<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motown Pensions Warning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/</link>
	<description>The Truth About Cars is dedicated to providing candid, unbiased automobile reviews and the latest in auto industry news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:11:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jerry weber</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1141742</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=213252#comment-1141742</guid>
		<description>Look, the law of unintneded consequences or kicking the can down the road prevails here. Every; time you early retire thousands of employees with lucrative buyouts, you are saving some money today for future costs later. None of these plans envisioned people leaving at the age of say 50. And worse, none of these pension plans called for a company of say 1/3 it;s former size having to wrestle with more retiress than workers.The only reason Social Security is not broke right now is that uncle sam still has more people paying in on the payroll then they did before.(I understand that the proportion of workers to retirees is less, but the real numbers of workers is still rising)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Look, the law of unintneded consequences or kicking the can down the road prevails here. Every; time you early retire thousands of employees with lucrative buyouts, you are saving some money today for future costs later. None of these plans envisioned people leaving at the age of say 50. And worse, none of these pension plans called for a company of say 1/3 it;s former size having to wrestle with more retiress than workers.The only reason Social Security is not broke right now is that uncle sam still has more people paying in on the payroll then they did before.(I understand that the proportion of workers to retirees is less, but the real numbers of workers is still rising)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 50merc</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1140402</link>
		<dc:creator>50merc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=213252#comment-1140402</guid>
		<description>&quot;The agency generally has a yearly cap of $54,000 in benefits for people who are 65.&quot;

Well, that might mean a sizable disappointment for some D3 retirees, but the vast majority of Americans in that age bracket would be jubilant to get that much.

One thing to reflect upon: this is the first time in human history that people have come to expect to quit working while still healthy and able, and enjoy a comfortable income (for many years!) to boot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;The agency generally has a yearly cap of $54,000 in benefits for people who are 65.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, that might mean a sizable disappointment for some D3 retirees, but the vast majority of Americans in that age bracket would be jubilant to get that much.</p>
<p>One thing to reflect upon: this is the first time in human history that people have come to expect to quit working while still healthy and able, and enjoy a comfortable income (for many years!) to boot.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porschespeed</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1139922</link>
		<dc:creator>porschespeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=213252#comment-1139922</guid>
		<description>There is a &lt;em&gt;lot&lt;/em&gt; of very sketchy accounting that goes on in the arena of pensions.

GM&#039;s pension has been admittedly underfunded by 20B+ several times in the last 5 years.

To address the theory that &quot;it&#039;s just the market&quot;, according to GM&#039;s filings and statements, most of that money isn&#039;t &lt;strong&gt;in&lt;/strong&gt; the stock market. It&#039;s in bonds.

PBGC has tried over the last several years to rewrite some of the rules, but has been met with heavy counter pressure from, you guessed it, big business. PBGC is also admittedly underfunded.

FWIW, according to the people who&#039;d like to rewrite the accounting rules, the D3 pensions are all grossly underfunded. Have been for more than 5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->There is a <em>lot</em> of very sketchy accounting that goes on in the arena of pensions.</p>
<p>GM&#8217;s pension has been admittedly underfunded by 20B+ several times in the last 5 years.</p>
<p>To address the theory that &#8220;it&#8217;s just the market&#8221;, according to GM&#8217;s filings and statements, most of that money isn&#8217;t <strong>in</strong> the stock market. It&#8217;s in bonds.</p>
<p>PBGC has tried over the last several years to rewrite some of the rules, but has been met with heavy counter pressure from, you guessed it, big business. PBGC is also admittedly underfunded.</p>
<p>FWIW, according to the people who&#8217;d like to rewrite the accounting rules, the D3 pensions are all grossly underfunded. Have been for more than 5 years.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ihatetrees</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1139801</link>
		<dc:creator>ihatetrees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=213252#comment-1139801</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Lichtronamo:
It seems strange to me that the Federal Government (and thus we the taxpayer) is on the hook for a pension program that is an agreement between a company and its employees. As far as I know, my 401K isn’t backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.&lt;/i&gt;

All firm&#039;s pension plans pay a premium to to PBGC in case a firm tanks. A firms premiums, combined with the value of what&#039;s left in the fund after a firm&#039;s death, are what the fund pays out. And a pension has huge legal and regulatory costs that 401K&#039;s don&#039;t. 

Of course, the PBGC pays far less than what many firms promised - especially degenerate unionized firms (like airlines, the steel industry). Management promised ginormous benefits for retirees in their 50&#039;s in exchange for labor peace. After bankruptcy, young retirees taking a 50 percent haircut was common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>Lichtronamo:<br />
It seems strange to me that the Federal Government (and thus we the taxpayer) is on the hook for a pension program that is an agreement between a company and its employees. As far as I know, my 401K isn’t backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.</i></p>
<p>All firm&#8217;s pension plans pay a premium to to PBGC in case a firm tanks. A firms premiums, combined with the value of what&#8217;s left in the fund after a firm&#8217;s death, are what the fund pays out. And a pension has huge legal and regulatory costs that 401K&#8217;s don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Of course, the PBGC pays far less than what many firms promised &#8211; especially degenerate unionized firms (like airlines, the steel industry). Management promised ginormous benefits for retirees in their 50&#8217;s in exchange for labor peace. After bankruptcy, young retirees taking a 50 percent haircut was common.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Farago</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1139512</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Farago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=213252#comment-1139512</guid>
		<description>I agree that the headline and text of this blog as originally written were inflammatory. After further research, I have changed both.

Make no mistake: this is a very serious situation. However, that&#039;s no excuse for descending into hyperbole. I apologize for same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I agree that the headline and text of this blog as originally written were inflammatory. After further research, I have changed both.</p>
<p>Make no mistake: this is a very serious situation. However, that&#8217;s no excuse for descending into hyperbole. I apologize for same.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lichtronamo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1139462</link>
		<dc:creator>Lichtronamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=213252#comment-1139462</guid>
		<description>It seems strange to me that the Federal Government (and thus we the taxpayer) is on the hook for a pension program that is an agreement between a company and its employees.  As far as I know, my 401K isn&#039;t backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It seems strange to me that the Federal Government (and thus we the taxpayer) is on the hook for a pension program that is an agreement between a company and its employees.  As far as I know, my 401K isn&#8217;t backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banned User</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1139432</link>
		<dc:creator>Banned User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=213252#comment-1139432</guid>
		<description>Say you have a million retirees in the Big 3.

You pay each one $30,000 per year which is a total of $30 billion per year.  Just how long will 130 billion last?

And that doesn&#039;t even take into account the huge cost of health care and all the dependants which need to be covered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Say you have a million retirees in the Big 3.</p>
<p>You pay each one $30,000 per year which is a total of $30 billion per year.  Just how long will 130 billion last?</p>
<p>And that doesn&#8217;t even take into account the huge cost of health care and all the dependants which need to be covered.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertSD</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1139082</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=213252#comment-1139082</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;@RF&lt;/i&gt;

Let&#039;s be fair here.  GM didn&#039;t &quot;raid&quot; its pension fund.  I know you really hate GM, but I&#039;m willing to bet that your investment portfolio is down by similar levels.  They did take out some money for the separations, but that&#039;s totally acceptable because those people no longer qualify for an annuity.

Imagine the pension fund at, say, GM as a collection of maybe 500,000 annuities at NPV.  Some are still being built (for current workers) and some are being paid out (retired workers), but we can assign NPVs to all of them.  GM&#039;s role is to try and keep each of those funds at an NPV that is considered &quot;funded.&quot;  If someone is separated from GM, the annuity they have built up so far (could be around to $700-800k at NPV) is no longer needed.  GM doesn&#039;t have the liability unless they&#039;re paying a reduced amount after separation.  So, they use that cash to pay the separation.  Any deficit comes from corporate cash.  Any surplus funds the pension.

To say that GM robbed the pension to fund for restructuring is disingenuous.  Likely all of the decline in % liabilities funded is due to the decline in the overall markets.  What this article doesn&#039;t point out is that their combined liabilities should have shrunk over the last two years, which is another reason why the fund would be smaller YOY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><i>@RF</i></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be fair here.  GM didn&#8217;t &#8220;raid&#8221; its pension fund.  I know you really hate GM, but I&#8217;m willing to bet that your investment portfolio is down by similar levels.  They did take out some money for the separations, but that&#8217;s totally acceptable because those people no longer qualify for an annuity.</p>
<p>Imagine the pension fund at, say, GM as a collection of maybe 500,000 annuities at NPV.  Some are still being built (for current workers) and some are being paid out (retired workers), but we can assign NPVs to all of them.  GM&#8217;s role is to try and keep each of those funds at an NPV that is considered &#8220;funded.&#8221;  If someone is separated from GM, the annuity they have built up so far (could be around to $700-800k at NPV) is no longer needed.  GM doesn&#8217;t have the liability unless they&#8217;re paying a reduced amount after separation.  So, they use that cash to pay the separation.  Any deficit comes from corporate cash.  Any surplus funds the pension.</p>
<p>To say that GM robbed the pension to fund for restructuring is disingenuous.  Likely all of the decline in % liabilities funded is due to the decline in the overall markets.  What this article doesn&#8217;t point out is that their combined liabilities should have shrunk over the last two years, which is another reason why the fund would be smaller YOY.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yankinwaoz</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1138921</link>
		<dc:creator>yankinwaoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=213252#comment-1138921</guid>
		<description>I think the word &quot;raided&quot; is wrong here.

If the underlying investment of a funded pension dropped to 70% of its previous year&#039;s value, then it would certainly make it appear that it is now 30% more underfunded. I know my 401k balance is a LOT lower today than it was 12 months ago, 30% or perhaps greater.

My point is, that I suspect that this new increase in the pension gap is a result of investment losses, not the siphoning of money out of the fund.

In addition, I don&#039;t think that any of the 3 companies could actually withdrawal money out even if they wanted to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think the word &#8220;raided&#8221; is wrong here.</p>
<p>If the underlying investment of a funded pension dropped to 70% of its previous year&#8217;s value, then it would certainly make it appear that it is now 30% more underfunded. I know my 401k balance is a LOT lower today than it was 12 months ago, 30% or perhaps greater.</p>
<p>My point is, that I suspect that this new increase in the pension gap is a result of investment losses, not the siphoning of money out of the fund.</p>
<p>In addition, I don&#8217;t think that any of the 3 companies could actually withdrawal money out even if they wanted to.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosie7562</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1138852</link>
		<dc:creator>rosie7562</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=213252#comment-1138852</guid>
		<description>Most workers would be much worse off than the yearly cap of $54k since there are plenty who probably retired early.  

&quot;For plans with a 2009 termination date, the maximum guarantee is $54,000.00 yearly ($4,500.00 monthly) for a single life annuity beginning at age 65. The maximum is adjusted downward for retirees younger than age 65. For example, the maximum guarantee for a participant who retires at age 62 is $42,660.00 yearly ($3,555.00 monthly) for a single-life annuity. At age 55, the maximum guarantee is $24,300.00 yearly ($2,025.00 monthly).&quot; http://www.pbgc.gov/media/key-resources-for-the-press/content/page13542.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Most workers would be much worse off than the yearly cap of $54k since there are plenty who probably retired early.  </p>
<p>&#8220;For plans with a 2009 termination date, the maximum guarantee is $54,000.00 yearly ($4,500.00 monthly) for a single life annuity beginning at age 65. The maximum is adjusted downward for retirees younger than age 65. For example, the maximum guarantee for a participant who retires at age 62 is $42,660.00 yearly ($3,555.00 monthly) for a single-life annuity. At age 55, the maximum guarantee is $24,300.00 yearly ($2,025.00 monthly).&#8221; <a href="http://www.pbgc.gov/media/key-resources-for-the-press/content/page13542.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbgc.gov/media/key-resources-for-the-press/content/page13542.html</a><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jolo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/gm-raids-pension-plan-from-overfunding-to-20b-deficit-in-one-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1138742</link>
		<dc:creator>jolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=213252#comment-1138742</guid>
		<description>Is that the hourly, salaried, or both?  Depending on which carmaker you&#039;re talking about, hourly is usually overfunded, but salaried is usually underfunded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Is that the hourly, salaried, or both?  Depending on which carmaker you&#8217;re talking about, hourly is usually overfunded, but salaried is usually underfunded.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 32/83 queries in 0.073 seconds using memcached

Served from: server32.autoforums.com @ 2009-11-22 08:41:43 -->