By Robert Farago on September 23, 2008

Former GM division and parts maker Delphi has been bankrupt for over three years. During that time, three main factions have emerged: GM (who wants to draw a line under its Delphi-related losses yet keep parts flowing at a low price), creditors (who want to make sure they get their god damn money back in the face of an increasingly inevitable Chapter 7 liquidation) and the lawyers (banking hundreds of millions of dollars from both sides). Matters are coming to a head, as all three groups face a September 30 deadline for agreement. GM wants to trade $3.4b worth of pension guarantees for, get this, $2b from Delphi’s coffers. AND The General wants a legal guarantee that Delphi can’t make any more calls on GM’s cash. Ever. Delphi’s creditors are, of course, livid. As The Detroit Free Press reports “The unsecured creditors committee says those measures make the deal untenable by eating into their payout. Often in bankruptcy cases, unsecured creditors see only a fraction of what they’re owed after a company files for bankruptcy.” Not said: the creditors would get sweet FA in C7. “The creditors committee today plans to ask U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain to allow it to sue GM on behalf of Delphi, saying the supplier didn’t do enough to turn around unprofitable contracts with the automaker.” In other words, never mind all that other stuff for a second; GM’s been paying too little for its Delphi parts. The lawyers? Happy, happy, happy!

8 Comments on “GM Tries to Grab $2b from Delphi...”


  • menno

    Well, when (not if) this heap of dung goes Chapter 7, what will GM, Toyota, and other companies which have relied upon it for part, do then?

    I suppose for GM it might actually be a bit of a break, in a sense, since they might be able to have an excuse to shut down totally unprofitable North American operations for awhile until they can retool Chinese suppliers for the necessary parts. On the other hand, given GM’s own monetary situation, this may well be the straw that breaks the Camel’s back.

    Toyota and other companies supplied by Delphi will also be hurt, of course, but there’s an obvious difference between a fleshwound and a mortal wound. Well, obvious to most. (”‘Tis but a fleshwound. Come back and fight!” – GM)

  • David Robinson
    daro31

    Things like this being dragged on for so long by the lawyers who are banking millions, does anyone think they don’t really have any incentive to solve the problem. I remember once reading that that you could tell how long the OJ Simpson trial was going to be by dividing Simpson net worth by the lawyers daily fee. Seems like a similarity.

  • inept123

    If the deadline really is (was?) September 20, then I must be missing something.

  • Robert Farago

    inept123:

    My bad. September 30. Text amended.

  • Ed Schoun
    netrun

    Judge Drain? Really? As in, Judge Drain declared Delphi has gone down the drain?

    Huh. Like, well, he’d would know, eh.

    What a perfect name for a bankruptcy judge.

  • Mike Leskow
    ihatetrees

    Hmmm. Early October could be interesting with the Delphi deadline and the GM short ban expiring…

  • 66Nova

    “…have an excuse to shut down totally unprofitable North American operations for awhile until they can retool Chinese suppliers for the necessary parts.”

    Well, won’t THAT help the American economy. Send more money and jobs overseas with no offsetting sale of US goods/services to foreign markets.

  • Robert Schwartz

    It would have been better if you had used this picture rather than the picture of the theater at Delphi you used.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can also login using Facebook Connect. Connect with Facebook

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Tata Defends JLR Acquisition

    Ion - I wonder if SAIC is still intrested in the Rover moniker, Tata may be able to sell that. They probably could sell Land Rover and Jaguar to GM, once GM drops the...
  • Re: EPA: New Car Fuel Economy Continues to Improve; Back to Early 1980’s Level

    Nutsaboutcars - There was nothing speculative in what I said. It was based on tons of past data that prove my point,...
  • Re: Tata Defends JLR Acquisition

    Nutsaboutcars - I have a ton of respect for Mr. Ratan Tata,  but his Jaguar remarks are wishful thinking and whistling in the dark. Jag and L-R could not make a dime well...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    Nutsaboutcars - After Driving the previous Prius for 3 days in the LAX area in April and June, my opinion of the car went up by a huge amount. Well behaved,...
  • Re: Take Two: 2009 Honda Accord LX Review

    bollocks - Sherman lin “I had a 91 EX with automatic and I miss it dearly. That car was head and shoulders above every other midsize offering then. I wish I had...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Mercedes Benz 190E 2.3-16

    Bulldog Drummond - Hi there, driving in the uk is hardly the same as hammering the back roads but interested to read your comments on the Merc steering....
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    oldowl - Was: mid-1980s Saab 99L (lime green) Am: 2010 Prius IV (winter gray)
  • Re: Review: Porsche GT3

    bollocks - I think some of you are being too hard on Sajeev.  Until a few years ago, I never understood why people went gaga over the 911.  It’s archaic.  It’s not...
  • Re: Karmann Lives, Kindof

    mpresley - That may be true, but no one could match the number of snaps (half of them not working) on the top of my old MG Midge.  Besides, what’s a little water between...
  • Re: Question Of The Day: What Car Are You?

    ragtopman - I’m practical but want a little fun out of life. Getting there is sometimes more important than being there. Has to be a convertible. My wife found...

 


Auto Insurance GPS Navigation
Car Loans Auto Parts
Car Warranty Wheels
Automotive Tires Car Care