By Sajeev Mehta
January 26, 2007 -
A forty-something friend once told me that I can’t have my cake and eat it too. I took it literally, as we were facing a well-stocked dessert table at the time. Though my 29-year-old metabolism burns off whatever sugar coated dish I cram into my mouth, I’ve had enough engineering education to understand the concept that two things cannot coexist in the same time - space continuum—at least until you get down to the sub atomic level. But then I found another loophole: a Honda Accord LX.
Mind you, the Accord’s design is about as exciting as waiting for dark matter to wander by. But for buyers who value stealth over spizzarkle, the Accord has the right angle stuff. The mid-sizer’s creases and curves adds to the model’s unassuming sleekosity; the latest taillight redesign and the rocker panel’s negative area reduce visual heft like a GQ magazine cover artist photochopping Kate Winslet’s stems.
The Accord’s front has a pronounced wedge shape, accentuated by elegant headlamps and a smartly integrated hood cutline. Aside from the discordant chrome moustache on the grille, the Accord is one of the best examples of understated automotive styling this side of an Aston Martin DB9. Of course, unlike David Brown's legacy, driving a Honda Accord is about as likely to get you noticed as wearing a red and white striped shirt at a “Where’s Waldo?” convention.
The Accord’s interior is equally non-descript, if well-lit, perfectly proportioned and faultlessly featured. Hence the reason Accord virgins invariably exclaim, “Gee it’s big in here!” (rather than using the word “nice”). While The Big 2.5’s defenders are quick to get out their measuring tapes and compare feature counts, to understand the Accord’s allure, they need to feel the love. The sedan’s precisely dampened switches, knobs and levers are more than a pleasant surprise. At this price point, they’re a miracle.
Activating the Accord’s turn signal stalk is like biting into a Lindt chocolate truffle. The glove box and lower dash storage binnacle doors open with all the graceful, elegant motion of a sunflower blooming in a time lapse movie. The Accord’s portal treatments combine rich cloth inserts, classy vinyl and integrated storage nooks, creating a segment high watermark. There’s space aplenty for kids and cargo, with the ideal amount of visibility for pampered back seat passengers.
Certainly the Accord’s plastic flash casting must be as nasty as anything in an Impala. Happy hunting; I didn’t find any. Yet perfection is (as always) elusive: the rear seat needs a higher butt cushion for long distance comfort. And then the Accord’s sensual snickery whispers “Pay no attention to the cost cutting behind that curtain.” And so you don’t.
The 2.4-liter engine is equally soothing– at least by four-banger standards. Depress the drive-by-wire throttle and the Accord revs both progressively and freely towards max power (166hp @ 5800rpm). The automatic box lacks the latest thing in transmissions (a sixth or seventh gear), but it swaps cogs with sufficient timing and speed (working with continuous variable valve timing) to keep lazy and sporting drivers in whatever torque the mill can muster (160 ft. lbs. @ 4000rpm).
The Accord LX is no neck snapper; it saunters from zero to 60mph in 8.1 seconds, and finishes the quarter mile in 16.6 seconds. At least you don’t pay for such, um, exuberance, at the pump; the ever-optimistic (at least ‘til later this year) feds report that the LX gets 24mpg about town, 34mpg on the open road. But with 3200 pounds in tow, the Accord’s four-cylinder is still the weakest link on the love train.
If and when you build up a head of steam, the LX’ driving dynamics are entirely entertaining. The pride of Marysville preserves any momentum you can carry into a corner and even lets you add more speed after the apex. The steering is nicely weighted, reasonably quick and linear. The stoppers operate better than the cheapie drum brakes (rear) and plastic wheel covers (15”) imply. And when Dr. Jekyll sublimates Mr. Hyde, the Accord gives a wonderfully compliant and isolating ride.
Strangely, you can’t order your four-pot Accord with stability/traction control, brake assist or electronic brake force distribution. The omission reflects a gaping hole in the Accord lineup: a mid-priced, lower output (circa 200hp) six-cylinder variant that splits the difference between value-priced sensibility and pricey pace. The Accord LX has excellent interior trimmings, big car real estate, pistonhead-approved handling and a comfortable ride, but it needs an effortless engine to match.
At $20k, the Honda Accord LX suffers against similarly priced, smoother-running V6 competitors from America (Ford Fusion) and South Korea (Hyundai Sonata). A mid-grade engine would keep the middle-class Accord ahead of the pack, while staying true to its understated style. The Ohio-built Japanese sedan would be, quite literally, the best of both worlds.
160 Responses to “ Honda Accord LX Review ”
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 … 16 » Show All Reverse Order
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 … 16 » Show All Reverse Order
Leave a Reply
Back to Top
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Subscribe to Newsletter
More Reviews

Digg
del.icio.us
Blinklist
Furl
Netscape
Google
NewsVine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
Windows Live
POWERED
January 26th, 2007 at 6:41 am
Yep. It’s nice car with the best 4-cylider engine in the class. However, given its price, it’s hard to ignore Ford Fusion V6 SE. Plus, if you get a Fusion, your car won’t look like the other ten Accords on the same block.
January 26th, 2007 at 8:20 am
Funny how this Accord differs from the one we know in Europe. I believe we get the Acura TSX sold as Accord over here, which is available with the same 2.4 engine, alongside a 2.0 four petrol and 2.2 CiTD diesel engine.
Allthough all the magazines describe it as a very good car though, it isn’t nearly as popular as it is in the US. Most cars in this segment are leased in Europe and people maybe therefore tend to get a Passat, A4, 3-Series, Peugeot 407 or Mondeo instead. With a diesel engine, obviously.
I like Hondas though I wouldn’t choose an Accord over the 3-series (320d and Accord diesel are direct competitors in this segment).
January 26th, 2007 at 8:39 am
When I drove the just-freshened 2005 Nissan Altima back-to-back with an Accord a couple years ago, I noticed that the Accord interior contained considerably more hard plastic. And yet it still had a richer ambiance than the Altima, despite the many soft-touch bits Nissan added that year. I’ve always wondered how it could be.
Thanks to this article, I now know this was Honda’s sensual snickery at work. Not sure what that means, but it’s as good an explanation as any I’ve come up with.
I did find the ride harsher and noisier than is implied here, but then I drove the V6, which I believe has a firmer suspension.
Quick links to the most common price comparisons for the Accord can be found in the sidebar here:
http://www.truedelta.com/models/Accord.php
January 26th, 2007 at 9:16 am
if i had to buy a car in the mid sized Family car segment i think it would have to be a mazda 6. This accord is just to boring and the camary is to…well…werid.
January 26th, 2007 at 9:17 am
Amazing how similiar the Camry’s interior is the accord, same big grey plastic door under the radio, only thing missing is the knee pockets. All I know is the Camry’s was a POS in the lower half, I will take your word the Honda’s is better.
January 26th, 2007 at 9:17 am
I sat in the new Accord at NAIAS. In my opinion the interior build quality does not deserve any unusual praise. According to TTAC’s policy to call out cars with “hard plastic - model airplane material” this Accord would definitely fall under that category…. IMHO
January 26th, 2007 at 9:25 am
Accord SE is available in Canada with four banger and all the rest of the goodies.
January 26th, 2007 at 9:27 am
JJ
Many (probably the majority of) American buyers are less concerned with a brand’s heritage or pizzazz than they are with the “no-brainer solution”–that car that will be a reasonable price up front, then run flawlessly for 5-10 years with just the bare minimum of maintenance. Nobody can touch Accord and Camry in that arena–at least in reputation (for now).
I admire the Accords, but I think of them as the car I would buy for my wife. No matter what improvements have been made, I’m still a glutton for punishment from the Germans and I don’t see that changing any time soon. I’ll perform (or pay for) a little extra maintenance to avoid being stuck in the automotive anonymity that is perfectly exemplified by the Accord. In my “33% rule” for the purpose of cars (transport/hobby/artwork), the Accord fits part 1 perfectly, part 2 halfway, and part 3 not at all. IMHO, of course.
btw, don’t they offer the Civic’s 190hp vtec in the Accord? That sounds like the perfect upgrade for this model to split the difference with the V6.
January 26th, 2007 at 9:41 am
Another great review, Sajeev, a virtual literary symphony. My favorite line - ..’reduce visual heft like a GQ magazine cover artist photochopping Kate Winslet’s stems”.
Would TTAC ever consider doing comparison tests? I would be interested in how this thing compares with the base Fusion Jonny tested.
January 26th, 2007 at 9:45 am
Life’s too short to drive boring cars.