Editorial: How GM Tried to Win Me Over, Part Two

Recent Comments

• Re: EPA: New Car Fuel Economy Continues to Improve; Back to Early 1980’s Level
  
  MBella - As is a PT Cruiser, HHR etc…
• Re: EPA: New Car Fuel Economy Continues to Improve; Back to Early 1980’s Level
  
  MBella - To my knowledge, new cars run leaner. Can you provide a citation for that claim?
• Re: EPA: New Car Fuel Economy Continues to Improve; Back to Early 1980’s Level
  
  MBella - I forgot to add that they try to make the C250 the winner, even though the CDI powered 190 destroys it in every...
• Re: EPA: New Car Fuel Economy Continues to Improve; Back to Early 1980’s Level
  
  MBella - In this thread they talk about a project Mercedes did. They took a W201 Mercedes, (190D) and replaced the...
• Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?
  
  werewolf34 - I am a 2001 BMW X5 with a stick shift. Powerful but fun to drive. Capable of going offroad but really made for cruising around and having fun. Also...
• Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?
  
  Sanman111 - I actually think that one of the cars I am looking to pick up next best personifies me…the Lexus SC300 manual maybe with a turbo under the hood....
• Re: Karmann Lives, Kindof
  
  pista - I believe it’s the Polo Cabriolet which was shown at Frankfurt.
• Re: EPA: New Car Fuel Economy Continues to Improve; Back to Early 1980’s Level
  
  MadHungarian - From 2001-04 my daily driver was a 1989 Caddy FWD Fleetwood coupe.  The 4.5 liter engine  gave me 20-21...
• Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?
  
  stuki - 1st gen Saab 900 turbo convertible, with the 16v engine.
• Re: Review: 2010 Cadillac SRX V6
  
  alexndr333 - Sajeev, You stated, “Don’t over analyze it, I like Caddys that ride like Caddys.  Its a slice of Americana, and it defined the brand.  You know, back...