Naming a sports car an "S2000" was not an auspicious start for Honda's open-top pocket rocket. It probably sounded way cool at the time, but it's SO four years ago. And yet the little roadster still has its supporters. Earlier this year, Car and Driver magazine included the Honda in their "10 Best Cars", calling it "pure and involving". Me, I call it old and aggravating.
To be sure, the S2000 looks the biz. While I preferred the original car's angular front, Honda's designers nailed the basic shape. It's aggressive, in an elegantly restrained sort of way. In the right color, in the right light, the S2000 sings a siren song to lure even the most Euro-centric enthusiast into its cabin. And then… Cue the Psycho shower scene violins. My God, is the S2000's cockpit a nasty place to spend your time. I'm not against– nor a stranger to– cheap and cheerful car interiors. The S2000 is neither. Admission starts at $32k, and the cockpit is an ergonomic and aesthetic disaster zone.
The S2000's cabin is small in every conceivable direction. Pop the top and you trade one problem for another; the metal roof catches rattle incessantly, just inches behind your head. That's after you press the starter button– on a four-cylinder engine? If only the rest of the switchgear lived up to the supercar pretensions. The S2000's rotary dials and cheap plastic switches wouldn't seem out of place in a '78 Toyota Corolla.
The sound system is particularly lame. Buyers intent on stunting and flossing, or determined to listen to a CD at highway speeds, will note that the S2000's four-speaker ICE has all the fidelity and bass response of a shower radio. Sensibly enough, Honda decided to hide the head unit behind a piece of metal effect plastic (a substance about as convincing as wood-grained polymer). Why they decided to mount a duplicate set of audio controls on the dash is anybody's guess– unless most Honda drivers are left-handed.
OK, so, here's the perceived wisdom on the S2000: its motorcycle-derived VTEC (Valve Timing and lift Electronic Control) technology creates a dual personality two-seater. Keep the revs low, and you can trundle around town like a myopic Accord driver. Blast the 2157cc engine to its 8000rpms redline, and look out Dale Earnhardt Jr., here I come! The Honda's zero to sixty sprint time of 5.4 seconds seems to confirm the theory.
The reality is more complex. It's certainly true that there's not a lot going on below 3000rpms. In fact, there's nothing going on below 3000rpms. If you don't mind driving down the mean streets of your local metropolis in an accelerative dead zone, then fine, it's a wonderful city car. On the other hand, there's a brief bit of well-mannered urge sheltering between 3 – 5000rpms. Keep the S2000's engine on the boil in that narrow power band and you can make perfectly placid progress, with a pleasant oomph aftertaste.
Above 5000rpms, well, that's a different story. I suppose the general idea is to hang on until 5850rpms, when the high-lift long duration cams come on song, then cane it to the 8000rpm redline. Two problems. One, the S2000's engine note lacks character, texture or tonality. And what it lacks it aural appeal, it makes up for with sheer volume. I reckon only a stone deaf driver could withstand the brutal din coming from the S2000's engine at full chat. North Korea uses less effective torture devices. Two, we're not talking about a nitrous-injection power boost. The additional hearing damage yields roughly 10% more go. So why bother? Shift at five and change and you're straight back into the meat of the powerband. Excluding a reverse gear that likes to play hide-and-seek, the S2000's six-speed gearbox offers nothing but quick slick shifts. So you can continue forward thrust without delay or diminution or waking every baby within two miles of your dual exhausts.
Anyway, no matter how you generate your speed, the S2000 rewards your efforts. The RWD roadster is 'front mid-engined' with a compact double wishbone suspension and 16" Bridgestones. It corners with minimal body roll, prodigious grip and tremendous feedback. Aided by an electrically-assisted rack-and-pinion steering system, the S2000 slices through corners with consummate ease, flick flacking like a sports bike. The previous model's tendency to swap ends in extreme situations has been replaced with at-the-limit understeer. Which is just as well, considering how easy it is to approach those limits.
If Honda upgraded the S2000's cabin and sonically tuned the engine, the Nipponese convertible would be an irresistible alternative to its newer, fresher challengers. As it is, the S2000 is a great car that constantly screams for forgiveness.
5 Comments on “Honda S2000 Review...”
Back to TopLeave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You can also login using Facebook Connect.
I think Honda’s approach to the interior ergonomics were “no distractions from the driver”. Also. I think they placed the stereo functions at fingers reach from the steering wheel so the driver wouldn’t have to leave open or constantly open and close the radio cover, which really cleans up the dash :-). The S2000 is purely a drivers car. Little to no compromises and delivers what it intends to; driving pleasure. But thats my opinion. Great review. Oh… and they’re actually 17″ Bridgestones and not 16″ for the 2004 and up.
You’re approaching the S2000 with the wrong mentality. Being the Boxster driver you are, you’re used to a bit more refinement.
Think 4 wheeled motorcycle and then you’ll get it.
This review is at best funny at worst dumb. The s2000 is a driver’s car, if you want a better radio simply swap it, although at highway speeds it will still be pretty poor unless you modify the whole car to be a boom box. The sound of an s2000 is fantastic I guess its just loud for those that have never been to an F1 race LOL! It is simply not a car for posers but for people that feel that driving should be a sport! The car runs just fine at any RPM, however at 6K its transforms fron your everyday 4 cylinder accord into a .5 version of an F1 car. Add to that brakes that will pull out your teeth plus handling and responses that would make a Ferrari proud, all that for 34K. If you want a nice convertible buy a Miata, if you want to pose buy a Boxster. If you want a slightly detuned track car that can flog a boxster S for a little more than half the price then you buy an S2000!!!!
BTW the only way the latches make noise under any circumstances is if you fail to put in locked position after disengaging them if that is not commen sense a quick look at the manual would be of help ;)
I agree with the 3 responses as well.
the interior is simplistic. this car is focused on the driving experience, not how pretty my dashboard is.
as for the radio, why do you need supreme music quality when you have the top down? buy a lexus or replace it.
the engine tone is fantastic. civics sound terrible with similarly sized engines and this is much better than most engines/exhausts i hear. name a better stock exhaust on a car of similar price.
the car is going for the raw feel. they make other convertibles if you dont think honda made a good car with new features that arent seen for the reliability and quality
One thing conveniently forgotten is that the S2000 which is available to North America has the wrong engine in it.
The orginal (and best) engine for the S2000 is the orginal 1995cc F20c designed to rev quickly like a motorbike and give you that rev-limit hunting raw scream. The re-stroked and torque output biased 2.2L engine is considered, by the man that invented V-TEC, to be the most “un-Honda like solution” to the ‘problem’ that American drivers had with the car. It’s meant to be a 4 wheeled japanese moterbike but America turned it into a japanese harley davidson with a distinct loss of character. So you have no-one to blame but yourselves.
Also the desire for more cylinders (implying even greater engine capacity) would be interesting in a 6 cylinder/ 2.5Litre guise. Only thing is then the engine would not make 9000rpm like the F20C does.
I’ve personally seen the S2000 outlast a Boxster in terms of quality. The principle at play is the more luxury and gadgets you have, the more stuff there will be to break / fall apart / stop working. Especially in a sports car with harder usage patterns.
Now if the cabin feels too small and the radio too soft and the exhaust note is too much and and and … (bah humbug). If you’re thinking like this, maybe an Accord is more up your alley. (ps: if the roof latches rattle, you doing it wrong.)
Lastly consider just ONE thing: When Honda STOPS making this car, you WILL look back at it and most likely write something like “…what happened to pure sports cars like the S2000?… “