periods.</p>
<p>One minute you argue the Saudis are holding out for higher prices, next you say they spurn cheap Chinese and Indian offers. Connect the dots!</p>
<p>Your average cost rise for oil is based on more expensive to extract (deep sea) oil. The truth is it&#8217;s as cheap as ever but the Saudis choose to &#8216;allow&#8217; competitors to develop knowing full well they could put peddle to the floor at any point with their $1.50 cost base, flood the market with cheap oil and level the competitors inside a year.</p>
<p>Regards Saudi peak oil well we all know the &#8217;strictly audited&#8217; international oil reserves are a joke. This is a game of poker where everyone holds their cards to their chests. World reserves are colossal and getting higher every year. It pays not mention this fact of life.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560793</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560793</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Saudi oil still costs little different to extract today as 30 years ago ($1.50 per barrel). North Sea or Mexican Gulf oil approx £3.50 per barrel.&lt;/em&gt;
Perhaps true, but.
One of the tenets of peak oil is that all the oil that&#039;s cheap to find and get out of the ground (like S.A.) has been found, that we are now prospecting for the stuff that&#039;s harder (=more expensive to) find and extract.  Witness your own words: $1.50 from S.A., vs. $6. for your underwater sources.  And I wonder if your extraction price covers the exploration price.  It&#039;s got to be hideously more expensive to search for oil underwater and in the Arctic than it is in Texas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Saudi oil still costs little different to extract today as 30 years ago ($1.50 per barrel). North Sea or Mexican Gulf oil approx £3.50 per barrel.</em><br />
Perhaps true, but.<br />
One of the tenets of peak oil is that all the oil that&#8217;s cheap to find and get out of the ground (like S.A.) has been found, that we are now prospecting for the stuff that&#8217;s harder (=more expensive to) find and extract.  Witness your own words: $1.50 from S.A., vs. $6. for your underwater sources.  And I wonder if your extraction price covers the exploration price.  It&#8217;s got to be hideously more expensive to search for oil underwater and in the Arctic than it is in Texas.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteMoran</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560775</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteMoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560775</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Doesn’t matter which way you look at the oil price, it’s pants at beating inflation.&lt;/em&gt;

Did you notice the chart was &lt;em&gt;already&lt;/em&gt; corrected for inflation?????????

&lt;em&gt;currency is trashed by Govt printing presses&lt;/em&gt;

That sounds like a Conservative talking point rather than a serious argument, but again the oil price chart I gave you was already corrected for inflation.

&lt;em&gt;even supertankers anchored all over the world with billions of gallons of the stuff.&lt;/em&gt;

Mostly because the Saudis WILL NOT give the stuff away. A little cabal called OPEC needs to keep a higher and higher minimum price for their economies. The Chinese have made offers for &quot;all&quot; that &quot;supertanker stored&quot; oil at $35-$40/barrel for their reserves but have been knocked back repeatedly. India too.

&lt;em&gt;Saudi oil still costs little different to extract today as 30 years ago ($1.50 per barrel). North Sea or Mexican Gulf oil approx £3.50 per barrel.&lt;/em&gt;

Errr... I&#039;ve no idea where you&#039;re getting those figures, but they look nothing like the ones we work with via our petro-connected/contracting clients.

&lt;em&gt;We know the Saudis are pumping at only 50% capacity.&lt;/em&gt;

The Saudis (to keep using your example) have never provided auditable proof of their reserves, and they very definitely are trying to preserve a higher price. Many in the industry suspect that have hit a significant peak. Anyone who claims to know rates/reserves is guessing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><em>Doesn’t matter which way you look at the oil price, it’s pants at beating inflation.</em></p>
<p>Did you notice the chart was <em>already</em> corrected for inflation?????????</p>
<p><em>currency is trashed by Govt printing presses</em></p>
<p>That sounds like a Conservative talking point rather than a serious argument, but again the oil price chart I gave you was already corrected for inflation.</p>
<p><em>even supertankers anchored all over the world with billions of gallons of the stuff.</em></p>
<p>Mostly because the Saudis WILL NOT give the stuff away. A little cabal called OPEC needs to keep a higher and higher minimum price for their economies. The Chinese have made offers for &#8220;all&#8221; that &#8220;supertanker stored&#8221; oil at $35-$40/barrel for their reserves but have been knocked back repeatedly. India too.</p>
<p><em>Saudi oil still costs little different to extract today as 30 years ago ($1.50 per barrel). North Sea or Mexican Gulf oil approx £3.50 per barrel.</em></p>
<p>Errr&#8230; I&#8217;ve no idea where you&#8217;re getting those figures, but they look nothing like the ones we work with via our petro-connected/contracting clients.</p>
<p><em>We know the Saudis are pumping at only 50% capacity.</em></p>
<p>The Saudis (to keep using your example) have never provided auditable proof of their reserves, and they very definitely are trying to preserve a higher price. Many in the industry suspect that have hit a significant peak. Anyone who claims to know rates/reserves is guessing.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560709</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560709</guid>
		<description>Peter Moran

Thanks for the links. Doesn&#039;t matter which way you look at the oil price, it&#039;s pants at beating inflation. Consider you need to double your money every 10yrs to stay level and oil, like all commodities (wheat, cocoa, gold etc), underperforms.

The spikes we see at times of recession brings commodities back up to the average trend line for inflation, but only briefly. Gold, silver and oil have been at oil time highs but these still fall quite a ways short of inflation (which suggests gold still has a ways to go).

Regards &#039;Nobelled&#039; Krugman he states &quot;telltale signs of a speculative price boom are missing&quot;. Apart from the tanking of the Dollar there&#039;s no other explanation than what i&#039;d describe as investors seeking safe harbour as their currency is trashed by Govt printing presses combined with speculators piling in to ride the wave. 

Krugman gives iron ore as example. But like oil and copper the demand curves are almost flat and the supply plentiful. We&#039;ve oil coming out of our ears, even supertankers anchored all over the world with billions of gallons of the stuff. Sugar has seen a 300% price rise but poor harvets in India and Brazil were cause. Namely there was a shortage of demand. No such luck in either supply or demand to explain the oil price spike to $140+

Regards &quot;there is a much more significant cost floor under current oil production&quot; i presume you&#039;re referring to an averaged global cost floor, including higher costs to extract deep sea oil. An averaged cost base is academic, but not reality. Saudi oil still costs little different to extract today as 30 years ago ($1.50 per barrel). North Sea or Mexican Gulf oil approx £3.50 per barrel.

The market cost just depends on where you choose to buy. We know the Saudis are pumping at only 50% capacity. If they wanted they could floor the accelerator anytime they like and blast all other producers, particularly deep sea companies/countries, out of the water (pun intended).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Peter Moran</p>
<p>Thanks for the links. Doesn&#8217;t matter which way you look at the oil price, it&#8217;s pants at beating inflation. Consider you need to double your money every 10yrs to stay level and oil, like all commodities (wheat, cocoa, gold etc), underperforms.</p>
<p>The spikes we see at times of recession brings commodities back up to the average trend line for inflation, but only briefly. Gold, silver and oil have been at oil time highs but these still fall quite a ways short of inflation (which suggests gold still has a ways to go).</p>
<p>Regards &#8216;Nobelled&#8217; Krugman he states &#8220;telltale signs of a speculative price boom are missing&#8221;. Apart from the tanking of the Dollar there&#8217;s no other explanation than what i&#8217;d describe as investors seeking safe harbour as their currency is trashed by Govt printing presses combined with speculators piling in to ride the wave. </p>
<p>Krugman gives iron ore as example. But like oil and copper the demand curves are almost flat and the supply plentiful. We&#8217;ve oil coming out of our ears, even supertankers anchored all over the world with billions of gallons of the stuff. Sugar has seen a 300% price rise but poor harvets in India and Brazil were cause. Namely there was a shortage of demand. No such luck in either supply or demand to explain the oil price spike to $140+</p>
<p>Regards &#8220;there is a much more significant cost floor under current oil production&#8221; i presume you&#8217;re referring to an averaged global cost floor, including higher costs to extract deep sea oil. An averaged cost base is academic, but not reality. Saudi oil still costs little different to extract today as 30 years ago ($1.50 per barrel). North Sea or Mexican Gulf oil approx £3.50 per barrel.</p>
<p>The market cost just depends on where you choose to buy. We know the Saudis are pumping at only 50% capacity. If they wanted they could floor the accelerator anytime they like and blast all other producers, particularly deep sea companies/countries, out of the water (pun intended).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Engineer</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560515</link>
		<dc:creator>Engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560515</guid>
		<description>Honda really can&#039;t seem to nail the hybrid technology:
1st gen Insight: Great mileage, but too much of a science project. Pity it was not around when 2008 and $4/gal hit, though...
Accord hybrid: Here&#039;s an idea: &lt;b&gt;performance&lt;/b&gt; hybrid! Unfortunately, most customers expect &lt;b&gt;great&lt;/b&gt; mileage from a hybrid, and performance not so much. Failed marketing?
Latest Insight: To add insult to injury Honda gave up and tried to &quot;just copy the #$@# Prius&quot;. Except the &lt;i&gt;copy&lt;/i&gt; is not close enough to the original in key metrics. Whoops.

Back to the drawing board, Honda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Honda really can&#8217;t seem to nail the hybrid technology:<br />
1st gen Insight: Great mileage, but too much of a science project. Pity it was not around when 2008 and $4/gal hit, though&#8230;<br />
Accord hybrid: Here&#8217;s an idea: <b>performance</b> hybrid! Unfortunately, most customers expect <b>great</b> mileage from a hybrid, and performance not so much. Failed marketing?<br />
Latest Insight: To add insult to injury Honda gave up and tried to &#8220;just copy the #$@# Prius&#8221;. Except the <i>copy</i> is not close enough to the original in key metrics. Whoops.</p>
<p>Back to the drawing board, Honda.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven02</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560445</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560445</guid>
		<description>@ PeteMoran
I agree, it is interesting to see the Civic so low, I haven&#039;t been tracking Civic sales, so I don&#039;t know exactly why that would be.  The Civic is going on its 5th model year with the current design, while the Prius just had major upgrades.  It will be interesting to see how this plays out later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@ PeteMoran<br />
I agree, it is interesting to see the Civic so low, I haven&#8217;t been tracking Civic sales, so I don&#8217;t know exactly why that would be.  The Civic is going on its 5th model year with the current design, while the Prius just had major upgrades.  It will be interesting to see how this plays out later.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedj101</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560444</link>
		<dc:creator>tedj101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560444</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Uh, did any of you try buying a TDI last month? They’re nearly impossible to find- VW is selling every one it brings over here.&lt;&lt;

Actually, I did.  They are long oversold.  I also tried to buy the Audi A-3 diesel in it too was oversold.  

I ended up buying a BMW diesel which was sold out but available to order for present production which means mine will be here later this month. Diesels are actually selling better than most people realize.

As to the OP&#039;s comment on being dirty, he hasn&#039;t looked at diesels that meet the current emissions standards.  Run a handkerchief into the exhaust of a new BMW diesel, they run it into the exhaust of a Prius.  You won&#039;t need two hankies.  It will still be clean after being in the exhaust of a BMW diesel.  You&#039;ll have to throw it away after it comes out of the Prius, though...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&gt;&gt;Uh, did any of you try buying a TDI last month? They’re nearly impossible to find- VW is selling every one it brings over here.&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>Actually, I did.  They are long oversold.  I also tried to buy the Audi A-3 diesel in it too was oversold.  </p>
<p>I ended up buying a BMW diesel which was sold out but available to order for present production which means mine will be here later this month. Diesels are actually selling better than most people realize.</p>
<p>As to the OP&#039;s comment on being dirty, he hasn&#039;t looked at diesels that meet the current emissions standards.  Run a handkerchief into the exhaust of a new BMW diesel, they run it into the exhaust of a Prius.  You won&#039;t need two hankies.  It will still be clean after being in the exhaust of a BMW diesel.  You&#039;ll have to throw it away after it comes out of the Prius, though&#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brettc</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560438</link>
		<dc:creator>brettc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560438</guid>
		<description>@trollthattellsthetruth

The 1.9 litre PD TDIs do/did require VW 505.01 oil. Although since a lot of them are now out of warranty, some people are starting to use 505.00 oil like Mobil 1 Turbo diesel truck. 

The current 2.0 litre engine also requires VW 507.00 approved oil. VW dealers are supposed to stock Castrol SLX for the new cars, but there are other oils that meet the 507.00 spec.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@trollthattellsthetruth</p>
<p>The 1.9 litre PD TDIs do/did require VW 505.01 oil. Although since a lot of them are now out of warranty, some people are starting to use 505.00 oil like Mobil 1 Turbo diesel truck. </p>
<p>The current 2.0 litre engine also requires VW 507.00 approved oil. VW dealers are supposed to stock Castrol SLX for the new cars, but there are other oils that meet the 507.00 spec.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ret</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560430</link>
		<dc:creator>ret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560430</guid>
		<description>@ Bruce from DC

&lt;strong&gt;Perhaps, in their subconscious way, most Americans actually realize that for the kind of driving they do, the hybrid is a better solution than the diesel&lt;/strong&gt;

So says the guy who lives in DC...  Is that where &quot;most&quot; Americans live?  Perhaps in a land of 300,000,000 people there are a few who have a long highway commute?  Of my current 15 mile commute, 12 is on the highway.  In my last job, it was more like 35 of 45 miles.  Would a hybrd have been right for me?

I&#039;m not saying you&#039;re wrong that a hybrid is a good idea as a city car, but not everyone lives and drives in a city, so your &quot;most Americans&quot; statement is a bit myopic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@ Bruce from DC</p>
<p><strong>Perhaps, in their subconscious way, most Americans actually realize that for the kind of driving they do, the hybrid is a better solution than the diesel</strong></p>
<p>So says the guy who lives in DC&#8230;  Is that where &#8220;most&#8221; Americans live?  Perhaps in a land of 300,000,000 people there are a few who have a long highway commute?  Of my current 15 mile commute, 12 is on the highway.  In my last job, it was more like 35 of 45 miles.  Would a hybrd have been right for me?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying you&#8217;re wrong that a hybrid is a good idea as a city car, but not everyone lives and drives in a city, so your &#8220;most Americans&#8221; statement is a bit myopic.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trollthattellsthetruth</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560406</link>
		<dc:creator>trollthattellsthetruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560406</guid>
		<description>@ Mirko 

Thank you for your clarification.  I am ignorant in that regard; my knowledge only dates back to 1999 and it only encompasses the US domestic market and some JDM.  One thing that I have never seen mentioned here is the possible higher maintenance costs for a diesel.  For example, I know that diesel pickup trucks there is a fuel/water separator that must be replaced like a fuel filter and that diesel oil (for the engine) is usually more expensive than oil for gasoline engines.  I also don&#039;t know if this is still true but the TDi 1.9 liter sold here a few years ago required a special specification of oil per Volkswagen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@ Mirko </p>
<p>Thank you for your clarification.  I am ignorant in that regard; my knowledge only dates back to 1999 and it only encompasses the US domestic market and some JDM.  One thing that I have never seen mentioned here is the possible higher maintenance costs for a diesel.  For example, I know that diesel pickup trucks there is a fuel/water separator that must be replaced like a fuel filter and that diesel oil (for the engine) is usually more expensive than oil for gasoline engines.  I also don&#8217;t know if this is still true but the TDi 1.9 liter sold here a few years ago required a special specification of oil per Volkswagen.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe McKinney</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560380</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe McKinney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560380</guid>
		<description>My wife and I recently traded our 2006 Jetta TDI for a 2010 Honda Odyssey. The TDI was a great car. We logged over 94,000 miles with zero problems. My only complaint is that required maintenance like the DSG service and timing belt replacement were horrifically expensive.

The VW dealers are a mixed bag. The local dealership where I bought the Jetta was a bunch of jerks. The other local dealer where I always had the car seviced was honest, polite and professional.

When we needed a bigger vehicle we didn&#039;t even consider VW. A Jetta Wagon or Passat wagon would be pricey to maintain, and the Routan combines VW&#039;s price premium with Chrysler&#039;s reliability.

Honda may have erred with the Ridgeline and the new Insight, but one thing they have nailed is the minivan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My wife and I recently traded our 2006 Jetta TDI for a 2010 Honda Odyssey. The TDI was a great car. We logged over 94,000 miles with zero problems. My only complaint is that required maintenance like the DSG service and timing belt replacement were horrifically expensive.</p>
<p>The VW dealers are a mixed bag. The local dealership where I bought the Jetta was a bunch of jerks. The other local dealer where I always had the car seviced was honest, polite and professional.</p>
<p>When we needed a bigger vehicle we didn&#8217;t even consider VW. A Jetta Wagon or Passat wagon would be pricey to maintain, and the Routan combines VW&#8217;s price premium with Chrysler&#8217;s reliability.</p>
<p>Honda may have erred with the Ridgeline and the new Insight, but one thing they have nailed is the minivan.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceipower</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560364</link>
		<dc:creator>ceipower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560364</guid>
		<description>The question is:Will Honda be able to admit to this failure on their part. Honda has had so many market misses in the last decade and they seem to ignore their failures. That&#039;s do-able but not if you continue to fail. Who at Honda figured that smaller than a Prius, less MPG than a Prius would be a success because its $2k cheaper?  Leave cheaper to Hyundai and Kia( and soon the Chinese)
Honda is pissing away it&#039;s good name all accross the Honda product line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The question is:Will Honda be able to admit to this failure on their part. Honda has had so many market misses in the last decade and they seem to ignore their failures. That&#8217;s do-able but not if you continue to fail. Who at Honda figured that smaller than a Prius, less MPG than a Prius would be a success because its $2k cheaper?  Leave cheaper to Hyundai and Kia( and soon the Chinese)<br />
Honda is pissing away it&#8217;s good name all accross the Honda product line.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce from DC</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560341</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce from DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560341</guid>
		<description>That BMW is putting $4000 on the hood to move the diesel 3-series tells you something, I guess.  But, the reality is that diesels and hybrids are appropriate for different types of uses -- a point infrequently made.  If most of your driving is stop and go commuting, averaging 25 mph and never exceeding 35, the hybrid is the car for you, because it does not idle and it recaptures braking energy.  On the other hand, if stop and go driving is not you, and you do a lot of driving at speed, then the diesel is the far better solution.  Hybrids really don&#039;t help in those circumstances, and their extra weight is literally a drag.

Perhaps, in their subconscious way, most Americans actually realize that for the kind of driving they do, the hybrid is a better solution than the diesel, leaving aside the diesel&#039;s bad reputation in America from the 1980s (MB&#039;s indestructible 4 and 5-cylinder diesels aside).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->That BMW is putting $4000 on the hood to move the diesel 3-series tells you something, I guess.  But, the reality is that diesels and hybrids are appropriate for different types of uses &#8212; a point infrequently made.  If most of your driving is stop and go commuting, averaging 25 mph and never exceeding 35, the hybrid is the car for you, because it does not idle and it recaptures braking energy.  On the other hand, if stop and go driving is not you, and you do a lot of driving at speed, then the diesel is the far better solution.  Hybrids really don&#8217;t help in those circumstances, and their extra weight is literally a drag.</p>
<p>Perhaps, in their subconscious way, most Americans actually realize that for the kind of driving they do, the hybrid is a better solution than the diesel, leaving aside the diesel&#8217;s bad reputation in America from the 1980s (MB&#8217;s indestructible 4 and 5-cylinder diesels aside).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldowl</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560321</link>
		<dc:creator>oldowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560321</guid>
		<description>We are actively in the market for a fuel efficient hatchback/wagon. When we called our nearest VW dealer about a wagon TDI, we were told that before discussions went further we would have to give them a deposit.

 As if.

VW diesels may be great, but the dealer experience is so poor and vehicle reliability has been so low that we went no farther down that road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->We are actively in the market for a fuel efficient hatchback/wagon. When we called our nearest VW dealer about a wagon TDI, we were told that before discussions went further we would have to give them a deposit.</p>
<p> As if.</p>
<p>VW diesels may be great, but the dealer experience is so poor and vehicle reliability has been so low that we went no farther down that road.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirko Reinhardt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560299</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirko Reinhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560299</guid>
		<description>An for fun, Prius sales in Germany in 2009:

January: 121
February: 253
March: 269
April: 90
May: 86
June: 187
July: 549
August: 585 (A few hundred of the July/August Prii were promotion cars for the Toyota sponsored 2009 Athletics World Championship in Berlin)
September: 707</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->An for fun, Prius sales in Germany in 2009:</p>
<p>January: 121<br />
February: 253<br />
March: 269<br />
April: 90<br />
May: 86<br />
June: 187<br />
July: 549<br />
August: 585 (A few hundred of the July/August Prii were promotion cars for the Toyota sponsored 2009 Athletics World Championship in Berlin)<br />
September: 707<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirko Reinhardt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/hybrid-and-vw-diesel-sales-analysis-prius-outsells-insight-8-to-1-jetta-tdi-4-to-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1560297</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirko Reinhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=334250#comment-1560297</guid>
		<description>@PeteMoran : 
&lt;i&gt;Thanks for those. Not a BMW to be seen. Where does the first one place?&lt;/i&gt; 

The 1- and the 3-series both used to be Top-10 sellers with more than 10,000 units a month until mid-2008.

Now it looks like that:
# 13 BMW 3-series: 5,323
# 16 BMW 1-series: 4,759
# 38 BMW 5-series: 2,219
# 78 BMW X3: 954
# 83 BMW X5: 816
#100 BMW 7-series: 661</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@PeteMoran :<br />
<i>Thanks for those. Not a BMW to be seen. Where does the first one place?</i> </p>
<p>The 1- and the 3-series both used to be Top-10 sellers with more than 10,000 units a month until mid-2008.</p>
<p>Now it looks like that:<br />
# 13 BMW 3-series: 5,323<br />
# 16 BMW 1-series: 4,759<br />
# 38 BMW 5-series: 2,219<br />
# 78 BMW X3: 954<br />
# 83 BMW X5: 816<br />
#100 BMW 7-series: 661<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 64/145 queries in 0.184 seconds using apc

Served from: autoforums.com @ 2010-03-22 06:29:45 -->